Substrate specificity of haloalkane dehalogenases
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media print
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
21294712
DOI
10.1042/bj20101405
PII: BJ20101405
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Agrobacterium tumefaciens enzymology genetics metabolism MeSH
- Enzyme Activation MeSH
- Models, Biological MeSH
- Bradyrhizobium enzymology genetics metabolism MeSH
- Escherichia coli genetics metabolism MeSH
- Phylogeny MeSH
- Hydrolases classification genetics metabolism physiology MeSH
- Mutant Proteins classification genetics metabolism MeSH
- Mycobacterium bovis enzymology genetics metabolism MeSH
- Mycobacterium smegmatis genetics metabolism MeSH
- Rhodococcus enzymology genetics metabolism MeSH
- Sphingobacterium enzymology genetics metabolism MeSH
- Substrate Specificity MeSH
- Xanthobacter enzymology genetics metabolism MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- haloalkane dehalogenase MeSH Browser
- Hydrolases MeSH
- Mutant Proteins MeSH
An enzyme's substrate specificity is one of its most important characteristics. The quantitative comparison of broad-specificity enzymes requires the selection of a homogenous set of substrates for experimental testing, determination of substrate-specificity data and analysis using multivariate statistics. We describe a systematic analysis of the substrate specificities of nine wild-type and four engineered haloalkane dehalogenases. The enzymes were characterized experimentally using a set of 30 substrates selected using statistical experimental design from a set of nearly 200 halogenated compounds. Analysis of the activity data showed that the most universally useful substrates in the assessment of haloalkane dehalogenase activity are 1-bromobutane, 1-iodopropane, 1-iodobutane, 1,2-dibromoethane and 4-bromobutanenitrile. Functional relationships among the enzymes were explored using principal component analysis. Analysis of the untransformed specific activity data revealed that the overall activity of wild-type haloalkane dehalogenases decreases in the following order: LinB~DbjA>DhlA~DhaA~DbeA~DmbA>DatA~DmbC~DrbA. After transforming the data, we were able to classify haloalkane dehalogenases into four SSGs (substrate-specificity groups). These functional groups are clearly distinct from the evolutionary subfamilies, suggesting that phylogenetic analysis cannot be used to predict the substrate specificity of individual haloalkane dehalogenases. Structural and functional comparisons of wild-type and mutant enzymes revealed that the architecture of the active site and the main access tunnel significantly influences the substrate specificity of these enzymes, but is not its only determinant. The identification of other structural determinants of the substrate specificity remains a challenge for further research on haloalkane dehalogenases.
References provided by Crossref.org
Structural Analysis of the Ancestral Haloalkane Dehalogenase AncLinB-DmbA
An Ultrasensitive Fluorescence Assay for the Detection of Halides and Enzymatic Dehalogenation
Caver Web 1.0: identification of tunnels and channels in proteins and analysis of ligand transport
Discovery of Novel Haloalkane Dehalogenase Inhibitors
A Pseudomonas putida strain genetically engineered for 1,2,3-trichloropropane bioremediation
Differences in crystallization of two LinB variants from Sphingobium japonicum UT26
Biochemical characterization of a novel haloalkane dehalogenase from a cold-adapted bacterium