• This record comes from PubMed

Quantitative but Not Qualitative Performance Changes in Predictive Motor Timing as a Result of Overtraining

. 2020 Apr ; 19 (2) : 201-207.

Language English Country United States Media print

Document type Journal Article

Links

PubMed 31898279
DOI 10.1007/s12311-019-01100-x
PII: 10.1007/s12311-019-01100-x
Knihovny.cz E-resources

The possibilities of substantial long-term improvement of predictive timing might be sometimes seen as limited, with scanty information of neural substrates underlying the potential learning process. To address this issue, we have investigated the performance of 21 baseball professionals and 21 matched controls in a predictive motor timing task previously shown to engage the cerebellum. Baseball players, hypothesized as a model of overtraining of the prediction of future state of the surroundings, showed significantly higher quantitative performance than nonathletic controls, with a substantial part of the baseball players reaching levels far beyond the range observed in common population. Furthermore, the qualitative performance profile of baseball players under various conditions as target speed and acceleration modes did not differ from the profile of healthy controls. Our results suggest that regular exigent training has the potential to vastly improve predictive motor timing. Moreover, the quantitative but not qualitative difference in the performance profile allows us to hypothesize that the selective honing of the same cerebellar processes and networks as in non-trained individuals is the substrate for the quantitative performance improvement, without substantial engagement of further neural nodes.

See more in PubMed

Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1997 Apr;7(2):170-84 PubMed

Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2016 Apr;8:282-288 PubMed

Neural Plast. 2016;2016:2073454 PubMed

Neuropsychology. 1998 Jan;12(1):3-12 PubMed

Curr Biol. 2000 Jul 13;10(14):R522-5 PubMed

Neural Plast. 2013;2013:908741 PubMed

Sports Med. 2008;38(9):703-14 PubMed

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2002 Oct;28(5):1131-48 PubMed

J Neuroimaging. 2014 Jan-Feb;24(1):45-53 PubMed

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Dec;71:739-755 PubMed

Cerebellum. 2009 Sep;8(3):334-9 PubMed

Learn Mem. 2005 May-Jun;12(3):260-9 PubMed

J Sports Sci. 2015;33(19):1980-7 PubMed

Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015 Sep 01;7(9):a021683 PubMed

Science. 1996 May 24;272(5265):1126-31 PubMed

J Neurosci. 2007 Mar 7;27(10):2493-502 PubMed

Science. 1995 Jan 27;267(5197):528-31 PubMed

Eur J Neurosci. 2002 Oct;16(8):1609-19 PubMed

Exp Brain Res. 2007 Jun;180(2):355-65 PubMed

Am J Psychiatry. 1997 Jan;154(1):119-21 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Nov 10;106(45):19156-61 PubMed

Neuropsychologia. 1996 Sep;34(9):863-71 PubMed

Brain Res. 2015 Sep 24;1621:260-9 PubMed

Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2002 Apr;12(2):217-22 PubMed

J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2007 Feb;29(1):60-77 PubMed

Cerebellum. 2012 Dec;11(4):925-30 PubMed

Schizophr Bull. 2016 Nov;42(6):1517-1527 PubMed

Cerebellum. 2010 Mar;9(1):124-35 PubMed

Cerebellum. 2019 Jun;18(3):500-510 PubMed

Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y). 2012;2: PubMed

Mov Disord. 2017 May;32(5):757-768 PubMed

Nat Neurosci. 2003 May;6(5):532-7 PubMed

Cerebellum. 2019 Apr;18(2):266-286 PubMed

Sleep. 1991 Dec;14(6):540-5 PubMed

PLoS One. 2009;4(3):e4785 PubMed

Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2014 Jul;5(4):429-446 PubMed

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...