Prediction of non-resectability in tubo-ovarian cancer patients using Peritoneal Cancer Index - A prospective multicentric study using imaging (ISAAC study)
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, pozorovací studie
PubMed
39393218
DOI
10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.10.003
PII: S0090-8258(24)01153-3
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Computed tomography, Laparoscopy, Laparotomy, Magnetic resonance, Ovarian cancer, Staging, Ultrasonography,
- MeSH
- difuzní magnetická rezonance metody MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory vaječníků * diagnostické zobrazování patologie chirurgie MeSH
- nádory vejcovodů diagnostické zobrazování patologie chirurgie MeSH
- peritoneální nádory * diagnostické zobrazování MeSH
- počítačová rentgenová tomografie * metody MeSH
- prediktivní hodnota testů MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ultrasonografie * metody MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- pozorovací studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: The aim was to evaluate the performance of the Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) using imaging (ultrasound, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), and whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (WB-DWI/MRI) in assessing peritoneal carcinomatosis and predicting non-resectability in tubo-ovarian carcinoma patients. METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter observational study. We considered all patients with suspected primary ovarian/tubal/peritoneal cancer who underwent preoperative ultrasound, CT, and WB-DWI/MRI (if available). The optimal cut off value for assessing the performance of the methods in predicting non-resectability was identified at the point at which the sensitivity and specificity were most similar. The reference standard to predict non-resectability was surgical outcome in terms of residual disease >1 cm or surgery not feasible. Agreement between imaging methods and surgical exploration in assessing sites included in the PCI score was evaluated using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: 242 patients were included from January 2020 until November 2022. The optimal PCI cut-off for predicting non-resectability for surgical exploration was >12, which achieved the best AUC of 0.87, followed by ultrasound with a cut-off of >10 and AUC of 0.81, WB-DWI/MRI with a cut-off of >12 and AUC of 0.81, and CT with a cut-off of >11 and AUC of 0.74. Using ICC, ultrasound had very high agreement (0.94) with surgical PCI, while CT and WB-DWI/MRI had high agreement (0.86 and 0.87, respectively). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound performed by an expert operator had the best agreement with surgical findings compared to WB-DWI/MRI and CT in assessing radiological PCI. In predicting non-resectability, ultrasound was non-inferior to CT, while its non-inferiority to WB-DWI/MRI was not demonstrated.
Department of Gynecologic Oncology Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori Milan Italy
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Clínica Universidad de Navarra Pamplona Spain
Department of Radiology IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano Milan Italy
Division of Radiology IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS Milan Italy
Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Preventive Gynecology Unit Division of Gynecology European Institute of Oncology IRCCS Milan Italy
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org