Writing
Dotaz
Zobrazit nápovědu
1st ed. vii, 116 s. : il. ; 23 cm
vi, 66 stran : ilustrace ; 19 cm
- MeSH
- biomedicínský výzkum metody MeSH
- psaní MeSH
- publikování MeSH
- Publikační typ
- příručky MeSH
- Konspekt
- Všeobecná příručková díla
- NLK Obory
- humanitní vědy a umění
- lingvistika, lékařská terminologie
The purpose of the study was to determine if a generalized motor program (GMP) exists for writing, as has been previously reported. Beginning with a 1942 experiment by Lashley, and continuing with a 1976 (Raibert) example, writers of some motor learning texts have asserted that one can write with different effectors (nonpreferred hand, mouth, foot, etc.) and the results are quite similar, thus demonstrating that writing is a generalized motor program. The task has not been reported in recent literature. In order to determine if the results reported were generalizable, the researchers recruited 31 individuals who volunteered to write a short sentence under five conditions: 1) preferred hand, 2) preferred hand with wrist stabilized, 3) non-preferred hand, 4) mouth, and 5) foot. Participants ranged in age from 19 to 75 and were grouped as follows: < 25 yrs, n = 15; 25–44 yrs, n = 6; > 44, n = 10. Although all of the samples were legible in Conditions 1 and 2, legibility deteriorated significantly in Conditions 4 and 5. Contrary to expectations, there were no significant differences between the samples produced by based on age groupings. The authors concluded that most adults cannot write legibly with their mouths or feet, contrary to what has been previously reported.
- Klíčová slova
- motorické programy, čitelnost,
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- funkční lateralita MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- motorické dovednosti * MeSH
- noha (od hlezna dolů) MeSH
- psaní rukou MeSH
- psaní * dějiny MeSH
- ruka MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- statistika jako téma MeSH
- ústa MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- pozorovací studie MeSH
3rd ed. x, 348 s.
- MeSH
- psaní MeSH
- publikování MeSH
- věda MeSH
- výzkum MeSH
- Publikační typ
- monografie MeSH
- Konspekt
- Lékařské vědy. Lékařství
- NLK Obory
- lékařství
- lékařská informatika
Third edition x, 262 stran : ilustrace ; 24 cm
Publishing in reputable peer-reviewed journals is an integral step of the clinical pharmacy research process, allowing for knowledge transfer and advancement in clinical pharmacy practice. Writing a manuscript for publication in a journal requires several careful considerations to ensure that research findings are communicated to the satisfaction of editors and reviewers, and effectively to the readers. This commentary provides a summary of the main points to consider, outlining how to: (1) select a suitable journal, (2) tailor the manuscript for the journal readership, (3) organise the content of the manuscript in line with the journal's guidelines, and (4) manage feedback from the peer review process. This commentary reviews the steps of the writing process, identifies common pitfalls, and proposes ways to overcome them. It aims to assist both novice and established researchers in the field of clinical pharmacy to enhance the quality of writing in a research paper to maximise impact.
- MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nemocniční lékárny * MeSH
- posudkové řízení MeSH
- psaní MeSH
- publikování MeSH
- výzkum v lékárnictví * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- MeSH
- kongresy jako téma MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- perinatální péče MeSH
- perinatologie * MeSH
- společnosti lékařské MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- dopisy MeSH
- úvodníky MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
