Východiska: Pro poskytování kvalitní ošetřovatelské péče je důležité, aby sestry i studenti studijních programů ošetřovatelství měli dobré znalosti a dovednosti. V posledních letech technologický pokrok umožnil využívat přístupy kombinovaného učení, včetně tzv. "flipped classroom" pro vzdělávání studentů.Cíl: Na základě obsahu vyhledaných studií vytvořit přehled o využití a účinnosti metody "flipped classroom" v souvislosti s vysokoškolským vzděláváním studentů ošetřovatelství. Metody: Vyhledání relevantních primárních studií bylo provedeno pomocí odborných licencovaných elektronických databází (PubMed, EbscoHost, Nursing@Ovid, Medvik). Na základě jejich analýzy byl zpracován přehled zaměřený na metodu "flipped classro- om" u studentů ošetřovatelství na vysokých školách (publikováno v letech 2015-2021). Výsledky: Bylo vyhledáno šest studií publikovaných v anglickém jazyce. V českém jazyce nebyla vyhledána žádná studie. Nalezené studie ověřovaly dopad metody "flipped classroom" na znalosti, schopnost řešit problémy a spokojenost vysokoškolských studentů ošetřovatelství. Ve všech studiích byl zaznamenán pozitivní vliv této metody. Závěr: Bylo zjištěno, že výuka metodou "flipped classroom" je hodnocena jako opti mální a že je přínosná pro zlepšení teoretických znalostí i praktických dovedností u vysokoškolských studentů ošetřovatelství.
Background: Nurses and students in nursing study programs need to have good knowledge and skills to guarantee high quality nursing care. In recent years, technologi- cal progress has made possible to use blended learning approaches, including a "flipped classroom" for student education.Aim: Create an overview of the use and effectiveness of the "flipped class" method in connection with the higher education of nursing students.Method: A search of relevant studies was performed using professional licensed electronic databases (PubMed, EbscoHost, Nursing@Ovid, Medvik). An overview was prepared from records including "flipped classroom" in connection with nursing students in universities (published in 2015-2021).Results: Six studies published in English language were found. No study was found in the Czech language. The studies verified the impact of the "flipped classroom" method on the knowledge, the ability to solve problems, and the satisfaction of university nursing students. A positive effect of this method was found in all studies.Conclusion: It was found that applying "flipped classroom" method was optimal and that there is a benefit for the improvement of theoretical knowledge and practical skills in university nursing students.
- MeSH
- Program Evaluation MeSH
- Education, Nursing, Graduate * MeSH
- Teaching * trends MeSH
- Publication type
- Review MeSH
Východiska: Pro poskytování kvalitní ošetřovatelské péče je důležité, aby sestry i studenti studijních programů ošetřovatelství měli dobré znalosti a dovednosti. V posledních letech technologický pokrok umožnil využívat přístupy kombinovaného učení, včetně tzv. "flipped classroom" pro vzdělávání studentů.Cíl: Na základě obsahu vyhledaných studií vytvořit přehled o využití a účinnosti metody "flipped classroom" v souvislosti s vysokoškolským vzděláváním studentů ošetřovatelství. Metody: Vyhledání relevantních primárních studií bylo provedeno pomocí odborných licencovaných elektronických databází (PubMed, EbscoHost, Nursing@Ovid, Medvik). Na základě jejich analýzy byl zpracován přehled zaměřený na metodu "flipped classro- om" u studentů ošetřovatelství na vysokých školách (publikováno v letech 2015-2021). Výsledky: Bylo vyhledáno šest studií publikovaných v anglickém jazyce. V českém jazyce nebyla vyhledána žádná studie. Nalezené studie ověřovaly dopad metody "flipped classroom" na znalosti, schopnost řešit problémy a spokojenost vysokoškolských studentů ošetřovatelství. Ve všech studiích byl zaznamenán pozitivní vliv této metody. Závěr: Bylo zjištěno, že výuka metodou "flipped classroom" je hodnocena jako opti mální a že je přínosná pro zlepšení teoretických znalostí i praktických dovedností u vysokoškolských studentů ošetřovatelství.
Background: Nurses and students in nursing study programs need to have good knowledge and skills to guarantee high quality nursing care. In recent years, technologi- cal progress has made possible to use blended learning approaches, including a "flipped classroom" for student education.Aim: Create an overview of the use and effectiveness of the "flipped class" method in connection with the higher education of nursing students.Method: A search of relevant studies was performed using professional licensed electronic databases (PubMed, EbscoHost, Nursing@Ovid, Medvik). An overview was prepared from records including "flipped classroom" in connection with nursing students in universities (published in 2015-2021).Results: Six studies published in English language were found. No study was found in the Czech language. The studies verified the impact of the "flipped classroom" method on the knowledge, the ability to solve problems, and the satisfaction of university nursing students. A positive effect of this method was found in all studies.Conclusion: It was found that applying "flipped classroom" method was optimal and that there is a benefit for the improvement of theoretical knowledge and practical skills in university nursing students.
- MeSH
- Program Evaluation MeSH
- Education, Nursing, Graduate * MeSH
- Teaching * trends MeSH
- Publication type
- Review MeSH
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this scoping review was to identify assessment instruments used for the self-report of pain by hospitalized patients who have had a stroke and who have communication problems. INTRODUCTION: Pain assessment in various patient groups has received considerable attention, and a variety of pain assessment instruments exists. Nevertheless, there is a lack of consensus regarding which pain assessment instruments are used for self-report of pain in stroke patients with communication problems. INCLUSION CRITERIA: This review included articles that focused on hospitalized adults who have had a stroke, have communication problems attributable to a stroke, and describe the use of an assessment instrument for the self-report of pain. The scoping review considered systematic reviews, quantitative and qualitative studies, and mixed method studies. METHODS: Ten databases were searched from inception to August 2020, using Embase as the key information source (it yielded 424 papers). Hand-searching of the references of the included articles yielded an additional 12 papers. Papers written in any language were considered. A data extraction table was created to record relevant information in line with the goals and results of each article, the sample studied, and the pain assessment instrument used. RESULTS: Ten papers were included in the review, most of which were descriptive studies. Most papers were from the United Kingdom and the United States. The most common communication problem in stroke patients was aphasia. The participants received care in various hospital settings (eg, rehabilitation units, comprehensive stroke units, palliative care). Eleven assessment instruments were identified. In most cases, the assessment instruments focused on assessing pain presence and pain intensity. The most frequently used unidimensional pain intensity instrument was the numerical rating scale. Four instruments were multidimensional, of which two assessed health-related quality of life, including pain. The most thorough pain assessment instrument was the ShoulderQ, which contains 10 verbal questions and three visual vertical graphic rating scales that focus on the assessment of stroke-related shoulder pain. CONCLUSIONS: A range of both unidimensional and multidimensional self-report pain instruments was identified; however, of all the possible communication problems, most studies focused solely on patients with mild to moderate aphasia. Therefore, further research is recommended, including studies that also enroll patients with various stroke-related communication problems other than aphasia. In addition, the instruments should be translated for research in non-Western countries. Finally, apart from descriptive studies, experimental research with a robust randomized controlled trial design is needed to examine the effect of pain-inducing procedures on the perceived pain in patients with stroke-related communication problems.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this scoping review is to systematically identify assessment instruments that are used for the self-report of pain by hospitalized stroke patients with communication problems. INTRODUCTION: To the best of the authors' knowledge, there are no existing instruments specifically dedicated to measuring pain in stroke patients with communication problems. Pain measurement instruments currently in use may complicate pain assessment in these patients. Additionally, there is a lack of consensus regarding these patients' ability to self-report pain using existing pain instruments. INCLUSION CRITERIA: The review will consider studies that focus on hospitalized adults where at least one subgroup has been diagnosed with stroke as well as associated communication problems attributable to a stroke. The concept of interest is assessment instruments used for the self-report of pain by these patients. The scoping review will include systematic reviews, quantitative studies of any design, and mixed methods studies. METHODS: The search will occur in three phases: an initial limited search, a full search, and a screening of the reference lists of all the included articles. The key information sources include: PubMed, CINAHL, Nursing@Ovid, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase. All identified citations will be uploaded to a reference management program, and the titles and abstracts screened. Full texts of studies potentially meeting the inclusion criteria will be assessed in detail, with relevant data extracted and reported in tabular as well as descriptive format that aligns with the objectives and scope of this review.
- MeSH
- Pain diagnosis MeSH
- Stroke * complications MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Communication MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Review Literature as Topic MeSH
- Self Report MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
Aim: Patient self-management is considered one of the preconditions for successful control of chronic conditions (including chronic pain), and health literacy is a relevant factor that can affect patient outcomes. The aim was to conduct a scoping review to synthesize studies within the healthcare context that have dealt with chronic pain in adults and measured literacy, and also to explore what literacy instruments were used. Methods: After determining clear inclusion and exclusion criteria, 8 electronic databases were searched for relevant articles; additional articles were obtained through reference lists of the obtained articles. Of the 56 records that were screened, 14 were included for data abstraction. Results: Most (n = 11) obtained studies were quantitative and most were based on a definition of literacy that focused on individuals, i.e. either on their reading level or on their abilities to access, read, understand, appraise, and act on health information. Correspondingly, most (n = 10) instruments measured individual-level characteristics; they did so mainly to examine the relationship between health literacy and various pain-related variables. Most studies were conducted in the USA and Germany. Conclusions: Chronic pain health literacy is a topic with emerging research. However, most instruments are generic and are oriented mainly towards individuals. Thus, chronic pain-specific instruments should be developed, and the existing instruments should be expanded to include contextual factors as well. Research is urgently needed in non-Western countries, especially given the current and predicted future global trends concerning chronic pain.
Aim: Patient self-management is considered one of the preconditions for successful control of chronic conditions (including chronic pain), and health literacy is a relevant factor that can affect patient outcomes. The aim was to conduct a scoping review to synthesize studies within the healthcare context that have dealt with chronic pain in adults and measured literacy, and also to explore what literacy instruments were used. Methods: After determining clear inclusion and exclusion criteria, 8 electronic databases were searched for relevant articles; additional articles were obtained through reference lists of the obtained articles. Of the 56 records that were screened, 14 were included for data abstraction. Results: Most (n = 11) obtained studies were quantitative and most were based on a definition of literacy that focused on individuals, i.e. either on their reading level or on their abilities to access, read, understand, appraise, and act on health information. Correspondingly, most (n = 10) instruments measured individual-level characteristics; they did so mainly to examine the relationship between health literacy and various pain-related variables. Most studies were conducted in the USA and Germany. Conclusions: Chronic pain health literacy is a topic with emerging research. However, most instruments are generic and are oriented mainly towards individuals. Thus, chronic pain-specific instruments should be developed, and the existing instruments should be expanded to include contextual factors as well. Research is urgently needed in non-Western countries, especially given the current and predicted future global trends concerning chronic pain.
- MeSH
- Chronic Pain psychology therapy MeSH
- Databases, Bibliographic MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Patient Medication Knowledge classification MeSH
- Review Literature as Topic MeSH
- Health Literacy classification MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Review MeSH
