Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi establish symbiotic associations with many plant species, transferring significant amounts of soil nutrients such as phosphorus to plants and receiving photosynthetically fixed carbon in return. Functioning of AM symbiosis is thus based on interaction between two living partners. The importance of dead AM fungal biomass (necromass) in ecosystem processes remains unclear. Here, we applied either living biomass or necromass (0.0004 potting substrate weight percent) of monoxenically produced AM fungus (Rhizophagus irregularis) into previously sterilized potting substrate planted with Andropogon gerardii. Plant biomass production significantly improved in both treatments as compared to non-amended controls. Living AM fungus, in contrast to the necromass, specifically improved plant acquisition of nutrients normally supplied to the plants by AM fungal networks, such as phosphorus and zinc. There was, however, no difference between the two amendment treatments with respect to plant uptake of other nutrients such as nitrogen and/or magnesium, indicating that the effect on plants of the AM fungal necromass was not primarily nutritional. Plant growth stimulation by the necromass could thus be either due to AM fungal metabolites directly affecting the plants, indirectly due to changes in soil/root microbiomes or due to physicochemical modifications of the potting substrate. In the necromass, we identified several potentially bioactive molecules. We also provide experimental evidence for significant differences in underground microbiomes depending on the amendment with living or dead AM fungal biomass. This research thus provides the first glimpse into possible mechanisms responsible for observed plant growth stimulation by the AM fungal necromass.

Department of Ecosystem Biology Faculty of Science University of South Bohemia Branišovská 1760 370 05 České Budějovice Czech Republic

Faculty of Science Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem České mládeže 8 400 96 Ústí nad Labem Czech Republic

Institute of Geology Czech Academy of Sciences Rozvojová 269 165 00 Prague 6 Czech Republic

Isotope Laboratory Institute of Experimental Botany Czech Academy of Sciences Vídeňská 1083 142 20 Prague 4 Czech Republic

Laboratory of Biotransformation Institute of Microbiology Czech Academy of Sciences Vídeňská 1083 142 20 Prague 4 Czech Republic

Laboratory of Fungal Biology Institute of Microbiology Czech Academy of Sciences Vídeňská 1083 142 20 Prague 4 Czech Republic

Laboratory of Fungal Genetics and Metabolism Institute of Microbiology Czech Academy of Sciences Vídeňská 1083 142 20 Prague 4 Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2012 Dec;82(3):666-77 PubMed

Trends Plant Sci. 2015 Mar;20(3):150-4 PubMed

Plant J. 2014 Aug;79(3):398-412 PubMed

Plant Cell. 2008 May;20(5):1407-20 PubMed

J Immunol. 2006 Aug 1;177(3):1805-16 PubMed

Biochimie. 2017 Oct;141:21-29 PubMed

New Phytol. 2018 Dec;220(4):1059-1075 PubMed

J Biol Chem. 2007 Jul 13;282(28):20705-14 PubMed

New Phytol. 2013 Apr;198(1):203-13 PubMed

Trends Ecol Evol. 2018 Feb;33(2):129-142 PubMed

Science. 2011 Aug 12;333(6044):880-2 PubMed

New Phytol. 2013 Apr;198(1):190-202 PubMed

New Phytol. 2015 Mar;205(4):1406-23 PubMed

Front Plant Sci. 2017 Mar 27;8:390 PubMed

Mycorrhiza. 2018 Aug;28(5-6):421-433 PubMed

Ecol Evol. 2016 May 30;6(13):4332-46 PubMed

Phytochemistry. 2007 Jan;68(1):33-40 PubMed

Mycorrhiza. 2018 Apr;28(3):269-283 PubMed

Mol Ecol Resour. 2012 Mar;12(2):219-32 PubMed

Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2016 Oct;41:83-89 PubMed

Mycorrhiza. 2018 Aug;28(5-6):435-450 PubMed

J Biol Chem. 2009 Sep 18;284(38):25687-96 PubMed

FEBS J. 2005 Mar;272(5):1160-8 PubMed

Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Jan;40(Database issue):D136-43 PubMed

Science. 2003 May 16;300(5622):1138-40 PubMed

Mycorrhiza. 2014 Nov;24(8):603-10 PubMed

Mol Plant. 2010 Sep;3(5):783-93 PubMed

Mycorrhiza. 2017 Jan;27(1):35-51 PubMed

Plant Physiol. 2011 Jul;156(3):1050-7 PubMed

Trends Plant Sci. 2016 Nov;21(11):937-950 PubMed

Plant Physiol. 2000 Nov;124(3):1027-38 PubMed

Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008 Oct;6(10):763-75 PubMed

ISME J. 2016 Oct;10(10):2341-51 PubMed

Mycorrhiza. 2018 Jan;28(1):71-83 PubMed

Mycobiology. 2011 Jun;39(2):79-84 PubMed

Bioinformatics. 2015 Nov 1;31(21):3476-82 PubMed

Dev Cell. 2011 Jul 19;21(1):145-58 PubMed

Science. 2009 May 8;324(5928):753-4 PubMed

Mycorrhiza. 2017 Jul;27(5):477-486 PubMed

New Phytol. 2014 Oct;204(2):289-96 PubMed

Nature. 2001 Nov 22;414(6862):462-70 PubMed

FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2009 Mar;67(3):389-96 PubMed

Front Plant Sci. 2015 Feb 13;6:65 PubMed

J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403-10 PubMed

Unraveling the diversity of hyphal explorative traits among Rhizophagus irregularis genotypes

Nutrient-dependent cross-kingdom interactions in the hyphosphere of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus

Mycorrhiza governs plant-plant interactions through preferential allocation of shared nutritional resources: A triple (13C, 15N and 33P) labeling study

Arbuscular Mycorrhiza and Nitrification: Disentangling Processes and Players by Using Synthetic Nitrification Inhibitors

Organic nitrogen utilisation by an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus is mediated by specific soil bacteria and a protist

Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Mediates Efficient Recycling From Soil to Plants of Nitrogen Bound in Chitin