HPMA copolymer-doxorubicin conjugates: The effects of molecular weight and architecture on biodistribution and in vivo activity
Language English Country Netherlands Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
22759979
DOI
10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.06.029
PII: S0168-3659(12)00529-9
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Acrylamides chemistry pharmacokinetics therapeutic use MeSH
- Antibiotics, Antineoplastic chemistry pharmacokinetics MeSH
- Doxorubicin chemistry pharmacokinetics therapeutic use MeSH
- Kaplan-Meier Estimate MeSH
- Lymphoma drug therapy MeSH
- Metabolic Clearance Rate MeSH
- Molecular Structure MeSH
- Molecular Weight MeSH
- Mice, Inbred C57BL MeSH
- Mice MeSH
- Cell Line, Tumor MeSH
- Drug Stability MeSH
- Tissue Distribution MeSH
- Neoplasm Transplantation MeSH
- Structure-Activity Relationship MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Male MeSH
- Mice MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Acrylamides MeSH
- Antibiotics, Antineoplastic MeSH
- Doxorubicin MeSH
- N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide co-polymer-doxorubicin conjugate MeSH Browser
The molecular weight and molecular architecture of soluble polymer drug carriers significantly influence the biodistribution and anti-tumour activities of their doxorubicin (DOX) conjugates in tumour-bearing mice. Biodistribution of N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide (HPMA) copolymer-DOX conjugates of linear and star architectures were compared in EL4 T-cell lymphoma-bearing mice. Biodistribution, including tumour accumulation, and anti-tumour activity of the conjugates strongly depended on conjugate molecular weight (MW), polydispersity, hydrodynamic radius (R(h)) and molecular architecture. With increasing MW, renal clearance decreased, and the conjugates displayed extended blood circulation and enhanced tumour accumulation. The linear conjugates with flexible polymer chains were eliminated by kidney clearance more quickly than the highly branched star conjugates with comparable MWs. Interestingly, the data suggested different mechanisms of renal filtration for star and linear conjugates. Only star conjugates with MWs below 50,000g.mo(-1) were removed by kidney filtration, while linear polymer conjugates with MWs near 70,000g.mol(-1), exceeding the generally accepted limit for renal elimination, were detected in the urine 36-96h after injection. Additionally, survival of tumour-bearing mice was strongly dependent on molecular weight and polymer conjugate architecture. Treatment of mice with the lower MW conjugate at a dose of 10mg DOX eq./kg resulted in 12% long-term surviving animals, while treatment with the corresponding star conjugate enabled 75% survival of animals.
References provided by Crossref.org
Evaluation of linear versus star-like polymer anti-cancer nanomedicines in mouse models
HPMA Copolymer-Based Nanomedicines in Controlled Drug Delivery
Cancer Microenvironment: What Can We Learn from the Stem Cell Niche