authorization Dotaz Zobrazit nápovědu

Přesná shoda Sémantické

BACKGROUND: The safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of hyaluronidase-facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin (fSCIG) 10% (dual-vial unit of human immunoglobulin 10% and recombinant human hyaluronidase [rHuPH20]) were assessed in children with primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDs). METHODS: This phase 4, post-authorization, prospective, interventional, multicenter study (NCT03116347) conducted in the European Economic Area, enrolled patients aged 2 to < 18 years with a documented PID diagnosis who had received immunoglobulin therapy for ≥ 3 months before enrollment. New fSCIG 10% starters underwent fSCIG 10% dose ramp-up for ≤ 6 weeks (epoch 1) before receiving fSCIG 10% for ≤ 3 years (epoch 2); patients pretreated with fSCIG 10% entered epoch 2 directly. The primary outcome was the number and rate (per infusion) of all noninfectious treatment-related serious and severe adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: In total, 42 patients were enrolled and dosed (median [range] age: 11.5 [3-17] years; 81% male; 23 new starters; 19 pretreated). Overall, 49 related noninfectious, treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were reported in 15 patients; most were mild in severity (87.8%). No treatment-related serious TEAEs were reported. Two TEAEs (infusion site pain and emotional distress) were reported as severe and treatment-related in a single new fSCIG 10% starter. The rate of local TEAEs was lower in pretreated patients (0.1 event/patient-year) versus new starters (1.3 events/patient-year). No patients tested positive for binding anti-rHuPH20 antibodies (titer of ≥ 1:160). CONCLUSIONS: No safety signals were identified, and the incidence of local AEs declined over the duration of fSCIG 10% treatment. This study supports fSCIG 10% long-term safety in children with PIDs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER (CLINICALTRIALS.GOV): NCT03116347.

Publikační typ
časopisecké články MeSH

Abstrakt

Patient access GAP: the delay between marketing authorization and reimbursement decision on new drugs

Folia pharmaceutica Universitatis Carolinae. 2017 ; 47 (47) : 67.

ISSN 1210-9495
Medvik
Zdroj

Publikační typ
abstrakt z konference MeSH

Abstrakt

Non-interventional post-authorization study with the active substance fentanyl in the form of transdermal patch

Klinická onkologie. 2015 ; 28 (Supplementum 1) : S58-S59.

ISSN 0862-495X
Medvik
Zdroj

Brněnské onkologické dny a ... Konference pro nelékařské zdravotnické pracovníky : Brno, ..... 2015 ; () : S58-S59.

Medvik
Zdroj

Publikační typ
abstrakt z konference MeSH

Článek online

Causality assessment of adverse drug reaction: A narrative review to find the most exhaustive and easy-to-use tool in post-authorization settings

Journal of Applied Biomedicine. 2023 ; 21 (2) : 59-66. [pub] 20230621

J. Appl. Biomed. (Čes. Budějovice Print)
ISSN 1214-0287
Medvik
Zdroj

BACKGROUND: The core motive of pharmacovigilance is the detection and prevention of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), to improve the risk-benefit balance of the drug. However, the causality assessment of ADRs remains a major challenge among clinicians, and none of the available tools of causality assessment used for assessing ADRs have been universally accepted. OBJECTIVE: To provide an up-to-date overview of the different causality assessment tools. METHODS: We conducted electronic searches in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane database. The eligibility of each tool was screened by three reviewers. Each eligible tool was then scrutinized for its domains (the reported specific set of questions/areas used for calculating the likelihood of cause-and-effect relation of an ADR) to discover the most comprehensive tool. Finally, we subjectively assessed the tool's ease-of-use in a Canadian, Indian, Hungarian, and Brazilian clinical context. RESULTS: Twenty-one eligible causality assessment tools were retrieved. Naranjo's tool and De Boer's tool appeared the most comprehensive among all the tools, covering 10 domains each. Regarding "ease-of-use" in a clinical setting, we judged that many tools were hard to implement in a clinical context because of their complexity and/or lengthiness. Naranjo's tool, Jones's tool, Danan and Benichou's tool, and Hsu and Stoll's tool appeared to be the easiest to implement into various clinical contexts. CONCLUSION: Among the many tools identified, 1981 Naranjo's scale remains the most comprehensive and easy to use for performing causality assessment of ADRs. Upcoming analysis should compare the performance of each ADR tool in clinical settings.