Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

The choice of embedding media affects image quality, tissue R2* , and susceptibility behaviors in post-mortem brain MR microscopy at 7.0T

P. Dusek, VI. Madai, T. Huelnhagen, E. Bahn, R. Matej, J. Sobesky, T. Niendorf, J. Acosta-Cabronero, J. Wuerfel,

. 2019 ; 81 (4) : 2688-2701. [pub] 20181202

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20022817

Grantová podpora
15-25602A Czech Ministry of Health - International
Q27/LF1 Charles University - International
Q28/LF1; Charles University - International
CZ.2.16/3.1.00/24509 OPPK - International
1210251 Helmholtz Alliance ICEMED - International
203147/Z/16/Z Wellcome - International
NV15-25602A MZ0 CEP - Centrální evidence projektů

Digitální knihovna NLK
Plný text - Článek

E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 2012-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Wiley Free Content od 1999 do Před 5 lety

PURPOSE: The quality and precision of post-mortem MRI microscopy may vary depending on the embedding medium used. To investigate this, our study evaluated the impact of 5 widely used media on: (1) image quality, (2) contrast of high spatial resolution gradient-echo (T1 and T2* -weighted) MR images, (3) effective transverse relaxation rate (R2* ), and (4) quantitative susceptibility measurements (QSM) of post-mortem brain specimens. METHODS: Five formaldehyde-fixed brain slices were scanned using 7.0T MRI in: (1) formaldehyde solution (formalin), (2) phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), (3) deuterium oxide (D2 O), (4) perfluoropolyether (Galden), and (5) agarose gel. SNR and contrast-to-noise ratii (SNR/CNR) were calculated for cortex/white matter (WM) and basal ganglia/WM regions. In addition, median R2* and QSM values were extracted from caudate nucleus, putamen, globus pallidus, WM, and cortical regions. RESULTS: PBS, Galden, and agarose returned higher SNR/CNR compared to formalin and D2 O. Formalin fixation, and its use as embedding medium for scanning, increased tissue R2* . Imaging with agarose, D2 O, and Galden returned lower R2* values than PBS (and formalin). No major QSM offsets were observed, although spatial variance was increased (with respect to R2* behaviors) for formalin and agarose. CONCLUSIONS: Embedding media affect gradient-echo image quality, R2* , and QSM in differing ways. In this study, PBS embedding was identified as the most stable experimental setup, although by a small margin. Agarose and Galden were preferred to formalin or D2 O embedding. Formalin significantly increased R2* causing noisier data and increased QSM variance.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20022817
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20201214124835.0
007      
ta
008      
201125s2019 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1002/mrm.27595 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30506939
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Dusek, Petr $u Department of Neurology, Charles University, 1st Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Praha, Czech Republic. Department of Radiology, Charles University, 1st Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Praha, Czech Republic.
245    14
$a The choice of embedding media affects image quality, tissue R2* , and susceptibility behaviors in post-mortem brain MR microscopy at 7.0T / $c P. Dusek, VI. Madai, T. Huelnhagen, E. Bahn, R. Matej, J. Sobesky, T. Niendorf, J. Acosta-Cabronero, J. Wuerfel,
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: The quality and precision of post-mortem MRI microscopy may vary depending on the embedding medium used. To investigate this, our study evaluated the impact of 5 widely used media on: (1) image quality, (2) contrast of high spatial resolution gradient-echo (T1 and T2* -weighted) MR images, (3) effective transverse relaxation rate (R2* ), and (4) quantitative susceptibility measurements (QSM) of post-mortem brain specimens. METHODS: Five formaldehyde-fixed brain slices were scanned using 7.0T MRI in: (1) formaldehyde solution (formalin), (2) phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), (3) deuterium oxide (D2 O), (4) perfluoropolyether (Galden), and (5) agarose gel. SNR and contrast-to-noise ratii (SNR/CNR) were calculated for cortex/white matter (WM) and basal ganglia/WM regions. In addition, median R2* and QSM values were extracted from caudate nucleus, putamen, globus pallidus, WM, and cortical regions. RESULTS: PBS, Galden, and agarose returned higher SNR/CNR compared to formalin and D2 O. Formalin fixation, and its use as embedding medium for scanning, increased tissue R2* . Imaging with agarose, D2 O, and Galden returned lower R2* values than PBS (and formalin). No major QSM offsets were observed, although spatial variance was increased (with respect to R2* behaviors) for formalin and agarose. CONCLUSIONS: Embedding media affect gradient-echo image quality, R2* , and QSM in differing ways. In this study, PBS embedding was identified as the most stable experimental setup, although by a small margin. Agarose and Galden were preferred to formalin or D2 O embedding. Formalin significantly increased R2* causing noisier data and increased QSM variance.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a pitva $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D001344
650    _2
$a mozek $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patologie $7 D001921
650    _2
$a mapování mozku $x metody $7 D001931
650    _2
$a kontrastní látky $7 D003287
650    _2
$a oxid deuteria $7 D017666
650    _2
$a ethery $7 D004987
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a fluorokarbony $7 D005466
650    _2
$a formaldehyd $7 D005557
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a počítačové zpracování obrazu $7 D007091
650    _2
$a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D008279
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a fosfáty $7 D010710
650    _2
$a sefarosa $x chemie $7 D012685
650    _2
$a poměr signál - šum $7 D059629
650    _2
$a odběr biologického vzorku $7 D013048
650    _2
$a zalévání tkání $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D016610
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Madai, Vince Istvan $u Department of Neurology and Center for Stroke Research Berlin (CSB), Charité-Universitaetsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.
700    1_
$a Huelnhagen, Till $u Berlin Ultrahigh Field Facility (B.U.F.F.), Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin, Germany.
700    1_
$a Bahn, Erik $u Institute of Neuropathology, University Medicine Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
700    1_
$a Matej, Radoslav $u Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Thomayer Hospital, Praha, Czech Republic. Department of Pathology, Charles University, 1st Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Praha, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Sobesky, Jan $u Department of Neurology and Center for Stroke Research Berlin (CSB), Charité-Universitaetsmedizin, Berlin, Germany. Experimental and Clinical Research Center (ECRC), Charité-Universitaetsmedizin and Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin, Germany.
700    1_
$a Niendorf, Thoralf $u Berlin Ultrahigh Field Facility (B.U.F.F.), Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin, Germany. Experimental and Clinical Research Center (ECRC), Charité-Universitaetsmedizin and Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin, Germany.
700    1_
$a Acosta-Cabronero, Julio $u Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom. German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany.
700    1_
$a Wuerfel, Jens $u NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin, Berlin, Germany. Medical Imaging Analysis Center AG, Basel, Switzerland. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University Basel, Switzerland.
773    0_
$w MED00003172 $t Magnetic resonance in medicine $x 1522-2594 $g Roč. 81, č. 4 (2019), s. 2688-2701
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30506939 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20201125 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20201214124835 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1595136 $s 1113493
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 81 $c 4 $d 2688-2701 $e 20181202 $i 1522-2594 $m Magnetic resonance in medicine $n Magn Reson Med $x MED00003172
GRA    __
$a 15-25602A $p Czech Ministry of Health $2 International
GRA    __
$a Q27/LF1 $p Charles University $2 International
GRA    __
$a Q28/LF1; $p Charles University $2 International
GRA    __
$a CZ.2.16/3.1.00/24509 $p OPPK $2 International
GRA    __
$a 1210251 $p Helmholtz Alliance ICEMED $2 International
GRA    __
$a 203147/Z/16/Z $p Wellcome $2 International
GRA    __
$a NV15-25602A $p MZ0
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20201125

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...