BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines for Radical Cystectomy (RC) were published over ten years ago. Aim of this systematic review is to update ERAS recommendations for patients undergoing RC and to give an expert opinion on the relevance of each single ERAS item. METHODS: A systematic review was performed to identify the impact of each single ERAS item on RC outcomes. Embase and Medline (through Pubmed) were searched systematically. Relevant articles were selected and graded. For each ERAS item, a level of evidence was determined. An e-Delphi consensus was then performed amongst an international panel with renowned experience in RC to provide recommendations based on expert opinion. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Preoperative medical optimization and avoiding bowel preparation are highly recommended. Robotic-assisted RC with intracorporeal urinary diversion is moderately recommended and can help in applying other ERAS items, such as early mobilization. Medical thromboprophylaxis should be administered and nasogastric tube should be removed at the end of surgery. Perioperative fluid restriction as well as opioid-sparing anesthesia protocols should be implemented. Generally, consensus was reached on most ERAS items, with the exception of epidural anesthesia (no consensus), resection site drainage (consensus against), and type of urinary drainage. Limitations include the lack of a multidisciplinary approach to the present consensus, giving however a highly specialized surgical opinion on ERAS. CONCLUSIONS: and clinical implications: The current study updates ERAS recommendations for patients undergoing RC and suggests application of ERAS by a panel of experts in the field.

• MeSH
• časné pohybování MeSH
• chirurgové MeSH
• cystektomie * metody   MeSH
• diverze moči metody   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• nádory močového měchýře chirurgie   MeSH
• roboticky asistované výkony MeSH
• směrnice pro lékařskou praxi jako téma MeSH
• urychlená pooperační rehabilitace * MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• přehledy MeSH
• systematický přehled MeSH

CONTEXT: Adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have recently emerged as guideline-recommended treatments of high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC). However, there is limited evidence regarding the optimal candidates and the differential efficacy of adjuvant ICI regimens. OBJECTIVE: To synthesize and compare the efficacy and safety of adjuvant ICIs for high-risk MIUC using updated data from phase III randomized controlled trials. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: In April 2024, three databases were searched for eligible randomized controlled trials that evaluated oncologic outcomes in patients with MIUC treated with adjuvant ICIs. Pairwise meta-analysis (MA) and network meta-analyses were performed to compare the hazard ratios of oncological outcomes, including disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. Subgroup analyses were conducted on the basis of predefined clinicopathological features. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Three randomized controlled trials that assessed the efficacy of adjuvant nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and atezolizumab were included in the MAs and network meta-analyses groups. Pairwise MAs showed that treatment with adjuvant ICIs significantly improved DFS [hazards ratio: 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66-0.90] as well as OS (hazards ratio: 0.87, 95% CI 0.76-1.00) in patients with MIUC compared with in the placebo/observation group. The DFS benefit was prominent in patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.041) and in those with bladder cancer (P = 0.013) but did not differ across programmed death-ligand 1 and lymph node status. Adjuvant ICI therapy was associated with increased risk of any (OR: 2.98, 95% CI 2.06-4.33) and severe adverse events (OR: 1.78, 95% CI 1.49-2.13). The treatment rankings revealed that pembrolizumab for DFS (84%) and nivolumab for OS (93%) had the highest likelihood of improving survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our analyses demonstrated the DFS and OS benefits of adjuvant ICIs for high-risk MIUC. Furthermore, patients with bladder cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy appeared to be the optimal candidates for adjuvant ICIs regarding prolonged DFS. Adjuvant ICIs are the standard of care for high-risk MIUC, and differential clinical behaviors and efficacy will enrich clinical decision-making.

• MeSH
• adjuvantní chemoterapie metody   MeSH
• inhibitory kontrolních bodů * terapeutické užití   farmakologie   MeSH
• invazivní růst nádoru MeSH
• karcinom z přechodných buněk farmakoterapie   patologie   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• nádory močového měchýře farmakoterapie   patologie   MeSH
• síťová metaanalýza MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• metaanalýza MeSH
• systematický přehled MeSH

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There is no standardized regimen for follow-up after radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer (BC). To address this gap, we conducted a multicenter study involving urologist members from the European Association of Urology (EAU) bladder cancer guideline panels. Our objective was to identify consistent post-RC follow-up strategies and develop a practice-based framework based on expert opinion. METHODS: We surveyed 27 urologist members of the EAU guideline panels for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer and muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer using a pre-tested questionnaire with dichotomous responses. The survey inquired about follow-up strategies after RC and the use of risk-adapted strategies. Consistency was defined as >75% affirmative responses for follow-up practices commencing 3 mo after RC. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: We received responses from 96% of the panel members, who provided data from 21 European hospitals. Risk-adapted follow-up is used in 53% of hospitals, with uniform criteria for high-risk (at least ≥pT3 or pN+) and low-risk ([y]pT0/a/1N0) cases. In the absence of agreement for risk-based follow up, a non-risk-adapted framework for follow-up was developed. Higher conformity was observed within the initial 3 yr, followed by a decline in subsequent follow-up. Follow-up was most frequent during the first year, including patient assessments, physical examinations, and laboratory tests. Computed tomography of the chest and abdomen/pelvis was the most common imaging modality, initially at least biannually, and then annually from years 2 to 5. There was a lack of consistency for continuing follow-up beyond 10 yr after RC. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: This practice-based post-RC follow-up framework developed by EAU bladder cancer experts may serve as a valuable guide for urologists in the absence of prospective randomized studies. PATIENT SUMMARY: We asked urologists from the EAU bladder cancer guideline panels about their patient follow-up after surgical removal of the bladder for bladder cancer. We found that although urologists have varying approaches, there are also common follow-up practices across the panel. We created a practical follow-up framework that could be useful for urologists in their day-to-day practice.

• MeSH
• cystektomie * metody   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• nádory močového měchýře * chirurgie   patologie   MeSH
• následná péče normy   metody   MeSH
• následné studie MeSH
• průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
• směrnice pro lékařskou praxi jako téma MeSH
• urologie normy   MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• Geografické názvy
• Evropa MeSH

INTRODUCTION: Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) is crucial in managing metastatic germ cell tumors (GCTs), particularly post-chemotherapy. Given the long-term survival of these patients, perioperative morbidity is a significant concern. However, data on RPLND morbidity using predefined reporting standards are scarce. This study aims to address this gap by utilizing updated European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines for standardized complication reporting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent RPLND for GCTs between 2010 and 2022. 30-day complications were extracted from digital charts using a predefined procedure-specific catalog. Complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC), and the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) was calculated for each patient. RESULTS: Sixty-nine men underwent RPLND at a median age of 32 years (IQR 25-38). Chemotherapy was administered to 64 patients (93 %), with 48 (70 %) having negative tumor markers. Median tumor diameter was 52 mm (IQR 35-83), and median operative time was 197 min (IQR 128-262). Unilateral template removal was performed in 55 patients (80 %). A total of 157 complications were reported in 66 patients (96 %), with anemia (33 %) and gastrointestinal issues (24 %) being the most common. Five patients (7.2 %) had "major" complications (CDC grade ≥ IIIa), and the median CCI was 12 (IQR 9-23). Using the CCI, the proportion of patients with a "major" complication burden increased to 14 %, compared to 8.5 % by CDC alone. The primary limitation of this study is its retrospective design and the limited 30-day follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Most patients experience postoperative complications after RPLND, though severe complications are rare. These findings could improve patient counseling when discussing testicular cancer therapy options.

• MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• germinální a embryonální nádory * chirurgie   patologie   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• lymfadenektomie * škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• morbidita MeSH
• následné studie MeSH
• pooperační komplikace * epidemiologie   etiologie   MeSH
• prognóza MeSH
• retroperitoneální prostor chirurgie   patologie   MeSH
• retrospektivní studie MeSH
• směrnice pro lékařskou praxi jako téma * normy   MeSH
• testikulární nádory * chirurgie   patologie   MeSH
• urologie normy   MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• scoping review MeSH

The influence of surgical volume on partial nephrectomy (PN) outcomes is a subject of debate. The European Association of Urology (EAU) renal cell carcinoma (RCC) guideline panel performed a protocol-driven systematic review of the association between hospital volume (HV) and oncological, functional, and complication outcomes following PN for RCC. The intervention was PN performed in a higher-volume hospital (defined according to the number of procedures per unit time) and the comparator was PN performed in a lower-volume hospital. Ten studies involving a total of 106 569 patients were included in the review. Higher HV was associated with lower complication rates, shorter length of stay, lower positive surgical margin rates, and lower transfusion rates. For six studies, multivariable analyses showed that low HV was an independent risk factor for inpatient complications, PSM presence, longer LOS, and failure to achieve a trifecta of no complications, warm ischemia time <25 min, and negative surgical margins. Most studies were judged to have high risk of bias. The available evidence suggests a potential association between higher HV and better PN outcomes in RCC. The EAU RCC guidelines panel encourages the development and rigorous evaluation of indicators of surgery quality in RCC to better inform the designation of high-quality centers within models of centralized care.

• MeSH
• centra s nižším počtem specializovaných operací * statistika a číselné údaje   MeSH
• délka pobytu MeSH
• karcinom z renálních buněk * chirurgie   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• nádory ledvin * chirurgie   MeSH
• nefrektomie * metody   normy   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• pooperační komplikace epidemiologie   MeSH
• směrnice pro lékařskou praxi jako téma MeSH
• specializovaná centra se zvyšujícím se počtem výkonů a tím zvyšující se kvalitou léčby * statistika a číselné údaje   MeSH
• urologie normy   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• systematický přehled MeSH
• Geografické názvy
• Evropa MeSH

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We present a summary of the 2025 update for the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). The aim is to provide practical recommendations on the clinical management of UTUC with a focus on diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. METHODS: For the 2025 guidelines on UTUC, new and relevant evidence was identified, collated, and appraised via a structured assessment of the literature. Databases searched included Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Libraries. Recommendations within the guidelines were developed by the panel to prioritise clinically important care decisions. The strength of each recommendation was determined according to a balance between desirable and undesirable consequences of alternative management strategies, the quality of the evidence (including the certainty of estimates), and the nature and variability of patient values and preferences. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Key recommendations emphasise the importance of thorough diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up for patients with UTUC. The guidelines stress the importance of appropriate treatment taking into account patient values and preferences. Key updates in the 2025 UTUC guidelines include: significant changes to the recommendations for UTUC diagnosis; complete revision of the sections addressing risk stratification, ureteroscopy, and the surgical approach for radical nephroureterectomy; addition of four new recommendations, two related to kidney-sparing management of localised low-risk UTUC and a further two related to management of high-risk nonmetastatic UTUC; a review and adaptation of recommendation for UTUC follow-up; and addition of a new section addressing quality indicators for UTUC management. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: This overview of the 2025 EAU guidelines on UTUC offers valuable insights into risk factors, diagnosis, classification, treatment, and follow-up for UTUC. The guidelines contain information on the management of individual patients according to the current best evidence and are designed for effective integration in clinical practice.

• MeSH
• karcinom z přechodných buněk * terapie   diagnóza   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• nádory ledvin * terapie   diagnóza   MeSH
• nádory močovodu * terapie   diagnóza   MeSH
• společnosti lékařské MeSH
• urologie normy   MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• směrnice pro lékařskou praxi MeSH
• Geografické názvy
• Evropa MeSH

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The European Association of Urology (EAU) renal cell carcinoma (RCC) guideline panel has updated their evidence-based guidelines and recommendations for the management of RCC. Here we present a summary of the 2025 RCC guidelines updated with standardised methodology to provide reproducible evidence for the management of RCC. METHODS: For the 2025 update, a literature search was performed covering the period from May 1, 2023 to May 1, 2024 using the Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Libraries. The data search focused on meta-analyses, systematic reviews, randomised controlled trials (RCTs), and retrospective or controlled comparator-arm studies. Evidence was synthesised as outlined for all EAU guidelines. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Clinical practise recommendations were updated in all chapters of the RCC guidelines on the basis of a structured literature search. The studies included were predominantly retrospective with matched or unmatched cohorts based on single- or multi-institutional data. Several prospective studies and RCTs provided data that resulted in recommendations based on higher levels of evidence. Specifically, updates include new recommendations on stereotactic body radiotherapy for localised RCC, adjuvant therapy, systemic therapy for clear-cell RCC in later lines, other subtypes, and a new chapter on hereditary RCC. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The 2025 RCC guidelines have been updated by a multidisciplinary panel of experts using methodological standards to provide a contemporary evidence base for the management of RCC.

• MeSH
• karcinom z renálních buněk * terapie   diagnóza   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• nádory ledvin * terapie   diagnóza   MeSH
• společnosti lékařské MeSH
• urologie normy   MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• směrnice pro lékařskou praxi MeSH
• Geografické názvy
• Evropa MeSH

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the role of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in the perioperative management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review using PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase, following PRISMA guidelines. Studies from January 2013 to March 2024 were included if they examined ctDNA in MIBC patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) and perioperative chemotherapy or immunotherapy. RESULTS: Eight studies were included. ctDNA detected before RC was associated with poor recurrence-free survival and higher risk of nodal and locally advanced disease. Postoperative ctDNA levels correlated with shorter disease-free survival and higher recurrence rates. ctDNA clearance during neoadjuvant chemotherapy was predictive of treatment response. ctDNA status post-neoadjuvant immunotherapy correlated with pathological outcomes and recurrence rates. CONCLUSIONS: ctDNA is a promising biomarker for predicting oncological outcomes in MIBC, with potential to guide perioperative treatment decisions. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these findings.

• MeSH
• cirkulující nádorová DNA * krev   MeSH
• cystektomie MeSH
• invazivní růst nádoru MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• nádorové biomarkery krev   MeSH
• nádory močového měchýře * patologie   krev   terapie   genetika   MeSH
• prognóza MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• přehledy MeSH
• systematický přehled MeSH

The KEYNOTE-564 trial showed that adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy with pembrolizumab, a PD-1 antibody, significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) and overall (OS) survival in localised clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with a high risk of relapse. The TiNivo and CONTACT-03 trials have reported results for subsequent therapy after progression on ICI therapy in the metastatic setting. The European Association of Urology (EAU) RCC guidelines panel reassessed the new trial results to update recommendations for adjuvant therapy and post-adjuvant therapy. Adjuvant pembrolizumab significantly improved OS (hazard ratio 0.62, 95% confidence interval 0.44-0.87; p = 0.005). Recent trials of subsequent ICI after recurrence on ICI in the metastatic setting do not support ICI monotherapy or combination therapy in patients with recurrence on or after adjuvant ICI therapy. There are no prospective trial results for treatment after adjuvant pembrolizumab failure. On the basis of the recent results, the EAU RCC guidelines panel has updated the recommendation for adjuvant therapy and now issues a strong recommendation for adjuvant pembrolizumab. ICI monotherapy or combination therapy is not recommended in patients with recurrence during or shortly after adjuvant pembrolizumab. PATIENT SUMMARY: Treatment with an immunotherapy drug called pembrolizumab after surgery in patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk kidney cancer delays the time to recurrence of cancer and prolongs survival. Therefore, pembrolizumab after surgery is strongly recommended for these patients. However, a significant proportion of patients have life-changing or serious side effects and these must be discussed.

• MeSH
• adjuvantní chemoterapie MeSH
• humanizované monoklonální protilátky MeSH
• inhibitory kontrolních bodů * terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• karcinom z renálních buněk * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• nádory ledvin * farmakoterapie   patologie   MeSH
• směrnice pro lékařskou praxi jako téma MeSH
• urologie normy   MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• směrnice pro lékařskou praxi MeSH
• úvodníky MeSH
• Geografické názvy
• Evropa MeSH

Recent phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrate the promising impact of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combination therapies on locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). However, comparative data on the efficacy and toxicity of different ICI-based combinations are lacking. This study aims to compare the efficacy of first-line ICI-based combination therapies for locally advanced or metastatic UC using phase 3 RCT data. In November 2023, three databases were searched for RCTs evaluating oncological outcomes in patients with locally advanced or metastatic UC who were treated with first-line ICI-based combination therapies. Network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to compare outcomes, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rates (ORRs), complete response rates (CRRs), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Subgroup analyses were based on PD-L1 status and cisplatin eligibility. The NMA included five RCTs. Enfortumab vedotin (EV) + pembrolizumab ranked the highest for improving OS (100%), PFS (100%), ORR (96%), and CRR (96%), followed by nivolumab + chemotherapy. EV + pembrolizumab combination superiority held across PD-L1 status and cisplatin eligibility. In patients who are cisplatin-eligible, EV + pembrolizumab significantly improved OS (HR: 0.68, 95%CI 0.47-0.99) and PFS (HR: 0.67, 95%CI 0.49-0.92) compared to nivolumab + chemotherapy. Durvalumab + tremelimumab was the safest combination for severe TRAEs, and EV + pembrolizumab ranked second. Our analyses support EV + pembrolizumab combination as a first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic UC. Thus, EV + pembrolizumab may become a guideline-changing standard treatment.

• MeSH
• humanizované monoklonální protilátky terapeutické užití   aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• inhibitory kontrolních bodů * terapeutické užití   MeSH
• karcinom z přechodných buněk farmakoterapie   mortalita   patologie   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• metastázy nádorů MeSH
• monoklonální protilátky MeSH
• nádory močového měchýře farmakoterapie   patologie   mortalita   MeSH
• protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie * terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma MeSH
• síťová metaanalýza * MeSH
• urologické nádory farmakoterapie   mortalita   patologie   MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• metaanalýza MeSH
• přehledy MeSH
• systematický přehled MeSH