OBJECTIVES: After cardiac arrest, a key factor determining survival outcomes is low-flow duration. Our aims were to determine the relation of survival and low-flow duration of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) and conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR) and if these 2 therapies have different short-term survival curves in relation to low-flow duration. METHODS: We searched Embase, Medline, Web of Science and Google Scholar from inception up to April 2021. A linear mixed-effect model was used to describe the course of survival over time, based on study-specific and time-specific aggregated survival data. RESULTS: We included 42 observational studies reporting on 1689 ECPR and 375 751 CCPR procedures. Of the included studies, 25 included adults, 13 included children and 4 included both. In adults, survival curves decline rapidly over time (ECPR 37.2%, 29.8%, 23.8% and 19.1% versus CCPR-shockable 36.8%, 7.2%, 1.4% and 0.3% for 15, 30, 45 and 60 min low-flow, respectively). ECPR was associated with a statistically significant slower decline in survival than CCPR with initial shockable rhythms (CCPR-shockable). In children, survival curves decline rapidly over time (ECPR 43.6%, 41.7%, 39.8% and 38.0% versus CCPR-shockable 48.6%, 20.5%, 8.6% and 3.6% for 15, 30, 45 and 60 min low-flow, respectively). ECPR was associated with a statistically significant slower decline in survival than CCPR-shockable. CONCLUSIONS: The short-term survival of ECPR and CCPR-shockable patients both decline rapidly over time, in adults as well as in children. This decline of short-term survival in relation to low-flow duration in ECPR was slower than in conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospero: CRD42020212480, 2 October 2020.

• MeSH
• Time Factors MeSH
• Child MeSH
• Adult MeSH
• Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation * adverse effects   MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation * methods   MeSH
• Retrospective Studies MeSH
• Heart Arrest * diagnosis   therapy   MeSH
• Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest * therapy   MeSH
• Check Tag
• Child MeSH
• Adult MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Meta-Analysis MeSH
• Systematic Review MeSH

• MeSH
• Cardiac Surgical Procedures * adverse effects   MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Mitral Valve diagnostic imaging   surgery   MeSH
• Mitral Valve Insufficiency * diagnostic imaging   surgery   MeSH
• Robotic Surgical Procedures * adverse effects   MeSH
• Robotics * MeSH
• Treatment Outcome MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH

• MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Specialties, Surgical * MeSH
• Forecasting MeSH
• Myocardial Revascularization MeSH
• Robotic Surgical Procedures * MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Geographicals
• Europe MeSH

OBJECTIVES: Implantation of a personalized external aortic root support (PEARS) can prevent dilatation of the aortic root and ascending aorta in patients with aortopathy of various aetiologies. Because PEARS is an emerging technology, all aspects concerning indications, surgical technique and safety should be elucidated. Our goal was to summarize all of these aspects so that physicians and patients would have sufficient information to evaluate this alternative approach. METHODS: Between April 2004 and March 2020, 317 patients underwent PEARS operations at 25 surgical centres in 9 countries. RESULTS: The most common indication was Marfan syndrome (57%). The single perioperative death represented a mortality of 0.3%. The long-term experience comprises 871 patient/years with 1 patient living for 15 years and 19 patients living for more than 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: PEARS seems to be a promising method of treatment of dilatation of the aortic root and/or ascending aorta. Multicentre observational studies are needed to gain more experience because this operation is still uncommon and the number of operations per surgeon/centre is low.

• MeSH
• Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic surgery   MeSH
• Aorta surgery   MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Vascular Surgical Procedures methods   MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Review MeSH

OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of infectious endocarditis (IE) in intravenous drug users (IDUs) is increasing, and the number of patients who need surgery is also rising. Relatively little is known about the short-term and long-term outcomes of these operations. METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of our institutional results, focussing on risk factors for perioperative death, major adverse events and long-term survival. A total of 50 of the 66 (75.75%) patients had postoperative follow-up, and the mean follow-up time was 53.9 ± 9.66 months. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on whether they were having their first operation or were being reoperated for recurrent IE. RESULTS: From March 2006 to December 2015, a total of 158 patients underwent surgery for IE; 72 (45.6%) of them were identified as active IDUs. The operative mortality in IDUs was 8.33% (6 patients), with no significant difference between the 2 groups (P = 0.6569). Survival rates at 1 year, at 3 years and at the end of follow-up were 92%, 72% and 64%, respectively. There was significantly worse survival of patients with recurrent IE (log-rank test, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Although the short-term results of operation for IE in IDUs are good, long-term outcomes are not satisfactory. The survival of patients with recurrence of IE caused by return to intravenous drug use is significantly worse.

• MeSH
• Adult MeSH
• Endocarditis etiology   mortality   surgery   MeSH
• Substance Abuse, Intravenous complications   mortality   MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Survival Rate MeSH
• Young Adult MeSH
• Recurrence MeSH
• Reoperation MeSH
• Retrospective Studies MeSH
• Risk Factors MeSH
• Check Tag
• Adult MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Young Adult MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH

Poor ventilatory efficiency, defined as the increase in minute ventilation relative to carbon dioxide production during exercise (VE/VCO2 slope), may be associated with dynamic hyperinflation and thereby promote the development of prolonged air leak (PAL) after lung resection. Consecutive lung lobectomy candidates (n = 96) were recruited for this prospective two-centre study. All subjects underwent pulmonary function tests and cardiopulmonary exercise testing prior to surgery. PAL was defined as the presence of air leaks from the chest tube on the 5th postoperative day and developed in 28 (29%) subjects. Subjects with PAL were not different in terms of age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, type of surgery (thoracotomy/video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery) and site of surgery (right/left lung; upper/lower lobes). Subjects with PAL had more frequent pleural adhesions (50% vs 21%; P = 0.006) and steeper VE/VCO2 slope (35 ± 7 vs 30 ± 5; P = 0.001). Stepwise logistic regression showed that only the presence of pleural adhesions [odds ratio (OR) 3.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-10.9; P = 0.008] and VE/VCO2 slope (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.0-1.2; P = 0.003) were independently associated with PAL (AUC 0.74, 95% CI 0.62-0.86). We conclude that a high VE/VCO2 slope during exercise may be helpful in identifying patients at greater risk for the development of PAL after lung lobectomy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03498352.

• MeSH
• Exercise physiology   MeSH
• Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted MeSH
• Chest Tubes MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Logistic Models MeSH
• Lung Diseases mortality   physiopathology   surgery   MeSH
• Pulmonary Ventilation physiology   MeSH
• Pneumonectomy adverse effects   MeSH
• Predictive Value of Tests MeSH
• Prognosis MeSH
• Prospective Studies MeSH
• Respiratory Function Tests MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Oxygen Consumption physiology   MeSH
• Exercise Test MeSH
• Check Tag
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH

OBJECTIVES: Usefulness of immature granulocyte percentage (IG%) to discriminate between postoperative non-infective systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and sepsis was tested in cardiac surgical patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 124 patients who developed non-infective SIRS and sepsis after elective cardiac surgery was performed. Predictive ability of IG% to predict sepsis was compared to procalcitonin (PCT), white blood cell count, temperature and different biomarker combinations using receiver operating characteristic and logistic regression analysis. The optimal cut-off points, diagnosis sensitivity and specificity were calculated. RESULTS: There were 44 patients diagnosed with sepsis and 80 patients with non-infective SIRS. In receiver operating characteristic analysis, area under the curve was higher for IG% (0.71) and PCT (0.72) compared to white blood cell count (0.62) and temperature (0.58). The best cut-off value for IG% was 1.45% (sensitivity 70.5%, specificity 60%) and 1.43 µg/l for PCT (sensitivity 65.9%, specificity 75%). The combination of IG% and PCT provided the best sepsis prediction (area under the curve of 0.8, sensitivity 63.6% and specificity 88.8%). CONCLUSIONS: In cardiac surgical patients, IG% is a helpful marker with the moderate ability to discriminate between sepsis and non-infective SIRS, comparable to serum PCT. A combination of these parameters increased the test's overall predictive ability by improving its specificity.

• MeSH
• Biomarkers blood   MeSH
• Granulocytes pathology   MeSH
• Cardiac Surgical Procedures * MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Leukocyte Count MeSH
• Prognosis MeSH
• Procalcitonin blood   MeSH
• Retrospective Studies MeSH
• ROC Curve MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Sepsis diagnosis   etiology   MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH

OBJECTIVES: In a multicentre, randomized-controlled, phase III trial in complex cardiovascular surgery (Randomized Evaluation of Fibrinogen vs Placebo in Complex Cardiovascular Surgery: REPLACE), single-dose human fibrinogen concentrate (FCH) was associated with the transfusion of increased allogeneic blood products (ABPs) versus placebo. Post hoc analyses were performed to identify possible reasons for this result. METHODS: We stratified REPLACE results by adherence to the transfusion algorithm, pretreatment fibrinogen level (≤2 g/l vs >2 g/l) and whether patients were among the first 3 treated at their centre. RESULTS: Patients whose treatment was adherent with the transfusion algorithm [FCH, n = 47 (60.3%); placebo, n = 57 (77.0%); P = 0.036] received smaller quantities of ABPs than those with non-adherent treatment (P < 0.001). Among treatment-adherent patients with pretreatment plasma fibrinogen ≤2 g/l, greater reduction in 5-min bleeding mass was seen with FCH versus placebo (median -22.5 g vs -15.5 g; P = 0.071). Considering patients with the above conditions and not among the first 3 treated at their centre (FCH, n = 15; placebo, n = 22), FCH was associated with trends towards reduced transfusion of ABPs (median 2.0 vs 4.0 units; P = 0.573) and greater reduction in 5-min bleeding mass (median -21.0 g vs -9.5 g; P = 0.173). Differences from a preceding single-centre phase II study with positive outcomes included more patients with pretreatment fibrinogen >2 g/l and fewer patients undergoing thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. CONCLUSIONS: None of the patient stratifications provided a clear explanation for the lack of efficacy seen for FCH in the REPLACE trial versus the positive phase II outcomes. However, together, the 3 factors demonstrated trends favouring FCH. Less familiarity with the protocol and procedures and unavoidable differences in the study populations may explain the differences seen between the phase II study and REPLACE. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01475669 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01475669; EudraCT trial no: 2011-002685-20.

• MeSH
• Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic complications   surgery   MeSH
• Double-Blind Method MeSH
• Fibrinogen therapeutic use   MeSH
• Hemostatics therapeutic use   MeSH
• Cardiac Surgical Procedures adverse effects   MeSH
• Blood Transfusion * MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Postoperative Hemorrhage epidemiology   MeSH
• Check Tag
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Clinical Trial, Phase III MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH
• Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
• Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to quantify the impact of donor variables on post-heart transplantation mortality and morbidity in recipients with and without a pretransplant left ventricular assist device (LVAD). METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study of the ISHLT Transplant Registry that includes all primary heart transplants in adult recipients (January 2005-June 2013, n = 15 532). All recipients were divided into patients with a durable continuous-flow LVAD (LVAD recipient, n = 3315) and without mechanical support (standard recipient, n = 12 217). Donors were classified as high risk (n = 3751) and low risk (n = 11 781). Transplants were categorized into low-risk donor/standard recipient (n = 9214), high-risk donor/standard recipient (n = 3003), low-risk donor/LVAD recipient (n = 2567) and high-risk donor/LVAD recipient (n = 748). Outcomes prior to discharge, survival at 5 years and freedom from complications were computed for each group. RESULTS: LVAD recipients experienced more episodes of infection, stroke and acute rejection with both low- (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001) and high-risk donors (P < 0.001, P = 0.008, P = 0.028) prior to transplant discharge. Within standard recipients, a higher rate of primary graft failure (P = 0.035), infection (P = 0.001), dialysis (P = 0.012), acute rejection (P = 0.037) and less freedom from cardiac allograft vasculopathy (P < 0.001) and malignancy (P = 0.004) was observed with high-risk donors. Within LVAD recipients, no differences in complications prior to discharge or long-term morbidity were detected between low- and high-risk donors. When compared to standard recipient/low-risk donors, all the 3 remaining categories had an increased probability of death or graft failure within 90 days: LVAD recipient/low-risk donor [hazard ratio (HR) 1.26, confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.51; P = 0.012], standard recipient/high-risk donor (HR 1.47, CI 1.27-1.71; P < 0.001) and LVAD recipient/high-risk donor (HR 1.72, CI 1.32-2.24; P < 0.001). Between 90 days and 5 years, only standard recipient/high-risk donor had an increased probability of death or graft failure (HR 1.140, CI 1.020-1.274; P = 0.021) when compared to standard recipient/low-risk donor. CONCLUSIONS: LVAD recipients, whether with high- or low-risk donors, have worse early (but not late) survival and more early complications than those of standard recipients. We found that adverse donor characteristics are less predictive for determining the outcome of LVAD-bridged recipients than standard recipients.

• MeSH
• Tissue Donors statistics & numerical data   MeSH
• Adult MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Survival Rate trends   MeSH
• Young Adult MeSH
• Heart Diseases surgery   MeSH
• Heart-Assist Devices * MeSH
• Transplant Recipients * MeSH
• Prospective Studies MeSH
• Registries * MeSH
• Heart Transplantation methods   mortality   MeSH
• Donor Selection MeSH
• Treatment Outcome MeSH
• Check Tag
• Adult MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Young Adult MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH
• Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
• Geographicals
• Europe MeSH
• United States MeSH

Surgical nuances of the implantation procedure of the HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist system (Abbott Corp., IL, USA) are discussed in this study. Particular attention is devoted to surgical details, preventative actions and considerations related to alternative implantation strategies. Dedicated surgical implantation tools may ease the implantation experience.

• MeSH
• Equipment Design MeSH
• Cardiac Surgical Procedures instrumentation   MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Tomography, X-Ray Computed MeSH
• Heart-Assist Devices * MeSH
• Heart Ventricles diagnostic imaging   surgery   MeSH
• Heart Failure diagnosis   surgery   MeSH
• Imaging, Three-Dimensional MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Publication type
• Video-Audio Media MeSH
• Journal Article MeSH
• Technical Report MeSH