- Publikační typ
- kazuistiky MeSH
AIMS: The field of conduction system pacing (CSP) is evolving, and our aim was to obtain a contemporary picture of European CSP practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: A survey was devised by a European CSP Expert Group and sent electronically to cardiologists utilizing CSP. A total of 284 physicians were invited to contribute of which 171 physicians (60.2%; 85% electrophysiologists) responded. Most (77%) had experience with both His-bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP). Pacing indications ranked highest for CSP were atrioventricular block (irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction) and when coronary sinus lead implantation failed. For patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and heart failure (HF), conventional biventricular pacing remained first-line treatment. For most indications, operators preferred LBBAP over HBP as a first-line approach. When HBP was attempted as an initial approach, reasons reported for transitioning to utilizing LBBAP were: (i) high threshold (reported as >2 V at 1 ms), (ii) failure to reverse bundle branch block, or (iii) > 30 min attempting to implant at His-bundle sites. Backup right ventricular lead use for HBP was low (median 20%) and predominated in pace-and-ablate scenarios. Twelve-lead electrocardiogram assessment was deemed highly important during follow-up. This, coupled with limitations from current capture management algorithms, limits remote monitoring for CSP patients. CONCLUSIONS: This survey provides a snapshot of CSP implementation in Europe. Currently, CSP is predominantly used for bradycardia indications. For HF patients with LBBB, most operators reserve CSP for biventricular implant failures. Left bundle branch area pacing ostensibly has practical advantages over HBP and is therefore preferred by many operators. Practical limitations remain, and large randomized clinical trial data are currently lacking.
- MeSH
- blokáda Tawarova raménka diagnóza terapie MeSH
- funkce levé komory srdeční MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- převodní systém srdeční MeSH
- srdeční arytmie terapie MeSH
- srdeční resynchronizační terapie * MeSH
- srdeční selhání * diagnóza terapie MeSH
- tepový objem fyziologie MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
In contrast to left bundle branch pacing, the criteria for left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP) were never validated. LVSP is usually defined as deep septal deployment of the pacing lead with a pseudo-right bundle branch morphology in V1. The case report describes an implant procedure during which this definition of LVSP was fulfilled in four of five pacing locations within the septum, with the shallowest of them present in less than 50% of the septal thickness. The case highlights the need for a more precise definition of LVSP.
- Publikační typ
- kazuistiky MeSH
The majority of patients tolerate right ventricular pacing well; however, some patients manifest signs of heart failure after pacemaker implantation and develop pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. This is a consequence of non-physiological ventricular activation bypassing the conduction system. Ventricular dyssynchrony was identified as one of the main factors responsible for pacing-induced cardiomyopathy development. Currently, methods that would allow rapid and reliable ventricular dyssynchrony assessment, ideally during the implant procedure, are lacking. Paced QRS duration is an imperfect marker of dyssynchrony, and methods based on body surface mapping, electrocardiographic imaging or echocardiography are laborious and time-consuming, and can be difficult to use during the implantation procedure. However, the ventricular activation sequence can be readily displayed from the chest leads using an ultra-high-frequency ECG. It can be performed during the implantation procedure to visualise ventricular depolarisation and resultant ventricular dyssynchrony during pacing. This information can assist the electrophysiologist in selecting a pacing location that avoids dyssynchronous ventricular activation.
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
AIMS: Fabry disease (FD) is a rare X-linked genetic disorder caused by α-galactosidase A (AGALA) deficiency. Whereas 'classic' variant has multisystemic manifestation, the more recently described 'later-onset' variant is characterized by predominant cardiac involvement that often mimics hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive unrelated patients with HCM were screened for FD in 16 (out of 17) cardiac centres in the Czech Republic covering specialized cardiology care from June 2017 to December 2018. AGALA activity and globotriaosylsphingosine (lyso-Gb3 ) levels were measured in all subjects using the dry blood spot method. FD was suspected in male patients with AGALA activity <1.2 μmol/h/L and in females with either low AGALA activity or lyso-Gb3 > 3.5 ng/mL. Positive screening results were confirmed by genetic testing. We evaluated 589 patients (390 males, 66%) with HCM (mean maximal myocardial thickness 19.1 ± 4.3 mm). The average age was 58.4 ± 14.7 years. In total, 17 patients (11 males, 6 females) had a positive screening result, and subsequently, six of them (four males and two females) had a genetically confirmed pathogenic GLA mutation (total prevalence of 1.02%). Five of these patients were carrying the p.N215S mutation known to cause a typical later-onset cardiac FD. CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed the prevalence of FD repeatedly reported in previous screening programmes (approximately 1% irrespective of gender) in a non-selected HCM population in Central Europe. Our findings advocate a routine screening for FD in all adult patients with HCM phenotype including both genders. The dry blood spot method used led to identification of clearly pathogenic variants.
- MeSH
- alfa-galaktosidasa genetika MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- Fabryho nemoc * diagnóza epidemiologie genetika MeSH
- genetické testování MeSH
- hypertrofická kardiomyopatie * diagnóza epidemiologie genetika MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
AIMS: We hypothesized that during left bundle branch (LBB) area pacing, the various possible combinations of direct capture/non-capture of the septal myocardium and the LBB result in distinct patterns of right and left ventricular activation. This could translate into different combinations of R-wave peak time (RWPT) in V1 and V6. Consequently, the V6-V1 interpeak interval could differentiate the three types of LBB area capture: non-selective (ns-)LBB, selective (s-)LBB, and left ventricular septal (LVS). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with unquestionable evidence of LBB capture were included. The V6-V1 interpeak interval, V6RWPT, and V1RWPT were compared between different types of LBB area capture. A total of 468 patients from two centres were screened, with 124 patients (239 electrocardiograms) included in the analysis. Loss of LVS capture resulted in an increase in V1RWPT by ≥15 ms but did not impact V6RWPT. Loss of LBB capture resulted in an increase in V6RWPT by ≥15 ms but only minimally influenced V1RWPT. Consequently, the V6-V1 interval was longest during s-LBB capture (62.3 ± 21.4 ms), intermediate during ns-LBB capture (41.3 ± 14.0 ms), and shortest during LVS capture (26.5 ± 8.6 ms). The optimal value of the V6-V1 interval value for the differentiation between ns-LBB and LVS capture was 33 ms (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 84.7%). A specificity of 100% for the diagnosis of LBB capture was obtained with a cut-off value of >44 ms. CONCLUSION: The V6-V1 interpeak interval is a promising novel criterion for the diagnosis of LBB area capture.
- MeSH
- elektrokardiografie metody MeSH
- Hisův svazek * MeSH
- kardiostimulace umělá metody MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mezikomorová přepážka * MeSH
- převodní systém srdeční MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of anticoagulation treatment on platelet aggregation. METHODS: The study group consisted of 24 patients on long-term warfarin therapy without any antiaggregation therapy. Platelet aggregation was measured using VerifyNow with arachidonic acid (AA) as an inducer in 23 patients and with light transmission aggregometry (LTA) in 19 patients using four different agonists. All patients had their international normalized ratio (INR) checked regularly. RESULTS: The mean INR value was 2.07 (SD 0.6). The average aggregation measured by VerifyNow was found to be 637.5 (SD 36.6) aspirin reaction units. The values of average aggregability in LTA were 73.3 % (SD 4.5 %), 73.2 % (SD 6 %) and 72.1 % (SD 4.8 %) in case of aggregation induced by AA, ADP, and collagen, respectively. Epinephrine-induced aggregability was 65.3 % (SD 14.7 %). Regression analysis between INR and values of collagen- or epinephrine-induced aggregability (r = 0.654 and 0.575) was found statistically signifi cant (p = 0.004 and 0.016); every increase in INR by 0,1 brings about an increase in collagen- and epinephrine-induced aggregation values by 1.5 and 4, respectively. CONCLUSION: Administration of warfarin does not produce a signifi cant reduction in platelet aggregation. On the contrary, prolonged INR evokes a mild increase in aggregation induced by collagen or epinephrine (Tab. 2, Fig. 3, Ref. 32).
BACKGROUND: During nonselective His bundle (HB) pacing, it is clinically important to confirm His bundle capture versus right ventricular septal (RVS) capture. The present study aimed to validate the hypothesis that during HB capture, left ventricular lateral wall activation time, approximated by the V6 R-wave peak time (V6 RWPT), will not be longer than the corresponding activation time during native conduction. METHODS: Consecutive patients with permanent HB pacing were recruited; cases with abnormal His-ventricle interval or left bundle branch block were excluded. Two corresponding intervals were compared: stimulus-V6 RWPT and native HB potential-V6 RWPT. The difference between these two intervals (delta V6 RWPT), which was diagnostic of lack of HB capture, was identified using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: A total of 723 electrocardiograms (ECGs) (219 with native rhythm, 172 with selective HB, 215 with nonselective HB, and 117 with RVS capture) were obtained from 219 patients. The native HB-V6 RWPT, nonselective-, and selective-HB paced V6 RWPT were nearly equal, while RVS V6 RWPT was 32.0 (±9.5) ms longer. The ROC curve analysis indicated delta V6 RWPT > 12 ms as diagnostic of lack of HB capture (specificity of 99.1% and sensitivity of 100%). A blinded observer correctly diagnosed 96.7% (321/332) of ECGs using this criterion. CONCLUSIONS: We validated a novel criterion for HB capture that is based on the physiological left ventricular activation time as an individualized reference. HB capture can be diagnosed when paced V6 RWPT does not exceed the value obtained during native conduction by more than 12 ms, while longer paced V6 RWPT indicates RVS capture.
- MeSH
- blokáda Tawarova raménka diagnóza terapie MeSH
- elektrokardiografie MeSH
- Hisův svazek * MeSH
- kardiostimulace umělá * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- srdeční komory diagnostické zobrazování MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- MeSH
- elektrofyziologické techniky kardiologické MeSH
- Hisův svazek * MeSH
- kardiostimulace umělá * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- dopisy MeSH
- komentáře MeSH
