BACKGROUND: Kidney transplant recipients are at risk for a severe course of COVID-19 with a high mortality rate. A considerable number of patients remains without a satisfactory serological response after the baseline and adjuvant SARS-CoV-2 vaccination schedule. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of one and two booster doses of mRNA vaccines (either mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2) in 125 COVID-19 naive, adult kidney transplant recipients who showed an insufficient humoral response (SARS-CoV-2 IgG <10 AU/ml) to the previous 2-dose vaccination schedule. The primary outcome was the difference in the rate of a positive antibody response (SARS-CoV-2 IgG ≥10 AU/ml) between one and two booster doses at 1 month after the final booster dose. RESULTS: A positive humoral response was observed in 36 (62%) patients receiving two booster doses and in 28 (44%) patients receiving one booster dose (odds ratio [OR], 2.10, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-4.34, p = .043). Moreover, median SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels were higher with two booster doses (p = .009). The number of patients with positive virus neutralizing antibody (VNA) levels was numerically higher with two booster doses compared to one booster dose, but without statistical significance (66% vs. 50%, p = .084). There was no significant difference in positive seroconversions rate and antibody levels between mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2. CONCLUSION: A higher number of kidney transplant recipients achieved a positive antibody response after two booster doses compared to one booster dose.
- MeSH
- COVID-19 * prevence a kontrola MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- imunoglobulin G MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mRNA vakcíny MeSH
- příjemce transplantátu MeSH
- protilátky virové MeSH
- SARS-CoV-2 MeSH
- transplantace ledvin * škodlivé účinky MeSH
- vakcína BNT162 MeSH
- vakcína firmy Moderna proti COVID-19 MeSH
- vakcíny proti COVID-19 škodlivé účinky MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Although cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is an important factor in the pathogenesis of kidney allograft rejection, previous studies have not determined the optimal CMV prevention strategy to avoid indirect effects of the virus. In this randomized trial involving 140 kidney transplant recipients, incidence of acute rejection at 12 months was not lower with valganciclovir prophylaxis (for at least 3 months) compared with preemptive therapy initiated after detection of CMV DNA in whole blood. However, prophylaxis was associated with a lower risk of subclinical rejection at 3 months. Although both regimens were effective in preventing CMV disease, the incidence of CMV DNAemia (including episodes with higher viral loads) was significantly higher with preemptive therapy. Further research with long-term follow-up is warranted to better compare the two approaches. BACKGROUND: The optimal regimen for preventing cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in kidney transplant recipients, primarily in reducing indirect CMV effects, has not been defined. METHODS: This open-label, single-center, randomized clinical trial of valganciclovir prophylaxis versus preemptive therapy included kidney transplant recipients recruited between June 2013 and May 2018. After excluding CMV-seronegative recipients with transplants from seronegative donors, we randomized 140 participants 1:1 to receive valganciclovir prophylaxis (900 mg, daily for 3 or 6 months for CMV-seronegative recipients who received a kidney from a CMV-seropositive donor) or preemptive therapy (valganciclovir, 900 mg, twice daily) that was initiated after detection of CMV DNA in whole blood (≥1000 IU/ml) and stopped after two consecutive negative tests (preemptive therapy patients received weekly CMV PCR tests for 4 months). The primary outcome was the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection at 12 months. Key secondary outcomes included subclinical rejection, CMV disease and DNAemia, and neutropenia. RESULTS: The incidence of acute rejection was lower with valganciclovir prophylaxis than with preemptive therapy (13%, 9/70 versus 23%, 16/70), but the difference was not statistically significant. Subclinical rejection at 3 months was lower in the prophylaxis group (13% versus 29%, P = 0.027). Both regimens prevented CMV disease (in 4% of patients in both groups). Compared with prophylaxis, preemptive therapy resulted in significantly higher rates of CMV DNAemia (44% versus 75%, P < 0.001) and a higher proportion of patients experiencing episodes with higher viral load (≥2000 IU/ml), but significantly lower valganciclovir exposure and neutropenia. CONCLUSION: Among kidney transplant recipients, the use of valganciclovir prophylaxis did not result in a significantly lower incidence of acute rejection compared with the use of preemptive therapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: Optimizing Valganciclovir Efficacy in Renal Transplantation (OVERT Study), ACTRN12613000554763 .
- MeSH
- antivirové látky škodlivé účinky MeSH
- cytomegalovirové infekce * epidemiologie MeSH
- Cytomegalovirus genetika MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- neutropenie * chemicky indukované komplikace MeSH
- příjemce transplantátu MeSH
- transplantace ledvin * škodlivé účinky MeSH
- valganciklovir škodlivé účinky MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA vaccination may fail to sufficiently protect transplant recipients against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We retrospectively evaluated COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients (n = 226) after BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine administration. The control group consisted of unvaccinated patients (n = 194) during the previous pandemic wave. We measured anti-spike protein immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels and cellular responses, using enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay, in a prospective cohort after vaccination (n = 31) and recovery from COVID-19 (n = 19). COVID-19 was diagnosed in 37 (16%) vaccinated and 43 (22%) unvaccinated patients. COVID-19 severity was similar in both groups, with patients exhibiting a comparable need for hospitalization (41% vs. 40%, p = 1.000) and mortality (14% vs. 9%, p = .726). Short posttransplant periods were associated with COVID-19 after vaccination (p < .001). Only 5 (16%) patients achieved positive SARS-CoV-2 IgG after vaccination, and 17 (89%, p < .001) recovered from COVID-19 (median IgG levels, 0.6 vs. 52.5 AU/ml, p < .001). A cellular response following vaccination was present in the majority (n = 22, 71%), with an increase in interleukin 2 secreting T cells (p < .001). Despite detectable T cell immunity after mRNA vaccination, kidney transplant recipients remained at a high risk of severe COVID-19. Humoral responses induced by vaccination were significantly lower than that after COVID-19.
- MeSH
- COVID-19 * epidemiologie prevence a kontrola MeSH
- incidence MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- messenger RNA MeSH
- mRNA vakcíny MeSH
- pandemie MeSH
- příjemce transplantátu MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- protilátky virové MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- SARS-CoV-2 MeSH
- syntetické vakcíny MeSH
- transplantace ledvin * škodlivé účinky MeSH
- vakcína BNT162 MeSH
- vakcíny proti COVID-19 MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Klíčová slova
- remdesivir, molnupiravir,
- MeSH
- antivirové látky terapeutické užití MeSH
- COVID-19 * komplikace terapie MeSH
- dexamethason farmakologie terapeutické užití MeSH
- heparin nízkomolekulární terapeutické užití MeSH
- humanizované monoklonální protilátky terapeutické užití MeSH
- imunosupresivní léčba MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- monitorování léčiv metody MeSH
- monoklonální protilátky farmakologie terapeutické užití MeSH
- směrnice pro lékařskou praxi jako téma MeSH
- transplantace ledvin * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- přehledy MeSH
Získaný von Willebrandův syndrom (AvWS) je vzácnou krvácivou chorobou, jejíž podstatou je dysfunkce von Willebrandova faktoru (vWF) různého typu a tíže. Klinické projevy a rozdílnost intenzity krvácivých projevů jsou pak dané rozmanitostí postižení vWF. AvWS se vyskytuje obvykle u dospělých pacientů s negativní osobní či rodinou anamnézou krvácivé symptomatologie a je asociován se základními chorobami. V posledních letech je porucha funkce vWF nejčastěji připisována kardiovaskulárním, autoimunitním, lymfoproliferativním či myeloproliferativním komorbiditám. Skutečná prevalence AvWS není známá, protože mnoho případů může být klinicky i laboratorně němých. U výše uvedené specifické populace pacientů lze tak očekávat jeho vyšší výskyt. Prezentujeme kazuistiku 90letého pacienta s první epizodou krvácivého projevu a nově diagnostikovanou dysfunkcí vWF. Popisem případu se budeme snažit přednést diagnostické a léčebné možnosti AvWS včetně jejich úskalí a upozornit na situace, ve kterých na AvWS pomyslet.
Acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AvWS) is a rare bleeding disorder caused by von Willebrand factor (vWF) dysfunction of various types and severities. Clinical manifestations and differences in the intensity of bleeding are then given by the diversity of vWF disorders. AvWS usually occurs in adult patients with a negative personal or family history of bleeding symptoms and is associated with underlying disease. In recent years, vWF dysfunction has been most commonly attributed to cardiovascular, autoimmune, lymphoproliferative or myeloproliferative comorbidities. The true prevalence of AvWS is unknown, since many cases may be clinically or laboratory silent and remain undiagnosed. Thus, a higher incidence can be expected in the above-mentioned specific patient population. We present a case report of a 90year-old patient with the very first episode of bleeding manifestation and newly diagnosed vWF dysfunction. By describing the case, we will try to present the diagnostic and treatment options of AvWS, including their pitfalls, and draw attention to situations in which to think about AvWS.
