Quantitative but Not Qualitative Performance Changes in Predictive Motor Timing as a Result of Overtraining
Language English Country United States Media print
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
31898279
DOI
10.1007/s12311-019-01100-x
PII: 10.1007/s12311-019-01100-x
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Cerebellar learning, Cerebellum, Overtraining, Predictive motor timing,
- MeSH
- Baseball MeSH
- Exercise physiology MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Brain physiology MeSH
- Psychomotor Performance physiology MeSH
- Athletes * MeSH
- Learning physiology MeSH
- Time Perception physiology MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
The possibilities of substantial long-term improvement of predictive timing might be sometimes seen as limited, with scanty information of neural substrates underlying the potential learning process. To address this issue, we have investigated the performance of 21 baseball professionals and 21 matched controls in a predictive motor timing task previously shown to engage the cerebellum. Baseball players, hypothesized as a model of overtraining of the prediction of future state of the surroundings, showed significantly higher quantitative performance than nonathletic controls, with a substantial part of the baseball players reaching levels far beyond the range observed in common population. Furthermore, the qualitative performance profile of baseball players under various conditions as target speed and acceleration modes did not differ from the profile of healthy controls. Our results suggest that regular exigent training has the potential to vastly improve predictive motor timing. Moreover, the quantitative but not qualitative difference in the performance profile allows us to hypothesize that the selective honing of the same cerebellar processes and networks as in non-trained individuals is the substrate for the quantitative performance improvement, without substantial engagement of further neural nodes.
Center for Magnetic Resonance Research University of Minnesota Minneapolis USA
Department of Neurology School of Medicine University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USA
Department of Psychiatry Université de Montréal Montréal Canada
See more in PubMed
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1997 Apr;7(2):170-84 PubMed
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2016 Apr;8:282-288 PubMed
Neural Plast. 2016;2016:2073454 PubMed
Neuropsychology. 1998 Jan;12(1):3-12 PubMed
Curr Biol. 2000 Jul 13;10(14):R522-5 PubMed
Neural Plast. 2013;2013:908741 PubMed
Sports Med. 2008;38(9):703-14 PubMed
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2002 Oct;28(5):1131-48 PubMed
J Neuroimaging. 2014 Jan-Feb;24(1):45-53 PubMed
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Dec;71:739-755 PubMed
Cerebellum. 2009 Sep;8(3):334-9 PubMed
Learn Mem. 2005 May-Jun;12(3):260-9 PubMed
J Sports Sci. 2015;33(19):1980-7 PubMed
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015 Sep 01;7(9):a021683 PubMed
Science. 1996 May 24;272(5265):1126-31 PubMed
J Neurosci. 2007 Mar 7;27(10):2493-502 PubMed
Science. 1995 Jan 27;267(5197):528-31 PubMed
Eur J Neurosci. 2002 Oct;16(8):1609-19 PubMed
Exp Brain Res. 2007 Jun;180(2):355-65 PubMed
Am J Psychiatry. 1997 Jan;154(1):119-21 PubMed
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Nov 10;106(45):19156-61 PubMed
Neuropsychologia. 1996 Sep;34(9):863-71 PubMed
Brain Res. 2015 Sep 24;1621:260-9 PubMed
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2002 Apr;12(2):217-22 PubMed
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2007 Feb;29(1):60-77 PubMed
Cerebellum. 2012 Dec;11(4):925-30 PubMed
Schizophr Bull. 2016 Nov;42(6):1517-1527 PubMed
Cerebellum. 2010 Mar;9(1):124-35 PubMed
Cerebellum. 2019 Jun;18(3):500-510 PubMed
Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y). 2012;2: PubMed
Mov Disord. 2017 May;32(5):757-768 PubMed
Nat Neurosci. 2003 May;6(5):532-7 PubMed
Cerebellum. 2019 Apr;18(2):266-286 PubMed
Sleep. 1991 Dec;14(6):540-5 PubMed
PLoS One. 2009;4(3):e4785 PubMed
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2014 Jul;5(4):429-446 PubMed