Global rise in emerging alien species results from increased accessibility of new source pools
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu historické články, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Grantová podpora
I 3757
Austrian Science Fund FWF - Austria
PubMed
29432147
PubMed Central
PMC5877962
DOI
10.1073/pnas.1719429115
PII: 1719429115
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- drivers, globalization, invasive species, source species pools, time series,
- MeSH
- biodiverzita MeSH
- biologické modely MeSH
- dějiny 16. století MeSH
- dějiny 17. století MeSH
- dějiny 18. století MeSH
- dějiny 19. století MeSH
- dějiny 20. století MeSH
- dějiny 21. století MeSH
- ekosystém MeSH
- populační dynamika dějiny MeSH
- zavlečené druhy dějiny statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- dějiny 16. století MeSH
- dějiny 17. století MeSH
- dějiny 18. století MeSH
- dějiny 19. století MeSH
- dějiny 20. století MeSH
- dějiny 21. století MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- historické články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. MeSH
Our ability to predict the identity of future invasive alien species is largely based upon knowledge of prior invasion history. Emerging alien species-those never encountered as aliens before-therefore pose a significant challenge to biosecurity interventions worldwide. Understanding their temporal trends, origins, and the drivers of their spread is pivotal to improving prevention and risk assessment tools. Here, we use a database of 45,984 first records of 16,019 established alien species to investigate the temporal dynamics of occurrences of emerging alien species worldwide. Even after many centuries of invasions the rate of emergence of new alien species is still high: One-quarter of first records during 2000-2005 were of species that had not been previously recorded anywhere as alien, though with large variation across taxa. Model results show that the high proportion of emerging alien species cannot be solely explained by increases in well-known drivers such as the amount of imported commodities from historically important source regions. Instead, these dynamics reflect the incorporation of new regions into the pool of potential alien species, likely as a consequence of expanding trade networks and environmental change. This process compensates for the depletion of the historically important source species pool through successive invasions. We estimate that 1-16% of all species on Earth, depending on the taxonomic group, qualify as potential alien species. These results suggest that there remains a high proportion of emerging alien species we have yet to encounter, with future impacts that are difficult to predict.
Berlin Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research 14195 Berlin Germany
Bio Protection Research Centre Lincoln University 7648 Christchurch New Zealand
Biota of North America Program Chapel Hill NC 27516
Botanical Society of Britain and Ireland HG1 1SS Harrogate United Kingdom
CABI 2800 Delémont Switzerland
Center for InterAmerican Studies Bielefeld University 33615 Bielefeld Germany
Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Wallingford OX10 8BB United Kingdom
Charles Darwin Foundation for the Galapagos Islands Puerto Ayora Santa Cruz Galapagos Ecuador
Department of Agriculture University of Sassari 07100 Sassari Italy
Department of Biological Diversity and Nature Conservation Environment Agency 1090 Vienna Austria
Department of Biology University of Fribourg 1700 Fribourg Switzerland
Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research University of Vienna 1030 Vienna Austria
Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research University of Vienna 1030 Vienna Austria;
Department of Botany National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution Washington DC 20013
Department of Community Ecology Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research UFZ 06120 Halle Germany
Department of Environmental Biology Sapienza University 00185 Rome Italy
Department of Experimental and Systems Ecology Bielefeld University 33615 Bielefeld Germany
Ecology Department of Biology University of Konstanz 78457 Konstanz Germany
German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research Halle Jena Leipzig 04103 Leipzig Germany
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique UR 0633 Zoologie Forestière 45075 Orléans France
Institute for Environmental Protection and Research 00144 Rome Italy
Institute of Ecology and Evolution University of Bern CH 3012 Bern Switzerland
Institute of Zoology Zoological Society of London NW1 4RY London United Kingdom
Landcare Research PB 92170 Auckland New Zealand
Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries 12587 Berlin Germany
School of Biological and Biomedical Sciences Durham University DH1 3LE Durham United Kingdom
School of Biological Sciences The University of Hong Kong Pokfulam Hong Kong China
School of Biological Sciences University of Auckland Auckland 1142 New Zealand
Scion 8440 Christchurch New Zealand
Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre 60325 Frankfurt am Main Germany;
US Forest Service Northern Research Station Morgantown WV 26505
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Seebens H, et al. No saturation in the accumulation of alien species worldwide. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14435. PubMed PMC
Capinha C, Essl F, Seebens H, Moser D, Pereira HM. BIOGEOGRAPHY. The dispersal of alien species redefines biogeography in the Anthropocene. Science. 2015;348:1248–1251. PubMed
Simberloff D, et al. Impacts of biological invasions: what’s what and the way forward. Trends Ecol Evol. 2013;28:58–66. PubMed
Pyšek P, Richardson DM. Invasive species, environmental change and management, and health. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 2010;35:25–55.
Kettunen M, et al. 2009. Technical support to EU strategy on invasive species (IAS)—Assessment of the impacts of IAS in Europe and the EU: Final report for the European Commission, Institute for European Environmental Policy (Inst for European Environmental Policy, Brussels)
Vilà M, et al. How well do we understand the impacts of alien species on ecosystem services? A pan-European, cross-taxa assessment. Front Ecol Environ. 2010;8:135–144.
Lewis SL, Maslin MA. Defining the anthropocene. Nature. 2015;519:171–180. PubMed
Hulme PE. Trade, transport and trouble: Managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. J Appl Ecol. 2009;46:10–18.
Levine JM, D’Antonio CM. Forecasting biological invasions with increasing international trade. Conserv Biol. 2003;17:322–326.
Seebens H, Essl F, Blasius B. The intermediate distance hypothesis of biological invasions. Ecol Lett. 2017;20:158–165. PubMed
Pyšek P, et al. Disentangling the role of environmental and human pressures on biological invasions across Europe. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:12157–12162. PubMed PMC
Pauchard A, Alaback PB. Influence of elevation, land Use, and landscape context on patterns of alien plant invasions along roadsides in protected areas of South-Central Chile. Conserv Biol. 2004;18:238–248.
Liebhold AM, Brockerhoff EG, Kimberley M. Depletion of heterogeneous source species pools predicts future invasion rates. J Appl Ecol. 2017;54:1968–1977.
Dyer EE, et al. The global distribution and drivers of alien bird species richness. PLoS Biol. 2017;15:e2000942. PubMed PMC
Leung B, et al. TEASIng apart alien species risk assessments: A framework for best practices. Ecol Lett. 2012;15:1475–1493. PubMed
European Plant Protection Organization 2015 A1 and A2 lists of pests recommended for regulation as quarantine pests. Available at archives.eppo.int/EPPOStandards/PM1_GENERAL/pm1-002-26-en_A1A2_2017.pdf.
Roy HE, et al. 2015. Invasive alien species–Prioritising prevention efforts through horizon scanning. ENV.B.2/ETU/2014/0016. (European Commission, Brussels)
Pyšek P, et al. Naturalized alien flora of the world. Preslia. 2017;89:203–274.
Dyer EE, et al. A global analysis of the determinants of alien geographical range size in birds. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2016;25:1346–1355.
Joppa LN, Roberts DL, Pimm SL. How many species of flowering plants are there? Proc Biol Sci. 2011;278:554–559. PubMed PMC
Chapman AD. Numbers of Living Species in Australia and the World. 2nd Ed Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts; Canberra, Australia: 2009.
Blackburn TM, Dyer EE, Su S, Cassey P. Long after the event, or four things we (should) know about bird invasions. J Ornithol. 2015;156(Suppl 1):15–25.
Eaton JA, Leupen BTC, Krishnasamy K. Songsters of Singapore: An Overview of the Bird Species in Singapore Pet Shops. Petaling Jaya; Selangor, Malaysia: 2017.
Early R, et al. Global threats from invasive alien species in the twenty-first century and national response capacities. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12485. PubMed PMC
Seebens H, et al. Global trade will accelerate plant invasions in emerging economies under climate change. Glob Change Biol. 2015;21:4128–4140. PubMed
Petitpierre B, et al. Climatic niche shifts are rare among terrestrial plant invaders. Science. 2012;335:1344–1348. PubMed
Bellard C, Leroy B, Thuiller W, Rysman JF, Courchamp F. Major drivers of invasion risks throughout the world. Ecosphere. 2016;7:1–14.
Hulme PE. Addressing the threat to biodiversity from botanic gardens. Trends Ecol Evol. 2011;26:168–174. PubMed
Pears N. Familiar aliens: The acclimatisation societies’ role in New Zealand’s biogeography. Scott Geogr Mag. 1982;98:23–34.
di Castri F. History of biological invasions with special emphasis on the Old World. In: Drake JA, et al., editors. Biological Invasions: a Global Perspective. Wiley; Chichester, UK: 1989. pp. 1–30.
Fry C. The Plant Hunters: The Adventures of the World’s Greatest Botanical Explorers. Univ of Chicago Press; Chicago: 2013.
Essl F, et al. Crossing frontiers in tackling pathways of biological invasions. Bioscience. 2015;65:769–782.
Casties I, Seebens H, Briski E. Importance of geographic origin for invasion success: A case study of the North and Baltic Seas versus the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River region. Ecol Evol. 2016;6:8318–8329. PubMed PMC
Kalusová V, et al. Naturalization of European plants on other continents: The role of donor habitats. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:13756–13761. PubMed PMC
Weigelt P, Jetz W, Kreft H. Bioclimatic and physical characterization of the world’s islands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:15307–15312. PubMed PMC
Blackburn TM, et al. A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol. 2011;26:333–339. PubMed
Aukema JE, et al. Historical accumulation of nonindigenous forest pests in the Continental United States. Bioscience. 2010;60:886–897.
Nealis VG, et al. Historical occurrence of alien arthropods and pathogens on trees in Canada. Can J For Res. 2016;46:172–180.
Froese R, Pauly D. 2015 FishBase. Available at www.fishbase.de/. Accessed March 3, 2017.
van Kleunen M, et al. Global exchange and accumulation of non-native plants. Nature. 2015;525:100–103. PubMed
Dawson W, et al. Global hotspots and correlates of alien species richness across taxonomic groups. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017;1:186.
Pagad S, Hayes K, Katsanevakis S, Costello MJ. 2017 World Register of Introduced Marine Species (WRIMS). Available at www.marinespecies.org/. Accessed December 7, 2017.
R Development Core Team 2015 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna), R version 3.2.3. Available at https://www.r-project.org/. Accessed January 19, 2018.
Chini LP, Hurtt GC, Frolking S. 2014. Harmonized global land use for years 1500 -2100, V1 (Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center, Oak Ridge, TN), 10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1248.
Barbieri K, Keshk OMG, Pollins BM. Trading data: Evaluating our assumptions and coding rules. Conflict Manag Peace. 2009;26:471–491.
Klein Goldewijk K, Beusen A, Van Drecht G, De Vos M. The HYDE 3.1 spatially explicit database of human-induced global land-use change over the past 12,000 years. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2011;20:73–86.
Costello C, Springborn M, McAusland C, Solow A. Unintended biological invasions: Does risk vary by trading partner? J Environ Econ Manage. 2007;54:262–276.
Wood SN. Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R. CRC; Boca Raton, FL: 2006.
Wood SN, Scheipl F. 2016 gamm4: Generalized Additive Mixed Models using “mgcv” and “lme4”. R package version 0.2-4. Available at https://cran.r-project.org/package=gamm4. Accessed January 19, 2018.
Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker N, Saveliev AA, Smith GM. Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R. Springer; New York: 2009.
Delisle F, Lavoie C, Jean M, Lachance D. Reconstructing the spread of invasive plants: Taking into account biases associated with herbarium specimens. J Biogeogr. 2003;30:1033–1042.
Meyer C, Kreft H, Guralnick R, Jetz W. Global priorities for an effective information basis of biodiversity distributions. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8221. PubMed PMC
Recent advances in availability and synthesis of the economic costs of biological invasions
The recovery of European freshwater biodiversity has come to a halt
Unveiling the hidden economic toll of biological invasions in the European Union
Naturalized alien floras still carry the legacy of European colonialism
Scientists' warning on invasive alien species
Drivers of future alien species impacts: An expert-based assessment
Economic use of plants is key to their naturalization success
Biodiversity policy beyond economic growth
Drivers of the relative richness of naturalized and invasive plant species on Earth