Cíl: Porovnat účinnost a bezpečnost perorálního ( p. o.) a vaginálního (vag.) podání misoprostolu a intracervikálního (i.c.) podání dinoprostonu při farmakologické indukci porodu. Identifikovat výhody a nevýhody jednotlivých metod indukce porodu. Metodika: Analýza souboru rodiček, které porodily na Gynekologicko-porodnické klinice LF MU a FN Brno v období od 1. 8. 2019 do 31. 1. 2020, u nichž bylo využito jedno z následujících schémat indukce porodu: skupina A: misoprostol 25 μg p. o. ? 2 hod, skupina B: misoprostol 50 μg vag. ? 6 hod, skupina C: dinoproston 1 mg i.c. ? 2 hod. Podmínkou pro zařazení do studie byla tato vstupní kritéria: jednočetné těhotenství, ukončený 36. gestační týden, živý plod, poloha podélná hlavičkou a cervix skóre ≥ 6. Vylučujícím kritériem byla jizva na děloze, závažná vrozená vývojová vada plodu a růstová restrikce plodu. Hodnoceny byly časové faktory indukce, výskyt známek akutní hypoxie v průběhu porodu, způsob porodu, nutnost podání akutní tokolýzy za porodu, nutnost podání infuze s oxytocinem v I. nebo II. době porodní, využití epidurální analgezie, mateřská krevní ztráta, porodní poranění matky, závažné mateřské komplikace včetně ruptury dělohy, hodnota pH z pupečníkové arterie < 7,1; hodnota Apgar skóre v 5. min < 5. Výsledky byly vzájemně porovnány a statisticky zpracovány. Výsledky: Celkem bylo zařazeno 378 žen (skupina A: 133 žen, skupina B: 145 žen, skupina C: 100 žen). Byla prokázána statisticky významně vyšší úspěšnost vaginálního dokončení porodu ve skupině A oproti skupinám B a C (88 vs. 77,9 vs. 76 %; p = 0,035). Nejdelší časový úsek od podání první dávky preparátu do porodu plodu byl zaznamenán ve skupině A (medián: 700 vs. 565 vs. 375 min; p = 0,0001). Mezi skupinami nebyl prokázán rozdíl v délce trvání I. a II. doby porodní. Četnost ukončení porodu císařským řezem z důvodu akutní hypoxie plodu byla nejnižší ve skupině A (2,3 vs. 10,3 vs. 9 %; p = 0,023). Děložní ruptura nebyla v souboru zaznamenána. Mezi skupinami nebyl zaznamenán statisticky významný rozdíl ve velikosti celkové krevní ztráty při porodu, stejně jako ve výskytu hodnoty pH z a. umbilicalis < 7,10 a Apgar skóre v 5. min < 5. Závěr: Nejvyšší úspěšnost s ohledem na vaginální dokončení porodu byla dosažena při využití nízkodávkovaného perorálního misoprostolu. Nevýhodou této metody indukce porodu je významné prodloužení času od zahájení indukce do porodu plodu. Mezi jednotlivými metodami indukce porodu nebyl nalezen statisticky významný rozdíl ve výskytu závažných perinatálních komplikací.
Objective: To compare the effectiveness and safety of the methods of pharmacological induction of labor. To identify the advantages and disadvantages of oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol and intracervical administration of dinoprostone. Materials and methods: Analysis of a group of women who gave birth at the Faculty Hospital Brno from 1st August 2019 to 31st January 2020, and one of the following labor induction schemes was used: group A: misoprostol 25 μg orally every 2 hours, group B: misoprostol 50 μg vaginally every 6 hours, group C: intracervical dinoprostone 1 mg every 2 hours. Inclusion criteria were: singleton pregnancy, completed 36th gestational week, live fetus, cephalic presentation, and cervix score ≥ 6. Exclusion criteria were uterine scars and fetal growth restriction. Time factors of induction, occurrence of acute hypoxia during labor, mode of delivery, use of tocolysis during labor, necessity of oxytocin infusion, use of epidural analgesia, blood loss, uterine rupture, umbilical artery pH, and Apgar score at the 5th min were evaluated. Results: A total of 378 women were included (133 vs. 145 vs. 100). A statistically significantly higher success rate of vaginal delivery was demonstrated in group A compared to groups B and C (88 vs. 77.9 vs. 76%; P = 0.035). The longest time from the administration of the first dose of the preparation to delivery of the fetus was in group A (medians in minutes 700 vs. 565 vs. 375; P < 0.0001). There was no difference between the groups in the I. and II. labor stage duration. Cesarean delivery rate due to acute hypoxia was the lowest in group A (2.3 vs. 10.3 vs. 9%; P = 0.023). Uterine rupture was not recorded; there were no differences in neonatal outcome parameters. Conclusion: The highest success rate of vaginal delivery was achieved with the use of low-dose oral misoprostol. The disadvantage of this method is a significant increase in the time from the start of induction to the delivery of the fetus. There was no difference in the occurrence of severe perinatal complications between the induction methods.
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are one of the most common bacterial diseases both in communities and in hospitalized patients, and at the same, time they are one of the most common indications for the use of antibiotics. UTI guidelines are generally available nationally or internationally, but they do not address all aspects of UTI treatment for different patient cohorts, age, gender, or comorbidities. The aim of the study was to point out the importance of stratified cumulative antibiograms at the level of individual health care facilities and the significant differences between epidemiological data, not only at the national level, but also at the local level. Our study analyses data from 383 patients with UTIs from a hospital department, General University Hospital (GUH), and 272 patients from an outpatient medical facility, Urocentrum (UC). This analysis focuses on the most common UTI causative agent, Escherichia coli, its representation as the causative agent of UTI in patients with complicated acute cystitis (N30), and its representation in complicated acute cystitis in patients with prostate cancer (C61). In addition to the frequency of occurrence, a sub-analysis of the incidence of resistance of E. coli to commonly used antibiotics by age, gender, diagnosis, and medical facility was performed. Results: The most common causative agent of UTI was E. coli. In patients with N30, it was 70% in GUH and 54% in UC, but in oncological patients with UTI, it was only 39% and 35%, respectively. In patients with UTI in C61, there was a significant difference in susceptibility of E. coli between individual health care facilities. Lower resistance was found in UC opposite to GUH isolates in ampicillin, with 29.8% vs. 65%, p = 0.001; amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, with 8.5% vs. 30%, p = 0.01; with 2.1% vs. 17.5% in pivmecillinam, p = 0.01; with 10.6% vs. 37.5% in co-trimoxazole, p = 0.003; and ciprofloxacin, with 10.6% vs. 30%, p = 0.04. The study shows significant differences in the sensitivity of urinary E. coli isolates in patients in relation to age, gender, medical devices, and the presence of comorbidities.
- MeSH
- antibakteriální látky * terapeutické užití MeSH
- bakteriální léková rezistence MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- Escherichia coli * účinky léků izolace a purifikace MeSH
- infekce močového ústrojí * farmakoterapie mikrobiologie epidemiologie MeSH
- infekce vyvolané Escherichia coli farmakoterapie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mikrobiální testy citlivosti * MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: It is unclear how invasive resuscitative protocols may impact the time-dependent prognosis of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) resuscitations, or the relationship between intra-arrest transport and outcomes. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of the Prague OHCA Study, which randomized refractory OHCAs to "invasive" (intra-arrest transport for possible ECPR initiation) vs. "standard" resuscitation strategies (predominantly performed on-scene). Between groups, we compared outcomes of the initial resuscitation and 180- and 30-day favourable neurological outcomes (CPC 1-2), and within categories based on resuscitation duration (collapse-to-ROSC/ECPR interval). We plotted the dynamic probability of favourable outcomes with increasing durations of unsuccessful resuscitation. RESULTS: Among invasive and standard groups, respectively: 34/124 (27%) vs. 58/132 (44%) had sustained ROSC (difference -17%, 95%CI -5.0, -28); 38/124 (31%) vs. 24/132 (18%) had 30-day favourable neurological outcomes (difference 12%; 95%CI 2.0, 23); and 39/124 (31%) vs. 29/132 (22%) had 180-day favourable neurological outcomes (difference 9.5%; 95%CI -1.3, 20). For favourable outcome cases: standard group resuscitation durations were right-skewed within the first 60 min; for the invasive group the distribution was bimodal, extending to 77 min. For invasive- and standard-treated cases, the probability of favourable outcomes among those in refractory arrest at 30 min was 28% and 7.6%, respectively; declining to 0% at 77 and 60 min. CONCLUSION: In comparison to standard resuscitation, invasive strategy cases had fewer achieve sustained ROSC, however improved overall 30-day favourable neurological outcomes. While standard resuscitation yield was limited to < 60 min, invasive protocols offer a second extended window of potential successful resuscitation.
- MeSH
- časové faktory MeSH
- kardiopulmonální resuscitace * metody MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- urgentní zdravotnické služby metody MeSH
- zástava srdce mimo nemocnici * terapie mortalita MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
Streptococcus pyogenes, group A streptococci (GAS) bacteriaemia, is a life-threatening infection with high mortality, requiring fast diagnosis together with the use of appropriate antibiotic therapy as soon as possible. Our study analysed data from 93 patients with GAS bacteraemia at the General University Hospital in Prague between January 2006 and March 2024. In the years 2016-2019 there was an increase in GAS bacteraemia. Mortality in the period 2006-2019 was 21.9%; in the period 2020-2024, the mortality increased to 41.4%, p = 0.08. At the same time, in the post-2020 period, the time from hospital admission to death was reduced from 9.5 days to 3 days. A significant predictor of worse outcome in this period was high levels of procalcitonin, >35.1 μg/L (100% sensitivity and 82.35% specificity), and lactate, >5 mmol/L (90.91% sensitivity and 91.67% specificity). Myoglobin was a significant predictor in both compared periods, the AUC was 0.771, p = 0.044, and the AUC was an even 0.889, p ≤ 0.001, respectively. All isolates of S. pyogenes were susceptible to penicillin, and resistance to clindamycin was 20.3% from 2006-2019 and 10.3% in 2020-2024. Appropriate therapy was initiated in 89.1%. and 96.6%, respectively. We hypothesise that the increase in mortality after 2020 might be due to a decrease in the immune status of the population.
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Randomized data evaluating the impact of the extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) approach on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are lacking. The objective of this follow-up study was to assess the long-term clinical outcomes of the ECPR-based versus CCPR approach. METHODS: The Prague OHCA trial was a single-center, randomized, open-label trial. Patients with witnessed refractory OHCA of presumed cardiac origin, without return of spontaneous circulation, were randomized during ongoing resuscitation on scene to conventional CPR (CCPR) or an ECPR-based approach (intra-arrest transport, ECPR if ROSC is not achieved prehospital and immediate invasive assessment). RESULTS: From March 2013 to October 2020, 264 patients were randomized during ongoing resuscitation on scene, and 256 patients were enrolled. Long-term follow-up was performed 5.3 (interquartile range 3.8-7.2) years after initial randomization and was completed in 255 of 256 patients (99.6%). In total, 34/123 (27.6%) patients in the ECPR-based group and 26/132 (19.7%) in the CCPR group were alive (log-rank P = 0.01). There were no significant differences between the treatment groups in the neurological outcome, survival after hospital discharge, risk of hospitalization, major cardiovascular events and quality of life. Of long-term survivors, 1/34 (2.9%) in the ECPR-based arm and 1/26 (3.8%) in the CCPR arm had poor neurological outcome (both patients had a cerebral performance category score of 3). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with refractory OHCA, the ECPR-based approach significantly improved long-term survival. There were no differences in the neurological outcome, major cardiovascular events and quality of life between the groups, but the trial was possibly underpowered to detect a clinically relevant difference in these outcomes. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01511666, Registered 19 January 2012.
- MeSH
- časové faktory MeSH
- kardiopulmonální resuscitace * MeSH
- kvalita života MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- zástava srdce mimo nemocnici * terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
AIMS: Refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (r-OHCA) in patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) is associated with poor outcomes. The role of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in this patient group is uncertain. This study aims to analyse clinical course, outcomes, and the effect of an invasive procedure, including ECPR, in a randomized population. METHODS AND RESULTS: A post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial (Prague OHCA study) was conducted to evaluate the effect of ECPR vs. a standard approach in r-OHCA. A subgroup of patients with PE-related r-OHCA was identified, and procedural and outcome characteristics, including favourable neurological survival, organ donation, and complications, were compared to patients without PE. Pulmonary embolism was identified as a cause of r-OHCA in 24 of 256 (9.4%) enrolled patients. Patients with PE were more likely to be women [12/24 (50%) vs. 32/232 (13.8%); P < 0.001] and presented more frequently with an initial non-shockable rhythm [23/24 (95.8%) vs. 77/232 (33.2%); P < 0.001], as well as more severe acidosis at admission [median pH (interquartile range); 6.83 (6.75-6.88) vs. 6.98 (6.82-7.14); P < 0.001]. Their favourable 180-day neurological survival was significantly lower [2/24 (8.3%) vs. 66/232 (28.4%); P = 0.049], but the proportion of accepted organ donors was higher (16.7 vs. 4.7%, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to PE has a different presentation and inferior outcomes compared to other causes but may represent an important source of organ donations. The ECPR method did not improve patient outcomes.
- MeSH
- kardiopulmonální resuscitace * metody MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mimotělní membránová oxygenace * metody MeSH
- plicní embolie * etiologie komplikace MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- zástava srdce mimo nemocnici * etiologie terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: The impact of serial imaging on the outcome of ICU patients has not been studied specifically in patients with high illness severity. METHODS: The authors sought a relationship between the numbers of antero-posterior supine chest X-rays (CXR), computed tomography (CT) examinations, and outcome in a cohort of 292 patients with severe COVID-19 ARDS collected over 24 months in a high-volume ECMO center with established ultrasound and echocardiographic diagnostics. Of the patients, 172 (59%) were obese or morbidly obese, and 119 (41%) were treated with ECMO. RESULTS: The median number of CXRs was eight per 14 days of the length of stay in the ICU. The CXR rate was not related to ICU survival (p = 0.37). Patients required CT scanning in 26.5% of cases, with no relationship to the outcome except for the better ICU survival of the ECMO patients without a need for a CT scan (p = 0.01). The odds ratio for survival associated with ordering a CT scan in an ECMO patient was 0.48, p = 0.01. The calculated savings for not routinely requesting a whole-body CT scan in every patient were 98.685 EUR/24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Serial imaging does not impact the survival rates of patients with severe ARDS. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients who did not need CT scanning had significantly better ICU outcomes.
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: The severity of tissue hypoxia is routinely assessed by serum lactate. We aimed to determine whether early lactate levels predict outcomes in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) treated by conventional and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). METHODS: This study is a post-hoc analysis of a randomized Prague OHCA study (NCT01511666) assessing serum lactate levels in refractory OHCA treated by ECPR (the ECPR group) or conventional resuscitation with prehospital achieved return of spontaneous circulation (the ROSC group). Lactate concentrations measured on admission and every 4 hours (h) during the first 24 h were used to determine their relationship with the neurological outcome (the best Cerebral Performance Category score within 180 days post-cardiac arrest). RESULTS: In the ECPR group (92 patients, median age 58.5 years, 83% male) 26% attained a favorable neurological outcome. In the ROSC group (82 patients, median age 55 years, 83% male) 59% achieved a favorable neurological outcome. In ECPR patients lactate concentrations could discriminate favorable outcome patients, but not consistently in the ROSC group. On admission, serum lactate >14.0 mmol/L for ECPR (specificity 87.5%, sensitivity 54.4%) and >10.8 mmol/L for the ROSC group (specificity 83%, sensitivity 41.2%) predicted an unfavorable outcome. CONCLUSION: In refractory OHCA serum lactate concentrations measured anytime during the first 24 h after admission to the hospital were found to correlate with the outcome in patients treated by ECPR but not in patients with prehospital ROSC. A single lactate measurement is not enough for a reliable outcome prediction and cannot be used alone to guide treatment.
- MeSH
- hypoxie MeSH
- kardiopulmonální resuscitace * MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mimotělní membránová oxygenace * MeSH
- prognóza MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- zástava srdce mimo nemocnici * terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
BACKGROUND: Refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) treated with standard advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) has poor outcomes. Transport to hospital followed by in-hospital extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) initiation may improve outcomes. We performed a pooled individual patient data analysis of two randomised controlled trials evaluating ECPR based approach in OHCA. METHODS: The individual patient data from two published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were pooled: ARREST (enrolled Aug 2019-June 2020; NCT03880565) and PRAGUE-OHCA (enrolled March 1, 2013-Oct 25, 2020; NCT01511666). Both trials enrolled patients with refractory OHCA and compared: intra-arrest transport with in-hospital ECPR initiation (invasive approach) versus continued standard ACLS. The primary outcome was 180-day survival with favourable neurological outcome (defined as Cerebral Performance Category 1-2). Secondary outcomes included: cumulative survival at 180 days, 30-day favourable neurological survival, and 30-day cardiac recovery. Risk of bias in each trial was assessed by two independent reviewers using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Heterogeneity was assessed via Forest plots. FINDINGS: The two RCTs included 286 patients. Of those randomised to the invasive (n = 147) and standard (n = 139) groups, respectively: the median age was 57 (IQR 47-65) and 58 years (IQR 48-66), and the median duration of resuscitation was 58 (IQR 43-69) and 49 (IQR 33-71) minutes (p = 0.17). In a modified intention to treat analysis, 45 (32.4%) in the invasive and 29 (19.7%) patients in the standard arm survived to 180 days with a favourable neurological outcome [absolute difference (AD), 95% CI: 12.7%, 2.6-22.7%, p = 0.015]. Forty-seven (33.8%) and 33 (22.4%) patients survived to 180 days [HR 0.59 (0.43-0.81); log rank test p = 0.0009]. At 30 days, 44 (31.7%) and 24 (16.3%) patients had favourable neurological outcome (AD 15.4%, 5.6-25.1%, p = 0.003), 60 (43.2%), and 46 (31.3%) patients had cardiac recovery (AD: 11.9%, 0.7-23%, p = 0.05), in the invasive and standard arms, respectively. The effect was larger in patients presenting with shockable rhythms (AD 18.8%, 7.6-29.4; p = 0.01; HR 2.26 [1.23-4.15]; p = 0.009) and prolonged CPR (>45 min; HR 3.99 (1.54-10.35); p = 0.005). INTERPRETATION: In patients with refractory OHCA, the invasive approach significantly improved 30- and 180-day neurologically favourable survival. FUNDING: None.
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
