OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) compared to standard of care in improving pain, physical function, and stiffness in older adults with knee osteoarthritis (OA) over six months. Secondary outcomes included multidimensional frailty and quality of life. DESIGN: An exploratory, multicentre, randomized controlled trial (RCT). SETTING: Five European geriatric centres in Italy, Germany, Turkiye and the Czech Republic. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy older adults (mean age 76.1 ± 6.8 years; 80% female) with knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence Grades 1-2) were randomized into two groups: CGA (n = 35) or standard of care (n = 35). INTERVENTION: The CGA group underwent a multidimensional geriatric assessment and intervention, identifying impairments and tailoring interventions accordingly, while the control group received standard of care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was improvement in pain, stiffness, and functional limitations measured using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) over six months. Secondary outcomes included changes in multidimensional frailty (Multidimensional Prognostic Index, MPI), quality of life (SF-36), and adherence to interventions. RESULTS: The CGA group showed a non-significant improvement in total WOMAC scores (-4.49 ± 3.40, p = 0.19), with slight reductions in pain (-1.12 ± 0.96) and functional limitations (-3.26 ± 2.21). MPI slightly improved (-0.02 ± 0.04, p = 0.69), but no significant changes were observed in SF-36 scores. No falls, hospitalizations, or severe adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: CGA may offer potential benefits for managing knee OA in older adults, particularly for pain and function, though statistical significance was not achieved. Larger studies with longer follow-up are warranted to confirm these findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05659979.

• MeSH
• Osteoarthritis, Knee * therapy   physiopathology   diagnosis   MeSH
• Geriatric Assessment * methods   MeSH
• Quality of Life MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH
• Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH

PURPOSE: Incident delirium is a frequent complication among hospitalized older people with COVID-19, associated with increased length of hospital stay, higher morbidity and mortality rates. Although delirium is preventable with early detection, systematic assessment methods and predictive models are not universally defined, thus delirium is often underrated. In this study, we tested the role of the Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI), a prognostic tool based on Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, to predict the risk of incident delirium. METHODS: Hospitalized older patients (≥ 65 years) with COVID-19 infection were enrolled (n = 502) from ten centers across Europe. At hospital admission, the MPI was administered to all the patients and two already validated delirium prediction models were computed (AWOL delirium risk-stratification score and Martinez model). Delirium occurrence during hospitalization was ascertained using the 4A's Test (4AT). Accuracy of the MPI and the other delirium predictive models was assessed through logistic regression models and the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: We analyzed 293 patients without delirium at hospital admission. Of them 33 (11.3%) developed delirium during hospitalization. Higher MPI score at admission (higher multidimensional frailty) was associated with higher risk of incident delirium also adjusting for the other delirium predictive models and COVID-19 severity (OR = 12.72, 95% CI = 2.11-76.86 for MPI-2 vs MPI-1, and OR = 33.44, 95% CI = 4.55-146.61 for MPI-3 vs MPI-1). The MPI showed good accuracy in predicting incident delirium (AUC = 0.71) also superior to AWOL tool, (AUC = 0.63) and Martinez model (AUC = 0.61) (p < 0.0001 for both comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: The MPI is a sensitive tool for early identification of older patients with incident delirium.

• MeSH
• COVID-19 * complications   epidemiology   diagnosis   MeSH
• Delirium * diagnosis   epidemiology   MeSH
• Geriatric Assessment * methods   MeSH
• Risk Assessment MeSH
• Hospitalization * statistics & numerical data   MeSH
• Incidence MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Prognosis MeSH
• Prospective Studies MeSH
• Risk Factors MeSH
• SARS-CoV-2 MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH
• Geographicals
• Europe MeSH

AIMS: Literature regarding anticoagulants in older people affected by atrial fibrillation (AF) is limited to retrospective studies, poorly considering the importance of multidimensional frailty. The main objective of this study is to evaluate in hospitalised older persons with AF the benefit/risk ratio of the anticoagulant treatments, considering the severity of frailty, determined by the multidimensional prognostic index (MPI). METHODS: In this European, multicentre, prospective study, older hospitalised patients (≥65 years) with non-valvular AF were followed-up for 12 months. Anticoagulants' use at discharge ascertained using medical records. MPI was calculated using tools derived from comprehensive geriatric assessment, classifying participants in robust, pre-frail or frail. Mortality (primary outcome); vascular events, including ischemic heart disease or ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke or gastrointestinal bleedings (secondary outcomes). RESULTS: 2,022 participants (mean age 82.9 years; females 56.6%) were included. Compared with people not taking anticoagulants (n = 823), people using vitamin K antagonists (n = 450) showed a decreased risk of mortality (hazard ratio, HR = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.59-0.93), more pronounced in patients using direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) (n = 749) (HR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.37-0.57). Only people taking DOACs reported a significantly lower risk of vascular events (HR = 0.55; 95% CI: 0.31-0.97). The efficacy of DOACs was present independently from frailty status. The risk of gastrointestinal bleedings and hemorrhagic stroke did not differ based on the anticoagulant treatments and by MPI values. CONCLUSIONS: Anticoagulant treatment, particularly with DOACs, was associated with reduced mortality in older people, without increasing the risk of hemorrhagic events, overall suggesting the importance of treating with anticoagulants older people with AF.

• MeSH
• Anticoagulants * therapeutic use   adverse effects   MeSH
• Atrial Fibrillation * drug therapy   mortality   complications   diagnosis   MeSH
• Geriatric Assessment * MeSH
• Risk Assessment MeSH
• Frailty * mortality   diagnosis   MeSH
• Frail Elderly * statistics & numerical data   MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Prospective Studies MeSH
• Risk Factors MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH
• Geographicals
• Europe MeSH

BACKGROUND: Data regarding the importance of multidimensional frailty to guide clinical decision making for remdesivir use in older patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are largely unexplored. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this research was to evaluate if the Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI), a multidimensional frailty tool based on the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA), may help physicians in identifying older hospitalized patients affected by COVID-19 who might benefit from the use of remdesivir. METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective study of older adults hospitalized for COVID-19 in 10 European hospitals, followed-up for 90 days after hospital discharge. A standardized CGA was performed at hospital admission and the MPI was calculated, with a final score ranging between 0 (lowest mortality risk) and 1 (highest mortality risk). We assessed survival with Cox regression, and the impact of remdesivir on mortality (overall and in hospital) with propensity score analysis, stratified by MPI = 0.50. RESULTS: Among 496 older adults hospitalized for COVID-19 (mean age 80 years, female 59.9%), 140 (28.2% of patients) were treated with remdesivir. During the 90 days of follow-up, 175 deaths were reported, 115 in hospital. Remdesivir treatment significantly reduced the risk of overall mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.54, 95% confidence interval CI 0.35-0.83 in the propensity score analysis) in the sample as whole. Stratifying the population, based on MPI score, the effect was observed only in less frail participants (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.22-0.96 in propensity score analysis), but not in frailer subjects. In-hospital mortality was not influenced by remdesivir use. CONCLUSIONS: MPI could help to identify less frail older adults hospitalized for COVID-19 who could benefit more from remdesivir treatment in terms of long-term survival.

• MeSH
• COVID-19 * MeSH
• COVID-19 Drug Treatment MeSH
• Geriatric Assessment methods   MeSH
• Frailty * drug therapy   MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Prognosis MeSH
• Prospective Studies MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH
• Observational Study MeSH
• Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH

BACKGROUND: Literature suggests that different risks of mortality could influence physicians in prescribing or not anticoagulants in older patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI) can be considered a tool for the detection of multidimensional frailty. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate whether prescription patterns of oral anticoagulants exist, based on MPI values. METHODS: Older hospitalised patients (age ≥ 65 years) with non-valvular AF were included across 24 European centres. MPI was calculated using validated and standardised tools derived from a comprehensive geriatric assessment. Other functional and clinical information were collected to calculate indexes specific for haemorrhagic and thromboembolic risk in AF. RESULTS: Altogether, 2,012 participants affected by AF (mean age was 83.2 ± 7.5, range: 65-104 years), with a higher presence of women (57.0%), were included. Overall, 440 took vitamin K antagonists VKAs (22.0%), 667 (33.4%) direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), whilst 44.6% did not take any anticoagulant treatment. Prescription of anticoagulants was associated with MPI values, with people taking anticoagulants having lower mean MPI values. Anticoagulant therapy was not used in 53.1% of the group with the highest risk of mortality, compared with 32.3% of those in the group with the lowest mortality risk. People with higher scores in MPI were less frequently treated with anticoagulant therapy, after adjusting for several potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS: The EURopean study of Older Subjects with Atrial Fibrillation (EUROSAF) suggested that almost half of the older persons with AF do not receive anticoagulants and that MPI is an important determinant in prescribing or not anticoagulants. Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02973984KEY POINTSAtrial fibrillation is a common condition in older people. The data regarding the use of anticoagulants is mainly derived from randomised controlled trials that do not include a sufficient number of older frail people.Our study suggests that a consistent part of older people affected by atrial fibrillation was not treated with anticoagulants, in particular, older frail patients; however, it is unclear if this choice is supported or not by evidence.The prognostic evaluation through the multidimensional prognostic index could be useful information for the choice in the prescription of anticoagulants in older people affected by atrial fibrillation.

• MeSH
• Anticoagulants therapeutic use   MeSH
• Administration, Oral MeSH
• Stroke * etiology   prevention & control   MeSH
• Atrial Fibrillation * complications   diagnosis   drug therapy   MeSH
• Prescriptions MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Prognosis MeSH
• Prospective Studies MeSH
• Cross-Sectional Studies MeSH
• Risk Factors MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH
• Observational Study MeSH
• Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH

U zdravých jedinců jsou kosterní svaly největší tkání v těle (30–40 % celkové tělesné hmotnosti) a jsou v nich uloženy tři čtvrtiny všech tělesných proteinů. Změny svalové soustavy, zejména ve smyslu snížení svalové hmoty a funkce, významně ovlivňují prognózu a průběh řady chronických onemocnění, včetně chronických onemocnění jater. Jejich přítomnost je asociována s vyšší morbiditou, mortalitou a horší kvalitou života pacientů. K popisu změn svalové tkáně jsou používány pojmy sarkopenie, myosteatóza a s poruchou svalstva úzce souvisí i komplexnější pojem „frailty“, syndrom křehkosti. Sarkopenie je definována jako snížení množství svalové hmoty a/nebo svalové funkce, k diagnostice se nejčastěji používá stanovení tzv. skeletal muscle index (SMI) na úrovni třetího lumbálního obratle (L3) dle CT. Myosteatóza je definována jako přítomnost tuku ve svalech jak intramyocelulárně, tak intermyocelulárně a je diagnostikována na základě stanovení denzity svalů na CT v úrovni L3 (skeletal muscle radiation attenuation – SM-RA). Syndrom křehkosti (frailty) zahrnuje kromě změn svalové tkáně a poklesu schopnosti pohybu i změny dalších orgánových systémů, jejichž důsledkem je snížení rezerv organizmu a vyšší riziko nepříznivého průběhu onemocnění. K diagnostice se využívají různé skórovací systémy, např. Fried Frailty Index nebo modifikovaný Liver Frailty Index (LFI) u pacientů s jaterní cirhózou. Základem léčby pacientů s poruchami svalové tkáně je léčba základního onemocnění (včetně transplantace jater u pokročilé cirhózy), zlepšení výživy, dostatečná fyzická aktivita a léčba eventuálního deficitu vitaminu D. V tomto přehledovém článku shrnujeme aktuální pohled na patofyziologii, diagnostiku a léčbu sarkopenie, myosteatózy a syndromu křehkosti u pacientů s jaterní cirhózou.

Skeletal muscles are the biggest tissue in healthy people (30–40% of total body mass) and they comprise three quarters of total body proteins. Muscle alterations, especially muscle wasting and loss of muscle function, have an indisputable prognostic value in the outcome of chronic diseases, including chronic liver diseases. Muscle wasting is associated with higher morbidity, mortality and poor quality of life. The terms sarcopenia and myosteatosis are used to describe specific muscle alterations, both forming substantial components of multidimensional construct “frailty syndrome”. Sarcopenia is defined as loss of muscle mass and/or loss of muscle function. It is usually diagnosed using the skeletal muscle index from computed tomography (CT) image analysis at the L3 vertebra. Myosteatosis is defined as an excess intramyocelullar and intermyocellular fat deposition. Diagnosis of myosteatosis is based on a measurement of skeletal muscle density by CT imaging at the L3 vertebra (skeletal muscle radiation attenuation – SM-RA). Besides muscle alterations and decreased physical performance, frailty syndrome also comprises changes of other organ systems, leading to the loss of functional reserves and higher vulnerability. Different scoring systems, such as Fried Frailty Index (FFI) or modified Liver Frailty Index (LFI) for patients with liver cirrhosis, are used to diagnose patients with frail phenotype. The principle of the treatment of patients with muscle alterations is therapy of liver disease (including liver transplant in advanced cirrhosis), improvement of the nutritional status, adequate physical activity and supplementation of vitamin D deficiency, if necessary. In this review, we summarize up-to-date knowledge about pathophysiology, diagnostic tools and treatment options of sarcopenia, myosteatosis and frailty syndrome in patients with liver cirrhosis

• Keywords
• myosteatóza, syndrom křehkosti,
• MeSH
• Liver Cirrhosis * complications   MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Sarcopenia * etiology   physiopathology   MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Publication type
• Review MeSH

OBJECTIVE: Data on prognostic tools for indicating mechanical ventilation in older people with COVID-19 are still limited. The aim of this research was to evaluate if the Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI), based on the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA), may help physicians in identifying older hospitalized patients affected by COVID-19 who might benefit from mechanical ventilation. DESIGN: Longitudinal, multicenter study. SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: 502 older people hospitalized for COVID-19 in 10 European hospitals. METHODS: MPI was calculated using 8 different domains typical of the CGA. A propensity score, Cox's regression analysis was used for assessing the impact of mechanical ventilation on rehospitalization/mortality for 90 days' follow-up, stratified by MPI = 0.50. The accuracy of MPI in predicting negative outcomes (ie, rehospitalization/mortality) was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC), and the discrimination with several indexes like the Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI) and the Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI). RESULTS: Among 502 older people hospitalized for COVID-19 (mean age: 80 years), 152 were treated with mechanical ventilation. In the propensity score analysis, during the 90-day follow-up period, there were 44 rehospitalizations and 95 deaths. Mechanical ventilation in patients with MPI values ≥ 0.50, indicating frailer participants, was associated with a higher risk of rehospitalization/mortality (hazard ratio 1.56, 95% CI 1.09-2.23), whereas in participants with MPI values < 0.50 this association was not significant. The accuracy of the model including age, sex, respiratory parameters, and MPI was good (AUC = 0.783) as confirmed by an NRI of 0.2756 (P < .001) and an IDI of 0.1858 (P < .001), suggesting a good discrimination of the model in predicting negative outcomes. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: MPI could be useful for better individualizing older people hospitalized by COVID-19 who could benefit from mechanical ventilation.

• MeSH
• COVID-19 * therapy   MeSH
• Geriatric Assessment methods   MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Prognosis MeSH
• Prospective Studies MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Respiration, Artificial MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH
• Observational Study MeSH

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The literature regarding enteral nutrition and mortality in older frail people is limited and still conflicting. Moreover, the potential role of comprehensive geriatric assessment is poorly explored. We therefore aimed to investigate whether the Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI), an established tool that assesses measures of frailty and predicts mortality, may help physicians in identifying patients in whom ETF (enteral tube feeding) is effective in terms of reduced mortality. METHODS: Observational, longitudinal, multicenter study with one year of follow-up. Data regarding ETF were recorded through medical records. A standardized comprehensive geriatric assessment was used to calculate the MPI. Participants were divided in low (MPI-1), moderate (MPI-2) or severe (MPI-3) risk of mortality. Data regarding mortality were recorded through administrative information. RESULTS: 1064 patients were included, with 79 (13 in MPI 1-2 and 66 in MPI-3 class) receiving ETF. In multivariable analysis, patients receiving ETF experienced a higher risk of death (odds ratio, OR = 2.00; 95% confidence intervals, CI: 1.19-3.38). However, after stratifying for their MPI at admission, mortality was higher in MPI-3 class patients (OR = 2.03; 95%CI: 1.09-3.76), but not in MPI 1-2 class patients (OR = 1.51; 95%CI: 0.44-5.25). The use of propensity score confirmed these findings. CONCLUSIONS: ETF is associated with a higher risk of death. However, this is limited to more frail patients, suggesting the importance of the MPI in the prognostic evaluation of ETF.

• MeSH
• Enteral Nutrition * MeSH
• Inpatients * MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Longitudinal Studies MeSH
• Mortality * MeSH
• Odds Ratio MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH
• Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
• Geographicals
• Australia MeSH
• Europe MeSH

MPI_AGE is a European Union co-funded research project aimed to use the Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI), a validated Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA)-based prognostic tool, to develop predictive rules that guide clinical and management decisions in older people in different European countries. A series of international studies performed in different settings have shown that the MPI is useful to predict mortality and risk of hospitalization in community-dwelling older subjects at population level. Furthermore, studies performed in older people who underwent a CGA before admission to a nursing home or receiving homecare services showed that the MPI successfully identified groups of persons who could benefit, in terms of reduced mortality, of specific therapies such as statins in diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease, anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation and antidementia drugs in cognitive decline. A prospective trial carried out in nine hospitals in Europe and Australia demonstrated that the MPI was able to predict not only in-hospital and long-term mortality, but also institutionalization, re-hospitalization and receiving homecare services during the one-year follow-up after hospital discharge. The project also explored the association between MPI and mortality in hospitalized older patients in need of complex procedures such as transcatheter aortic valve implantation or enteral tube feeding. Evidence from these studies has prompted the MPI_AGE Investigators to formulate recommendations for healthcare providers, policy makers and the general population which may help to improve the cost-effectiveness of appropriate health care interventions for older patients.

• MeSH
• Cost-Benefit Analysis MeSH
• Geriatric Assessment MeSH
• Hospitalization economics   MeSH
• Frail Elderly * MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Multimorbidity * MeSH
• Prognosis MeSH
• Prospective Studies MeSH
• Risk Factors MeSH
• Independent Living MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Review MeSH

Background: In a three-month report from the CGA-TAVI registry, we found the Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI) and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) to be of value for predicting short-term outcomes in elderly patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). In the present analysis, we examined the association of these tools with outcomes up to one year post-TAVI. Methods: CGA-TAVI is an international, observational registry of geriatric patients undergoing TAVI. Patients were assessed using the MPI and SPPB. Efficacy of baseline values and any postoperative change for predicting outcome were established using logistic regression. Kaplan-Meier analysis was carried out for each comprehensive geriatric assessment tool, with survival stratified by risk category. Results: One year after TAVI, 14.1% of patients deceased, while 17.4% met the combined endpoint of death and/or non-fatal stroke, and 37.7% the combined endpoint of death and/or hospitalisation and/or non-fatal stroke. A high-risk MPI score was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (aOR = 36.13, 95% CI: 2.77-470.78, P = 0.006) and death and/or non-fatal stroke (aOR = 10.10, 95% CI: 1.48-68.75, P = 0.018). No significant associations were found between a high-risk SPPB score and mortality or two main combined endpoints. In contrast to a worsening SPPB, an aggravating MPI score at three months post-TAVI was associated with an increased risk of death and/or non-fatal stoke at one year (aOR = 95.16, 95% CI: 3.41-2657.01). Conclusions: The MPI showed value for predicting the likelihood of death and a combination of death and/or non-fatal stroke by one year after TAVI in elderly patients.

• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH