BACKGROUND: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a common complication among patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). Despite advances in PAH treatment, evidence for the benefits of PAH therapies in CHD-PAH is limited. OBJECTIVES: This analysis aimed to evaluate outcomes in patients with repaired PAH-CHD receiving an approved PAH drug. METHODS: This was a pooled analysis including CHD-PAH patients whose CHD was repaired ≥1 year prior from 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, event-driven studies: GRIPHON (NCT01106014), SERAPHIN (NCT00660179), and COMPASS-2 (NCT00303459). The primary endpoint was time to first confirmed morbidity/mortality (M/M) event. HRs with 95% CIs were determined with random effects models. RESULTS: The analysis included 1,982 patients with PAH, 177 (8.9%) with CHD-PAH. In the overall PAH cohort, the mean age was 48 and 49 years in treatment and placebo groups; 80% and 77% were female. In the CHD-PAH cohort, the mean age was 41 and 39 years; 70% and 66% were female. Overall, ≥98% in each group were World Health Organization functional class II and III at baseline. There was a significant reduction in risk of M/M events vs placebo in the overall PAH and CHD-PAH cohorts: 37% reduction in the overall PAH cohort (HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.52-0.77) and 50% reduction in the CHD-PAH population (HR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.26-0.94). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with approved PAH drugs provided a similar reduction in M/M risk in patients with repaired CHD-PAH when compared with the overall PAH population. This pooled analysis provides important evidence to guide medical management in this patient population.

• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH

BACKGROUND: Age affects disease severity and patient outcomes in pulmonary arterial hypertension. This post-hoc analysis identified prognostic age groups and associated macitentan/selexipag treatment effects. METHODS: Randomized trials evaluated macitentan (SERAPHIN; NCT00660179) and selexipag (GRIPHON; NCT01106014) versus placebo (primary endpoint: time to morbidity/mortality [M/M]). This analysis defined age thresholds differentiating M/M risk in patients randomized to placebo (Cox regression determining treatment effect by age). RESULTS: Three age groups (< 35, 35-64, ≥ 65 years) showed good M/M risk discrimination (c-statistic 0.69, SERAPHIN; 0.66, GRIPHON). M/M risk was higher in placebo patients < 35 versus 35-64 years (SERAPHIN: hazard ratio [HR] 1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-2.72, p = 0.02; GRIPHON: HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.28-2.56, p < 0.001). M/M risk trended higher in patients ≥ 65 versus 35-64 years (SERAPHIN: HR 1.55, 95% CI 0.89-2.69, p = 0.12; GRIPHON (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.75-1.55, p = 0.69). M/M risk was lower with macitentan/selexipag versus placebo: macitentan < 35 (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.25-0.78; p = 0.005), 35-64 (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.33-0.76; p < 0.001), ≥ 65 years (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.30-1.58; p = 0.38); selexipag < 35 (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.32-0.78; p = 0.002), 35-64 (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.54-0.96; p = 0.03), ≥ 65 years (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.33-0.91; p = 0.02). Adverse-event discontinuations were similar. CONCLUSIONS: The benefit (vs placebo) of macitentan/selexipag on reducing risk of M/M events was consistent across all ages, including the younger group where significant treatment effects were observed.

• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is successfully treatable with pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA), balloon pulmonary angioplasty, and medical therapy. Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management risk score (RRS) is able to predict long-term outcome in inoperable patients or in patients with residual PH after surgery. We performed a post hoc analysis of RRS in patients who were enrolled in the CTREPH study (NCT01416636), a randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing high-dose and low-dose subcutaneous (SC) treprostinil in patients with severe CTEPH that was classified by an interdisciplinary CTEPH team as nonoperable, or as persistent or recurrent pulmonary hypertension after PEA. Baseline mean RRS was similar in both treatment groups (8.7 in high-dose arm vs. 8.6 in low-dose arm), but mean RRS change from baseline to Week 24 was greater in the high-dose treprostinil group than in the low-dose treprostinil group (-0.88 vs. -0.17). The difference in RRS change from baseline to Week 24 between high dose versus low dose was statistically significant with mean difference of -0.70 (95% confidence interval: -1.36 to -0.05, p = 0.0352), and was driven mainly by improvement of World Health Organization functional class and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide concentration. SC treprostinil therapy administered in standard dose had positive effect on the risk profile measured by RRS in patients with inoperable or persistent/recurrent severe CTEPH. Although our study was limited by the small sample size and post hoc nature, assessment of risk profile is of great importance to this particular patient population with very poor prognosis.

• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH

INTRODUCTION: In SERAPHIN, a long-term, event-driven, double-blind randomised controlled trial in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), macitentan 10 mg significantly reduced the risk of morbidity/mortality compared with placebo. Its open-label extension study (SERAPHIN OL) further assessed long-term safety and tolerability of macitentan 10 mg in PAH patients. METHODS: Patients in SERAPHIN who completed the double-blind treatment period or experienced a morbidity event during the study could enter SERAPHIN OL. Patients received macitentan 10 mg once daily, and safety and survival were assessed until end of treatment (+ 28 days). Two overlapping sets were analysed for safety: (1) all patients in SERAPHIN OL (OL safety set); (2) patients randomised to macitentan 10 mg in SERAPHIN (long-term safety/survival set). Survival was evaluated as an exploratory endpoint in the latter set. RESULTS: Of 742 patients randomised in SERAPHIN, 550 (74.1%) entered SERAPHIN OL (OL safety set); 242 patients were randomised to macitentan 10 mg in SERAPHIN (long-term safety/survival set). Median (min, max) exposure to macitentan 10 mg was 40.1 (0.1, 130.5) months (2074.7 patient-years; OL safety set) and 54.7 (0.1, 141.3) months (1151.0 patient-years; long-term safety/survival set). Safety in both analysis sets was comparable to the known safety profile of macitentan. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates (95% CI) at 1, 5, 7 and 9 years were 95.0% (91.3, 97.1), 73.3% (66.6, 78.9), 62.6% (54.6, 69.6) and 52.7% (43.6, 61.0), respectively (long-term safety/survival set; median follow-up: 5.9 years). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis provides the longest follow-up for safety and survival published to date for any PAH therapy. The safety profile of macitentan 10 mg over this extensive treatment period was in line with that observed in SERAPHIN. As the majority of patients were receiving other PAH therapy at macitentan initiation, our study provides additional insight into the long-term safety of macitentan, including as part of combination therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00660179 and NCT00667823.

• MeSH
• familiární plicní arteriální hypertenze farmakoterapie   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• plicní arteriální hypertenze * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• pyrimidiny škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• sulfonamidy škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a rare complication of acute pulmonary embolism, either symptomatic or not. The occlusion of proximal pulmonary arteries by fibrotic intravascular material, in combination with a secondary microvasculopathy of vessels <500 µm, leads to increased pulmonary vascular resistance and progressive right heart failure. The mechanism responsible for the transformation of red clots into fibrotic material remnants has not yet been elucidated. In patients with pulmonary hypertension, the diagnosis is suspected when a ventilation/perfusion lung scan shows mismatched perfusion defects, and confirmed by right heart catheterisation and vascular imaging. Today, in addition to lifelong anticoagulation, treatment modalities include surgery, angioplasty and medical treatment according to the localisation and characteristics of the lesions.This statement outlines a review of the literature and current practice concerning diagnosis and management of CTEPH. It covers the definitions, diagnosis, epidemiology, follow-up after acute pulmonary embolism, pathophysiology, treatment by pulmonary endarterectomy, balloon pulmonary angioplasty, drugs and their combination, rehabilitation and new lines of research in CTEPH.It represents the first collaboration of the European Respiratory Society, the International CTEPH Association and the European Reference Network-Lung in the pulmonary hypertension domain. The statement summarises current knowledge, but does not make formal recommendations for clinical practice.

• MeSH
• arteria pulmonalis MeSH
• balónková angioplastika * MeSH
• chronická nemoc MeSH
• endarterektomie MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• plicní embolie * MeSH
• plicní hypertenze * MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH
• přehledy MeSH

Background Conducting randomized controlled trials to investigate survival in a rare disease like pulmonary arterial hypertension has considerable ethical and logistical constraints. In many studies, such as the Study with an Endothelin Receptor Antagonist in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension to Improve Clinical Outcome (SERAPHIN) randomized controlled trial, evaluating survival is further complicated by bias introduced by allowing active therapy among placebo-treated patients who clinically deteriorate. Methods and Results SERAPHIN enrolled and followed patients in the same time frame as the US Registry to Evaluate Early And Long-term PAH Disease Management, providing an opportunity to compare observed survival for SERAPHIN patients with predicted survival had they received real-world treatment as in the Registry to Evaluate Early And Long-term PAH Disease Management. From the Registry to Evaluate Early And Long-term PAH Disease Management (N=3515), 734 patients who met SERAPHIN eligibility criteria were selected and their data used to build a prediction model for time to death up to 3 years based on 10 baseline prognostic variables. The model was used to predict a survival curve for each of the 742 SERAPHIN patients via their baseline variables. The average of these predicted survival curves was compared with observed survival of the placebo (n=250) and macitentan 10 mg (n=242) groups using a log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard model. Observed mortality risk for patients randomized to placebo, 62% of whom were taking background pulmonary arterial hypertension therapy, tended to be lower than that predicted for all SERAPHIN patients (16% lower; P=0.259). The observed placebo survival curve closely approximated the predicted survival curve for the first 15 months. Beyond that time, observed risk of mortality decreased compared with predicted mortality, potentially reflecting the impact of crossover of patients in the placebo group to active therapy. Over 3 years, risk of mortality observed with macitentan 10 mg was 35% lower than predicted mortality ( P=0.010). Conclusions These analyses show that, in a rare disease, real-world observational data can complement randomized controlled trial data to overcome some challenges associated with assessing survival in the setting of a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Trial Registration https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifiers: NCT00660179 and NCT00370214.

• MeSH
• antagonisté endotelinového receptoru škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• antihypertenziva škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• časové faktory MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• hodnocení rizik MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III jako téma MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• medicína založená na důkazech MeSH
• multicentrické studie jako téma MeSH
• plicní arteriální hypertenze diagnóza   farmakoterapie   mortalita   MeSH
• pozorovací studie jako téma MeSH
• příčina smrti MeSH
• progrese nemoci MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma MeSH
• rizikové faktory MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• vzácné nemoci diagnóza   farmakoterapie   mortalita   MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH

BACKGROUND: Treprostinil, a prostacyclin analogue, is effective for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. However, information is scarce regarding treprostinil for treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous treprostinil in this setting. METHODS: In this 24-week, randomised, double-blind controlled trial, we enrolled patients with CTEPH, classified as non-operable, or with persistent or recurrent pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary endarterectomy, in six European expert centres in Austria, Czech Republic, Germany, and Poland. Patients in WHO functional class III or IV with a 6-min walk distance of 150-400 m were randomly assigned at a 1:1 allocation ratio to continuous high-dose subcutaneous treprostinil (target dose around 30 ng/kg per min at week 12) or low-dose subcutaneous treprostinil (target dose around 3 ng/kg per min at week 12). The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in 6-min walk distance at week 24. All patients who received at least one dose of the study drug were included in the intention-to-treat efficacy and safety analyses based on assessment of adverse events. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu EudraCT number 2008-006441-10 and ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01416636. FINDINGS: From March 9, 2009, to June 9, 2016, 105 patients were enrolled with 53 (50%) patients randomly assigned to high-dose and 52 (50%) patients to low-dose subcutaneous treprostinil. At week 24, marginal mean 6-min walk distance improved by 44·98 m (95% CI 27·52 to 62·45) in the high-dose group, and by 4·29 m (95% CI -13·34 to 21·92) in the low-dose group (treatment effect 40·69 m, 95% CI 15·86 to 65·53, p=0·0016). 12 serious adverse events were reported in ten (19%) of 52 patients from the low-dose group and 16 serious adverse events were reported in nine (17%) of 53 patients from the high-dose group. The most common treatment-related adverse events in both groups were infusion site pain and other infusion site reactions. INTERPRETATION: Treatment with subcutaneous treprostinil was safe, and improved exercise capacity in patients with severe CTEPH. Subcutaneous treprostinil provides a parenteral treatment option for patients of WHO functional class III or IV and those who do not tolerate other therapies or need combination treatment. FUNDING: SciPharm Sàrl.

• MeSH
• antihypertenziva aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
• epoprostenol aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   analogy a deriváty   MeSH
• injekce subkutánní MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• monitorování léčiv metody   MeSH
• plicní embolie komplikace   MeSH
• plicní hypertenze * diagnóza   farmakoterapie   etiologie   patofyziologie   MeSH
• stupeň závažnosti nemoci MeSH
• test chůzí metody   MeSH
• tolerance zátěže účinky léků   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• vztah mezi dávkou a účinkem léčiva MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH

BACKGROUND: Patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension who achieve a six-minute walk distance of 380-440 m may have improved prognosis. Using the randomized controlled trial of macitentan in pulmonary arterial hypertension (SERAPHIN), the association between six-minute walk distance and long-term outcomes was explored. METHODS: Patients with six-minute walk distance data at Month 6 were dichotomized as above or below the median six-minute walk distance (400 m) and assessed for future risk of pulmonary arterial hypertension-related death or hospitalization and all-cause death. Additionally, six-minute walk distance values at baseline, Month 6 and the change from baseline to Month 6 were categorized by quartiles. All associations were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method using a log-rank test and Cox regression models. RESULTS: Patients with a six-minute walk distance >400 m vs. ≤400 m at Month 6 have a reduced risk of pulmonary arterial hypertension-related death or hospitalization (hazard ratio 0.48; 95% confidence interval 0.33-0.69). The risk was also lower for patients with higher quartiles of six-minute walk distance at baseline or Month 6 (baseline: hazard ratio [Q4 (>430 m) vs. Q1 (≤300 m)] 0.23; 95% confidence interval 0.15-0.36; Month 6: hazard ratio [Q4 (>455 m) vs. Q1 (≤348 m)] 0.33; 95% confidence interval 0.19-0.55). In contrast, six-minute walk distance changes at Month 6 were not associated with the risk of pulmonary arterial hypertension-related death or hospitalization (p = 0.477). These findings were consistent when adjusted for known confounders. Similar results were observed for the risk of all-cause death up to end of study. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension walking >400 m had better long-term prognosis. Although changes in six-minute walk distance were not associated with long-term outcomes, assessing absolute six-minute walk distance values remains important in the clinical management of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

• MeSH
• chůze * MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• plicní hypertenze diagnóza   patofyziologie   MeSH
• prognóza MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH

BACKGROUND: Registry data suggest that disease progression in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is indicative of poor prognosis. However, the prognostic relevance of PAH-related morbidity has not been formally evaluated in randomized controlled trials. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of these analyses was to assess the impact of morbidity events on the risk of subsequent mortality using the landmark method and data from the SERAPHIN and GRIPHON studies. METHODS: For each study, the risk of all-cause death up to the end of the study was assessed from the landmark time point (months 3, 6, and 12) according to whether a patient had experienced a primary endpoint morbidity event before the landmark. Each analysis was conducted using data from all patients who were available for survival follow-up at the landmark. RESULTS: In the SERAPHIN study, on the basis of the 3-month landmark time point, patients who experienced a morbidity event before month 3 had an increased risk of death compared with patients who did not (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.39; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.94 to 5.92). In the GRIPHON study, on the basis of the 3-month landmark time point, there was also an increased risk with a HR of 4.48; (95% CI: 2.98 to 6.73). Analyses based on 6-month and 12-month landmarks also showed increased risk in patients who experienced morbidity events, albeit with a reduced HR. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the prognostic relevance of PAH-related morbidity as defined in the SERAPHIN and GRIPHON studies, highlighting the importance of preventing disease progression in patients with PAH and supporting the clinical relevance of SERAPHIN and GRIPHON morbidity events. (Study of Macitentan [ACT-064992] on Morbidity and Mortality in Patients With Symptomatic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension [SERAPHIN]; NCT00660179; Selexipag [ACT-293987] in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension [GRIPHON]; NCT01106014).

• MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• míra přežití trendy   MeSH
• morbidita MeSH
• mortalita trendy   MeSH
• následné studie MeSH
• plicní hypertenze diagnóza   mortalita   patofyziologie   MeSH
• prognóza MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH

OBJECTIVE: We compared the haemodynamic effects of riociguat in patients with inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) or persistent/recurrent CTEPH after pulmonary endarterectomy in the Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Soluble Guanylate Cyclase-Stimulator Trial 1 study. METHODS: Patients with inoperable or persistent/recurrent CTEPH (n=261; mean± SD age 59±14 years; 66% women) were randomised to riociguat (up to 2.5 mg three times daily) or placebo. Haemodynamic parameters were assessed at baseline and week 16. RESULTS: Riociguat decreased pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) in inoperable (n=189; least-squares mean difference: -285 dyn s/cm(5) (95% CI -357 to -213); p<0.0001) and persistent/recurrent (n=72; -131 dyn s/cm(5) (95% CI -214 to -48); p=0.0025) patients. Cardiac index improved in inoperable patients by a least-squares mean difference of +0.6 L/min/m(2) (95% CI 0.4 to 0.7; p<0.0001), while in persistent/recurrent patients the change was +0.2 L/min/m(2) (95% CI -0.1 to 0.5; p=0.17). Mean pulmonary artery pressure decreased in inoperable and persistent/recurrent patients(-4.7 mm Hg (95% CI -6.9 to -2.6; p<0.0001 and -4.8 mm Hg (-8.2 to -1.5; p=0.0055), respectively). For all patients, changes in 6 min walk distance correlated with changes in PVR (r=-0.29 (95% CI -0.41 to -0.17); p<0.0001) and cardiac index (r=0.23 (95% CI 0.10 to 0.35); p=0.0004). CONCLUSIONS: Riociguat improved haemodynamics in patients with inoperable CTEPH or persistent/recurrent CTEPH. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00855465.

• MeSH
• antihypertenziva škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• arteria pulmonalis účinky léků   patofyziologie   MeSH
• arteriální tlak účinky léků   MeSH
• časové faktory MeSH
• cévní rezistence účinky léků   MeSH
• chronická nemoc MeSH
• dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
• endarterektomie MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• metoda nejmenších čtverců MeSH
• obnova funkce MeSH
• plicní embolie komplikace   diagnóza   MeSH
• plicní hypertenze diagnóza   farmakoterapie   etiologie   patofyziologie   MeSH
• prospektivní studie MeSH
• pyrazoly škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• pyrimidiny škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• recidiva MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• test chůzí MeSH
• tolerance zátěže účinky léků   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH