Characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from rabbits
Language English Country United States Media print
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
17702469
DOI
10.1007/bf02931312
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Bacteriocins metabolism MeSH
- Cecum microbiology MeSH
- Feces microbiology MeSH
- Animals, Domestic microbiology MeSH
- Rabbits MeSH
- Meat microbiology MeSH
- Microbial Sensitivity Tests MeSH
- Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial * MeSH
- Bridged-Ring Compounds metabolism MeSH
- Methicillin Resistance * MeSH
- Staphylococcus aureus drug effects isolation & purification MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Rabbits MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Geographicals
- Slovakia MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Bacteriocins MeSH
- enterocin MeSH Browser
- Bridged-Ring Compounds MeSH
The occurrence of Staphylococcus aureus in rabbit feces, cecum and meat and its enterotoxin production, susceptibility to antibiotics and its sensitivity or resistance to bacteriocins produced by enterococci with probiotic properties were determined. Isolates were resistant to ampicillin, penicillin, phosphomycin and methicillin; a high percentage of susceptibility was also recorded to vancomycin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline and tobramycin. S. aureus isolates did not produce enterotoxins and were sensitive to partially purified enterocins (PPB) EK13, AL41 and EF2019 in the range of 100 to 12800 AU/mL; all S. aureus isolates, except the strain SA 2A/3, exhibited the highest sensitivity to PPB EK13. On the other hand, all strains were resistant to PPB CCM4231.
See more in PubMed
Vet Microbiol. 1998 Oct;63(2-4):217-27 PubMed
J Med Microbiol. 2004 Oct;53(Pt 10):1023-1027 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2006;51(3):236-8 PubMed
Microbes Infect. 2005 Feb;7(2):187-94 PubMed
Soc Appl Bacteriol Symp Ser. 1990;19:101S-107S PubMed
Vaccine. 2004 Oct 22;22(31-32):4191-202 PubMed
Microbiology (Reading). 1997 Nov;143 ( Pt 11):3491-3500 PubMed
Int J Food Microbiol. 2000 Oct 1;61(1):1-10 PubMed
Vet Microbiol. 2004 Aug 6;101(4):245-51 PubMed
Bull World Health Organ. 2002;80(2):126-33 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2005;50(6):499-502 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2006;51(6):614-8 PubMed
Vet Microbiol. 2003 Jan 2;91(1):57-64 PubMed
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2003 Jan-Feb;116(1-2):37-40 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2005;50(3):187-94 PubMed
Genet Mol Res. 2003 Mar 31;2(1):63-76 PubMed
Res Microbiol. 2006 Jun;157(5):496-502 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2004;49(4):411-7 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2006;51(3):239-42 PubMed
Microbes Infect. 1999 Aug;1(10):795-805 PubMed
J Food Prot. 2000 Oct;63(10):1333-7 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 1999;44(6):707-11 PubMed
Meat Sci. 2005 Apr;69(4):807-10 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2006;51(6):659-63 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2004;49(4):353-86 PubMed
J Appl Microbiol. 2003;94(3):523-30 PubMed
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000 Jan;13(1):16-34, table of contents PubMed
Pathol Biol (Paris). 2004 Dec;52(10):579-83 PubMed
Microbiology (Reading). 1996 Apr;142(4):817-827 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2006;51(5):381-6 PubMed