-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Identification of lactobacilli isolated from food by genotypic methods and MALDI-TOF MS
M. Dušková, O. Šedo, K. Kšicová, Z. Zdráhal, R. Karpíšková,
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- Bacteria chemie klasifikace izolace a purifikace MeSH
- fermentace MeSH
- genotyp MeSH
- Lactobacillus genetika izolace a purifikace MeSH
- maso mikrobiologie MeSH
- mléčné výrobky mikrobiologie MeSH
- polymerázová řetězová reakce metody MeSH
- potravinářská mikrobiologie MeSH
- ribozomální DNA MeSH
- RNA ribozomální 16S MeSH
- spektrometrie hmotnostní - ionizace laserem za účasti matrice metody MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
Lactobacilli are bacteria with important implications in food and feed fermentation. Detailed knowledge of the lactobacilli composition is of high relevance to food and health control, various industrial or biotechnological applications, etc., but accurate identification of the Lactobacillus species is not an easy task. In this study, three methods, i.e. polymerase chain reaction (PCR), amplified 16S rDNA restriction analysis with restrictase MseI (16S-ARDRA), and the matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) were evaluated for their capabilities to identify Lactobacillus species. After comparison of the three methods on a set of 19 type/reference Lactobacillus strains, 148 strains isolated from dairy and meat products were characterized by PCR and MALDI-TOF MS. The strains were differentiated into nine and ten lactobacilli species by PCR and MALDI-TOF MS, respectively, with nine of these species being congruent. The success rates of species level assignment were 77% for PCR and 93% for MALDI-TOF MS that proved superior in the species identification. However, to differentiate between closely related Lactobacillus species, MALDI-TOF MS needs to be used in combination with genotypic techniques to achieve a more reliable identification.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc13012394
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20130411101008.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 130404s2012 ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.07.029 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)23072695
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Dušková, Marta $u Department of Milk Hygiene and Technology, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Palackého tř. 3a, CZ-61242 Brno, Czech Republic. duskovam@vfu.cz
- 245 10
- $a Identification of lactobacilli isolated from food by genotypic methods and MALDI-TOF MS / $c M. Dušková, O. Šedo, K. Kšicová, Z. Zdráhal, R. Karpíšková,
- 520 9_
- $a Lactobacilli are bacteria with important implications in food and feed fermentation. Detailed knowledge of the lactobacilli composition is of high relevance to food and health control, various industrial or biotechnological applications, etc., but accurate identification of the Lactobacillus species is not an easy task. In this study, three methods, i.e. polymerase chain reaction (PCR), amplified 16S rDNA restriction analysis with restrictase MseI (16S-ARDRA), and the matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) were evaluated for their capabilities to identify Lactobacillus species. After comparison of the three methods on a set of 19 type/reference Lactobacillus strains, 148 strains isolated from dairy and meat products were characterized by PCR and MALDI-TOF MS. The strains were differentiated into nine and ten lactobacilli species by PCR and MALDI-TOF MS, respectively, with nine of these species being congruent. The success rates of species level assignment were 77% for PCR and 93% for MALDI-TOF MS that proved superior in the species identification. However, to differentiate between closely related Lactobacillus species, MALDI-TOF MS needs to be used in combination with genotypic techniques to achieve a more reliable identification.
- 650 _2
- $a Bacteria $x chemie $x klasifikace $x izolace a purifikace $7 D001419
- 650 _2
- $a ribozomální DNA $7 D004275
- 650 _2
- $a mléčné výrobky $x mikrobiologie $7 D003611
- 650 _2
- $a fermentace $7 D005285
- 650 _2
- $a potravinářská mikrobiologie $7 D005516
- 650 _2
- $a genotyp $7 D005838
- 650 _2
- $a Lactobacillus $x genetika $x izolace a purifikace $7 D007778
- 650 _2
- $a maso $x mikrobiologie $7 D008460
- 650 _2
- $a polymerázová řetězová reakce $x metody $7 D016133
- 650 _2
- $a RNA ribozomální 16S $7 D012336
- 650 _2
- $a spektrometrie hmotnostní - ionizace laserem za účasti matrice $x metody $7 D019032
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Šedo, Ondrej $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Kšicová, Kateřina $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Zdráhal, Zbyněk $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Karpíšková, Renáta $u -
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002320 $t International journal of food microbiology $x 1879-3460 $g Roč. 159, č. 2 (2012), s. 107-14
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23072695 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20130404 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20130411101238 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 975592 $s 810675
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2012 $b 159 $c 2 $d 107-14 $i 1879-3460 $m International journal of food microbiology $n Int J Food Microbiol $x MED00002320
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20130404