STUDY QUESTION: How are ART and IUI regulated, funded, and registered in European countries, and how has the situation changed since 2018? SUMMARY ANSWER: Of the 43 countries performing ART and IUI in Europe, and participating in the survey, specific legislation exists in only 39 countries, public funding varies across and sometimes within countries (and is lacking or minimal in four countries), and national registries are in place in 33 countries; only a small number of changes were identified, most of them in the direction of improving accessibility, through increased public financial support and/or opening access to additional subgroups. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The annual reports of the European IVF-Monitoring Consortium (EIM) clearly show the existence of different approaches across Europe regarding accessibility to and efficacy of ART and IUI treatments. In a previous survey, some coherent information was gathered about how those techniques were regulated, funded, and registered in European countries, showing that diversity is the paradigm in this medical field. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A survey was designed using the SurveyMonkey tool consisting of 90 questions covering several domains (legal, funding, and registry) and considering specific details on the situation of third-party donations. New questions widened the scope of the previous survey. Answers refer to the situation of countries on 31 December 2022. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTINGS, METHODS: All members of the EIM were invited to participate. The received answers were checked and initial responders were asked to address unclear answers and to provide any additional information considered relevant. Tables resulting from the consolidated data were then sent to members of the Committee of National Representatives of ESHRE, requesting a second check. Conflicting information was clarified by direct contact. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Information was received from 43 out of the 45 European countries where ART and IUI are performed. There were 39 countries with specific legislation on ART, and artificial insemination was considered an ART technique in 33 of them. Accessibility is limited to infertile couples only in 8 of the 43 countries. In 5 countries, ART and IUI are permitted also for treatments of single women and all same sex couples, while a total of 33 offer treatment to single women and 19 offer treatment to female couples. Use of donated sperm is allowed in all except 2 countries, oocyte donation is allowed in 38, simultaneous donation of sperm and oocyte is allowed in 32, and embryo donation is allowed in 29 countries. Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT)-M/SR (for monogenetic disorders, structural rearrangements) is not allowed in 3 countries and PGT-A (for aneuploidy) is not allowed in 10; surrogacy is accepted in 15 countries. Except for marital/sexual situation, female age is the most frequently reported limiting criterion for legal access to ART: minimal age is usually set at 18 years and the maximum ranges from 42 to 54 with some countries not using numeric definition. Male maximum age is set in very few countries. Where third-party donors are permitted, age is frequently a limiting criterion (male maximum age ranging from 35 to 50; female maximum age from 30 to 37). Other legal restrictions in third-party donation are the number of children born from the same donor (or, in some countries, the number of families with children from the same donor) and, in 12 countries, there is a maximum number of oocyte donations. How countries deal with the anonymity is diverse: strict anonymity, anonymity just for the recipients (not for children when reaching legal adulthood age), a mixed system (anonymous and non-anonymous donations), and strict non-anonymity. Inquiring about donors' genetic screening showed that most countries have enforced either mandatory or scientific recommendations that exclude the most prevalent genetic diseases, although, again, diversity is evident. Reimbursement/compensation systems exist in more than 30 European countries, with around 10 describing clearly defined maximum amounts considered acceptable. Public funding systems are extremely variable. One country provides no financial assistance to ART/IUI patients and three offer only minimal support. Limits to the provision of funding are defined in the others i.e. age (female maximum age is the most used), existence of previous children, BMI, maximum number of treatments publicly supported, and techniques not entitled for funding. In a few countries reimbursement is linked to a clinical policy. The definitions of the type of expenses covered within an IVF/ICSI cycle, up to which limit, and the proportion of out-of-pocket costs for patients are also extremely dissimilar. National registries of ART are in place in 33 out of the 43 countries contributing to the survey and a registry of donors exists in 19 of them. When comparing with the results of the previous survey, the main changes are: (i) an extension of the beneficiaries of ART techniques (and IUI), evident in nine countries; (ii) public financial support exists now in Albania and Armenia; (iii) in Luxembourg, the only ART centre expanded its on-site activities; (iv) donor-conceived children are entitled to know the donor identity in six countries more than in 2018; and (v) four more countries have set a maximum number of oocyte donations. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Although the responses were provided by well-informed and committed individuals and submitted to double checking, no formal validation by official bodies was in place. Therefore, possible inaccuracies cannot be excluded. The results presented are a cross-section in time, and ART and IUI frameworks within European countries undergo continuous modification. Finally, some domains of ART activity were deliberately left out of the scope of this survey. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our results offer a detailed updated view of the ART and IUI situation in European countries. It provides extensive answers to many relevant questions related to ART usage at the national level and could be used by institutions and policymakers at both national and European levels. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The study has no external funding, and all costs were covered by ESHRE. There were no competing interests.
- MeSH
- Reproductive Techniques, Assisted * legislation & jurisprudence economics statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Fertilization in Vitro economics legislation & jurisprudence MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Surveys and Questionnaires MeSH
- Registries * MeSH
- Insemination, Artificial economics legislation & jurisprudence MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Geographicals
- Europe MeSH
STUDY QUESTION: What are the data and trends on ART and IUI cycle numbers and their outcomes, and on fertility preservation (FP) interventions, reported in 2019 as compared to previous years? SUMMARY ANSWER: The 23rd ESHRE report highlights the rising ART treatment cycles and children born, alongside a decline in twin deliveries owing to decreasing multiple embryo transfers; fresh IVF or ICSI cycles exhibited higher delivery rates, whereas frozen embryo transfers (FET) showed higher pregnancy rates (PRs), and reported IUI cycles decreased while maintaining stable outcomes. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: ART aggregated data generated by national registries, clinics, or professional societies have been gathered and analyzed by the European IVF-Monitoring (EIM) Consortium since 1997 and reported in a total of 22 manuscripts published in Human Reproduction and Human Reproduction Open. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Data on medically assisted reproduction (MAR) from European countries are collected by EIM for ESHRE each year. The data on treatment cycles performed between 1 January and 31 December 2019 were provided by either national registries or registries based on initiatives of medical associations and scientific organizations or committed persons in one of the 44 countries that are members of the EIM Consortium. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Overall, 1487 clinics offering ART services in 40 countries reported, for the second time, a total of more than 1 million (1 077 813) treatment cycles, including 160 782 with IVF, 427 980 with ICSI, 335 744 with FET, 64 089 with preimplantation genetic testing (PGT), 82 373 with egg donation (ED), 546 with IVM of oocytes, and 6299 cycles with frozen oocyte replacement (FOR). A total of 1169 institutions reported data on IUI cycles using either husband/partner's semen (IUI-H; n = 147 711) or donor semen (IUI-D; n = 51 651) in 33 and 24 countries, respectively. Eighteen countries reported 24 139 interventions in pre- and post-pubertal patients for FP, including oocyte, ovarian tissue, semen, and testicular tissue banking. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In 21 countries (21 in 2018) in which all ART clinics reported to the registry 476 760 treatment cycles were registered for a total population of approximately 300 million inhabitants, allowing the best estimate of a mean of 1581 cycles performed per million inhabitants (range: 437-3621). Among the reporting countries, for IVF the clinical PRs per aspiration slightly decreased while they remained similar per transfer compared to 2018 (21.8% and 34.6% versus 25.5% and 34.1%, respectively). In ICSI, the corresponding PRs showed similar trends compared to 2018 (20.2% and 33.5%, versus 22.5% and 32.1%) When freeze-all cycles were not considered for the calculations, the clinical PRs per aspiration were 28.5% (28.8% in 2018) and 26.2% (27.3% in 2018) for IVF and ICSI, respectively. After FET with embryos originating from own eggs, the PR per thawing was at 35.1% (versus 33.4% in 2018), and with embryos originating from donated eggs at 43.0% (41.8% in 2018). After ED, the PR per fresh embryo transfer was 50.5% (49.6% in 2018) and per FOR 44.8% (44.9% in 2018). In IVF and ICSI together, the trend toward the transfer of fewer embryos continues with the transfer of 1, 2, 3, and ≥4 embryos in 55.4%, 39.9%, 2.6%, and 0.2% of all treatments, respectively (corresponding to 50.7%, 45.1%, 3.9%, and 0.3% in 2018). This resulted in a reduced proportion of twin delivery rates (DRs) of 11.9% (12.4% in 2018) and a similar triplet DR of 0.3%. Treatments with FET in 2019 resulted in twin and triplet DR of 8.9% and 0.1%, respectively (versus 9.4% and 0.1% in 2018). After IUI, the DRs remained similar at 8.7% after IUI-H (8.8% in 2018) and at 12.1% after IUI-D (12.6% in 2018). Twin and triplet DRs after IUI-H were 8.7% and 0.4% (in 2018: 8.4% and 0.3%) and 6.2% and 0.2% after IUI-D (in 2018: 6.4% and 0.2%), respectively. Eighteen countries (16 in 2018) provided data on FP in a total number of 24 139 interventions (20 994 in 2018). Cryopreservation of ejaculated sperm (n = 11 592 versus n = 10 503 in 2018) and cryopreservation of oocytes (n = 10 784 versus n = 9123 in 2018) were most frequently reported. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Caution with the interpretation of results should remain as data collection systems and completeness of reporting vary among European countries. Some countries were unable to deliver data about the number of initiated cycles and/or deliveries. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The 23rd ESHRE data collection on ART, IUI, and FP interventions shows a continuous increase of reported treatment numbers and MAR-derived livebirths in Europe. Although it is the largest data collection on MAR in Europe, further efforts toward optimization of both the collection and the reporting, from the perspective of improving surveillance and vigilance in the field of reproductive medicine, are awaited. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): The study has received no external funding and all costs are covered by ESHRE. There are no competing interests.
- MeSH
- Reproductive Techniques, Assisted * MeSH
- Child MeSH
- Fertilization in Vitro * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Registries MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Semen MeSH
- Pregnancy, Twin MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Pregnancy Rate MeSH
- Pregnancy Outcome epidemiology MeSH
- Check Tag
- Child MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Geographicals
- Europe MeSH
Cervical mucus (CM) is a viscous fluid that is produced by the cervical glands and functions as a uterine cervix plug. Its viscosity decreases during ovulation, providing a window for non-invasive sampling. This study focuses on proteomic characterization of CM to evaluate its potential as a non-invasively acquired source of biomarkers and in understanding of molecular (patho)physiology of the female genital tract. The first objective of this work was to optimize experimental workflow for CM processing and the second was to assess differences in the proteomic composition of CM during natural ovulatory cycles obtained from intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles and in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Proteomic analysis of CM samples revealed 4370 proteins involved in processes including neutrophil degranulation, cellular stress responses, and hemostasis. Differential expression analysis revealed 199 proteins enriched in IUI samples and 422 enriched in IVF. The proteins enriched in IUI were involved in phosphatidic acid synthesis, responses to external stimulus, and neutrophil degranulation, while those enriched in IVF samples were linked to neutrophil degranulation, formation of a cornified envelope and hemostasis. Subsequent analyses clarified the protein composition of the CM and how it is altered by hormonal stimulation of the uterus.
- MeSH
- Biomarkers MeSH
- Cervix Mucus * MeSH
- Fertilization in Vitro MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Proteome MeSH
- Proteomics MeSH
- Insemination, Artificial * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
INTRODUCTION: The J Project (JP) physician education and clinical research collaboration program was started in 2004 and includes by now 32 countries mostly in Eastern and Central Europe (ECE). Until the end of 2021, 344 inborn errors of immunity (IEI)-focused meetings were organized by the JP to raise awareness and facilitate the diagnosis and treatment of patients with IEI. RESULTS: In this study, meeting profiles and major diagnostic and treatment parameters were studied. JP center leaders reported patients' data from 30 countries representing a total population of 506 567 565. Two countries reported patients from JP centers (Konya, Turkey and Cairo University, Egypt). Diagnostic criteria were based on the 2020 update of classification by the IUIS Expert Committee on IEI. The number of JP meetings increased from 6 per year in 2004 and 2005 to 44 and 63 in 2020 and 2021, respectively. The cumulative number of meetings per country varied from 1 to 59 in various countries reflecting partly but not entirely the population of the respective countries. Altogether, 24,879 patients were reported giving an average prevalence of 4.9. Most of the patients had predominantly antibody deficiency (46,32%) followed by patients with combined immunodeficiencies (14.3%). The percentages of patients with bone marrow failure and phenocopies of IEI were less than 1 each. The number of patients was remarkably higher that those reported to the ESID Registry in 13 countries. Immunoglobulin (IgG) substitution was provided to 7,572 patients (5,693 intravenously) and 1,480 patients received hematopoietic stem cell therapy (HSCT). Searching for basic diagnostic parameters revealed the availability of immunochemistry and flow cytometry in 27 and 28 countries, respectively, and targeted gene sequencing and new generation sequencing was available in 21 and 18 countries. The number of IEI centers and experts in the field were 260 and 690, respectively. We found high correlation between the number of IEI centers and patients treated with intravenous IgG (IVIG) (correlation coefficient, cc, 0,916) and with those who were treated with HSCT (cc, 0,905). Similar correlation was found when the number of experts was compared with those treated with HSCT. However, the number of patients treated with subcutaneous Ig (SCIG) only slightly correlated with the number of experts (cc, 0,489) and no correlation was found between the number of centers and patients on SCIG (cc, 0,174). CONCLUSIONS: 1) this is the first study describing major diagnostic and treatment parameters of IEI care in countries of the JP; 2) the data suggest that the JP had tremendous impact on the development of IEI care in ECE; 3) our data help to define major future targets of JP activity in various countries; 4) we suggest that the number of IEI centers and IEI experts closely correlate to the most important treatment parameters; 5) we propose that specialist education among medical professionals plays pivotal role in increasing levels of diagnostics and adequate care of this vulnerable and still highly neglected patient population; 6) this study also provides the basis for further analysis of more specific aspects of IEI care including genetic diagnostics, disease specific prevalence, newborn screening and professional collaboration in JP countries.
- MeSH
- Immunoglobulin G * MeSH
- Administration, Intravenous MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Infant, Newborn MeSH
- Educational Status MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Infant, Newborn MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Geographicals
- Egypt MeSH
- Europe MeSH
Primární imunodeficience jsou skupinou čítající v současné době přes 450 onemocnění, jejichž klinický a laboratorní fenotyp je často velmi nespecifický, což představuje zásadní překážku ve vytipování rizikových pacientů, promptní diagnostice a cílené léčbě. V rámci projektu Primary ImmunoDeficiency Look-up App (PIDLA) jsme vytvořili aplikaci napomáhající lékařům v diferenciální diagnostice vrozených poruch imunity. Aplikace je postavena na základech mezinárodní klasifikace primárních imunodeficiencí IUIS z roku 2020 a využívá sofistikovaných vyhledávacích a řadících algoritmů. V textu popisujeme metodu tvorby aplikace a demonstrujeme její funkci. PIDLA je volně dostupný na webové stránce www.pidla.eu.
Primary immunodeficiencies are now a group of over 450 diseases, whose clinical and laboratory phenotypes can be very ambiguous and therefore present a major hurdle to the selection of high-risk patients, quick diagnosis and targetted therapy. As part of the Primary ImmunoDeficiency Look-up App (PIDLA) project we created an app which assists physicians in the differential diagnosis of inborn errors of the immunity. The app is based on the international classification of primary immunodeficiencies IUIS from the year 2020 and utilizes sophisticated searching and ranking algorithms. In this text we describe the method of app development and demonstrate its function. PIDLA is freely available at the webpage www.pidla.eu.
- Keywords
- PIDLA,
- MeSH
- Algorithms MeSH
- Diagnosis, Differential MeSH
- Immune System Diseases MeSH
- Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases * diagnosis MeSH
- Signs and Symptoms MeSH
- Medical Informatics Applications * MeSH
- Publication type
- Review MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czech Republic MeSH
Tyrophagus putrescentiae is an astigmatid mite of great economic, medical and veterinary importance. The microbiome, especially intracellular bacteria, may affect allergy/allergen expression. We targeted Wolbachia proteins, allergen comparisons and markers in Wolbachia-mite interactions in three mite populations. A decoy database was constructed by proteogenomics using the T. putrescentiae draft genome, Wolbachia transcriptome assembly and current T. putrescentiae-related sequences in GenBank. Among thousands of mite-derived proteins, 18 Wolbachia proteins were reliably identified. We suggest that peroxiredoxin, bacterioferritin, ankyrin repeat domain-containing protein and DegQ family serine endoprotease indicate a higher-level bacterium-bacterium-host interaction. We produced evidence that the host-Wolbachia interaction is modulated through pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), mannose-binding lectins/mannose receptors, the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway with TNF-α, and others. We observed Tyr p 3 suppression in mites with Wolbachia, linking trypsin to PRR modulation. Nine out of the 12 current WHO/IUIS official allergens were reliably identified, but the remaining three allergens, Tyr p 1, 8 and 35, were detected as only trace hits. This study provides numerous markers for further Wolbachia-host interaction research. For accuracy, mite allergens should be considered according to abundance in species, but mite populations/strains, as well as their microbiome structure, may be key factors. SIGNIFICANCE: The astigmatid mites occurring in homes are significant producers of allergens that are highly dangerous to humans and domesticated animals. Mites are tightly associated with microorganisms that affect their biology and consequently allergy signatures. Mite populations were found to be infected with certain intracellular bacteria, but some populations lacked an intracellular bacterium. Our previous research showed that some populations of Tyrophagus putrescentiae are infected with Wolbachia, but some populations host additional bacteria of interest. Thus, there are not only interactions between the mites and Wolbachia but also likely an additional level of interaction that can be found in the interaction between different bacteria in the mites. These "higher-level" signatures and consequences that bacteria affect, including allergen production, are not understood in mites. In this study, we identified Wolbachia-specific proteins in mites for the first time. This study provides Wolbachia- and mite-derived markers that can be clues for describing "higher-level" mite-bacterium-bacterium interactions. Indeed, the microbiome contribution to allergies can potentially be derived directly from bacterial proteins, especially if they are abundant.
- MeSH
- Allergens * MeSH
- Proteome MeSH
- Proteomics MeSH
- Mites * microbiology MeSH
- Wolbachia * MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
... Systémová onemocnění 63 -- Sterilita 65 -- In vitro fertilizace (IVF) 84 -- Intrauterinní inseminace (IUI ...
Jessenius Medica
3., přepracované a doplněné vydání 767 stran : schémata, tabulky ; 19 cm
Publikace se zaměřuje na gynekologická onemocnění a i různé komplikace těhotenství. Určeno odborné veřejnosti.; Postupy při vyšetření, diagnostice a léčbě nejčastějších postupů v gynekologické praxi.
- MeSH
- Contraceptive Devices, Female MeSH
- Genital Diseases, Female MeSH
- Obstetric Labor Complications MeSH
- Pregnancy Complications MeSH
- Genital Neoplasms, Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Monograph MeSH
- Conspectus
- Gynekologie. Porodnictví
- NML Fields
- gynekologie a porodnictví
- onkologie
- perinatologie a neonatologie
The allergen repertoire of the house dust mite, Dermatophagoides farinae, is incomplete despite most mite allergens having been described in this species. Using proteogenomics, we aimed to compare proteins and allergens between sexes and provide a foundation for the identification of novel allergens. Overall, 6297 protein hits were identified, and 2899 and 886 were male- and female-specific, respectively. Removal of trace results narrowed the dataset to 3478 hits, including 275 and 157 male- and female-specific hits, respectively. All 34 WHO/IUIS-approved D. farinae allergens (omitting Der f 17) were identified, and we also identified homologs of the yet undescribed Der f 9 and 38. Der f 27/serpin exhibited the largest sex-dependent difference and was dominant in females. Using official protein sequences, Der f 11, 14, 23, 28 and 30 were identified with low success. However, identification success of Der f 11 and 14 was greatly increased by using longer/complete sequences. Der f 30 is characterized by the same tryptic digests as the more abundant Der f 30 (isoform) identified here. Der f 23 appears to be of low abundance in mite bodies. Der f 28.0101 and Der f 28.0201 were detected at low abundance and in trace amounts, respectively. SIGNIFICANCE: In this work, we performed a proteogenomic annotation of the house dust mite, Dermatophagoides farinae, which is the most important source of house dust allergens. The proteogenomic analysis performed here provides a foundation for not only understanding the biology of the mite but also the identification of novel allergens. This study generated a robust proteomic dataset for D. farinae and reviewed existing and candidate allergens in this species. We stress some pitfalls of high-throughput analyses, especially that improper headers of allergen protein records provided in databases can lead to confusion. Using partial sequences in proteomic identification and quantification can lead to low identification success (low signal intensity or MS/MS counts). Thus, we individually curated the protein sequences for proper identification and quantification. The discovered sex differences can be one factor affecting allergen/immunogen variations in mite extracts. Overall, this work provides a benchmark for accurate identification of mite immunogenic proteins using proteomics.
- MeSH
- Allergens genetics immunology metabolism MeSH
- Dermatophagoides farinae genetics immunology metabolism MeSH
- Arthropod Proteins genetics immunology metabolism MeSH
- Proteogenomics methods MeSH
- Proteome metabolism MeSH
- Pyroglyphidae genetics immunology metabolism MeSH
- Amino Acid Sequence MeSH
- Sequence Homology MeSH
- Sex Factors MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. MeSH
... 68 -- Léčby neplodnosti 69 -- IUI 70 -- Darování spermatu 71 -- IVF 72 -- Testy 76 -- Sólo pro partnera ...
Vydání: I. 175 stran ; 20 cm
Srozumitelnou a jednoduchou formou zjistíte, co je neplodnost a jak se léčí. Bývalá koordinátorka IVF poradí, jak případnou léčbou asistované reprodukce projít co nejsnadněji i co vás v centru asistované reprodukce čeká. Nakladatelská anotace. Kráceno; Jedinečná kniha o tom nejcitlivějším tématu, o problémech s početím. Srozumitelnou a jednoduchou formou zjistíte, co je neplodnost a jak se léčí. Bývalá koordinátorka IVF poradí, jak případnou léčbou asistované reprodukce projít co nejsnadněji i co vás v centru asistované reprodukce čeká. Dočtete se, jak se zkusit k dítěti dopracovat přírodní cestou a jaké léčby existují. V knize najdete i slovníček pojmů a také část pro partnera. Nejste na to sami, zjistěte, Jak na IVF.
- MeSH
- Reproductive Techniques, Assisted MeSH
- Infertility, Female * MeSH
- Publication type
- Monograph MeSH
- Popular Work MeSH
- Conspectus
- Gynekologie. Porodnictví
- NML Fields
- reprodukční lékařství
The 2017 International Union of Immunological Societies (IUIS) classification recognizes 3 hyper-IgE syndromes (HIES), including the prototypic Job's syndrome (autosomal dominant STAT3-loss of function) and autosomal recessive PGM3 and SPINK5 syndromes. Early diagnosis of PID can direct life-saving or transformational interventions; however, it remains challenging owing to the rarity of these conditions. This can result in diagnostic delay and worsen prognosis. Within increasing access to "clinical-exome" testing, clinicians need to be aware of the implication and rationale for genetic testing, including the benefits and limitations of current therapies. Extreme elevation of serum IgE has been associated with a growing number of PID syndromes including the novel CARD11 and ZNF341 deficiencies. Variable elevations in IgE are associated with defects in innate, humoral, cellular and combined immunodeficiency syndromes. Barrier compromise can closely phenocopy these conditions. The aim of this article was to update readers on recent developments at this important interface between allergy and immunodeficiency, highlighting key clinical scenarios which should draw attention to possible immunodeficiency associated with extreme elevation of IgE, and outline initial laboratory assessment and management.
- MeSH
- Hypersensitivity blood diagnosis immunology therapy MeSH
- Diagnostic Imaging MeSH
- Diagnosis, Differential MeSH
- Phenotype MeSH
- Immunoglobulin E blood immunology MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Disease Management MeSH
- Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes blood diagnosis etiology therapy MeSH
- Symptom Assessment MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Meta-Analysis MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Review MeSH