BACKGROUND: STARDUST, a phase 3b randomised trial, compared ustekinumab therapeutic strategies in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) using early endoscopic assessment and treat-to-target (T2T) versus standard of care (SoC). AIM: To assess the efficacy of ustekinumab extended treatment in a long-term extension (LTE) of up to 104 weeks with dosing adapted according to clinical, biomarker and endoscopy outcomes. METHODS: Adults with moderately-to-severely active CD received intravenous ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg at Week 0 and subcutaneous ustekinumab 90 mg at Week 8. At Week 16, 440 ≥70-point responders were randomised to T2T or SoC and 323 entered the LTE. At Week 48, a unified, protocol-defined ustekinumab dose frequency escalation/de-escalation was applied based on achieving endoscopic remission and corticosteroid-free clinical remission. Achieving corticosteroid-free clinical remission and biomarker remission at consecutive visits determined ustekinumab dosing frequency. Dichotomous variables were analysed using non-responder imputation. RESULTS: Among patients who entered the LTE, 7.7%, 48.6% and 43.7% received doses every 4, 8 and 12 weeks, respectively. Ustekinumab dose frequency was escalated in 23.5% and de-escalated in 19.7%. Endoscopic response and remission rates were 28.9% and 10.73% (all randomised) and 39.3% and 14.6% (patients entering the LTE), respectively, at Week 104. Clinical remissiona rates at week 104 were 50.2% (all randomised) and 68.4% (patients entering the LTE). There were no new safety signals. CONCLUSION: STARDUST LTE is the first interventional ustekinumab efficacy study to show a favourable benefit-risk profile with preservation of clinical and endoscopic outcomes through Week 104 using flexible, algorithm-driven dose adjustment including de-escalation.

• MeSH
• biologické markery analýza   MeSH
• Crohnova nemoc * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• gastrointestinální endoskopie MeSH
• indukce remise MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• ustekinumab * terapeutické užití   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH

Background: Current management of mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis (UC) involves monitoring clinical markers of disease activity, such as stool frequency (SF) and rectal bleeding (RB), and adjusting treatment accordingly. Our aim was to assess whether targeting treatment based on faecal calprotectin (FC) levels (treat-to-target; T2T) provides greater UC disease control versus a symptom-based approach. Methods: This was a pragmatic, randomised (1:1) controlled study of patients with mild-to-moderate UC (global Mayo score 2-6) treated with ≤2.4 g/day 5-aminosalicylic acid that compared the effectiveness of two management strategies with (interventional arm) and without (reference arm) FC home monitoring over 12 months of follow-up. Treatment was optimised in the interventional arm using FC values and clinical symptoms (PRO-2), while the reference arm used only PRO-2. Results: 193 patients completed the study. No significant difference was found for the primary endpoint (Mayo Endoscopic Subscore [MES] = 0 at 12 months). A numerical advantage for the interventional arm over the reference arm for the primary endpoint (37.0% vs. 33.4%, respectively) and for MES ≤ 1, RB = 0, and SF ≤ 1 at 12 months was found following imputation for missing data. The composite endpoint of MES = 0, RB = 0, and SF ≤ 1 at 12 months was achieved at a significantly higher rate in the interventional arm than the reference arm (effect size [ES]: 0.17, 95% CI 0.02-0.32; p < 0.05). A similar result was obtained for MES ≤ 1, RB = 0 and SF ≤ 1 (ES: 0.22; 95% CI 0.07-0.37; p < 0.05). Conclusions: T2T using FC monitoring was effective in patients with mild-to-moderate UC at 12 months. Further longer-term studies are required to confirm the results.

• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH

BACKGROUND: While indirect comparison of infliximab (IFX) and vedolizumab (VDZ) in adults with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) shows that IFX has better effectiveness during induction, and comparable efficacy during maintenance treatment, comparative data specific to subcutaneous (SC) IFX (i.e., CT-P13 SC) versus VDZ are limited. AIM: Pooled analysis of randomised studies to compare efficacy and safety with IFX SC and VDZ in moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease. METHODS: Parallel-group, randomised studies evaluating IFX SC and VDZ in patients with moderate-to-severe CD or UC were identified. Eligible studies reported ≥ 1 prespecified outcome of interest at Week 6 (reflecting treatment during the induction phase) and/or at 1 year (Weeks 50-54; reflecting treatment during the maintenance phase). Prespecified efficacy and safety outcomes considered in this pooled analysis included the proportions of patients achieving disease-specific clinical responses, clinical remission, or discontinuing due to lack of efficacy, and the proportions of patients experiencing adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, infections, serious infections, or discontinuing due to AEs. Data from multiple studies or study arms were extracted and pooled using a random-effect model; comparative analyses were performed separately for patients with CD and UC. RESULTS: We identified three eligible CD trials and four eligible UC trials that assigned over 1200 participants per disease cohort to either IFX SC or VDZ. In patients with CD, intravenous induction therapy with IFX demonstrated better efficacy (non-overlapping 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) compared with VDZ; during the maintenance phase, IFX SC showed numerically better efficacy (overlapping 95% CIs) than VDZ. A lower proportion of IFX SC-treated patients discontinued therapy due to lack of efficacy over 1 year. In patients with UC, efficacy profiles were similar with IFX SC and VDZ during the induction and maintenance phases, and a lower proportion of IFX SC-treated patients discontinued therapy due to lack of efficacy over 1 year. In both cohorts, safety profiles for IFX SC and VDZ were generally comparable during 1 year. CONCLUSION: IFX SC demonstrated better efficacy than VDZ in patients with CD, and similar efficacy to VDZ in patients with UC; 1-year safety was comparable with IFX SC and VDZ.

• MeSH
• Crohnova nemoc * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• gastrointestinální látky škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• humanizované monoklonální protilátky * MeSH
• indukce remise MeSH
• infliximab škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma MeSH
• ulcerózní kolitida * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH

BACKGROUND: Etrolizumab is a gut-targeted anti-β7 integrin monoclonal antibody. In a previous phase 2 induction study, etrolizumab significantly improved clinical remission versus placebo in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of etrolizumab with infliximab in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. METHODS: We conducted a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, phase 3 study (GARDENIA) across 114 treatment centres worldwide. We included adults (age 18-80 years) with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (Mayo Clinic total score [MCS] of 6-12 with an endoscopic subscore of ≥2, a rectal bleeding subscore of ≥1, and a stool frequency subscore of ≥1) who were naive to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors. Patients were required to have had an established diagnosis of ulcerative colitis for at least 3 months, corroborated by both clinical and endoscopic evidence, and evidence of disease extending at least 20 cm from the anal verge. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive subcutaneous etrolizumab 105 mg once every 4 weeks or intravenous infliximab 5 mg/kg at 0, 2, and 6 weeks and every 8 weeks thereafter for 52 weeks. Randomisation was stratified by baseline concomitant treatment with corticosteroids, concomitant treatment with immunosuppressants, and baseline disease activity. All participants and study site personnel were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who had both clinical response at week 10 (MCS ≥3-point decrease and ≥30% reduction from baseline, plus ≥1-point decrease in rectal bleeding subscore or absolute rectal bleeding score of 0 or 1) and clinical remission at week 54 (MCS ≤2, with individual subscores ≤1); efficacy was analysed using a modified intention-to-treat population (all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study drug). GARDENIA was designed to show superiority of etrolizumab over infliximab for the primary endpoint. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02136069, and is now closed to recruitment. FINDINGS: Between Dec 24, 2014, and June 23, 2020, 730 patients were screened for eligibility and 397 were enrolled and randomly assigned to etrolizumab (n=199) or infliximab (n=198). 95 (48%) patients in the etrolizumab group and 103 (52%) in the infliximab group completed the study through week 54. At week 54, 37 (18·6%) of 199 patients in the etrolizumab group and 39 (19·7%) of 198 in the infliximab group met the primary endpoint (adjusted treatment difference -0·9% [95% CI -8·7 to 6·8]; p=0·81). The number of patients reporting one or more adverse events was similar between treatment groups (154 [77%] of 199 in the etrolizumab group and 151 [76%] of 198 in the infliximab group); the most common adverse event in both groups was ulcerative colitis (55 [28%] patients in the etrolizumab group and 43 [22%] in the infliximab group). More patients in the etrolizumab group reported serious adverse events (including serious infections) than did those in the infliximab group (32 [16%] vs 20 [10%]); the most common serious adverse event was ulcerative colitis (12 [6%] and 11 [6%]). There was one death during follow-up, in the infliximab group due to a pulmonary embolism, which was not considered to be related to study treatment. INTERPRETATION: To our knowledge, this trial is the first phase 3 maintenance study in moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis to use infliximab as an active comparator. Although the study did not show statistical superiority for the primary endpoint, etrolizumab performed similarly to infliximab from a clinical viewpoint. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche.

• MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
• gastrointestinální látky terapeutické užití   MeSH
• humanizované monoklonální protilátky terapeutické užití   MeSH
• infliximab terapeutické užití   MeSH
• injekce subkutánní MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• mladý dospělý MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• stupeň závažnosti nemoci MeSH
• ulcerózní kolitida farmakoterapie   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• mladý dospělý MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There are limited comparative data for infliximab and vedolizumab in inflammatory bowel disease patients. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of infliximab and vedolizumab in adult patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis. RESULTS: We identified six eligible Crohn's disease and seven eligible ulcerative colitis trials that randomised over 1900 participants per disease cohort to infliximab or vedolizumab. In the Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis cohorts, infliximab yielded better efficacy than vedolizumab for all analysed outcomes (CDAI-70, CDAI-100 responses, and clinical remission for Crohn's disease and clinical response and clinical remission for ulcerative colitis) during the induction phase, with non-overlapping 95% confidence intervals. In the maintenance phase, similar proportions of infliximab- or vedolizumab-treated patients achieved clinical response, clinical remission, or mucosal healing in both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. For the safety outcomes, rates of adverse events, serious adverse events, and discontinuations due to adverse events were similar in infliximab- and vedolizumab-treated patients in both diseases. The infection rate was higher in infliximab for Crohn's disease and higher in vedolizumab when treating patients with ulcerative colitis. There was no difference between the treatments in the proportions of patients who reported serious infections in both indications. CONCLUSIONS: Indirect comparison of infliximab and vedolizumab trials in adult patients with moderate-to severe Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis demonstrated that infliximab has better efficacy in the induction phase and comparable efficacy during the maintenance phase and overall safety profile compared to vedolizumab.

• MeSH
• Crohnova nemoc * chemicky indukované   farmakoterapie   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• gastrointestinální látky škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• humanizované monoklonální protilátky MeSH
• idiopatické střevní záněty * chemicky indukované   farmakoterapie   MeSH
• infliximab škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• ulcerózní kolitida * chemicky indukované   farmakoterapie   MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• metaanalýza MeSH
• systematický přehled MeSH

BACKGROUND: A treat-to-target strategy, in which strictly defined treatment targets facilitate decision making in clinical practice, is advocated as an optimised management approach for some chronic disorders. The aim of the STARDUST trial was to assess whether a treat-to-target strategy with early endoscopy, regular biomarker and clinical symptom monitoring, and dose intensification for persistent inflammatory activity, was more successful in achieving endoscopic improvement at week 48 than a clinically driven maintenance strategy in patients with moderate-to-severe active Crohn's disease receiving ustekinumab. METHODS: This open-label, multicentre, randomised phase 3b trial included adults with active, moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI] 220-450 and Simple Endoscopic Score in Crohn's Disease [SES-CD] ≥3) for whom conventional therapy or one biologic therapy, or both, had failed. Patients received intravenous ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg at baseline and subcutaneous ustekinumab 90 mg at week 8. At week 16, patients with a CDAI improvement of 70 or more points from baseline were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive standard-of-care or treat-to-target maintenance treatment through week 48. Randomisation was balanced by using randomly permuted blocks and was stratified by biologic history status and baseline SES-CD score. All patients who signed informed consent, who were not screening failures, and who received at least one dose of study treatment were included in week 16 analyses. All patients included in week 16 analyses and randomly assigned to one of the maintenance treatment regimens were included in the week 48 efficacy and safety analyses (ie, on an intention-to-treat basis). Patients assigned to the treat-to-target arm received ustekinumab every 12 weeks or every 8 weeks based on SES-CD improvement from baseline and could escalate to every 4 weeks through week 48 if prespecified targets were missed. Patients assigned to the standard-of-care arm received ustekinumab every 12 weeks or every 8 weeks; those receiving treatment every 12 weeks could escalate per European labelling. The primary efficacy endpoint was endoscopic response at week 48 (SES-CD score ≥50% decrease from baseline), analysed by non-responder imputation. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03107793, and is active but not recruiting. FINDINGS: 498 patients received standard induction treatment, of whom 440 were randomly assigned to the treat-to-target group (n=219) or the standard-of-care group (n=221). At week 48, there was no significant difference in endoscopic response (83 [38%] of 219 patients vs 66 [30%] of 221 patients; p=0·087), endoscopic remission (25 [11%] vs 32 [15%]; p=0·334), mucosal healing (31 [14%] vs 37 [17%]; p=0·449), and clinical remission (135 [62%] vs 154 [70%]; p=0·072) between the two groups; clinical response was significantly lower in the treat-to-target group than in the standard-of-care group (149 [68%] vs 172 [78%]; p=0·020). Other endoscopic, clinical, and biomarker outcomes were generally not significantly different between groups. The most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events were nasopharyngitis (29 [13%] of 219 patients in the treat-to-target group vs 29 [13%] of 221 patients in the standard-of-care group), abdominal pain (23 [11%] vs 19 [9%]), arthralgia (24 [11%] vs 19 [9%]), and headache (24 [11%] vs 21 [10%]). INTERPRETATION: Timely escalation of ustekinumab therapy for patients with Crohn's disease, based on early endoscopic response, clinical symptoms, and biomarkers, did not result in significantly better endoscopic outcomes at week 48 than symptom-driven decisions alone. Future studies need to confirm if some subgroups of patient might benefit from a treat-to-target strategy with ustekinumab. FUNDING: Janssen-Cilag.

• MeSH
• Crohnova nemoc * terapie   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• indukce remise MeSH
• intravenózní podání MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• standardní péče MeSH
• ustekinumab * škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH

• MeSH
• biopsie MeSH
• Crohnova nemoc patologie   terapie   MeSH
• delfská metoda MeSH
• klinické rozhodování MeSH
• konsensus MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• metody pro podporu rozhodování * MeSH
• prediktivní hodnota testů MeSH
• prognóza MeSH
• reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
• střeva patologie   MeSH
• ulcerózní kolitida patologie   terapie   MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• konsensus - konference MeSH
• směrnice pro lékařskou praxi MeSH
• systematický přehled MeSH

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Histological scoring plays a key role in the assessment of disease activity in ulcerative colitis [UC] and is also important in Crohn ́s disease [CD]. Currently, there is no common scoring available for UC and CD. We aimed to validate the Inflammatory Bowel Disease [IBD]-Distribution [D], Chronicity [C], Activity [A] score [IBD-DCA score] for histological disease activity assessment in IBD. METHODS: Inter- and intra-rater reliability were assessed by 16 observers on biopsy specimens from 59 patients with UC and 25 patients with CD. Construct validity and responsiveness to treatment were retrospectively evaluated in a second cohort of 30 patients. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability was moderate to good for the UC cohort (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICCs] = 0.645, 0.623, 0.767 for D, C, and A, respectively) and at best moderate for the CD cohort [ICC = 0.690, 0.303, 0.733 for D, C, and A, respectively]. Intra-rater agreement ranged from good to excellent in both cohorts. Correlation with the Nancy Histological Index [NHI] was moderate and strong with the Simplified Geboes Score [SGS] and a Visual Analogue Scale [VAS], respectively. Large effect sizes were obtained for all three parameters. External responsiveness analysis revealed correlated changes between IBD-DCA score and NHI, SGS and VAS. CONCLUSIONS: The IBD-DCA score is a simple histological activity score for UC and CD, agreed and validated by a large group of IBD specialists. It provides reliable information on treatment response. Therefore, it has potential value for use in routine diagnostics as well as clinical studies.

• MeSH
• biopsie MeSH
• Crohnova nemoc patologie   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
• střevní sliznice patologie   MeSH
• stupeň závažnosti nemoci * MeSH
• ulcerózní kolitida patologie   MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• validační studie MeSH

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Ontamalimab, a fully-human monoclonal antibody targeting MAdCAM-1, induced remission in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis [UC] in the TURANDOT study. We aimed to assess long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of ontamalimab in TURANDOT II. METHODS: TURANDOT II was a phase 2, multicentre, open-label [OL] study in patients with moderate-to-severe UC who completed TURANDOT on placebo or ontamalimab (NCT01771809). Patients were randomised to 75 mg or 225 mg ontamalimab every 4 weeks for 72 weeks [OL1]. The dosage could be increased to 225 mg from Week 8 at the investigator's discretion. All patients then received 75 mg every 4 weeks for 72 weeks [OL2], followed by 6-month safety follow-up. The primary objective was safety, measured by adverse events [AEs], serious AEs [SAEs], and AEs leading to withdrawal. Mucosal healing [MH; centrally read endoscopy] was assessed. RESULTS: Of 330 patients, 180 completed OL1; 94 escalated to 225 mg; 127 completed OL2. Overall, 36.1% experienced drug-related AEs. The most common SAE [10.0%] was worsening/ongoing UC; 5.5% of patients had serious infections, the most common being gastroenteritis [0.9%]. One death and four cancers [all unrelated to ontamalimab] occurred. No PML [progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy]/lymphoproliferative disorders occurred. Geometric mean high-sensitivity C-reactive protein [hsCRP] and faecal calprotectin decreased across OL1 in both dose groups. The proportion of patients assigned to placebo in TURANDOT achieving MH increased from 8.8% [6/68] at baseline to 35.3% at Week 16 [24/68; non-responder imputation]. The corresponding increase in the ontamalimab group was from 23.3% [61/262] to 26.7% [70/262]. CONCLUSIONS: Ontamalimab was well tolerated up to 144 weeks in patients with moderate-to-severe UC, with good safety and efficacy.

• MeSH
• C-reaktivní protein analýza   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• gastrointestinální endoskopie metody   statistika a číselné údaje   MeSH
• gastrointestinální látky aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• humanizované monoklonální protilátky * aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• imunologická odpověď na dávku MeSH
• leukocytární L1-antigenní komplex analýza   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• molekuly buněčné adheze antagonisté a inhibitory   MeSH
• monitorování léčiv * metody   statistika a číselné údaje   MeSH
• mukoproteiny antagonisté a inhibitory   MeSH
• ulcerózní kolitida * diagnóza   farmakoterapie   imunologie   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze II MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Vedolizumab was shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of Crohn's disease [CD] and ulcerative colitis [UC] in the GEMINI Long-Term Safety [LTS] study. The vedolizumab Extended Access Program [XAP] provides patients with continued treatment. This XAP pharmacokinetics [PK] sub-study investigated vedolizumab efficacy, safety, and PK. METHODS: Vedolizumab dosing frequency was reduced from every 4 weeks [Q4W] to every 8 weeks [Q8W] at XAP enrolment, and patients were followed for 56 weeks. Outcomes included: efficacy, loss of clinical benefit, and re-escalation to Q4W dosing; and vedolizumab PK, immunogenicity, and adverse events. RESULTS: Among 167 enrolled patients [CD = 88, UC = 79], 80 [91%] with CD and 73 [92%] with UC completed 56 weeks; 76 [86%] and 71 [90%] with CD and UC, respectively, remained on Q8W dosing for 56 weeks. Clinical remission, corticosteroid-free clinical remission, and C-reactive protein levels were stable among patients remaining on Q8W through Week 56. Four patients with CD and two with UC resumed Q4W dosing [three with CD regained clinical response]. Patients with CD who completed Week 56 on Q8W dosing had median trough vedolizumab concentrations of 43.6 µg/mL at enrolment and 10.4 µg/mL at Week 56; concentrations were 42.4 µg/mL and 13.3 µg/mL, respectively, in patients with UC. Treatment-related adverse events were infrequent; no new or serious adverse events related to vedolizumab were reported. CONCLUSIONS: In the XAP-PK sub-study, adherence to Q8W dosing was high, with no loss of efficacy; very few patients required re-escalation to Q4W. There were no new safety signals.

• MeSH
• Crohnova nemoc * diagnóza   farmakoterapie   imunologie   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• gastrointestinální látky aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   farmakokinetika   MeSH
• humanizované monoklonální protilátky * aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   farmakokinetika   MeSH
• imunologická odpověď na dávku MeSH
• integriny antagonisté a inhibitory   MeSH
• intravenózní infuze MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• monitorování léčiv metody   MeSH
• ulcerózní kolitida * diagnóza   farmakoterapie   imunologie   MeSH
• vysazování léků metody   MeSH
• výsledky a postupy - zhodnocení (zdravotní péče) MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze IV MeSH
• klinické zkoušky MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH