Objev indukované pluripotence v roce 2006 umožnil revoluční způsob získávaní autologních terapeuticky aplikovatelných buněk, a mož‐ nost modelovat jakékoliv onemocnění v in vitro podmínkách. Možnost vrátit libovolnou, finálně diferencovanou buňku „v čase“ zpátky do stádia pluripotence je zajímavé i pro oblast onkologického výzkumu. Tato technologie umožnila studium procesů spojených s roz‐ vojem nádorového fenotypu buňky a taky s přechodem nádorové buňky do stádia s nižší mírou diferenciace. Reprogramování buněk do indukovaných pluripotentních kmenových buněk také pomáhá mnohem lépe studovat raritní populaci buněk, přítomných v nádo‐ rech – tzv. nádorové kmenové buňky. Indukovaná pluripotence některých typů nádorových buněk, spojená s jejich následnou řízenou diferenciací by se zároveň mohla stát jednou z možných terapeutických aplikací v onkologii.
Discovery of technology of induced pluripotency that allows the generation of autologous therapeutically applicable cells and generati‐ on of in vitro cell models for diseases with limited (or highly invasive) access to tested cells has also opened new horizons in the field of oncology research. The unique ability to reprogram the cancer cell into pluripotency with subsequent directed differentiation into cell with no malignant phenotype should be considered as a challenge in the field of new oncotherapy development. Although still conside‐ red to be realistic only on the level of experimental approach, the recent progress in the field of induced pluripotency gives the hope that dedifferentiation‐based therapies connected with the erase of malignant phenotype of original cancer cell will be more realistic in near future. By then, the most important role of induced pluripotency in oncology remains in the field of regenerative therapy as a source of autologous cells for regeneration of tissues or organs damaged by tumor growth or aggressive therapy
Oct4-mediated reprogramming has recently become a novel tool for the generation of various cell types from differentiated somatic cells. Although molecular mechanisms underlying this process are unknown, it is well documented that cells over-expressing Oct4 undergo transition from differentiated state into plastic state. This transition is associated with the acquisition of stem cells properties leading to epigenetically "open" state that is permissive to cell fate switch upon external stimuli. In order to contribute to our understanding of molecular mechanisms driving this process, we characterised human fibroblasts over-expressing Oct4 and performed comprehensive small-RNAseq analysis. Our analyses revealed new interesting aspects of Oct4-mediated cell plasticity induction. Cells over-expressing Oct4 lose their cell identity demonstrated by down-regulation of fibroblast-specific genes and up-regulation of epithelial genes. Interestingly, this process is associated with microRNA expression profile that is similar to microRNA profiles typically found in pluripotent stem cells. We also provide extensive network of microRNA families and clusters allowing us to precisely determine the miRNAome associated with the acquisition of Oct4-induced transient plastic state. Our data expands current knowledge of microRNA and their implications in cell fate alterations and contributing to understanding molecular mechanisms underlying it.
- MeSH
- Cell Line MeSH
- Embryo, Mammalian * MeSH
- Fibroblasts cytology metabolism MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- MicroRNAs * biosynthesis genetics MeSH
- Octamer Transcription Factor-3 * biosynthesis genetics MeSH
- Gene Expression Regulation * MeSH
- Cellular Reprogramming Techniques * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
Aim: Human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are inefficiently derived from somatic cells by overexpression of defined transcription factors. Overexpression of H2A histone variant macroH2A1.1, but not macroH2A1.2, leads to increased iPSC reprogramming by unclear mechanisms. Materials & methods: Cleavage under targets and tagmentation (CUT&Tag) allows robust epigenomic profiling of a low cell number. We performed an integrative CUT&Tag-RNA-Seq analysis of macroH2A1-dependent orchestration of iPSCs reprogramming using human endothelial cells. Results: We demonstrate wider genome occupancy, predicted transcription factors binding, and gene expression regulated by macroH2A1.1 during reprogramming, compared to macroH2A1.2. MacroH2A1.1, previously associated with neurodegenerative pathologies, specifically activated ectoderm/neural processes. Conclusion: CUT&Tag and RNA-Seq data integration is a powerful tool to investigate the epigenetic mechanisms occurring during cell reprogramming.
- MeSH
- Endothelial Cells metabolism MeSH
- Histones * metabolism MeSH
- Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells * metabolism MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Cellular Reprogramming genetics MeSH
- RNA-Seq MeSH
- Transcription Factors genetics MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
Reprogramming to pluripotency is associated with DNA damage and requires the functions of the BRCA1 tumor suppressor. Here, we leverage separation-of-function mutations in BRCA1/2 as well as the physical and/or genetic interactions between BRCA1 and its associated repair proteins to ascertain the relevance of homology-directed repair (HDR), stalled fork protection (SFP), and replication gap suppression (RGS) in somatic cell reprogramming. Surprisingly, loss of SFP and RGS is inconsequential for the transition to pluripotency. In contrast, cells deficient in HDR, but proficient in SFP and RGS, reprogram with reduced efficiency. Conversely, the restoration of HDR function through inactivation of 53bp1 rescues reprogramming in Brca1-deficient cells, and 53bp1 loss leads to elevated HDR and enhanced reprogramming in mouse and human cells. These results demonstrate that somatic cell reprogramming is especially dependent on repair of replication-associated double-strand breaks (DSBs) by the HDR activity of BRCA1 and BRCA2 and can be improved in the absence of 53BP1.
- MeSH
- Tumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1 * metabolism genetics MeSH
- DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Mice MeSH
- DNA Repair * MeSH
- Cellular Reprogramming * MeSH
- BRCA1 Protein * metabolism genetics MeSH
- Recombinational DNA Repair MeSH
- DNA Replication MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Mice MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural MeSH
The aim of this study was to extensively characterise natal dental pulp stem cells (nDPSC) and assess their efficiency to generate human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSC). A number of distinguishing features prompted us to choose nDPSC over normal adult DPSC, in that they differed in cell surface marker expression and initial doubling time. In addition, nDPSC expressed 17 out of 52 pluripotency genes we analysed, and the level of expression was comparable to human embryonic stem cells (hESC). Ours is the first group to report comprehensive characterization of nDPSC followed by directed reprogramming to a pluripotent stem cell state. nDPSC yielded hiPSC colonies upon transduction with Sendai virus expressing the pluripotency transcription factors POU5F1, SOX2, c-MYC and KLF4. nDPSC had higher reprogramming efficiency compared to human fibroblasts. nDPSC derived hiPSCs closely resembled hESC in terms of their morphology, expression of pluripotency markers and gene expression profiles. Furthermore, nDPSC derived hiPSCs differentiated into the three germ layers when cultured as embryoid bodies (EB) and by directed differentiation. Based on our findings, nDPSC present a unique marker expression profile compared with adult DPSC and possess higher reprogramming efficiency as compared with dermal fibroblasts thus proving to be more amenable for reprogramming.
- MeSH
- Biomarkers MeSH
- Cell Differentiation genetics MeSH
- Embryoid Bodies cytology MeSH
- Fibroblasts cytology metabolism MeSH
- Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells cytology metabolism MeSH
- Karyotype MeSH
- Stem Cells cytology metabolism MeSH
- Cells, Cultured MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Natal Teeth cytology MeSH
- Cellular Reprogramming * MeSH
- Transcriptome MeSH
- Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental MeSH
- Dental Pulp cytology MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
Differentiated nuclei can be reprogrammed/remodelled to totipotency after their transfer to enucleated metaphase II (MII) oocytes. The process of reprogramming/remodelling is, however, only partially characterized. It has been shown that the oocyte nucleus (germinal vesicle - GV) components are essential for a successful remodelling of the transferred nucleus by providing the materials for pseudo-nucleus formation. However, the nucleus is a complex structure and exactly what nuclear components are required for a successful nucleus remodelling and reprogramming is unknown. Till date, the only nuclear sub-structure experimentally demonstrated to be essential is the oocyte nucleolus (nucleolus-like body, NLB). In this study, we investigated what other GV components might be necessary for the formation of normal-sized pseudo-pronuclei (PNs). Our results showed that the removal of the GV nuclear envelope with attached chromatin and chromatin-bound factors does not substantially influence the size of the remodelled nuclei in reconstructed cells and that their nuclear envelopes seem to have normal parameters. Rather than the insoluble nuclear lamina, the GV content, which is dissolved in the cytoplasm with the onset of oocyte maturation, influences the characteristics and size of transferred nuclei.
- MeSH
- Cell Nucleolus metabolism MeSH
- Cell Nucleus metabolism MeSH
- Chromatin metabolism MeSH
- Cytoplasm metabolism MeSH
- Nuclear Lamina metabolism MeSH
- Nuclear Envelope metabolism MeSH
- RNA, Messenger metabolism MeSH
- Mice MeSH
- Oocytes cytology metabolism MeSH
- Oogenesis MeSH
- Ovarian Follicle metabolism MeSH
- Cellular Reprogramming * MeSH
- Nuclear Transfer Techniques * MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Mice MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
The authors of the article titled "Advances in Genetic Reprogramming: Prospects from Developmental Biology to Regenerative Medicine" (Dhanjal DS, Singh R, Sharma V, Nepovimova E, Adam V, Kuca K, Chopra C. Curr Med Chem. 2024; 31(13): 1646-1690. DOI: 10.2174/0929867330666230503144619. PMID: 37138422) [1] have made revisions to the references in the text and the reference section. These updates have been made to ensure the integrity of the article. The updated reference list can be found in the latest version of the article. The authors apologize for any confusion or inconvenience caused. The original article can be found online at: https://www.eurekaselect.com/article/131443.
- MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Cellular Reprogramming * genetics MeSH
- Regenerative Medicine * MeSH
- Developmental Biology MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Review MeSH
Significance: The architecture of the mitochondrial network and cristae critically impact cell differentiation and identity. Cells undergoing metabolic reprogramming to aerobic glycolysis (Warburg effect), such as immune cells, stem cells, and cancer cells, go through controlled modifications in mitochondrial architecture, which is critical for achieving the resulting cellular phenotype. Recent Advances: Recent studies in immunometabolism have shown that the manipulation of mitochondrial network dynamics and cristae shape directly affects T cell phenotype and macrophage polarization through altering energy metabolism. Similar manipulations also alter the specific metabolic phenotypes that accompany somatic reprogramming, stem cell differentiation, and cancer cells. The modulation of oxidative phosphorylation activity, accompanied by changes in metabolite signaling, reactive oxygen species generation, and adenosine triphosphate levels, is the shared underlying mechanism. Critical Issues: The plasticity of mitochondrial architecture is particularly vital for metabolic reprogramming. Consequently, failure to adapt the appropriate mitochondrial morphology often compromises the differentiation and identity of the cell. Immune, stem, and tumor cells exhibit striking similarities in their coordination of mitochondrial morphology with metabolic pathways. However, although many general unifying principles can be observed, their validity is not absolute, and the mechanistic links thus need to be further explored. Future Directions: Better knowledge of the molecular mechanisms involved and their relationships to both mitochondrial network and cristae morphology will not only further deepen our understanding of energy metabolism but may also contribute to improved therapeutic manipulation of cell viability, differentiation, proliferation, and identity in many different cell types. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 39, 684-707.
The foundations of cell reprogramming were laid by Yamanaka and co-workers, who showed that somatic cells can be reprogrammed into pluripotent cells (induced pluripotency). Since this discovery, the field of regenerative medicine has seen advancements. For example, because they can differentiate into multiple cell types, pluripotent stem cells are considered vital components in regenerative medicine aimed at the functional restoration of damaged tissue. Despite years of research, both replacement and restoration of failed organs/ tissues have remained elusive scientific feats. However, with the inception of cell engineering and nuclear reprogramming, useful solutions have been identified to counter the need for compatible and sustainable organs. By combining the science underlying genetic engineering and nuclear reprogramming with regenerative medicine, scientists have engineered cells to make gene and stem cell therapies applicable and effective. These approaches have enabled the targeting of various pathways to reprogramme cells, i.e., make them behave in beneficial ways in a patient-specific manner. Technological advancements have clearly supported the concept and realization of regenerative medicine. Genetic engineering is used for tissue engineering and nuclear reprogramming and has led to advances in regenerative medicine. Targeted therapies and replacement of traumatized , damaged, or aged organs can be realized through genetic engineering. Furthermore, the success of these therapies has been validated through thousands of clinical trials. Scientists are currently evaluating induced tissue-specific stem cells (iTSCs), which may lead to tumour-free applications of pluripotency induction. In this review, we present state-of-the-art genetic engineering that has been used in regenerative medicine. We also focus on ways that genetic engineering and nuclear reprogramming have transformed regenerative medicine and have become unique therapeutic niches.
- MeSH
- Genetic Engineering MeSH
- Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells metabolism cytology MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Cellular Reprogramming * MeSH
- Regenerative Medicine * MeSH
- Tissue Engineering MeSH
- Developmental Biology MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Review MeSH
BACKGROUND: Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) play roles in both disease modelling and regenerative medicine. It is critical that the genomic integrity of the cells remains intact and that the DNA repair systems are fully functional. In this article, we focused on the detection of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) by phosphorylated histone H2AX (known as γH2AX) and p53-binding protein 1 (53BP1) in three distinct lines of hiPSCs, their source cells, and one line of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs). METHODS: We measured spontaneously occurring DSBs throughout the process of fibroblast reprogramming and during long-term in vitro culturing. To assess the variations in the functionality of the DNA repair system among the samples, the number of DSBs induced by γ-irradiation and the decrease over time was analysed. The foci number was detected by fluorescence microscopy separately for the G1 and S/G2 cell cycle phases. RESULTS: We demonstrated that fibroblasts contained a low number of non-replication-related DSBs, while this number increased after reprogramming into hiPSCs and then decreased again after long-term in vitro passaging. The artificial induction of DSBs revealed that the repair mechanisms function well in the source cells and hiPSCs at low passages, but fail to recognize a substantial proportion of DSBs at high passages. CONCLUSIONS: Our observations suggest that cellular reprogramming increases the DSB number but that the repair mechanism functions well. However, after prolonged in vitro culturing of hiPSCs, the repair capacity decreases.
- MeSH
- Tumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1 genetics metabolism MeSH
- Cell Line MeSH
- DNA genetics metabolism MeSH
- DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded * radiation effects MeSH
- Gene Expression MeSH
- Fibroblasts cytology metabolism radiation effects MeSH
- Phosphorylation radiation effects MeSH
- Histones genetics metabolism MeSH
- Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells cytology metabolism radiation effects MeSH
- G1 Phase Cell Cycle Checkpoints genetics MeSH
- G2 Phase Cell Cycle Checkpoints genetics MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Human Embryonic Stem Cells cytology metabolism radiation effects MeSH
- DNA Repair genetics MeSH
- Cellular Reprogramming MeSH
- Cellular Senescence genetics radiation effects MeSH
- Gamma Rays MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
