Cíl: Cílem tohoto systematického přehledu bylo ověřit úlohu urgentní mikrochirurgické embolektomie a extrakraniálního-intrakraniálního bypassu jako třetí linie léčby v případech uzávěru velké mozkové cévy po selhání standardní léčby. Soubor a metodika: Provedli jsme rozsáhlou rešerši osmi zdrojů publikované i nepublikované literatury. Dva recenzenti nezávisle na sobě provedli analýzu názvů, abstraktů, plných textů a poté provedli kritické hodnocení a extrakci dat z vybraných studií pomocí standardizovaných nástrojů. Výsledky zahrnutých studií jsme narativně syntetizovali. Výsledky: Vyhledávání identifikovalo osm relevantních článků, zahrnujících 12 pacientů s urgentním uzávěrem velké cévy (terminální krkavice nebo střední mozková tepna) a selháním standardní léčby, kteří podstoupili mikrochirurgický zákrok do 24 hodin od vzniku příznaků. Mikrochirurgická embolektomie byla provedena ve čtyřech případech (33 %), extrakraniální-intrakraniální bypass v pěti případech (42 %), jejich kombinace ve dvou případech (16 %) a manipulační intraoperační rekanalizace v jednom případě (8 %). Skóre na škále National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale se předoperačně pohybovalo v rozmezí 7–25 bodů a pooperačně (1–7 dní po operaci) v rozmezí 1–18 bodů. Funkční nezávislosti (modifikované Rankinovo skóre 0–2) bylo dosaženo u devíti pacientů (75 %) po 3–12 měsících po operaci. Závěr: Urgentní mikrochirurgická embolektomie, extrakraniální-intrakraniální bypass nebo kombinace těchto metod se jeví jako bezpečná a potenciálně účinná třetí linie léčby u pacientů s urgentním uzávěrem velké cévy v přední mozkové cirkulaci.
Aim: This systematic review aimed to verify the role of emergent microsurgical embolectomy and extracranial-intracranial bypass as third-line treatments in cases of intracranial large-vessel occlusion after failure of standard treatment. Materials and methods: We extensively searched eight sources of published and unpublished literature. Two reviewers independently performed titles, abstracts, and full text analyses, and then performed critical appraisal and data extraction from selected studies using standardised tools. We narratively synthesised the findings of the included studies. Results: The search identified eight relevant articles, including 12 patients with emergent large-vessel occlusion (carotid terminus or middle cerebral artery), and standard treatment failure who underwent microsurgery within 24 h from symptom onset. Microsurgical embolectomy was performed in four cases (33%), extracranial-intracranial bypass in five cases (42%), their combination in two cases (16%), and manipulative intraoperative recanalization in one case (8%). National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ranged pre-operatively from 7 to 25 points and postoperatively (1–7 days after surgery) from 1–18 points. Functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score 0–2) was achieved in nine patients (75%) at 3–12 months postoperatively. Conclusion: Emergent microsurgical embolectomy, extracranial-intracranial bypass, or a combination of these methods appear to be a safe and potentially effective third-line treatment for patients with emergent occlusion of large vessels in the anterior cerebral circulation
OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of pharmacological interventions for preventing upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding in people admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis using standard methodological procedures as recommended by Cochrane for screening of records, data extraction and analysis. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess the certainty of evidence. PARTICIPANTS: Randomised controlled trials involving patients admitted to ICUs for longer than 24 hours were included. SEARCH METHODS: The Cochrane Gut Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase and Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Information database (LILACS) databases were searched from August 2017 to March 2022. The search in MEDLINE was updated in April 2023. We also searched ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the prevention of clinically important upper GI bleeding. RESULTS: We included 123 studies with 46 996 participants. Cimetidine (relative risk (RR) 0.56, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.77, moderate certainty), ranitidine (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.76, moderate certainty), antacids (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.68, moderate certainty), sucralfate (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.75, moderate certainty) and a combination of ranitidine and antacids (RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.62, moderate certainty) are likely effective in preventing upper GI bleeding.The effect of any intervention on the prevention of nosocomial pneumonia, all-cause mortality in the ICU or the hospital, duration of the stay in the ICU, duration of intubation and (serious) adverse events remains unclear. CONCLUSIONS: Several interventions seem effective in preventing clinically important upper GI bleeding while there is limited evidence for other outcomes. Patient-relevant benefits and harms need to be assessed under consideration of the patients' underlying conditions.
BACKGROUND: Recurrent aphthous stomatitis is one of the most prevalent oral mucosal immunological diseases. A recent case-control study in the Egyptian population suggested that single nucleotide polymorphism Gly54Asp (rs1800450) of the mannose-binding lectin 2 gene might affect the mannose-binding lectin serum level and recurrent aphthous stomatitis development. The aim of this study was to determine the distribution of six functional mannose-binding lectin 2 gene polymorphisms and analyse their role in recurrent aphthous stomatitis susceptibility in the Czech population. METHODS: The study included 227 subjects; 137 healthy people and 90 patients with recurrent aphthous stomatitis. Six mannose-binding lectin 2 gene polymorphisms (rs11003125, rs7096206, rs7095891, rs5030737, rs1800450, rs1800451) were analysed by the SNaPshot assay method, mannose-binding lectin serum levels were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method in a subgroup of subjects (N = 87). RESULTS: No significant differences in mean of mannose-binding lectin serum levels between healthy controls and patients with recurrent aphthous stomatitis were observed (383 ng/ml ± 249 standard deviation (SD) vs. 316 ng/ml ± 177 SD in remission phase vs. 343 ng/ml ± 254 SD in active phase; p > 0.05), also the allele and genotype frequencies of the studied mannose-binding lectin 2 polymorphisms did not differ significantly between the two groups (p > 0.05, odds ratio (OR): 0.75-1.23). Moreover, the distribution of mannose-binding lectin 2 haplotypes and haplogenotypes was similar in the healthy subjects and patients with recurrent aphthous stomatitis (p > 0.05, OR: 0.75-1.23). CONCLUSIONS: This study did not confirm the previously reported association of the mannose-binding lectin 2 Gly54Asp gene variant and low mannose-binding lectin serum level as the risk factors for susceptibility to recurrent aphthous stomatitis. In addition, no significant relationships between mannose-binding lectin 2 functional haplotypes or haplogenotypes and recurrent aphthous stomatitis were observed.
- MeSH
- aftózní stomatitida * genetika MeSH
- frekvence genu MeSH
- genetická predispozice k nemoci MeSH
- genotyp MeSH
- jednonukleotidový polymorfismus MeSH
- lektin vázající mannosu MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- studie případů a kontrol MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY This article presents the evidence and the rationale for the recommendations for surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar stenosis (DLS) and spondylolisthesis that were recently developed as a part of the Czech Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) "The Surgical Treatment of the Degenerative Diseases of the Spine". MATERIAL AND METHODS The Guideline was drawn up in line with the Czech National Methodology of the CPG Development, which is based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. We used an innovative GRADE-adolopment method that combines adoption and adaptation of the existing guidelines with de novo development of recommendations. In this paper, we present three adapted recommendations on DLS and a recommendation on spondylolisthesis developed de novo by the Czech team. RESULTS Open surgical decompression in DLS patients has been evaluated in three randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A recommendation in favour of decompression was made based on a statistically significant and clinically evident improvement in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and leg pain. Decompression may be recommended for patients with symptoms of DLS in the event of correlation of significant physical limitation and the finding obtained via imaging. The authors of a systematic review of observational studies and one RCT conclude that fusion has a negligible role in the case of a simple DLS. Thus, spondylodesis should only be chosen as an adjunct to decompression in selected DLS patients. Two RCTs compared supervised rehabilitation with home or no exercise, showing no statistically significant difference between the procedures. The guideline group considers the post-surgery physical activity beneficial and suggests supervised rehabilitation in patients who have undergone surgery for DLS for the beneficial effects of exercise in the absence of known adverse effects. Four RCTs were found comparing simple decompression and decompression with fusion in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. None of the outcomes showed clinically significant improvement or deterioration in favour of either intervention. The guideline group concluded that for stable spondylolisthesis the results of both methods are comparable and, when other parameters are considered (balance of benefits and risks, or costs), point in favour of simple decompression. Due to the lack of scientific evidence, no recommendation has been formulated regarding unstable spondylolisthesis. The certainty of the evidence was rated as low for all recommendations. DISCUSSION Despite the unclear definition of stable/unstable slip, the inclusion of apparently unstable cases of DS in stable studies limits the conclusions of the studies. Based on the available literature, however, it can be summarized that in simple degenerative lumbar stenosis and static spondylolisthesis, fusion of the given segment is not justified. However, its use in the case of unstable (dynamic) vertebral slip is undisputable for the time being. CONCLUSIONS The guideline development group suggests decompression in patients with DLS in whom previous conservative treatment did not lead to improvement, spondylodesis only in selected patients, and post-surgical supervised rehabilitation. In patients with degenerative lumbar stenosis and spondylolisthesis with no signs of instability, the guideline development group suggests simple decompression (without fusion). Key words: degenerative lumbar stenosis, degenerative spondylolisthesis, spinal fusion, Clinical Practice Guideline, GRADE, adolopment.
- MeSH
- bederní obratle chirurgie MeSH
- chirurgická dekomprese metody MeSH
- fúze páteře * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- spinální stenóza * chirurgie MeSH
- spondylolistéza * komplikace chirurgie MeSH
- stenóza chirurgie MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- anglický abstrakt MeSH
- časopisecké články MeSH
- systematický přehled MeSH
OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of adding instrumented spinal fusion to decompression to treat degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from inception to May 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing decompression with instrumented fusion to decompression alone in patients with DS. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, assessed the risk of bias and extracted data. We provide the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation assessment of the certainty of evidence (COE). RESULTS: We identified 4514 records and included four trials with 523 participants. At a 2-year follow-up, adding fusion to decompression likely results in trivial difference in the Oswestry Disability Index (range 0-100, with higher values indicating greater impairment) with mean difference (MD) 0.86 (95% CI -4.53 to 6.26; moderate COE). Similar results were observed for back and leg pain measured on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher values indicating more severe pain. There was a slightly increased improvement in back pain (2-year follow-up) in the group without fusion shown by MD -5·92 points (95% CI -11.00 to -0.84; moderate COE). There was a trivial difference in leg pain between the groups, slightly favouring the one without fusion, with MD -1.25 points (95% CI -6.71 to 4.21; moderate COE). Our findings at 2-year follow-up suggest that omitting fusion may increase the reoperation rate slightly (OR 1.23; 0.70 to 2.17; low COE). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests no benefits of adding instrumented fusion to decompression for treating DS. Isolated decompression seems sufficient for most patients. Further RCTs assessing spondylolisthesis stability are needed to determine which patients would benefit from fusion. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022308267.
- MeSH
- bederní obratle chirurgie MeSH
- bolest MeSH
- chirurgická dekomprese metody MeSH
- fúze páteře * metody MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma MeSH
- spinální stenóza * MeSH
- spondylolistéza * komplikace chirurgie MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- metaanalýza MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- systematický přehled MeSH
- MeSH
- incizní kýla * chirurgie MeSH
- kolektomie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- ventrální hernie * chirurgie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Pozitivní zkušenost žen s péčí v mateřství souvisí s kvalitou péče a je stejně důležitá jako objektivně měřitelné perinatální výsledky. Spokojenost je koncept relativně široký s poměrně obtížnou operacionalizací. Nástroje pro její měření zahrnují nejčastěji proměnné týkající se struktury, procesu a výsledků. Změnu současné praxe k lepšímu podmiňuje přesná identifikace stávajících nedostatků v péči a hlavních determinant spokojenosti žen s péčí v mateřství. Cíl: Prostřednictvím literárního přehledu kontextuálně poukázat na identifikované významné determinanty spokojenosti žen. Metodika: Prostřednictvím PICo rámce byla formulována klinická otázka, podmiňující vyhledávání a definování kritérií pro zařazení článků. Otázka je zaměřena na determinanty související se spokojeností žen s péčí poskytovanou během mateřství. Populací jsou ženy žijící v podobném kulturním kontextu, se standardním průběhem těhotenství a s prožitou zkušeností. Uvedené pojmy byly transformovány do předmětových hesel a použity pro vyhledávání a následnou prezentaci v textu. Výsledky: Hodnocení kvality péče poskytované ženám v mateřství je nedílně spjato s konkrétní zkušeností ženy. Prožitek je podmíněn specifickými determinantami vztahujícími se k jednotlivým fázím mateřství a specifickými také pro různé sociodemografické skupiny žen a skupiny žen se zvýšenými nároky na péči. Existují ale i determinanty obecně platné pro všechny ženy bez rozdílu. Patří k nim kontinuální respektující péče, partnerská komunikace, naplnění osobních očekávání ženy, vysoká míra profesionality, podpora ze strany zdravotníků, zapojení ženy do rozhodování a respekt k její volbě. Závěr: Článek poskytuje přehled významných determinant spokojenosti žen s péčí, které byly zjištěny napříč různými zeměmi - zejména v evropském kontextu, ale i mimo něj. Zkušenosti žen z mateřství mohou významně ovlivnit život matky i dítěte. Je žádoucí, aby byly zkoumány a staly se standardním kritériem pro hodnocení kvality péče poskytované ženám v mateřství.
Women's positive experience of maternity care is related to the quality of care and is as important as objectively measurable perinatal outcomes. Satisfaction is a relatively broad concept with relatively difficult operationalisation. The tools for measuring it most often include variables related to structure, process, and outcomes. Improving current practice requires the accurate identification of existing care deficits and the main determinants of women's satisfaction with maternity care. Aim: To contextually highlight significant determinants of women's satisfaction that have been identified through a literary review. Methods: A clinical question was formulated through the PICo framework to determine the search and define inclusion criteria for articles. The question focused on determinants related to women's satisfaction with the care provided during motherhood. The population under consideration is women living in a similar cultural context, with a normal course of pregnancy, and lived experience. These concepts were transformed into subject headings used in the search and text presentation strategies. Results: The evaluation of the quality of care provided to women in maternity is inextricably linked to the specific experience of the woman. The experience is determined by specific factors related to the different phases of motherhood, as well as factors specific to different socio-demographic groups of women and groups of women with increased care demands. However, there are also determinants generally applicable to all women without distinction. These include continuous respectful care, communication with the partner, meeting the woman's personal expectations, a high level of professionalism, support from health professionals, the woman's involvement in decision-making, and respect for her choice. Conclusions: The paper provides an overview of the existing important determinants of women's satisfaction with the care, which have been identified across different countries - particularly in the European context and beyond. A woman's motherhood experience can significantly influence the lives of both mother and child. It is desirable that women's experiences are examined and become a standard criterion for assessing the quality of care provided to women during maternity.
AIMS: This study aimed to identify recommendations for quality nursing care provision, focusing on the possibilities of delivering telehealth nursing at the national level in the Czech Republic. BACKGROUND: The significant growth in the use of technology in health care has changed the environment for patient care and how health care is provided. The COVID-19 pandemic has shown the requirement for telemedicine use in everyday clinical practice. EVALUATION: A literature review aims to find guidelines, recommendations, manuals, standards or consensus papers published in 2017-2022. KEY ISSUES: In total, 12 guidelines were identified. Based on a critical evaluation carried out by two experts, the World Health Organization guideline focused on digital interventions to strengthen the health system has been identified. This guideline was evaluated to be of the highest quality and in line with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations methodology. CONCLUSION: The provision of telemedicine nursing interventions is currently limited at the national level and is not entirely accepted in reimbursement yet. The interprofessional collaboration will be initiated to make recommendations for specific patient groups. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Selected guidelines can be recommended for national adoption to set up and support nursing interventions in telemedicine, including nursing management settings.
- MeSH
- COVID-19 * epidemiologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- ošetřovatelská péče * MeSH
- pandemie MeSH
- poskytování zdravotní péče metody MeSH
- telemedicína * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
BACKGROUND: Recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) is multifactorial disease with unclear etiopathogenesis. The aim of this study was to determine distribution of the angiotensin I converting enzyme (ACE) gene polymorphisms and their influence on RAS susceptibility in Czech population. METHODS: The study included 230 subjects (143 healthy controls and 87 patients with RAS) with anamnestic, clinical and laboratory data. Five ACE gene polymorphisms (rs4291/rs4305/rs4311/rs4331/rs1799752 = ACE I/D) were determined by TaqMan technique. RESULTS: The allele and genotype distributions of the studied ACE I/D polymorphisms were not significantly different between subjects with/without RAS (Pcorr > 0.05). However, carriers of II genotype were less frequent in the RAS group (OR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.21-1.12, P = 0.059). Stratified analysis by sex demonstrated lower frequency of II genotype in women (OR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.09-1.17, P < 0.035, Pcorr > 0.05, respectively) than in men with RAS (P > 0.05). Moreover, the frequency of AGTGD haplotype was significantly increased in RAS patients (OR = 13.74, 95% CI = 1.70-110.79, P = 0.0012, Pcorr < 0.05). In subanalysis, TGD haplotype was significantly more frequent in RAS patients (P < 0.00001) and CGI haplotype was less frequent in RAS patients (P < 0.01), especially in women (P = 0.016, Pcorr > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that while the AGTGD and TGD haplotypes are associated with increased risk of RAS development, CGI haplotype might be one of protective factors against RAS susceptibility in Czech population.
- MeSH
- aftózní stomatitida * epidemiologie genetika MeSH
- angiotensin konvertující enzym * genetika MeSH
- frekvence genu MeSH
- genetická predispozice k nemoci genetika MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- polymorfismus genetický genetika MeSH
- studie případů a kontrol MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
This is a protocol for a scoping review that aims to determine how guideline authors using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach have addressed previously identified challenges related to public health. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews will be followed. We will search and screen titles of guidelines for all languages published in 2013-2021 in: the GIN library, BIGG database, Epistemonikos GRADE guidelines repository, GRADEpro Database, MAGICapp, NICE and WHO websites. Two reviewers will independently screen full texts of the documents identified. The following information will be extracted: methods used for identifying different stakeholders and incorporating their perspectives; methods for identification and prioritization of non-health outcomes; methods for determining thresholds for decision-making; methods for incorporating and grading evidence from non-randomized studies; methods for addressing concerns with conditional recommendations in public health; methods for reaching consensus; additional methodological concerns; and any modifications made to GRADE. A combination of directed content analysis and descriptive statistics will be used for data analysis, and the findings presented narratively in a tabular and graphical form. In this protocol, we present the pilot results from 13 identified eligible guidelines issued between January and August 2021. We will publish the full review results when they become available.
