Orthopedic clinics of North America, ISSN 0030-5898 vol. 39, no. 4, October 2008
xii, 394-552 s. : il., ; 26 cm
- MeSH
- Humeral Fractures diagnosis classification therapy MeSH
- Shoulder Fractures diagnosis classification therapy MeSH
- Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary MeSH
- Shoulder Dislocation diagnosis classification therapy MeSH
- Fracture Fixation, Internal MeSH
- Publication type
- Collected Work MeSH
- Conspectus
- Ortopedie. Chirurgie. Oftalmologie
- NML Fields
- ortopedie
- traumatologie
- MeSH
- Acromioclavicular Joint injuries MeSH
- Internal Fixators utilization MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Shoulder Dislocation surgery classification therapy MeSH
- Regeneration MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Comparative Study MeSH
Autori v práci predkladajú stručný prierez hodnotenia prednej instability ramenného kíbu z viacerých aspektov. Za clef práce si stanovili predstavenie jednotlivých typov morfologických zmien, ako ich navrhol Resch (6). Za obdobie 2 rokov (od júna 1995 doteraz) artroskopicky vyšetrili 96 pacientov s klinickým obrazom prednej instability humeroskapulárneho kĺbu. Z toho bolo 69 mužov a 27 žien, všetci v produktívnom veku. 1. typ lezie podľa Rescha zistili v 52 % prípadov, 2. typ v 21 %, 3. typ v 6 %, 4. typ v 13 %, 5. typ v 1 % a 6. typ v 7% prípadov, čo korešponduje s literárnymi údajmi. Za najťažšie diagnostikovateĺný považujú 5. typ lézie. Určitý stupeň rutiny vyžaduje aj odlíšenie 1. od 4. typu a 2. od 6. typu Reschovej schémy. Tretí typ považujú naopak za štandardný, nezameniteľný obraz.
The authors review briefly the evaluation of anterior instability of the shoulder joint from different aspects. The objective of their work was to present different types of morphological changes, as suggested by Resch (6). During the two-year period since June 1995 so far a )tal of 96 patients with the clinical picture of anterior instability of the humeroscapular joint were examined arthroscopically. The group comprised 69 men and 27 vomen, all in productive age. Type 1 lesions according to Resch were found in 52 %, type 2 in 21 %, type 3 in 6 %, type 4 in 13 %, type 5 in 1 % and type 6 in 7 % if the patients, which is consistent with data reported in the literature. In their opinion type 5 lesions are most difficult to diagnose. A certain amount of routine is needed also to differentiate type 1 and 4 and type 2 and 6 according to Resch's classification. Conversely, they consider type 3 findings standard and unequivocal.