Background: Ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancers often share clinical characteristics and are typically diagnosed at advanced stages due to nonspecific symptoms. The utility of tumor markers, particularly CA125 and HE4, in the diagnosis and follow-up of these cancers remains an area of active investigation. Objectives: The CEEGOG (Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group) OX-01 study aimed to evaluate HE4's role alongside CA125 in follow-up for advanced-stage ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancers. It assessed the potential for detecting recurrence using marker elevation and imaging methods, examining the necessity of dynamic monitoring and current cut-off values' accuracy for early relapse detection. Methods: In this multicenter prospective cohort study, 117 eligible patients with Stage III-IV cancers were included. Patients had elevated CA125 or HE4 at diagnosis and achieved complete remission after first-line treatment. HE4 and CA125 levels were monitored every 3-4 months in the first two years and every six months thereafter. CT scans were performed if markers exceeded set thresholds or increased by over 20%. Results: During a median follow-up of 13.7 months, 73% of patients relapsed. Median HE4 levels were significantly higher in relapsed patients. A 10 IU/mL increase from baseline in CA125 had a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 93%, while a 15 pmol/L increase in HE4 had a sensitivity of 74% and specificity of 92% for predicting relapse up to three months before CT scan detection. Conclusions: The study found that dynamic changes in HE4 and CA125 levels, rather than predefined cut-off values, are crucial for early relapse detection. These markers may offer a significant lead time over imaging, potentially enabling earlier intervention. Further research is needed to validate these findings.
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
AIM: The aim of this study was to assess whether the use of sentinel lymph node (SLN) in addition to lymphadenectomy was associated with survival benefit in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. METHODS: International, multicenter, retrospective study. INCLUSION CRITERIA: cervical cancer treated between 01/2007 and 12/2016 by surgery only; squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, FIGO 2009 stage IB1-IIA2, negative surgical margins, and laparotomy approach. Patients undergoing neo-adjuvant and/or adjuvant treatment and/or with positive para-aortic lymph nodes, were excluded. Women with positive pelvic nodes who refused adjuvant treatment, were included. Lymph node assessment was performed by SLN (with ultrastaging protocol) plus pelvic lymphadenectomy ('SLN' group) or pelvic lymphadenectomy alone ('non-SLN' group). RESULTS: 1083 patients were included: 300 (27.7 %) in SLN and 783 (72.3 %) in non-SLN group. 77 (7.1 %) patients had recurrence (N = 11, 3.7 % SLN versus N = 66, 8.4 % non-SLN, p = 0.005) and 34 (3.1 %) (N = 4, 1.3 % SLN versus N = 30, 3.8 % non-SLN, p = 0.033) died. SLN group had better 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) (96.0 %,95 %CI:93.5-98.5 versus 92.0 %,95 %CI:90.0-94.0; p = 0.024). No 5-year overall survival (OS) difference was shown (98.4 %,95 %CI:96.8-99.9 versus 96.8 %,95 %CI:95.4-98.2; p = 0.160). SLN biopsy and lower stage were independent factors associated with improved DFS (HR:0.505,95 %CI:0.266-0.959, p = 0.037 and HR:2.703,95 %CI:1.389-5.261, p = 0.003, respectively). Incidence of pelvic central recurrences was higher in the non-SLN group (1.7 % versus 4.5 %, p = 0.039). CONCLUSION: Adding SLN biopsy to pelvic lymphadenectomy was associated with lower recurrence and death rate and improved 5-year DFS. This might be explained by the lower rate of missed nodal metastasis thanks to the use of SLN ultrastaging. SLN biopsy should be recommended in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
- MeSH
- biopsie sentinelové lymfatické uzliny metody MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lymfadenektomie * metody MeSH
- lymfatické metastázy MeSH
- nádory děložního čípku * patologie chirurgie mortalita MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- sentinelová uzlina * patologie chirurgie MeSH
- spinocelulární karcinom chirurgie patologie mortalita MeSH
- staging nádorů MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
AIMS: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecological cancer worldwide and its incidence is rising. The cornerstone of its management is surgical treatment with nodal staging. A monocentric study investigating the potential of the molecular biology method of one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) in sentinel lymph node (SLN) analysis was conducted at our institution between April 2016 and January 2018. Histopathological ultrastaging was used as the reference standard for SLN examination and OSNA as the index test. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term outcome of patients with discordant SLN and OSNA results. To our knowledge, this is the first study exploring this issue. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were followed in line with the current ESMO/ESGO/ESTRO recommendations. The institutional electronic database was retrospectively searched for patients' follow-up data from April 2016 till March 2023. Only patients who provided a written valid consent and had a positive OSNA and negative ultrastaging of their SLN analysis were included in the study. The primary endpoint was the retrospective analysis of their clinical outcome. Data from 58 patients enrolled into our previous study were reviewed and 12 discordant patients who met the inclusion criteria for this study were identified. The median follow-up was 83 months. Disease recurrence was detected in 3 (25%) patients, two of these were nodal and both patients died. One patient had a solitary lung metastasis which was surgically treated, and the patient was disease-free during the whole study period. CONCLUSION: The recurrence rate of patients included in the study was in the intermediate-high and high-risk group range, and hence, higher than expected based on ultrastaging results. Furthermore, benign epithelial inclusions do not seem to adversely affect OSNA SLN analysis in EC patients.
- MeSH
- biopsie sentinelové lymfatické uzliny * MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lokální recidiva nádoru patologie genetika epidemiologie MeSH
- lymfatické metastázy patologie diagnóza MeSH
- nádory endometria * genetika patologie chirurgie MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- sentinelová uzlina * patologie chirurgie MeSH
- staging nádorů * MeSH
- techniky amplifikace nukleových kyselin * metody MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of number of radical hysterectomies performed per year in each center with disease-free survival and overall survival. METHODS: We conducted an international, multicenter, retrospective study of patients previously included in the Surveillance in Cervical Cancer collaborative studies. Individuals with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage IB1-IIA1 cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy and had negative lymph nodes at final histology were included. Patients were treated at referral centers for gynecologic oncology according to updated national and international guidelines. Optimal cutoffs for surgical volume were identified using an unadjusted Cox proportional hazard model, with disease-free survival as the outcome and defined as the value that minimizes the P-value of the split in groups in terms of disease-free survival. Propensity score matching was used to create statistically similar cohorts at baseline. RESULTS: A total of 2,157 patients were initially included. The two most significant cutoffs for surgical volume were identified at seven and 17 surgical procedures, dividing the entire cohort into low-volume, middle-volume, and high-volume centers. After propensity score matching, 1,238 patients were analyzed-619 (50.0%) in the high-volume group, 523 (42.2%) in the middle-volume group, and 96 (7.8%) in the low-volume group. Patients who underwent surgery in higher-volume institutions had progressively better 5-year disease-free survival than those who underwent surgery in lower-volume centers (92.3% vs 88.9% vs 83.8%, P=.029). No difference was noted in 5-year overall survival (95.9% vs 97.2% vs 95.2%, P=.70). Cox multivariable regression analysis showed that FIGO stage greater than IB1, presence of lymphovascular space invasion, grade greater than 1, tumor diameter greater than 20 mm, minimally invasive surgical approach, nonsquamous cell carcinoma histology, and lower-volume centers represented independent risk factors for recurrence. CONCLUSION: Surgical volume of centers represented an independent prognostic factor affecting disease-free survival. Increasing number of radical hysterectomies performed in each center every year was associated with improved disease-free survival.
BACKGROUND: In cervical cancer, presence of lymph-node macrometastases (MAC) is a major prognostic factor and an indication for adjuvant treatment. However, since clinical impact of micrometastases (MIC) and isolated tumor-cells (ITC) remains controversial, we sought to identify a cut-off value for the metastasis size not associated with negative prognosis. METHODS: We analyzed data from 967 cervical cancer patients (T1a1L1-T2b) registered in the SCCAN (Surveillance in Cervical CANcer) database, who underwent primary surgical treatment, including sentinel lymph-node (SLN) biopsy with pathological ultrastaging. The size of SLN metastasis was considered a continuous variable and multiple testing was performed for cut-off values of 0.01-1.0 mm. Disease-free survival (DFS) was compared between N0 and subgroups of N1 patients defined by cut-off ranges. RESULTS: LN metastases were found in 172 (18%) patients, classified as MAC, MIC, and ITC in 79, 54, and 39 patients, respectively. DFS was shorter in patients with MAC (HR 2.20, P = 0.003) and MIC (HR 2.87, P < 0.001), while not differing between MAC/MIC (P = 0.484). DFS in the ITC subgroup was neither different from N0 (P = 0.127) nor from MIC/MAC subgroups (P = 0.449). Cut-off analysis revealed significantly shorter DFS compared to N0 in all subgroups with metastases ≥0.4 mm (HR 2.311, P = 0.04). The significance of metastases <0.4 mm could not be assessed due to limited statistical power (<80%). We did not identify any cut-off for the size of metastasis with significantly better prognosis than the rest of N1 group. CONCLUSIONS: In cervical cancer patients, the presence of LN metastases ≥0.4 mm was associated with a significant negative impact on DFS and no cut-off value for the size of metastasis with better prognosis than N1 was found. Traditional metastasis stratification based on size has no clinical implication.
- MeSH
- biopsie sentinelové lymfatické uzliny MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lymfatické metastázy patologie MeSH
- lymfatické uzliny patologie MeSH
- mikrometastázy patologie MeSH
- nádory děložního čípku * chirurgie patologie MeSH
- nádory prsu * patologie MeSH
- sentinelová uzlina * patologie MeSH
- staging nádorů MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend tailoring the radicality of hysterectomy according to the known preoperative tumor characteristics in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess whether increased radicality had an effect on 5-year disease-free survival in patients with early-stage cervical cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy. The secondary aims were 5-year overall survival and pattern of recurrence. STUDY DESIGN: This was an international, multicenter, retrospective study from the Surveillance in Cervical CANcer (SCCAN) collaborative cohort. Patients with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 stage IB1 and IIA1 who underwent open type B/C1/C2 radical hysterectomy according to Querleu-Morrow classification between January 2007 and December 2016, who did not undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy and who had negative lymph nodes and free surgical margins at final histology, were included. Descriptive statistics and survival analyses were performed. Patients were stratified according to pathologic tumor diameter. Propensity score match analysis was performed to balance baseline characteristics in patients undergoing nerve-sparing and non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy. RESULTS: A total of 1257 patients were included. Of note, 883 patients (70.2%) underwent nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy, and 374 patients (29.8%) underwent non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy. Baseline differences between the study groups were found for tumor stage and diameter (higher use of non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for tumors >2 cm or with vaginal involvement; P<.0001). The use of adjuvant therapy in patients undergoing nerve-sparing and non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy was 27.3% vs 28.6%, respectively (P=.63). Five-year disease-free survival in patients undergoing nerve-sparing vs non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy was 90.1% (95% confidence interval, 87.9-92.2) vs 93.8% (95% confidence interval, 91.1-96.5), respectively (P=.047). Non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy was independently associated with better disease-free survival at multivariable analysis performed on the entire cohort (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.81; P=.004). Furthermore, 5-year overall survival in patients undergoing nerve-sparing vs non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy was 95.7% (95% confidence interval, 94.1-97.2) vs non-nerve-sparing 96.5% (95% confidence interval, 94.3-98.7), respectively (P=.78). In patients with a tumor diameter ≤20 mm, 5-year disease-free survival was 94.7% in nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy vs 96.2% in non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (P=.22). In patients with tumors between 21 and 40 mm, 5-year disease-free survival was 90.3% in non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy vs 83.1% in nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (P=.016) (no significant difference in the rate of adjuvant treatment in this subgroup, P=.47). This was confirmed after propensity match score analysis (balancing the 2 study groups). The pattern of recurrence in the propensity-matched population did not demonstrate any difference (P=.70). CONCLUSION: For tumors ≤20 mm, no survival difference was found with more radical hysterectomy. For tumors between 21 and 40 mm, a more radical hysterectomy was associated with improved 5-year disease-free survival. No difference in the pattern of recurrence according to the extent of radicality was observed. Non-nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy was associated with better 5-year disease-free survival than nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy after propensity score match analysis.
- MeSH
- hysterektomie škodlivé účinky MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory děložního čípku * patologie MeSH
- přežití po terapii bez příznaků nemoci MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- spinocelulární karcinom * patologie MeSH
- staging nádorů MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural MeSH
BACKGROUND: Up to 26% of patients with early-stage cervical cancer experience relapse after primary surgery. However, little is known about which factors influence prognosis following disease recurrence. Therefore, our aims were to determine post-recurrence disease-specific survival (PR-DSS) and to identify respective prognostic factors for PR-DSS. METHODS: Data from 528 patients with early-stage cervical cancer who relapsed after primary surgery performed between 2007 and 2016 were obtained from the SCANN study (Surveillance in Cervical CANcer). Factors related to the primary disease and recurrence were combined in a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model to predict PR-DSS. RESULTS: The 5-year PR-DSS was 39.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 22.7%-44.5%), median disease-free interval between primary surgery and recurrence (DFI1) was 1.5 years, and median survival after recurrence was 2.5 years. Six significant variables were identified in the multivariable analysis and were used to construct the prognostic model. Two were related to primary treatment (largest tumour size and lymphovascular space invasion) and four to recurrence (DFI1, age at recurrence, presence of symptoms, and recurrence type). The C-statistic after 10-fold cross-validation of prognostic model reached 0.701 (95% CI 0.675-0.727). Three risk-groups with significantly differing prognoses were identified, with 5-year PR-DSS rates of 81.8%, 44.6%, and 12.7%. CONCLUSIONS: We developed the robust model of PR-DSS to stratify patients with relapsed cervical cancer according to risk profiles using six routinely recorded prognostic markers. The model can be utilised in clinical practice to aid decision-making on the strategy of recurrence management, and to better inform the patients.
- MeSH
- adenokarcinom mortalita patologie patofyziologie terapie MeSH
- adenoskvamózní karcinom mortalita patologie patofyziologie terapie MeSH
- adjuvantní chemoterapie MeSH
- adjuvantní radioterapie MeSH
- asymptomatické nemoci MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- hysterektomie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lokální recidiva nádoru mortalita patologie patofyziologie terapie MeSH
- lymfatické uzliny patologie MeSH
- míra přežití MeSH
- multivariační analýza MeSH
- nádory děložního čípku mortalita patologie patofyziologie terapie MeSH
- neuroendokrinní karcinom mortalita patologie patofyziologie terapie MeSH
- prognóza MeSH
- proporcionální rizikové modely MeSH
- spinocelulární karcinom mortalita patologie patofyziologie terapie MeSH
- staging nádorů MeSH
- trachelektomie MeSH
- tumor burden MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural MeSH
Základem diagnostiky endometriálního karcinomu je histopatologická morfologie. Bokhman v roce 1983 položil základ klasickému dělení endometriálního karcinomu na dvě poměrně široké skupiny nádorů rozdílných v patogenezi. Tato klasifikace splňuje didaktický účel, poskytuje snadnou orientaci pro epidemiologická data, avšak není vhodná ke stratifikaci pacientek. Toto dělení v sobě nese široký překryv klinických, patologických i molekulárních vlastností tumorů. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) projekt řadí endometriální tumory do čtyř skupin na základě molekulárně genetických vlastností. Integrace histopatologického nálezu spolu s molekulární klasifikací se jeví jako nejlepší přístup pro hodnocení každého jednotlivého nádoru.
The basis for the diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma is histopathological morphology. Since 1983 we used Bokhman classic division of endometrial cancer on two relatively wide groups of tumors different in pathogenesis. This classification meets the didactic purpose, provides easy orientation for epidemiological data, but is not suitable for patient stratification. This division is carried out wide overlap of clinical, pathological and molecular tumor features. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project classifies endometrial tumors into four groups based on molecular genetic features. Integration of the histopathological findings along with molecular classification appears to be the best approach for evaluating each individual tumor.
Cíl: Hlavním cílem článku je přehledně informovat odbornou veřejnost o podobě nově implementované molekulární klasifikace endometriálního karcinomu do praxe. Metodika: Souhrn aktuálních poznatků, doporučení a nových postupů týkajících se molekulárně genetického vyšetřování tkání pacientek s endometriálním karcinomem. Výsledky: Endometriální karcinom je v současnosti diagnostikován na základě histopatologické morfologie. Dle klasického Bokhmanova dělení rozeznáváme dvě poměrně široké skupiny nádorů rozdílných v patogenezi. Typ I – estrogen-dependentní nádory, klinicky zpravidla indolentní, a typ II – non-endometrioidní nádory, klinicky agresivní, bez závislosti na stimulaci estrogeny. Tato klasifikace splňuje didaktický účel, poskytuje snadnou orientaci pro epidemiologická data, avšak není vhodná ke stratifikaci vzhledem k prolínání klinických, patologických i molekulárních vlastností. Projekt Genomový atlas nádorů řadí endometriální tumory do čtyř skupin na základě molekulárně genetických vlastností. Závěr: Integrace histopatologického nálezu spolu s molekulární klasifikací se jeví jako nejlepší přístup pro hodnocení každého jednotlivého nádoru. Dosáhneme tím ideální stratifikace pacientek pro léčebná schémata.
Objective: The main objective of the article is to clearly inform healthcare professionals about the newly implemented molecular classification of endometrial cancer into practice. Methods: Summary of current knowledge, recommendations and new procedures relating to molecular genetic examination of the tissues of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Results: Endometrial cancer is currently diagnosed on the base of histopathological morphology. According to the classical Bokhman division, we distinguish between two relatively wide groups of tumors which are different in pathogenesis: type I – estrogen-dependent tumors, clinically usually indolent, and type II – non-endometroid tumors, clinically aggressive, without dependence on estrogen stimulation. This classification fulfills a didactic purpose and provides easy orientation for epidemiological data, but is not suitable for stratification due to the overlap of clinical, pathological and molecular features. The Cancer Genome Atlas project classifies endometrial tumors into 4 groups based on molecular genetic features. Conclusion: Integration of the histopathological findings along with molecular classification appears to be the best approach for evaluating each individual tumor. This will help to achieve the ideal stratification of patients for treatment regimens.
- Klíčová slova
- molekulární klasifikace, projekt Genomový atlas nádorů, POLE mutace,
- MeSH
- endometroidní karcinom * genetika klasifikace MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mutace genetika MeSH
- nádory endometria genetika klasifikace MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- přehledy MeSH
BACKGROUND/AIM: To compare the diagnostic reliability, accuracy and safety of ultrasound-guided biopsy (Tru-Cut biopsy) and ascites puncture in patients with a primarily inoperable malignant ovarian tumor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of the studied methods in consecutively examined patients and a prospective validation of these methods. 79 women with a suspected primarily inoperable ovarian tumor underwent Tru-Cut biopsies and were included in the ultrasound-guided biopsy group. In addition, 55 patients after ascites puncture were enrolled in the comparison group. Both procedures were performed in 48 patients for the prospective validation. RESULTS: Significant differences in favour of ultrasound-guided biopsy were found in all studied variables (malignancy confirmation 72.9% vs. 95.8%, tumor origin 52.1% vs. 89.6%, histologic subtype 43.8% vs. 85.4% and accuracy, i.e. agreement of preoperative and definitive diagnosis 43.7% vs. 95.4%). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided biopsy is an accurate, reliable, safe and minimally invasive method. Owing to the high reliability and accuracy, it has the capacity to replace ascites puncture with cytologic examination or a more invasive method (laparoscopy, laparotomy) for adequate tumor sampling.
- MeSH
- ascites patologie MeSH
- cytodiagnostika MeSH
- histocytochemie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory vaječníků diagnóza MeSH
- punkce * metody MeSH
- reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- ultrasonografie * metody MeSH
- ultrazvukem navigovaná biopsie * metody normy MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
