-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Phase III Randomized Study of SB5, an Adalimumab Biosimilar, Versus Reference Adalimumab in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis
ME. Weinblatt, A. Baranauskaite, J. Niebrzydowski, E. Dokoupilova, A. Zielinska, J. Jaworski, A. Racewicz, M. Pileckyte, K. Jedrychowicz-Rosiak, SY. Cheong, J. Ghil,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, fáze III, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
28950421
DOI
10.1002/art.40336
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- adalimumab škodlivé účinky farmakokinetika terapeutické užití MeSH
- antirevmatika škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- biosimilární léčivé přípravky škodlivé účinky farmakokinetika terapeutické užití MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- revmatoidní artritida farmakoterapie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
OBJECTIVE: SB5 is a biosimilar agent for adalimumab (ADA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and immunogenicity of SB5 in comparison with reference ADA in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: In this phase III, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study, patients with moderately to severely active RA despite treatment with methotrexate were randomized 1:1 to receive SB5 or reference ADA at a dosage of 40 mg subcutaneously every other week. The primary efficacy end point was the response rate based on the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) at week 24 in the per-protocol set (completer analysis). Additional end points included efficacy, PK, safety, and immunogenicity assessments. RESULTS: Of the 544 patients randomized to receive a study drug, the full analysis set comprised 542 patients (269 in the SB5 group, 273 in the reference ADA group) and the per-protocol set comprised 476 patients (239 receiving SB5, 237 receiving reference ADA). The ACR20 response rate at week 24 in the per-protocol set was equivalent between those receiving SB5 and those receiving reference ADA (72.4% and 72.2%, respectively); the difference in the ACR20 response rate (0.1%, [95% confidence interval -7.83%, 8.13%]) was within the predefined equivalence margin (±15%). Similar results were seen in the full analysis set (missing data being considered a nonresponse). The SB5 and reference ADA treatment groups were comparable across other end points, including the ACR 50% and ACR 70% improvement response rates, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints based on the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, PK data, incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events, and the antidrug antibody response. Subgroup analyses showed that the efficacy and safety of SB5 and reference ADA were comparable regardless of antidrug antibody status. CONCLUSION: The ACR20 response rate at week 24 was equivalent between patients treated with the biosimilar agent SB5 and those treated with reference ADA. SB5 and reference ADA were both well tolerated, with comparable safety profiles, in patients with RA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston Massachusetts
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kaunas Lithuania
Mazowieckie Centrum Badań Klinicznych Grodzisk Mazowiecki Poland
Medica Pro Familia Gdynia Poland
Medica Pro Familia Warsaw Poland
Medical Plus Uherske Hradiste Czech Republic
Reumatika Centrum Reumatologii Warsaw Poland
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19013070
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20190409155520.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 190405s2018 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1002/art.40336 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)28950421
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Weinblatt, Michael E $u Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
- 245 10
- $a Phase III Randomized Study of SB5, an Adalimumab Biosimilar, Versus Reference Adalimumab in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis / $c ME. Weinblatt, A. Baranauskaite, J. Niebrzydowski, E. Dokoupilova, A. Zielinska, J. Jaworski, A. Racewicz, M. Pileckyte, K. Jedrychowicz-Rosiak, SY. Cheong, J. Ghil,
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVE: SB5 is a biosimilar agent for adalimumab (ADA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and immunogenicity of SB5 in comparison with reference ADA in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: In this phase III, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study, patients with moderately to severely active RA despite treatment with methotrexate were randomized 1:1 to receive SB5 or reference ADA at a dosage of 40 mg subcutaneously every other week. The primary efficacy end point was the response rate based on the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) at week 24 in the per-protocol set (completer analysis). Additional end points included efficacy, PK, safety, and immunogenicity assessments. RESULTS: Of the 544 patients randomized to receive a study drug, the full analysis set comprised 542 patients (269 in the SB5 group, 273 in the reference ADA group) and the per-protocol set comprised 476 patients (239 receiving SB5, 237 receiving reference ADA). The ACR20 response rate at week 24 in the per-protocol set was equivalent between those receiving SB5 and those receiving reference ADA (72.4% and 72.2%, respectively); the difference in the ACR20 response rate (0.1%, [95% confidence interval -7.83%, 8.13%]) was within the predefined equivalence margin (±15%). Similar results were seen in the full analysis set (missing data being considered a nonresponse). The SB5 and reference ADA treatment groups were comparable across other end points, including the ACR 50% and ACR 70% improvement response rates, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints based on the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, PK data, incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events, and the antidrug antibody response. Subgroup analyses showed that the efficacy and safety of SB5 and reference ADA were comparable regardless of antidrug antibody status. CONCLUSION: The ACR20 response rate at week 24 was equivalent between patients treated with the biosimilar agent SB5 and those treated with reference ADA. SB5 and reference ADA were both well tolerated, with comparable safety profiles, in patients with RA.
- 650 _2
- $a adalimumab $x škodlivé účinky $x farmakokinetika $x terapeutické užití $7 D000068879
- 650 _2
- $a mladiství $7 D000293
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a antirevmatika $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D018501
- 650 _2
- $a revmatoidní artritida $x farmakoterapie $7 D001172
- 650 _2
- $a biosimilární léčivé přípravky $x škodlivé účinky $x farmakokinetika $x terapeutické užití $7 D059451
- 650 _2
- $a dvojitá slepá metoda $7 D004311
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a klinické zkoušky, fáze III $7 D017428
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Baranauskaite, Asta $u Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
- 700 1_
- $a Niebrzydowski, Jaroslaw $u Medica Pro Familia, Gdynia, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Dokoupilova, Eva $u Medical Plus, Uherske Hradiste, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Zielinska, Agnieszka $u Medica Pro Familia, Warsaw, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Jaworski, Janusz $u Reumatika, Centrum Reumatologii, Warsaw, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Racewicz, Artur $u Zdrowie Osteo-Medic, Białystok, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Pileckyte, Margarita $u Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.
- 700 1_
- $a Jedrychowicz-Rosiak, Krystyna $u Mazowieckie Centrum Badań Klinicznych, Grodzisk Mazowiecki, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Cheong, Soo Yeon $u Samsung Bioepis, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
- 700 1_
- $a Ghil, Jeehoon $u Samsung Bioepis, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00188151 $x 2326-5205 $g Roč. 70, č. 1 (2018), s. 40-48 $t Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28950421 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20190405 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20190409155535 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1392380 $s 1051375
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 70 $c 1 $d 40-48 $e 20171121 $i 2326-5205 $m Arthritis & rheumatology $x MED00188151
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20190405