BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is still the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths and thus biomarkers allowing prediction of the resistance of patients to therapy and estimating their prognosis are needed. We designed a panel of 558 genes with pharmacogenomics records related to 5-fluorouracil resistance, genes important for sensitivity to other frequently used drugs, major oncodrivers, and actionable genes. We performed a target enrichment sequencing of DNA from tumors and matched blood samples of patients, and compared the results with patient prognosis stratified by systemic adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: The median number of detected variants per tumor sample was 18.5 with 4 classified as having a high predicted functional effect and 14.5 moderate effect. APC, TP53, and KRAS were the most frequent mutated genes (64%, 59%, and 42% of mutated samples, respectively) followed by FAT4 (23%), FBXW7, and PIK3CA (16% for both). Patients with advanced stage III had more frequently APC, TP53, or KRAS mutations than those in stages I or II. KRAS mutation counts followed an increasing trend with grade (G1 < G2 < G3). The response to adjuvant therapy was worse in carriers of frameshift mutations in APC or 12D variant in KRAS, but none of these oncodrivers had prognostic value. Carriage of somatic mutations in any of the genes ABCA13, ANK2, COL7A1, NAV3, or UNC80 had prognostic relevance for worse overall survival (OS) of all patients. In contrast, mutations in FLG, GLI3, or UNC80 were prognostic in the same direction for patients untreated, and mutations in COL6A3, LRP1B, NAV3, RYR1, RYR3, TCHH, or TENM4 for patients treated with adjuvant therapy. The first association was externally validated. From all germline variants with high or moderate predicted functional effects (median 326 per patient), > 5% frequency and positive Manhattan plot based on 3-year RFS, rs72753407 in NFACS, rs34621071 in ERBB4, and rs2444274 in RIF1 were significantly associated with RFS, OS or both. CONCLUSIONS: The present study identified several putative somatic and germline genetic events with prognostic potential for colorectal cancer that should undergo functional characterization.

• MeSH
• chemorezistence genetika   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• F-Box a WD repetice obsahující protein 7 genetika   MeSH
• farmakogenetika metody   MeSH
• fluoruracil terapeutické užití   MeSH
• fosfatidylinositol-3-kinasy třídy I MeSH
• kolorektální nádory * genetika   farmakoterapie   patologie   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mutace genetika   MeSH
• nádorové biomarkery genetika   MeSH
• nádorový supresorový protein p53 genetika   MeSH
• prognóza MeSH
• protein familiární adenomatózní polypózy genetika   MeSH
• protoonkogenní proteiny p21(ras) genetika   MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• vysoce účinné nukleotidové sekvenování MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH

PURPOSE: Analysis of somatic variant profiles in retrospectively collected pairs of primary tumors and synchronous liver metastases from surgically treated patients with colorectal carcinomas. Mutational profiles were compared between groups of patients stratified by response to chemotherapy and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study used whole-exome sequencing of tumor sample pairs from 20 patients diagnosed and treated at a single center. The Cancer Genome Atlas COAD-READ data set (n = 380) was used for validation in silico, where possible. RESULTS: The most frequently altered oncodrivers were APC (55% in primaries and 60% in metastases), TP53 (50/45), TRIP11 (30/5), FAT4 (20/25), and KRAS (15/25). Harboring variants with a high or moderate predicted functional effect in KRAS in primary tumors was significantly associated with poor relapse-free survival in both our sample set and the validation data set. We found a number of additional prognostic associations, including mutational load, alterations in individual genes, oncodriver pathways, and single base substitution (SBS) signatures in primary tissues, which were not confirmed by validation. Altered ATM, DNAH11, and MUC5AC, or a higher share of SBS24 signature in metastases seemed to represent poor prognostic factors, but because of a lack of suitable validation data sets, these results must be treated with extreme caution. No gene or profile was significantly associated with response to chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Taken together, we report subtle differences in exome mutational profiles between paired primary tumors and synchronous liver metastases and a distinct prognostic relevance of KRAS in primary tumors. Although the general scarcity of primary tumor-synchronous metastasis sample pairs with high-quality clinical data makes robust validation difficult, this study provides potentially valuable data for utilization in precision oncology and could serve as a springboard for larger studies.

• MeSH
• individualizovaná medicína MeSH
• kolorektální nádory * farmakoterapie   genetika   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• lokální recidiva nádoru MeSH
• nádory jater * farmakoterapie   genetika   MeSH
• prognóza MeSH
• protoonkogenní proteiny p21(ras) genetika   MeSH
• retrospektivní studie MeSH
• sekvenování exomu MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH