Scoping review
Dotaz
Zobrazit nápovědu
Background: Scoping reviews (ScoRev) have a dominant position in nursing and healthcare research. Both ScoRev and systematic review (SysRev) have methodological frameworks that have both common and different processing steps. Since ScoRev is considered to be a precursor for SysRev, both types need to be viewed by the researcher's synchronous optics and understand the requirements for these types of work. Aim: To define and describe the methodological framework of scoping review processing and point out the matches and differences in scoping review and systematic review. Results: The paper described the framework for processing ScoRev and defining the basic differences between ScoRev and SysRev. ScoRev and SysRev processing procedures are described in detail – terminological chaos, however, appears in the titles of published ScoRev studies, either confusing with SysRev or incorrectly combining these two separate types of review approaches. Conclusion: in nursing research, in the context of ScoRev, it is necessary to maintain the terminological clarity and precision for ScoRev processing. As a suitable format for the ScoRev titles is recommended "Specific title, description of the phenomenon studied and definition of relationship/purpose, benefit: scoping review".
- MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- publikování MeSH
- terminologie jako téma * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
Východiska: Dynamická neuromuskulární stabilizace (DNS) je populárním a často používaným konceptem, který se primárně zabývá fyzioterapií a nápravou pohybového aparátu. Původně je DNS využívaná především v terapeutickém prostředí, ale rozšířila se i do léčby sportovců a prevence poruch pohybového aparátu. Přesah v používání DNS lze sledovat i na (asymptomatické) dětské populaci. Cíle: Cílem článku je analýza vědecké evidence o DNS týkající se sportovců, dětí a mládeže. Dílčím cílem je zhodnotit, zda je možné, na základě dostupných dat, považovat DNS za vhodný prostředek přípravy (léčby) sportovců a zda představuje prvek vhodný do školní tělesné výchovy (TV). Metodika: Bylo provedeno scoping review, které se orientovalo na vyhledání zdrojů v kontextu DNS a následně na texty, které pracovaly se soubory buď dětí, mládeže nebo sportovců. Vyhledávání proběhlo pomocí klíčových slov: „dynamic neuromuscular stabilisation“, „DNS“, „functional assessment“, „developmental kinesiology“, „postural stabilisation“, „postural control“, „sports rehabilitation“ a využity byly databáze Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed a Google Scholar. Výsledky: Po vyřazení nevhodných zdrojů (přehledové články, teoretické stati apod.) zůstalo celkem 41 relevantních zdrojů. Studie zaměřené na skupiny dětí a sportovců byly podrobně popsány a diskutovány. Existuje velmi malá evidence potvrzující pozitivní efekt DNS u sportovců, který se odráží ve zvyšování sportov- ního výkonu nebo prevenci zranění. K věkové skupině dětí staršího školního věku jsou k dispozici pouze omezené informace, mladším dětem se nevěnovala žádná studie. Závěry: Zatím nemáme dostatečná data, která by adekvátně podpořila implementaci DNS do přípravy či terapie sportovců. Shodný stav konstatujeme také pro zařazení DNS do školní TV. Pro obě oblasti by byla vhodná další vědecká činnost.
Background: Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization (DNS) is a popular and frequently used concept primarily dealing with physiotherapy and musculoskeletal correction. Initially, DNS is primarily used in therapeutic settings, but has expanded into the treatment of athletes and the prevention of musculoskeletal disorders. Overlap in the use of DNS can also be seen in the (asymptomatic) paediatric population. Objective: The aim of this article is to analyse the scientific evidence on DNS in athletes, children, and adolescents. A sub-objective is to assess whether, based on the available data, DNS can be considered as a suitable tool for the preparation (treatment) of athletes and whether it represents an element suitable for physical education (PE). Methods: A scoping review was conducted, which focused on finding sources in the context of DNS and then on papers that worked with either children, adolescents, or athletes. The search was conducted using the keywords: 'dynamic neuromuscular stabilisation', 'DNS', 'functional assessment', 'developmental kinesiology', 'postural stabilisation', 'postural control', 'sports rehabilitation' and used the Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases. Results: After removing inappropriate sources (review articles, theoretical papers, etc.), a total of 41 relevant sources remained. Studies focusing on groups of children and athletes were described and discussed in detail. There is very little evidence to support a positive effect of DNS in athletes, resulting in increased athletic performance or injury prevention. There is also limited information on the older school-age group, and no studies have focused on younger children. Conclusions: there are not yet sufficient data to adequately support the implementation of DNS in the training or therapy of athletes. We conclude that the same is true for the inclusion of DNS in PE. Both areas would benefit from further research.
- Klíčová slova
- dynamická neuromuskulární stabilizace,
- MeSH
- kineziologie aplikovaná MeSH
- kvalitativní výzkum MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- muskuloskeletální a nervový systém - fyziologické jevy MeSH
- posturální rovnováha * fyziologie MeSH
- rehabilitace metody MeSH
- sportovci * MeSH
- tělesná výchova MeSH
- tělovýchovné lékařství * MeSH
- terapie cvičením MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
[Fatal consequences of CAN syndrome - scoping review]
Práce zabývající se fatálními formami týrání, zanedbávání či zneužívání dětí jsou dosud prakticky okrajovou problematikou. Cílem předložené práce je na základě analýzy primárních textů identifikovat rizikové faktory syndromu CAN s fatálními důsledky. Byly prohledávány vyhledávače Ebsco a WOS. U textů dostupných v plnotextu byla dvoufázově zhodnocena relevance vyhledaných studií nezávisle dvěma posuzovateli. Po aplikaci všech vylučovacích kritérií bylo do analýzy zahrnuto 10 zdrojů. Studie shodně potvrzují, že nejčastějším pachatelem jsou rodiče dítěte, přičemž rukou otce zmírají děti častěji následkem fatálního týrání a rukou matky následkem fatálního zanedbávání. Matky nesou odpovědnost za smrt dětí mladších, otcové naopak dětí starších. Z hlediska sociodemografických charakteristik lze identifikovat dle studií tyto základní rizikové faktory: nízký socioekonomický statut, matka samoživitelka, dítě v kojeneckém věku a matka v mladším věku. Do přímé souvislosti se smrtí dítěte byly dávány převážně případy fyzického traumatu. Z analyzovaných studií lze odvodit hypotézu, že mechanismus i vztah pachatele k oběti souvisí se stářím napadeného dítěte. Velmi diskutabilním zjištěním je fakt, že studie se shodují na tom, že fatální důsledky špatného zacházení nejsou zodpovědnými orgány identifikovány jako rizikové včas.
To date studies exploring fatal forms of maltreatment, neglect or abuse of children have only been treated as peripheral issues. The aim of the presented study is to identify CAN syndrome risk factors with fatal consequences based on the analysis of primary texts. The Ebsco and Web of Science databases formed the sources for the search. Full-text versions of studies were reviewed for relevance at two stages of the research by two independent assessors. Finally, after the application of all the criteria for exclusion, 10 studies were included in the analysis. The studies consistently confirm that the most frequent perpetrators of maltreatment, neglect or abuse of children are the parents. Fathers tend to cause the death of their children more often by fatal abuse, whereas mothers tend to be guilty of fatal neglect. Mothers are liable for the death of younger children, and fathers are more frequently responsible for the death of older children. In terms of social-demographic profile, the studies analyzed led us to identify the following basic risk factors: low social-economic status, the mother being the sole breadwinner, and infant children with a younger mother. A direct correlation was drawn mainly between a child’s death and cases of physical trauma. A hypothesis can be extrapolated from the analyzed studies that the age of the abused children affects both the mechanism and the relationship between the perpetrators and their victims. The fact that the conclusions of studies agree that fatal consequences of maltreatment are not being duly identified as risky early enough by the relevant authorities is a very debatable finding.
- Klíčová slova
- syndrom CAN,
- MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- fatální výsledek MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- metaanalýza jako téma MeSH
- rizikové faktory MeSH
- rodiče MeSH
- smrt MeSH
- socioekonomické faktory MeSH
- zneužívané dítě * MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
Bolesť spodnej časti chrbta v dôsledku pôsobenia faktorov na pracovisku je častou príčinou zvýšenej pracovnej neschopnosti, dnes už takmer v každom povolaní. Táto práca sa zameriava na jeden z najviac diskutovaných s prácou súvisiacich faktorov faktorov vo vzťahu k bolesti – fyzickú záťaž. Keďže práce z tejto oblasti často prezentujú rozdielne až protichodné zistenia, našim cieľom bolo zistiť nedostatky v súčasnej odbornej literatúre, ktoré by mohli byť dôvodom týchto nezrovnalostí. Na základe použitého päť stupňového metodologického prístupu podľa autorov Arksey & O’Malley, možno rozdiely v zisteniach medzi štúdiami pripísať prevažne ich metodologickým nedostatkom.
Low back pain due to workplace factors is a common cause of increased work absence in almost every occupation today. This study dealt with one of the most discussed work-associated factors in relation to pain – physical workload. Since the studies in this area often present different findings, our aim was to identify gaps in the current literature that could be the reason of these discrepancies. Based on Arksey & O’Malley’s five-step methodological approach, differences in findings between studies can be attributed predominantly to their methodological deficiencies.
- MeSH
- klinická studie jako téma MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lumbalgie * etiologie MeSH
- pracovní zátěž MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This is a protocol of a scoping review that will aim to synthesise methodological evidence on formulating plain language versions of recommendations from guidelines both for clinical practice and for public health. METHOD: We will conduct a search in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid) databases, and webpages of guidelines developers with no language and date limitations. The title/abstract and full-text screening will be performed by two reviewers independently. The team of reviewers will extract data on methods used for developing plain language versions of recommendations in a standardised manner. The data analysis and synthesis will be presented narratively in tabular form. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: We will conduct a scoping review based on this protocol.
- MeSH
- jazyk (prostředek komunikace) MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- přehledová literatura jako téma MeSH
- směrnice pro lékařskou praxi jako téma * normy MeSH
- výzkumný projekt normy MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Dementia is a growing issue in modern society. Non-pharmacological interventions such as music are suggested as the primary methods for symptom management. Therapeutic potential may also be found in sound/mechanical low frequency vibrations (LFV) that share the core characteristics of music, but these are lesser understood. The aim of the proposed scoping review is to explore the responses of persons with dementia to LFV, e.g., vibroacoustic therapy or whole-body vibration. The scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology guidelines. An extensive search in BMC, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, ERIC, MEDLINE (OvidSP), Pedro, ProQuest Central, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, and grey literature sources in Clinical Trials, Current Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, and manual search of relevant journals is planned to find all relevant research papers. The paper selection, full-text assessment, and data extraction will be performed by two independent reviewers. Participants' responses to the interventions and the experiment designs, including methodological challenges, will be analysed and compared. Results may highlight potential gaps in reporting and comparing sound and mechanical vibration approaches and promote better understanding of their potential for managing the symptoms of dementia. Furthermore, the possible relationships between LFV and music-based interventions may become clearer.
- MeSH
- demence * terapie MeSH
- hudba * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- systematický přehled jako téma * MeSH
- techniky fyzikální terapie MeSH
- vibrace MeSH
- výzkumný projekt MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews (SRs) are time-consuming and labor-intensive to perform. With the growing number of scientific publications, the SR development process becomes even more laborious. This is problematic because timely SR evidence is essential for decision-making in evidence-based healthcare and policymaking. Numerous methods and tools that accelerate SR development have recently emerged. To date, no scoping review has been conducted to provide a comprehensive summary of methods and ready-to-use tools to improve efficiency in SR production. OBJECTIVE: To present an overview of primary studies that evaluated the use of ready-to-use applications of tools or review methods to improve efficiency in the review process. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review. An information specialist performed a systematic literature search in four databases, supplemented with citation-based and grey literature searching. We included studies reporting the performance of methods and ready-to-use tools for improving efficiency when producing or updating a SR in the health field. We performed dual, independent title and abstract screening, full-text selection, and data extraction. The results were analyzed descriptively and presented narratively. RESULTS: We included 103 studies: 51 studies reported on methods, 54 studies on tools, and 2 studies reported on both methods and tools to make SR production more efficient. A total of 72 studies evaluated the validity (n = 69) or usability (n = 3) of one method (n = 33) or tool (n = 39), and 31 studies performed comparative analyses of different methods (n = 15) or tools (n = 16). 20 studies conducted prospective evaluations in real-time workflows. Most studies evaluated methods or tools that aimed at screening titles and abstracts (n = 42) and literature searching (n = 24), while for other steps of the SR process, only a few studies were found. Regarding the outcomes included, most studies reported on validity outcomes (n = 84), while outcomes such as impact on results (n = 23), time-saving (n = 24), usability (n = 13), and cost-saving (n = 3) were less often evaluated. CONCLUSION: For title and abstract screening and literature searching, various evaluated methods and tools are available that aim at improving the efficiency of SR production. However, only few studies have addressed the influence of these methods and tools in real-world workflows. Few studies exist that evaluate methods or tools supporting the remaining tasks. Additionally, while validity outcomes are frequently reported, there is a lack of evaluation regarding other outcomes.
- MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- systematický přehled jako téma * metody MeSH
- výzkumný projekt MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
Aim: Patient self-management is considered one of the preconditions for successful control of chronic conditions (including chronic pain), and health literacy is a relevant factor that can affect patient outcomes. The aim was to conduct a scoping review to synthesize studies within the healthcare context that have dealt with chronic pain in adults and measured literacy, and also to explore what literacy instruments were used. Methods: After determining clear inclusion and exclusion criteria, 8 electronic databases were searched for relevant articles; additional articles were obtained through reference lists of the obtained articles. Of the 56 records that were screened, 14 were included for data abstraction. Results: Most (n = 11) obtained studies were quantitative and most were based on a definition of literacy that focused on individuals, i.e. either on their reading level or on their abilities to access, read, understand, appraise, and act on health information. Correspondingly, most (n = 10) instruments measured individual-level characteristics; they did so mainly to examine the relationship between health literacy and various pain-related variables. Most studies were conducted in the USA and Germany. Conclusions: Chronic pain health literacy is a topic with emerging research. However, most instruments are generic and are oriented mainly towards individuals. Thus, chronic pain-specific instruments should be developed, and the existing instruments should be expanded to include contextual factors as well. Research is urgently needed in non-Western countries, especially given the current and predicted future global trends concerning chronic pain.
This is a protocol for a scoping review that aims to determine how guideline authors using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach have addressed previously identified challenges related to public health. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews will be followed. We will search and screen titles of guidelines for all languages published in 2013-2021 in: the GIN library, BIGG database, Epistemonikos GRADE guidelines repository, GRADEpro Database, MAGICapp, NICE and WHO websites. Two reviewers will independently screen full texts of the documents identified. The following information will be extracted: methods used for identifying different stakeholders and incorporating their perspectives; methods for identification and prioritization of non-health outcomes; methods for determining thresholds for decision-making; methods for incorporating and grading evidence from non-randomized studies; methods for addressing concerns with conditional recommendations in public health; methods for reaching consensus; additional methodological concerns; and any modifications made to GRADE. A combination of directed content analysis and descriptive statistics will be used for data analysis, and the findings presented narratively in a tabular and graphical form. In this protocol, we present the pilot results from 13 identified eligible guidelines issued between January and August 2021. We will publish the full review results when they become available.
