Národní program screeningu kolorektálního karcinomu (KRK) probíhá v České republice od roku 2000 a je příkladem mezioborové spolupráce. Podílí se na něm specialisté z oboru gastroenterologie, praktického lékařství, gynekologie a klinické biochemie. Program je založen na dvou základních metodách – screeningovém imunochemickém testu na okultní krvácení do stolice (iTOKS, FIT) a preventivní koloskopii (TOKS-pozitivní a screeningová koloskopie). O jeho efektivitě vypovídají vysoké počty zachycených kolorektálních prekancerózních a maligních lézí. V letech 2006–2023 bylo v rámci programu provedeno 531 362 preventivních koloskopií, diagnostikováno 202 575 pacientů s adenomy (38,1 %) a 14 473 s karcinomy (2,7 %). Kvalita programu je monitorována na základě indikátorů kvality, které jsou zaměřeny na organizaci (pokrytí cílové populace) i jednotlivé metody. Pokrytí screeningovými testy ve standardním dvouletém sledování se dlouhodobě pohybuje okolo 30 %, v roce 2023 činilo 30,0 % (s výjimkou let 2020 a 2021, kdy došlo k přechodnému poklesu pokrytí na 27 % z důvodu pandemie onemocnění covidem-19). Epidemiologické ukazatele ovlivňují i nescreeningové testy, pokrytí všemi relevantními metodami ve dvouletém intervalu činilo 37,5 % v roce 2023. Koloskopie je hodnocena šesti parametry (počet vyšetření, střevní očista, totální koloskopie, záchyt adenomů celkově, u žen a u mužů). Všechny tyto indikátory splňovalo v roce 2023 celkem 72 % center pro screeningovou koloskopii. Přístroje analyzující TOKS musejí nově procházet pravidelným externím hodnocením kvality (EHK). To by mělo vést také k optimalizaci pozitivity testů, která v roce 2023 dosahovala hodnoty 9,1 %. I díky programu screeningu KRK lze pozorovat příznivé epidemiologické trendy KRK, kdy v letech 2000–2022 došlo k poklesu incidence o 32,3 % a mortality o 47,8 %. Budoucnost programu spočívá v jeho dalším zefektivňování. Cílem je navýšení pokrytí cílové populace při udržení a dalším zvyšování kvality tak, aby byl program realizovatelný a průchodný.
The National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program has been conducted in the Czech Republic since 2000 and serves as an example of interdisciplinary collaboration. Specialists from gastroenterology, general practice, gynecology, and clinical biochemistry are involved in the program. It is based on two primary methods: the screening fecal immunochemical test for occult bleeding (iFOBT, FIT) and preventive colonoscopy (FOBT-positive colonoscopy and screening colonoscopy). The program‘s effectiveness is evidenced by the high number of detected colorectal precancerous and malignant lesions. Between 2006 and 2023, a total of 531,362 preventive colonoscopies were performed, diagnosing 202,575 patients with adenomas (38.1%) and 14,473 patients with cancers (2.7%). Program quality is monitored by indicators focused on both organization (target population coverage) and screening methods. Coverage with screening tests in a 2-year interval has consistently ranged around 30%, except between 2020 and 2021 during the COVID-19 pandemic (27%), reaching 30.0% in 2023. Non-screening tests also affect epidemiological indicators, with total coverage by all relevant methods in a 2-year interval in 2023 amounting to 37.5%. Colonoscopies are evaluated using six parameters (number of examinations, bowel preparation quality, total colonoscopies, and adenoma detection rate in total, in both women and men). In 2023, 72% of screening colonoscopy centers met all of these indicators. FOBT analyzers now must have the regular external quality assessment (EQA), which should help stabilize test positivity, standing at 9.1% in 2023. Thanks to the National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program, favorable epidemiological trends have been observed, with a 32.3% decrease in incidence and a 47.8% decrease in mortality between 2000 and 2022. The future of the program lies in its further optimization, with a goal of both increasing coverage of the target population by examination and quality improvement, ensuring the program’s feasibility and efficiency.
- MeSH
- incidence MeSH
- kolonoskopie MeSH
- kolorektální nádory * diagnóza mortalita prevence a kontrola MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- okultní krev MeSH
- plošný screening metody MeSH
- primární prevence MeSH
- řízení kvality MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
Správná funkčnost screeningu sluchových vad je založena na jednoduché organizaci screeningu, komfortu vyšetření pro pacienta, medicínské výtěžnosti a ekonomické únosnosti. Screening sluchu novorozenců byl aktualizován Metodickým pokynem Ministerstva zdravotnictví České republiky (Věstník MZ ČR č. 14/2021). Ke screeningu sluchu fyziologických novorozenců se používají tranzientně evokované otoakustické emise (TEOAE) a u rizikových novorozenců automatická BERA (AABR – automatic auditory brainstem responses; BERA – brainstem evoked response audiometry). Screening sluchu u dětí ve věku 5 let byl ustanoven Metodickým pokynem Ministerstva zdravotnictví České republiky (Věstník MZ ČR č. 11/2018), vyšetření je prováděno pomocí tónové audiometrie. Pozitivní screening znamená záchyt sluchové vady (poruchy sluchu), negativní screening nepřítomnost poruchy sluchu. Cílem práce je na žádost redakce časopisu Česko-slovenské pediatrie podat informace o současné metodice a stavu screeningu sluchu novorozenců a u dětí ve věku 5 let v České republice. Metodika práce vychází z publikace Celoplošný screening sluchu novorozenců v České republice – databáze a nová metodika z Česko-slovenské neonatologie 2/2022. Korespondující autor: prof. MUDr. Viktor Chrobok, CSc., Ph.D. Klinika otorinolaryngologie a chirurgie hlavy a krku Fakultní nemocnice Hradec Králové Sokolská 581 500 05 Hradec Králové chrobok@fnhk.cz
The correct functionality of the screening of hearing defects is based on a simple organization of the screening, comfort of the examination for the patient, medical yield and economic viability. The newborn hearing screening has been updated by the Methodological Instruction of the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic (Journal of the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic No. 14/2021). Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and automatic BERA (AABR – Automatic Auditory Brainstem Responses; BERA – Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry) are used for the hearing screening of normal newborns. Hearing screening of pre-school children aged 5 has been established by the Methodological Instruction of the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic (Journal of the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic No. 11/2018), and the examination is carried out by means of pure tone audiometry. A positive screening means detection of a hearing defect (suspected permanent hearing impairment), a negative screening means absence of a hearing impairment. The aim of the work is, at the request of the editors of the Journal Czech-Slovak Pediatrics, to provide information on the current methodology of hearing screening for newborns and children aged 5 years in the Czech Republic. The methodology of the work is based on the publication Comprehensive hearing screening of newborns in the Czech Republic – database and new methodology from the Czech-Slovak Neonatology 2/2022.
- MeSH
- audiometrie metody statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- novorozenec MeSH
- plošný screening * metody organizace a řízení statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- poruchy sluchu * diagnóza prevence a kontrola MeSH
- předškolní dítě MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- novorozenec MeSH
- předškolní dítě MeSH
- Publikační typ
- přehledy MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
UNLABELLED: In 2022, the European Commission updated its recommendation on cancer screening, inviting the Member States (MSs) to explore the feasibility of stepwise implementation of population-based screening for prostate cancer (PCa). In line with this recommendation, the PRAISE-U (Prostate Cancer Awareness and Initiative for Screening in the European Union (EU)) project was initiated. As part of the PRAISE-U, we aim to understand the current practice towards early detection in the EU MSs, the barriers to implementing or planning population-based screening programmes, and potential solutions to overcome these barriers. METHODS: We adapted the Barriers to Effective Screening Tool (BEST) survey to the PCa context. However, it has not been validated in this context. We translated it into all spoken languages in the EU27 and disseminated it to different stakeholders across the EU using a snowballing approach. RESULTS: We received 410 responses from 55 countries, of which 301 (73%) were from the 27 EU MSs. The most represented stakeholder group was urologists (218 (54%)), followed by general practitioners (GPs) (83 (21%)), patient representatives (35 (9%)), policy stakeholders (27 (7%)), researchers (23 (6%)), oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, nurses, and others (16 (4%)) and one industry representative. Among all respondents, 286 (69%) reported the absence of a population-based screening programme, mainly attributed to resource limitations and a lack of political and medical society support. Out of these 286 respondents, 196 (69%) indicated that opportunistic screening is being applied in their country, and 199 (70%) expressed their support for population-based screening programmes (which was highest amongst patient representatives and urologists and lowest amongst GPs and policy stakeholders). The highest scored barriers were lack of political support, insufficient operational resources, and inadequate participation. Suggested solutions to overcome these included awareness campaigns, consensus meetings, political lobbying and European guidelines (to overcome political support barriers), compatible IT systems (to overcome operational barriers), and easy access (to overcome participation barriers). CONCLUSIONS: Participants have noted the presence of opportunistic screening, and particularly urologists and patient representatives expressed their support for the establishment of a population-based PCa screening programme. Nevertheless, successful implementation of population-based screening programmes is complex; it requires political and medical society support, operational resources and capacity, awareness campaigns, as well as the development of protocols, guidelines, and legal frameworks.
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In Europe, prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer in men. Screening may therefore be crucial to lower health care costs, morbidity, and mortality. This systematic review aimed to provide a contemporary overview of the costs and benefits of PCa screening programmes. METHODS: A peer-reviewed literature search was conducted, using the PICO method. A detailed search strategy was developed in four databases based on the following key search terms: "PCa", "screening", and "cost effectiveness". Any type of economic evaluation was included. The search strategy was restricted to European countries, but no restrictions were set on the year of publication. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 7484 studies were identified initially. Of these, 19 studies described the cost effectiveness of PCa screening in Europe. Among the studies using an initially healthy study population, most focussed on risk- and/or age- and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based screening in addition to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and compared this with no screening. Incremental cost ratios (ICERs) varied from €5872 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) to €372 948/QALY, with a median of €56 487/QALY. Risk-based screening followed by MRI testing seemed to be a more cost-effective strategy than no screening. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: This systematic review indicates that screening programmes incorporating a risk-based approach and MRI have the potential to be cost effective. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this review, we looked at the cost effectiveness of prostate cancer screening in Europe. We found that a risk-based approach and incorporation of magnetic resonance imaging has the potential to be cost effective. However, there remains a knowledge gap regarding cost effectiveness of prostate cancer screening. Therefore, determinants of cost effectiveness require further investigation.
- MeSH
- analýza nákladové efektivity MeSH
- analýza nákladů a výnosů * MeSH
- časná detekce nádoru * ekonomika metody MeSH
- kvalitativně upravené roky života MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- magnetická rezonanční tomografie ekonomika MeSH
- nádory prostaty * diagnóza ekonomika MeSH
- náklady na zdravotní péči MeSH
- plošný screening ekonomika metody MeSH
- prostatický specifický antigen krev MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
- systematický přehled MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
BACKGROUND: A population-based cervical cancer screening programme is implemented in the Czech Republic. However, participation is insufficient among women over 50 years. This study aimed to estimate the potential improvement in participation through directly mailed HPV self-sampling kits (HPVssk) compared with standard invitation letters in women aged 50-65 non-participating in screening. METHODS: The study recruited 1564 eligible women (no cervical cancer screening in the last 3 years or more, no previous treatment associated with cervical lesions or cervical cancer). Eight hundred women were mailed with an HPVssk (HPVssk group), and 764 women were sent a standard invitation letter (control group) inviting them to a routine screening (Pap test). The primary outcome was a comparison of the overall participation rate between study groups using a binominal regression model. RESULTS: The participation rate in the HPVssk group was 13.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 11.2-15.9%; 7.4% of women returned the HPVssk and 6.0% attended gynaecological examination] and 5.0% (95% CI 3.6-6.8%) in the control group. Using the binominal regression model, the difference between the groups was estimated as 7.6% (95% CI 5.0-10.2%; P < 0.001). In the HPVssk group, 22% of women who returned HPVssk had a positive result and 70% of them underwent a follow-up examination. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with traditional invitation letters, the direct mailing of the HPVssk achieved a significantly higher participation rate, along with a notable HPV positivity rate among HPVssk responders. This approach offers a potentially viable method for engaging women who have not yet attended a cervical screening programme.
- MeSH
- časná detekce nádoru metody MeSH
- infekce papilomavirem * diagnóza MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory děložního čípku * diagnóza prevence a kontrola MeSH
- plošný screening metody MeSH
- vaginální stěr MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
With the new policy recommendation in 2022 to explore the possibilities of screening for prostate cancer by the European Commission, the landscape for prostate cancer early detection is evolving. In line with this recommendation, the PRAISE-U project aims to evaluate the early detection and diagnosis of prostate cancer through customised and risk-based screening programmes, with the goal to align protocols across European Union member states. This systematic review is part of the PRAISE-U project, with the goal to review the policy, medical guideline recommendations, and the current level of opportunistic screening presented in the scientific literature on prostate cancer early detection from 2016 to 2023 in European Union member states. An extensive literature search was performed on 1 June 2023 in a large number of databases, including Embase.com, Medline (Ovid), Web of Science Core Collection, Google Scholar, and Policy Commons. We identified 318 articles (qualitative, quantitative, and reviews), of which 41 were included in the full-text screening. Seventeen articles were ultimately identified as eligible for inclusion. The included articles revealed significant variations towards PSA-based early detection policies for prostate cancer in nine European countries. Despite official recommendations, opportunistic screening was prevalent across all nine countries regardless of recommendations for or against PSA-based early detection. This systematic review suggests that the current early detection policies are not fit for purpose. High levels of opportunistic screening and overdiagnosis persist, prompting policy recommendations for standardised guidelines, informed decision making, and increased awareness to improve efficiency and effectiveness in early detection.
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
- Publikační typ
- abstrakt z konference MeSH
