INTRODUCTION: Central nervous system lymphoma poses significant diagnostic challenges, with stereotactic biopsy being the gold standard for diagnosis. Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative histological examination are utilized to enhance biopsy yield, yet their comparative efficacy remains unclear. RESEARCH QUESTION: This study aims to compare the diagnostic yield of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative histological examination in stereotactic brain biopsies for central nervous system lymphoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 115 patients who underwent stereotactic brain biopsies for central nervous system lymphoma. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative histological examination were assessed and compared. RESULTS: Out of 125 surgeries, frameless biopsies were the most common, accounting for 74.4 percent. Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a sensitivity of 80.00 percent and a specificity of 98.51 percent (AUC = 0.893, p = 0.004), whereas intraoperative histological examination showed a sensitivity of 66.67 percent and a specificity of 59.09 percent (AUC = 0.629, p = 0.459). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The study emphasizes the critical role of intraoperative examinations, thus improving precision and diagnostic yield in the surgical management of central nervous system lymphoma. Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging outperforms intraoperative histological examination in terms of sensitivity and specificity for confirming positive biopsy yields in central nervous system lymphoma, thereby reducing the need for additional surgeries. These findings support the routine use of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in the surgical strategy for central nervous system lymphoma to improve diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes.
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Asthma is a heterogeneous disease. The Czech Pneumology and Allergology Societies commissioned 10 experts to review the literature and create joint national guidelines for managing asthma, reflecting this heterogeneity. The aim was to develop an easy-to-use diagnostic strategy as a rational approach to the widening opportunities for the use of phenotype-targeted therapy. The guidelines were presented on websites for public comments by members of both the societies. The reviewers' comments contributed to creating the final version of the guidelines. The key hallmark of the diagnostic approach is the pragmatic concept, which assesses the presence of allergy and eosinophilia in each asthmatic patient. The guidelines define three clinically relevant asthma phenotypes: eosinophilic allergic asthma, eosinophilic nonallergic asthma and noneosinophilic nonallergic asthma. The resulting multifunctional classification describing the severity, level of control and phenotype is the starting point for a comprehensive treatment strategy. The level of control is constantly confronted with the intensity of the common stepwise pharmacotherapy, and the concurrently included phenotyping is essential for phenotype-specific therapy. The concept of the asthma approach with assessing the presence of eosinophilia and allergy provides a way for more precise diagnosis, which is a prerequisite for using widening options of personalized therapy.
- MeSH
- alergie diagnóza patologie MeSH
- bronchiální astma klasifikace diagnóza terapie MeSH
- eozinofilie diagnóza patologie MeSH
- fenotyp MeSH
- individualizovaná medicína MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- stupeň závažnosti nemoci MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
- směrnice pro lékařskou praxi MeSH
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) in patients with advanced idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a complication connected with unfavorable prognosis. Great efforts have been made in attempting to establish a reliable non-invasive method which would enable detection of this complication. In this context a formula using pulmonary function parameters was published with outstanding results. METHODS: We tested the formula in 27 IPF patients who underwent a lung function examination, cardiac ultrasonography and catheterisation on the same day. RESULTS: Pulmonary hypertension was detected by catheterisation in 17 patients (63%). In our group, contrary to the published data, the aforementioned formula was neither useful for detecting patients with a high probability of PH nor as a means of calculating the mean pulmonary artery pressure in individual patients (p = 0.502 and p = 0.833, respectively). Ultrasound examination reached borderline correlation with the values measured by catheterisation when we compare patients with relevant results (r = 0.531, p = 0.051). However, the examination gave no usable results in 13 patients (48%). CONCLUSION: Our data suggests that no reliable, noninvasive method is currently available for detecting and confirming PH in IPF patients. We did not confirm the usefulness of the published formula. Further carefully organised studies will be necessary to verify or refute it.
- MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- plicní fibróza komplikace patofyziologie MeSH
- plicní hypertenze diagnóza etiologie patofyziologie ultrasonografie MeSH
- prognóza MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
- respirační funkční testy MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- senzitivita a specificita MeSH
- srdeční katetrizace MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- MeSH
- financování organizované MeSH
- Publikační typ
- abstrakty MeSH
- MeSH
- financování organizované MeSH
- Publikační typ
- abstrakty MeSH
