BACKGROUND: Limited licensed medications are available for multiple sclerosis (MS) in pediatric patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of alemtuzumab in pediatric patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and disease activity on prior disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). METHODS: LemKids was a multicenter, multinational, single-arm, open-label, switch (from ongoing DMT to alemtuzumab treatment) study in pediatric RRMS patients (aged 10-<18 years), with disease activity on DMT. The primary endpoint was a comparison of the number of new/enlarging T2 lesions on the magnetic resonance imaging of the brain between the prior-DMT period and alemtuzumab treatment. RESULTS: This study was prematurely terminated due to low enrollment and an European Medicines Agency Article-20 pharmacovigilance review of alemtuzumab in adult RRMS. Of 46 screened patients, 16 were enrolled; 12 completed prior-DMT treatment period; 11 received alemtuzumab of whom 7 completed treatment. Patients on alemtuzumab developed fewer new/enlarging T2 lesions compared with prior-DMT (7 vs 178, relative risk (95% confidence interval): 0.04 (0.01-0.14)). No significant pharmacodynamic changes or safety concerns were noted in this limited dataset. CONCLUSION: Alemtuzumab treatment was associated with a low number of new/enlarging T2 lesions in pediatric patients with RRMS and was safe and well tolerated in seven patients during infusion and the initial 4 months.

• MeSH
• Alemtuzumab * adverse effects   MeSH
• Child MeSH
• Immunologic Factors * adverse effects   administration & dosage   MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Magnetic Resonance Imaging MeSH
• Adolescent MeSH
• Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting * drug therapy   diagnostic imaging   MeSH
• Treatment Outcome MeSH
• Check Tag
• Child MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Adolescent MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH

IMPORTANCE: Progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) is a significant contributor to long-term disability accumulation in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). Prior studies have used varying PIRA definitions, hampering the comparability of study results. OBJECTIVE: To compare various definitions of PIRA. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study involved a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the MSBase registry from July 2004 to July 2023. The participants were patients with MS from 186 centers across 43 countries who had clinically definite relapsing-remitting MS, a complete minimal dataset, and 3 or more documented Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) assessments. EXPOSURE: Three-hundred sixty definitions of PIRA as combinations of the following criteria: baseline disability (fixed baseline with re-baselining after PIRA, or plus re-baselining after relapses, or plus re-baselining after improvements), minimum confirmation period (6, 12, or 24 months), confirmation magnitude (EDSS score at/above worsening score or at/above threshold compared with baseline), freedom from relapse at EDSS score worsening (90 days prior, 90 days prior and 30 days after, 180 days prior and after, since previous EDSS assessment, or since baseline), and freedom from relapse at confirmation (30 days prior, 90 days prior, 30 days before and after, or between worsening and confirmation). MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE: For each definition, we quantified PIRA incidence and persistence (ie, absence of a 3-month confirmed EDSS improvement over ≥5 years). RESULTS: Among 87 239 patients with MS, 33 303 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria; 24 152 (72.5%) were female and 9151 (27.5%) were male. At the first visits, the mean (SD) age was 36.4 (10.9) years; 28 052 patients (84.2%) had relapsing-remitting MS, and the median (IQR) EDSS score was 2.0 (1.0-3.0). Participants had a mean (SD) 15.1 (11.9) visits over 8.9 (5.2) years. PIRA incidence ranged from 0.141 to 0.658 events per decade and persistence from 0.753 to 0.919, depending on the definition. In particular, the baseline and confirmation period influenced PIRA detection. The following definition yielded balanced incidence and persistence: a significant disability worsening compared with a baseline (reset after each PIRA event, relapse, and EDSS score improvement), in absence of relapses since the last EDSS assessment, confirmed with EDSS scores (not preceded by relapses within 30 days) that remained above the worsening threshold for at least 12 months. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Incidence and persistence of PIRA are determined by the definition used. The proposed standardized definition aims to enhance comparability among studies.

• MeSH
• Adult MeSH
• Cohort Studies MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Disability Evaluation MeSH
• Disease Progression * MeSH
• Recurrence MeSH
• Registries MeSH
• Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting * diagnosis   physiopathology   MeSH
• Retrospective Studies MeSH
• Check Tag
• Adult MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH

BACKGROUND: Effectiveness of disease-modifying treatment (DMT) in people affected by primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) is limited. Whether specific subgroups may benefit more from DMT in a real-world setting remains unclear. Our aim was to investigate the potential effect of DMT on disability worsening among patients with PPMS stratified by different disability trajectories. METHODS: Within the framework of the Big MS Data network, we merged data from the Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques, the Swedish and Italian MS registries, and MSBase. We identified patients with PPMS that started DMT or were never treated during the observed period. Subpopulations with comparable baseline characteristics were selected by propensity score matching. Disability outcomes were analysed in time-to-recurrent event analyses, which were repeated in subclasses with different disability trajectories determined by latent class mixed models. RESULTS: Of the 3243 included patients, we matched 739 treated and 1330 untreated patients with a median follow-up of 3 years after pairwise censoring. No difference in the risk of confirmed disability worsening (CDW) was observed between the groups in the fully matched dataset (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.23, p=0.127). However, we found a lower risk for CDW among the class of treated patients with an aggressive disability trajectory (n=360, HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.92, p=0.014). CONCLUSIONS: In line with previous studies, our data suggest that DMT does not ameliorate disability worsening in PPMS, in general. However, we observed a beneficial effect of DMT on disability worsening in patients with aggressive predicted disability trajectories.

• MeSH
• Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive * drug therapy   physiopathology   MeSH
• Adult MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Disability Evaluation MeSH
• Disease Progression MeSH
• Registries MeSH
• Treatment Outcome MeSH
• Check Tag
• Adult MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH

Kazuistika představuje pacienta s roztroušenou sklerózou, který byl nejprve léčen pro izolovanou monokulární poruchou visu, a to kortikosteroidy s dobrým účinkem, následně žádné potíže neměl a dostavil se v důsledku nových klinických příznaků po 15 letech k neurologickému vyšetření, které na základě klinických a laboratorních vyšetření prokázalo definitivní diagnózu relabující formy roztroušené sklerózy. Na základě zahájení adekvátní imunomodulační léčby se podařilo onemocnění stabilizovat.

The case report presents a patient with multiple sclerosis who was initially treated for an isolated visual impairment in one eye. This condition was managed with corticosteroids, which proved effective. Subsequently, the patient had no further issues and presented for a neurological examination with after 15 years. Based on clinical and laboratory findings, a definitive diagnosis of the relapsing form of multiple sclerosis was established. With the initiation of appropriate immunomodulatory treatment, the disease was successfully stabilized.

• Keywords
• ozanimod,
• MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Sphingosine 1 Phosphate Receptor Modulators pharmacology   therapeutic use   MeSH
• Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting * diagnosis   drug therapy   MeSH
• Check Tag
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Publication type
• Case Reports MeSH

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: IV-administered ocrelizumab (OCR) is approved for the treatment of relapsing and primary progressive multiple sclerosis (RMS/PPMS). OCARINA II (NCT05232825) was designed to demonstrate noninferiority in drug exposure of OCR subcutaneous (SC) vs IV administration. METHODS: This phase 3, randomized, open-label study enrolled OCR-naive patients aged 18-65 years with RMS/PPMS and an Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 0-6.5. Patients received OCR IV 600 mg or OCR SC 920 mg (controlled period), followed by OCR SC 920 mg every 24 weeks, up to week 96 (OCR IV/SC and OCR SC/SC). The primary end point was OCR area under the serum concentration-time curve from day 1 to week 12 (AUCW1‒12); other end points included clinical, biomarker, and pharmacodynamic outcomes and safety data. RESULTS: Baseline demographics were balanced across OCR IV/SC and OCR SC/SC arms (N = 118/118, 40.0 ± 11.9/39.9 ± 11.4 years, 59.3%/65.3% female, 89.0%/89.0% with RMS). The study demonstrated noninferiority of OCR SC 920 mg to OCR IV 600 mg for the primary end point AUCW1-12 and also over the dosing interval for AUCW1‒24 (geometric mean ratios [90% CI] 1.29 [1.23-1.35] and 1.27 [1.21-1.34], respectively). At week 48, 111 of 118 (OCR IV/SC) and 114 of 118 (OCR SC/SC) had received OCR SC. A near-complete suppression of MRI activity was reported in OCR IV/SC and OCR SC/SC: 0 of 113 and 0 of 113 patients had T1 lesions while 1 of 114 and 1 of 113 had 2 and 1 new/enlarging T2 lesions, respectively. Two patients (1.9%) in each arm had 1 relapse, and 1 patient (0.9%; OCR SC/SC) had 2 relapses. In both arms, rapid and sustained B-cell depletion was observed and serum neurofilament light chain reduction was comparable. Patients receiving at least 1 dose of OCR SC 920 mg in the OCR IV/SC and OCR SC/SC arms reported adverse events (AEs): 75.4% and 86.4%, and serious AEs: 5.9% and 2.5%. The most frequently reported AEs were injection reactions (IRs, 51.5%); local and systemic IRs were experienced by 117 of 233 patients (50.2%) and 27 of 233 patients (11.6%), respectively. All IRs were mild/moderate; intensity and duration decreased with subsequent injections. DISCUSSION: The OCR SC formulation demonstrated noninferiority to OCR IV formulation regarding drug exposure, providing comparable efficacy and safety and an additional treatment option for patients with multiple sclerosis. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that a single SC injection of 920 mg of OCR achieves a noninferior 12-week area under serum concentration-time curve to that of 2 IV infusions of 300-mg OCR administered 2 weeks apart. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05232825; submitted: January 27, 2022; first patient enrolled: May 3, 2022; available at: clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05232825?term=NCT05232825&rank=1.

• MeSH
• Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive * drug therapy   MeSH
• Adult MeSH
• Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized * administration & dosage   therapeutic use   pharmacokinetics   adverse effects   MeSH
• Immunologic Factors * administration & dosage   pharmacokinetics   MeSH
• Injections, Subcutaneous MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Adolescent MeSH
• Young Adult MeSH
• Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting * drug therapy   MeSH
• Multiple Sclerosis * drug therapy   MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Treatment Outcome MeSH
• Check Tag
• Adult MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Adolescent MeSH
• Young Adult MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Equivalence Trial MeSH
• Clinical Trial, Phase III MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH
• Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH

BACKGROUND: Secondary progressive MS is associated with a worse prognosis, warranting the need for early predictive tools. The DAAE score estimates the five-year risk of transition to clinical diagnosis of SPMS, showing a 38 % risk in high-risk patients in Amsterdam and Buffalo data. The DAAE score remains to be validated against objective disease progression criteria. METHODS: External validation using data from the Prague MS cohort and MSBase-Lorscheider criteria. RESULTS: Among 2022 patients from the Prague MS database, 14.3 % clinically progressed according to MSbase-Lorscheider criteria over five years. Risk increased with higher DAAE scores comparable to the Amsterdam and Buffalo data; secondary validation showed an AUROC of 0.742 with faster progression for higher risk groups (p < 0.05), therapy-adjusted. CONCLUSION: The DAAE score performs similarly between centers and using objective criteria. These validation steps support its use in personalized MS management and treatment.

• MeSH
• Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive * diagnosis   physiopathology   MeSH
• Adult MeSH
• Risk Assessment MeSH
• Cohort Studies MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Prognosis MeSH
• Disease Progression * MeSH
• Multiple Sclerosis * diagnosis   MeSH
• Check Tag
• Adult MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Validation Study MeSH

INTRODUCTION: The efficacy of anti-CD20 antibodies has significantly contributed to advancing our understanding of disease pathogenesis and improved treatment outcomes in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). A comprehensive analysis of the peripheral immune cell profile, combined with prospective clinical characterization, of RRMS patients treated with ocrelizumab (OCR) or ofatumumab (OFA) was performed to further understand immune reconstitution following B-cell depletion. METHODS: REBELLION-MS is a longitudinal analysis of RRMS patients treated with either OCR (n = 34) or OFA (n = 25). Analysis of B, T, natural killer (NK) and natural killer T (NKT) cells at baseline, month 1, and 12 was performed by multidimensional flow cytometry. Data were analyzed by conventional gating and unsupervised computational approaches. In parallel, different clinical parameters were longitudinally assessed. Twenty treatment-naïve age/sex-matched RRMS patients were included as the control cohort. RESULTS: B-cell depletion by OCR and OFA resulted in significant reductions in CD20+ T and B cells as well as B-cell subsets, alongside an expansion of CD5+CD19+CD20- B cells, while also elevating exhaustion markers (CTLA-4, PD-1, TIGIT, TIM-3) across T, B, NK, and NKT cells. Additionally, regulatory T-cell (TREG) numbers increased, especially in OCR-treated patients, and reductions in double-negative (CD3+CD4-CD8-) T cells (DN T cells) were observed, with these DN T cells having higher CD20 expression compared to CD4 or CD8 positive T cells. These immune profile changes correlated with clinical parameters, suggesting pathophysiological relevance in RRMS. CONCLUSIONS: Our interim data add weight to the argumentation that the exhaustion/activation markers, notably TIGIT, may be relevant to the pathogenesis of MS. In addition, we identify a potentially interesting increase in the expression of CD5+ on B cells. Finally, we identified a population of double-negative T cells (KLRG1+HLADR+, in particular) that is associated with MS activity and decreased with CD20 depletion.

• MeSH
• Antigens, CD20 * immunology   MeSH
• B-Lymphocytes immunology   drug effects   MeSH
• Killer Cells, Natural immunology   MeSH
• Adult MeSH
• Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized * therapeutic use   pharmacology   MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Longitudinal Studies MeSH
• Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting * immunology   drug therapy   MeSH
• Check Tag
• Adult MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH

BACKGROUND: In relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), extended exposure to high-efficacy disease modifying therapy may increase the risk of side effects, compromise treatment adherence, and inflate medical costs. Treatment de-escalation, here defined as a switch to a lower efficacy therapy, is often considered by patients and physicians, but evidence to guide such decisions is scarce. In this study, we aimed to compare clinical outcomes between patients who de-escalated therapy versus those who continued their therapy. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis of data from an observational, longitudinal cohort of 87,239 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) from 186 centers across 43 countries, we matched treatment episodes of adult patients with RRMS who underwent treatment de-escalation from either high- to medium-, high- to low-, or medium- to low-efficacy therapy with counterparts that continued their treatment, using propensity score matching and incorporating 11 variables. Relapses and 6-month confirmed disability worsening were assessed using proportional and cumulative hazard models. RESULTS: Matching resulted in 876 pairs (de-escalators: 73% females, median [interquartile range], age 40.2 years [33.6, 48.8], Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] 2.5 [1.5, 4.0]; non-de-escalators: 73% females, age 40.8 years [35.5, 47.9], and EDSS 2.5 [1.5, 4.0]), with a median follow-up of 4.8 years (IQR 3.0, 6.8). Patients who underwent de-escalation faced an increased hazard of future relapses (hazard ratio 2.36 and 95% confidence intervals [CI] [1.79-3.11], p < 0.001), which was confirmed when considering recurrent relapses (2.43 [1.97-3.00], p < 0.001). It was also consistent across subgroups stratified by age, sex, disability, disease duration, and time since last relapse. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of this observational analysis, de-escalation may not be recommended as a universal treatment strategy in RRMS. The decision to de-escalate should be considered on an individual basis, as its safety is not clearly guided by specific patient or disease characteristics evaluated in this study.

• MeSH
• Adult MeSH
• Cohort Studies MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Longitudinal Studies MeSH
• Recurrence MeSH
• Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting * drug therapy   MeSH
• Retrospective Studies MeSH
• Treatment Outcome MeSH
• Check Tag
• Adult MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH
• Observational Study MeSH

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment is a well-recognized symptom of multiple sclerosis (MS) that can manifest early in the disease course. Deficits in cognitive function can have a major impact on daily life. However, cognitive decline is often under-examined in clinical trials and clinical practice due to lack of adequate data. The objective of this study was to examine the longitudinal effect of ocrelizumab vs interferon beta (IFNβ)-1a on cognitive impairment in 2 phase 3 studies in relapsing MS (RMS). METHODS: The pooled population of participants with RMS (n = 1656) from the OPERA I/II clinical trials received subcutaneous IFNβ-1a (44 μg; n = 829) 3 times weekly or intravenous ocrelizumab (600 mg; n = 827) every 24 weeks. Cognition was assessed with a Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), administered in written or oral form according to each site investigator's choice, that primarily measured cognitive processing speed at baseline and every 12 weeks until the end of the double-blind treatment (96 weeks). Treatment effects were investigated based on longitudinal linear models for the change from baseline in SDMT and Cox regression for the time to 12- or 24-week confirmed decline of ≥4 points. RESULTS: Among the participants with an SDMT assessment at baseline and ≥1 postbaseline time point (IFNβ-1a, n = 749; ocrelizumab, n = 766), ocrelizumab treatment was associated with a greater mean SDMT improvement over 96 weeks than IFNβ-1a treatment (5.4 [95 % CI, 4.4-6.5] vs 4.0 [95 % CI, 3.0-5.1]; adjusted mean difference, 1.4 [95 % CI, 0.05-2.72]; P = 0.042). The risk of a clinically meaningful SDMT decline (≥4 points) was lower for those treated with ocrelizumab for both ≥12 weeks (IFNβ-1a, 18.4 %; ocrelizumab, 12.7 %; hazard ratio, 0.63 [95 % CI, 0.47-0.85]; P = 0.003) and ≥24 weeks (IFNβ-1a, 12.9 %; ocrelizumab, 7.9 %; HR, 0.57 [95 % CI, 0.39-0.82]; P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Ocrelizumab treatment resulted in better cognitive outcomes as measured by SDMT in participants with RMS compared with IFNβ-1a treatment. However, methodological limitations need to be considered when interpreting these data. CLINICALTRIALS: gov: NCT01247324, NCT01412333.

• MeSH
• Adult MeSH
• Double-Blind Method MeSH
• Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized * administration & dosage   pharmacology   adverse effects   MeSH
• Immunologic Factors * administration & dosage   adverse effects   pharmacology   MeSH
• Interferon beta-1a * administration & dosage   pharmacology   MeSH
• Cognitive Dysfunction etiology   drug therapy   chemically induced   MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Longitudinal Studies MeSH
• Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting * drug therapy   MeSH
• Treatment Outcome MeSH
• Check Tag
• Adult MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Clinical Trial, Phase II MeSH
• Clinical Trial, Phase III MeSH
• Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
• Comparative Study MeSH

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) may demonstrate better disease control when treatment is initiated on high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) from onset. This subgroup analysis assessed the long-term efficacy and safety profile of the high-efficacy DMT ocrelizumab (OCR) as first-line therapy for early-stage relapsing MS (RMS). METHODS: Post hoc exploratory analyses of efficacy and safety were performed in a subgroup of treatment-naive patients with RMS who received ≥1 dose of OCR in the multicenter OPERA I/II (NCT01247324/NCT01412333) studies. Patients were randomized to OCR or interferon β-1a for 96 weeks (double-blind controlled treatment period [DBP]), before switching to OCR in the open-label extension (OLE). Efficacy assessments included no evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3), 24-week confirmed disability progression (CDP), MRI lesion activity, change in whole-brain volume; with safety outcomes assessed over a 9-year treatment period. RESULTS: Overall, 757 patients were included (interferon-treated n = 382, mean age 36.3 years, 65.7% female; OCR-treated n = 375, mean age 35.5 years, 64.0% female); 505 of 757 (66.7%) completed 9 years of follow-up. The difference in NEDA status between OCR-treated and interferon-treated patients achieved during the DBP (72.5% and 43.8%, respectively, odds ratio 3.48, 95% CI 2.52-4.81) was maintained throughout the 7-year OLE (48.2% vs 25.7%; odds ratio 2.72, 95% CI 1.94-3.82). No 24-week CDP was observed in 78.7% of OCR-treated patients over 9 years. Brain volume loss over the entire study period remained numerically higher among patients starting OCR later (p = 0.09 at OLE at week 336). During the DBP, safety profiles in both groups were similar; no new safety signals were observed during the OLE. Over >9 years of continuous OCR treatment, the rate of infections remained low and stable over time. DISCUSSION: A higher proportion of OCR-treated patients achieved NEDA status compared with interferon-treated patients during the DBP, which was maintained throughout the OLE. After switching to OCR, disability accrual and brain volume loss among interferon-treated patients became similar to the OCR-OCR group, but disability and brain volume loss accrued during interferon treatment were not recovered. Possible study limitations include assessment bias due to unmaintained blinding during the OLE. These data support OCR as first-line therapy for these patients. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that OCR delays disease progression in treatment-naïve patients with early-stage RMS.

• MeSH
• Adult MeSH
• Double-Blind Method MeSH
• Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized * adverse effects   therapeutic use   administration & dosage   MeSH
• Immunologic Factors * adverse effects   administration & dosage   therapeutic use   MeSH
• Interferon beta-1a therapeutic use   administration & dosage   MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Magnetic Resonance Imaging MeSH
• Disease Progression MeSH
• Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting * drug therapy   diagnostic imaging   MeSH
• Treatment Outcome MeSH
• Check Tag
• Adult MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH
• Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH