Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale-renal (IPOS-r) to Czech
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
36038854
PubMed Central
PMC9425933
DOI
10.1186/s12904-022-01044-w
PII: 10.1186/s12904-022-01044-w
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Advanced kidney disease, IPOS-renal, Outcome measurement, Patient-reported outcome measure, Reliability, Symptom assessment, Validity,
- MeSH
- kvalita života * psychologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nemoci ledvin * psychologie MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- psychometrie MeSH
- reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- srovnání kultur MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced kidney disease suffer from burdensome symptoms, which should be assessed by valid and reliable patient-reported outcome measures. This study aimed to provide a translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Czech version of the IPOS-r. METHODS: The IPOS-r was translated to Czech and culturally adapted using cognitive interviews. During the validation phase, patients and staff in dialysis centres and outpatient renal clinics completed the IPOS-r. Internal consistency was tested with Cronbach's alpha, its reliability via intraclass correlation coefficient for total IPOS-r score, and weighted Kappa (for test-retest and interrater reliability of individual items). Convergent validity was tested with Spearman correlation to Kidney Disease Quality of Life Survey-Short Form 1.2 (KDQOL-SF 1.2). We assessed sensitivity to change using a distribution-based approach. RESULTS: Two sets of translators independently performed forward and backward translations of the IPOS-r. Ten patients and ten health care professionals participated in cognitive pre-testing. The sample size for validation included 88 patients (mean age 66 ± SD13.8; 58% men) who were treated with haemodialysis (70.5%), home haemodialysis (5.5%), peritoneal dialysis (3%), and conservative management (21%). Cronbach's alpha was 0.72, and the intraclass correlation was 0.84 for test-retest reliability and 0.73 for interrater reliability. The IPOS-r correlated with KDQOL-SF 1.2 had a rho between 0.4-0.8 for most of the IPOS-r items, showing good convergent validity. The IPOS-r measure is feasible and takes 9 minutes to complete. Patients who reported a change in health status after 1 month demonstrated a total IPOS-r score change of eight points in both positive and negative directions. CONCLUSIONS: The process of translation and cultural adaptation of the IPOS-r was successful, and the Czech IPOS-r measure is a valid and reliable tool. The Czech IPOS-r can be used to assess symptoms in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: GAUK [82121].
1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Prague Czech Republic
3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Prague Czech Republic
Center for Palliative Care Prague Czech Republic
Kralovske Vinohrady University Hospital Prague Šrobárova 50 10034 Prague Czech Republic
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Weisbord SD, Carmody SS, Bruns FJ, et al. Symptom burden, quality of life, advance care planning and the potential value of palliative care in severely ill hemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2003;18:1345–1352. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfg105. PubMed DOI
Almutary H, Bonner A, Douglas C. Symptom burden in chronic kidney disease: a review of recent literature. J Ren Care. 2013;39:140–150. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-6686.2013.12022.x. PubMed DOI
Ferrans CE, Zerwic JJ, Wilbur JE, et al. Conceptual model of health-related quality of life. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2005;37:336–342. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2005.00058.x. PubMed DOI
Chandna SM, Da Silva-Gane M, Marshall C, et al. Survival of elderly patients with stage 5 CKD: comparison of conservative management and renal replacement therapy. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26:1608–1614. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq630. PubMed DOI PMC
Kurella Tamura M, Covinsky KE, Chertow GM, et al. Functional status of elderly adults before and after initiation of dialysis. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1539–1547. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0904655. PubMed DOI PMC
Feldman R, Berman N, Reid MC, et al. Improving symptom management in hemodialysis patients: identifying barriers and future directions. J Palliat Med. 2013;16:1528–1533. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0176. PubMed DOI PMC
Raj R, Ahuja KD, Frandsen M, et al. Symptoms and their recognition in adult haemodialysis patients: Interactions with quality of life. Nephrology (Carlton) 2017;22:228–233. doi: 10.1111/nep.12754. PubMed DOI
Weisbord SD, Fried LF, Mor MK, et al. Renal provider recognition of symptoms in patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;2:960–967. doi: 10.2215/cjn.00990207. PubMed DOI
Morton RL, Lioufas N, Dansie K, et al. Use of patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures in renal units in Australia and New Zealand: A cross-sectional survey study. Nephrology (Carlton) 2020;25:14–21. doi: 10.1111/nep.13577. PubMed DOI
McLaren S, Jhamb M, Unruh M. Using Patient-Reported Measures to Improve Outcomes in Kidney Disease. Blood Purif. 2021;50:649–654. doi: 10.1159/000515640. PubMed DOI
Aiyegbusi OL, Kyte D, Cockwell P, et al. Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in adult patients with chronic kidney disease: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0179733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179733. PubMed DOI PMC
Murtagh FE, Ramsenthaler C, Firth A, et al. A brief, patient- and proxy-reported outcome measure in advanced illness: Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) Palliat Med. 2019;33:1045–1057. doi: 10.1177/0269216319854264. PubMed DOI PMC
Raj R, Ahuja K, Frandsen M, et al. Validation of the IPOS-Renal Symptom Survey in Advanced Kidney Disease: A Cross-sectional Study. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018;56:281–287. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.04.006. PubMed DOI
Vlckova K, Hoschlova E, Chroustova E, et al. Psychometric properties of the Czech Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale: reliability and content validity analysis. BMC Palliat Care. 2020;19:39. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00552-x. PubMed DOI PMC
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:22. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-22. PubMed DOI PMC
Antunes B, Brown A, Witt J, Daveson BA, Ramsenthaler C, Benalia H, et al. Manual for crosscultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the POS. 2019.
Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, et al. Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8:94–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x. PubMed DOI
Willis GB, Artino AR., Jr What Do Our Respondents Think We're Asking? Using Cognitive Interviewing to Improve Medical Education Surveys. J Grad Med Educ. 2013;5:353–356. doi: 10.4300/jgme-d-13-00154.1. PubMed DOI PMC
Cappelleri JC, Jason Lundy J, Hays RD. Overview of classical test theory and item response theory for the quantitative assessment of items in developing patient-reported outcomes measures. Clin Ther. 2014;36:648–662. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.04.006. PubMed DOI PMC
Vet HCW, de Terwee C, Mokkin LB, Knol DK. Measurement in medicine a practical guide. Cambridge University Press; 2011;5:137-9.
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174. doi: 10.2307/2529310. PubMed DOI
Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med. 2005;37:360–363. PubMed
Crosby RD, Kolotkin RL, Williams GR. Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:395–407. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00044-1. PubMed DOI
Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. Int J Med Educ. 2011;2:53–55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd. PubMed DOI PMC
Sacks D, Baxter B, Campbell BCV, et al. Multisociety Consensus Quality Improvement Revised Consensus Statement for Endovascular Therapy of Acute Ischemic Stroke. Int J Stroke. 2018;13:612–632. doi: 10.1177/1747493018778713. PubMed DOI
Higginson IJ, Evans CJ, Grande G, et al. Evaluating complex interventions in end of life care: the MORECare statement on good practice generated by a synthesis of transparent expert consultations and systematic reviews. BMC Med. 2013;11:111. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-111. PubMed DOI PMC
Radbruch L, Loick G, Kiencke P, et al. Validation of the German version of the Brief Pain Inventory. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1999;18:180–187. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(99)00064-0. PubMed DOI
Schafer JL, Graham JW. Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychol Methods. 2002;7:147–177. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.7.2.147. PubMed DOI
Hays RD, Kallich JD, Mapes DL, et al. Development of the kidney disease quality of life (KDQOL) instrument. Qual Life Res. 1994;3:329–338. doi: 10.1007/bf00451725. PubMed DOI