BACKGROUND: Although biologic agents are very effective, long-term comparative studies demonstrating their safety relative to one another are still lacking. METHODS: A total of 124 patients with psoriasis were followed up for 30 months; 74 received anti-TNF-alpha inhibitors (adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab), 33 were on ustekinumab, and 17 were treated with secukinumab. The rates of adverse events in these groups were recorded and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Infliximab-treated patients showed a high occurrence of asymptomatic, but increased liver enzymes, fatigue, and respiratory as well as dermatologic infections. Adalimumab-treated patients were more often affected by musculoskeletal disorders and infections of all types. Patients treated with secukinumab presented with higher rates of cardiovascular disorders as well as respiratory and dermatologic infections. The group receiving etanercept was more often diagnosed with musculoskeletal and reproductive disorders, specifically menstrual disorders. The rates of therapy discontinuation and serious adverse events did not reach statistically significant values. CONCLUSION: A higher incidence of adverse events was observed among adalimumab-, and infliximab-treated patients, with ustekinumab found to have the safest profile. Our results demonstrate that a personalized approach, including evaluation of a patient's risk profile, is necessary before commencing a biologic. Further research is warranted to confirm the findings of our study.

• MeSH
• adalimumab * škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• dermatologické látky škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• etanercept * škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• humanizované monoklonální protilátky * škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• infliximab * škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• kohortové studie MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• monoklonální protilátky škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• prospektivní studie MeSH
• psoriáza * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• ustekinumab * terapeutické užití   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• pozorovací studie MeSH

• Klíčová slova
• Benepali (etanercept),
• MeSH
• ankylózující spondylitida * diagnostické zobrazování   farmakoterapie   MeSH
• antirevmatika terapeutické užití   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• etanercept aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• infliximab aplikace a dávkování   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladý dospělý MeSH
• náhrada léků MeSH
• TNF-alfa antagonisté a inhibitory   MeSH
• vezikulobulózní nemoci kůže chemicky indukované   epidemiologie   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladý dospělý MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• kazuistiky MeSH

OBJECTIVE: To describe risk factors for IBD development in a cohort of children with JIA. METHODS: JIA patients who developed IBD were identified from the international Pharmachild register. Characteristics were compared between IBD and non-IBD patients and predictors of IBD were determined using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Incidence rates of IBD events on different DMARDs were calculated, and differences between therapies were expressed as relative risks (RR). RESULTS: Out of 8942 patients, 48 (0.54% ) developed IBD. These were more often male (47.9% vs 32.0%) and HLA-B27 positive (38.2% vs 21.0%) and older at JIA onset (median 8.94 vs 5.33 years) than patients without IBD development. They also had more often a family history of autoimmune disease (42.6% vs 24.4%) and enthesitis-related arthritis (39.6% vs 10.8%). The strongest predictors of IBD on multivariable analysis were enthesitis-related arthritis [odds ratio (OR): 3.68, 95% CI: 1.41, 9.40] and a family history of autoimmune disease (OR: 2.27, 95% CI: 1.12, 4.54). Compared with methotrexate monotherapy, the incidence of IBD on etanercept monotherapy (RR: 7.69, 95% CI: 1.99, 29.74), etanercept with methotrexate (RR: 5.70, 95% CI: 1.42, 22.77) and infliximab (RR: 7.61, 95% CI: 1.27, 45.57) therapy was significantly higher. Incidence on adalimumab was not significantly different (RR: 1.45, 95% CI: 0.15, 13.89). CONCLUSION: IBD in JIA was associated with enthesitis-related arthritis and a family history of autoimmune disease. An increased IBD incidence was observed for etanercept therapy regardless of concomitant methotrexate use.

• MeSH
• antirevmatika * škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• dítě MeSH
• etanercept škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• idiopatické střevní záněty * farmakoterapie   epidemiologie   MeSH
• incidence MeSH
• juvenilní artritida * farmakoterapie   epidemiologie   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• methotrexát terapeutické užití   MeSH
• registrace MeSH
• Check Tag
• dítě MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH

• MeSH
• bezpečnost MeSH
• etanercept * aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• juvenilní artritida * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• neúspěšná terapie MeSH
• nežádoucí účinky léčiv epidemiologie   MeSH
• rutinně sbírané zdravotní údaje MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• klinická studie MeSH
• Geografické názvy
• Německo MeSH

• MeSH
• biosimilární léčivé přípravky * MeSH
• etanercept * aplikace a dávkování   farmakologie   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• klinická studie jako téma MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• nežádoucí účinky léčiv epidemiologie   klasifikace   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH

Objective: SB4, SB2, and SB5 are biosimilars of etanercept (ETN), infliximab (INF), and adalimumab (ADA), respectively. This pooled analysis evaluated the immunogenicity of these treatments across three phase III randomized controlled trials of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: Patients had to have at least one anti-drug antibody (ADAb) assessment up to the time of the primary endpoint from each study (week 24 in SB4 and SB5 studies; week 30 in SB2 study). The effect of ADAbs on American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response and the incidences of injection-site reactions (ISRs)/infusion-related reactions (IRRs) were evaluated. Results: The study included 1709 patients. The cumulative incidences of ADAbs were 30.3% in the all-treatments-combined group, 29.1% in the biosimilars combined group, and 31.5% in the reference products combined group. ACR20 response rates were significantly lower in ADAb-positive patients in the all-treatments-combined [odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 1.77 (1.37, 2.27), p < 0.0001], biosimilars combined [2.24 (1.53, 3.30), p < 0.0001], and reference products combined [1.49 (1.06, 2.09), p = 0.0225] groups. ADAb-positive patients also had a higher likelihood of developing ISRs/IRRs in the all-treatments-combined group [0.56 (0.31, 1.01), p = 0.0550], predominantly due to the results observed with SB2 + INF combined rather than with SB4 + ETN or SB5 + ADA combined. Conclusion: In this pooled analysis, ADAbs were associated with reduced efficacy in patients with RA treated with biosimilars (SB4, SB2, and SB5) or their reference products (ETN, INF, and ADA). ADAbs were associated with an increased incidence of ISRs/IRRs in those treated with SB2 + INF. Clinical trial registration numbers: NCT01936181 (SB2 study), NCT01895309 (SB4 study), and NCT02167139 (SB5 study).

• MeSH
• adalimumab škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• antirevmatika škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• biosimilární léčivé přípravky škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• etanercept škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• infliximab škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• inhibitory TNF škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• protilátky MeSH
• revmatoidní artritida farmakoterapie   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH

• MeSH
• etanercept * škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• klinická studie jako téma MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• nežádoucí účinky léčiv epidemiologie   klasifikace   MeSH
• revmatoidní artritida * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• riziko MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH

BACKGROUND: EGALITY was a phase III confirmatory efficacy and safety study conducted in patients with plaque-type psoriasis as a part of totality of evidence gathered during the development of GP2015, an etanercept biosimilar. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate equivalent efficacy and comparable safety and immunogenicity of GP2015 and the etanercept originator product (ETN, Enbrel® ) and evaluate effects of repeated switching between GP2015 and ETN. Results for efficacy, safety and immunogenicity during treatment period (TP) 2 (TP2) are presented pooling the two continued treatment arms (pooled continued) versus the two treatment arms with repeated switches (pooled switched). METHODS: Patients (n = 531) were randomized 1:1 to self-administer GP2015 or ETN twice-weekly subcutaneously during TP1. Patients with a ≥50% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 50) at week 12 were re-randomized for TP2 to continue the same treatment at once-weekly dosing or to undergo three consecutive treatment switches between GP2015 and ETN until week 30. Patients continued the last-assigned treatment during TP2, until week 52. RESULTS: Mean (standard deviation [SD]) PASI scores at baseline were similar in patients who underwent multiple switches compared to those with continued treatments during TP2. During TP2, PASI 50, PASI 75 and PASI 90 response rates, percent change from baseline in PASI scores and all other efficacy parameters were similar between the pooled switched and pooled continued treatment groups at all time points. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events including injection site reactions was comparable between the pooled switched (36.7%) and pooled continued (34.9%) groups. None of the patients in either treatment group were positive for binding anti-drug antibodies in TP2. CONCLUSION: Treatment efficacy, safety and immunogenicity were similar between the pooled continued and pooled switched treatments during TP2, indicating that there are no effects in the short term on clinical data of multiple switches between GP2015 and ETN.

• MeSH
• biosimilární léčivé přípravky aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• chronická nemoc MeSH
• dermatologické látky aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   imunologie   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
• etanercept aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   analogy a deriváty   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• injekce subkutánní MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• protilátky imunologie   MeSH
• psoriáza farmakoterapie   imunologie   MeSH
• rozvrh dávkování léků MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of SB4 (an etanercept biosimilar) with reference product etanercept (ETN) in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite methotrexate (MTX) therapy. METHODS: This is a phase III, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre study with a 24-week primary endpoint. Patients with moderate to severe RA despite MTX treatment were randomised to receive weekly dose of 50 mg of subcutaneous SB4 or ETN. The primary endpoint was the American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response at week 24. Other efficacy endpoints as well as safety, immunogenicity and pharmacokinetic parameters were also measured. RESULTS: 596 patients were randomised to either SB4 (N=299) or ETN (N=297). The ACR20 response rate at week 24 in the per-protocol set was 78.1% for SB4 and 80.3% for ETN. The 95% CI of the adjusted treatment difference was -9.41% to 4.98%, which is completely contained within the predefined equivalence margin of -15% to 15%, indicating therapeutic equivalence between SB4 and ETN. Other efficacy endpoints and pharmacokinetic endpoints were comparable. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was comparable (55.2% vs 58.2%), and the incidence of antidrug antibody development up to week 24 was lower in SB4 compared with ETN (0.7% vs 13.1%). CONCLUSIONS: SB4 was shown to be equivalent with ETN in terms of efficacy at week 24. SB4 was well tolerated with a lower immunogenicity profile. The safety profile of SB4 was comparable with that of ETN. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT01895309, EudraCT 2012-005026-30.

• MeSH
• antirevmatika škodlivé účinky   imunologie   farmakokinetika   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• biosimilární léčivé přípravky škodlivé účinky   farmakokinetika   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
• etanercept škodlivé účinky   imunologie   farmakokinetika   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• methotrexát terapeutické užití   MeSH
• protilátky krev   MeSH
• revmatoidní artritida farmakoterapie   MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• terapeutická ekvivalence MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
• srovnávací studie MeSH

In this transglobal, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, treat-to-target study, the maintenance of efficacy was compared between biologic-and biologic-free-disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) combination regimens after low disease activity (LDA) was achieved with biologic DMARD induction therapy. Patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy received open-label etanercept 50 mg subcutaneously once weekly plus methotrexate with or without other conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs for 24 weeks. Patients achieving LDA [disease activity score in 28 joints based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) <3.2] at week 24 were randomized to receive etanercept-methotrexate combination therapy or placebo-methotrexate combination therapy, with or without other csDMARDs, for 28 weeks. In the open-label period, 72% of patients achieved DAS28-ESR LDA at week 24. Patients enrolled in the double-blind period had long-standing rheumatoid arthritis and high disease activity at baseline (mean duration, 8.1 years; DAS28-ESR, 6.4). In the etanercept and placebo combination groups, 44% versus 17% achieved DAS28-ESR LDA and 34 versus 13% achieved DAS28-ESR remission at week 52 (p < 0.001). Adverse events were reported in 37 and 43%, serious adverse events in 0 and 4%, and serious infections in 0 and 2% in these groups, respectively, in the double-blind period. After induction of response with etanercept combination therapy following a treat-to-target approach in patients with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis and high disease activity at baseline, the etanercept combination regimen was significantly more effective in maintaining LDA and remission than a biologic-free regimen. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier. NCT01578850.

• MeSH
• antirevmatika aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• biologické přípravky aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• časové faktory MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
• etanercept aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• indukce remise MeSH
• kombinovaná farmakoterapie MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• methotrexát aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• revmatoidní artritida diagnóza   farmakoterapie   patofyziologie   MeSH
• rozvrh dávkování léků MeSH
• stupeň závažnosti nemoci MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
• srovnávací studie MeSH