PURPOSE: The study sought to understand the experiences of working age adults with myeloma and their partner/family members, living in Czechia, Germany, and Poland. METHODS: Qualitative interviews were conducted with 36 working age adults living with myeloma, and three family members. Data were collected from May to October 2022. Thematic analysis was applied to the data. RESULTS: Healthcare and state support within each country are described. The degree of work engagement was informed by patients' symptom burden, treatment needs, state financial aid, and family/financial obligations. Many did not conceptualise their status as involving 'return to work' as they had continued to be engaged with their jobs throughout. For some, remote working enabled them to manage treatments/side-effects and their job, while avoiding infection. In some cases, patients did not tell their employer or colleagues about their illness, for fear of discrimination. CONCLUSION: While experiences varied between countries, common across accounts was a struggle to balance ongoing treatments with employment, at a time when participants were expected to finance their own households and maintain their income and roles. Implications for Cancer Survivors To improve quality of life, clinical discussions around treatment decision-making should take into account patients' attitudes/approach to work, type of work engaged in, and other activities considered important to them. European Union and national cancer plans should set out optimum standards for employers, to ensure an equitable benchmark for how employees are supported. Such approaches would improve legal protections and better enforcement of employer policies to accommodate patients' limitations in the workplace.

• MeSH
• Adult MeSH
• Quality of Life * MeSH
• Qualitative Research MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Multiple Myeloma * psychology   therapy   epidemiology   mortality   MeSH
• Cancer Survivors * psychology   statistics & numerical data   MeSH
• Interviews as Topic MeSH
• Employment * statistics & numerical data   MeSH
• Check Tag
• Adult MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Geographicals
• Czech Republic MeSH
• Germany MeSH
• Poland MeSH

BACKGROUND: Charcot-Marie-Tooth is the most common inherited neuromuscular disorder. Rarely, it can be associated with heart failure and various arrhythmic disturbances. This case illustrates the challenges of making decisions to prevent sudden cardiac death in a patient with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. CASE SUMMARY: A 69-year-old male with a history of Type 1A Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease was admitted due to repetitive runs of ventricular tachycardia. Twelve-lead electrocardiogram, echocardiography, selective coronary angiography, and cardiac magnetic resonance did not clarify the cause of the electrical storm. As conservative therapy was not successful, radiofrequency ablation was chosen to treat the electrical storm. After this procedure, implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) was implanted. The follow-up revealed severe perforation by the ventricular lead. An extraction was performed with no complications and a new lead was immediately implanted. The patient remains asymptomatic. Three episodes of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia were recorded during the last follow-up. DISCUSSION: This case illustrates the challenges of making decisions to prevent sudden cardiac death in a patient with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease after successful ablation for electrical storm. Due to a lack of evidence, atypical origin of arrhythmia, and clinical presentation, we did not consider this as idiopathic arrhythmia and decided to implant an ICD, which was complicated by severe perforation by the lead. Specific recommendations for preventing sudden cardiac death in rare cardiac conditions, such as Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, still need to be refined.

• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Case Reports MeSH

BACKGROUND: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) improve outcomes in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) but are underused in clinical practice. Observational data suggest that hyperkalemia is the leading obstacle for the suboptimal use of MRA. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the effects of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) in optimizing use of spironolactone among participants with HFrEF and hyperkalemia. METHODS: REALIZE-K (Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of SZC for the Management of High Potassium in Patients With Symptomatic HFrEF Receiving Spironolactone) was a prospective, double-blind, randomized- withdrawal trial in participants with HFrEF (NYHA functional class II-IV; left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%), optimal guideline-directed therapy (except MRA), and prevalent or incident MRA-induced hyperkalemia. During open-label run-in, participants underwent spironolactone titration (target: 50 mg/day); those with hyperkalemia started SZC. Participants with normokalemia (potassium: 3.5-5.0 mEq/L) on SZC and spironolactone ≥25 mg/day were randomized to continued SZC or placebo for 6 months. The primary endpoint was optimal treatment response (normokalemia on spironolactone ≥25 mg/day without rescue therapy for hyperkalemia [months 1-6]). The 5 secondary endpoints were tested hierarchically. Exploratory endpoints included a composite of adjudicated cardiovascular death or worsening heart failure (HF) events (hospitalizations and urgent visits). RESULTS: Overall, 203 participants were randomized (SZC: 102; placebo: 101). Higher percentage of SZC- vs placebo-treated participants had optimal response (71% vs 36%; OR: 4.45; 95% CI: 2.89-6.86; P < 0.001). SZC (vs placebo) improved the first 4 secondary endpoints: normokalemia on randomization dose of spironolactone and without rescue therapy (58% vs 23%; OR: 4.58; 95% CI: 2.78-7.55; P < 0.001); receiving spironolactone ≥25 mg/day (81% vs 50%; OR: 4.33; 95% CI: 2.50-7.52; P < 0.001); time to hyperkalemia (HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.37-0.71; P < 0.001); and time to decrease/discontinuation of spironolactone due to hyperkalemia (HR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.17-0.73; P = 0.006). There was no between-group difference in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Clinical Summary Score at 6 months (-1.01 points; 95% CI: -6.64 to 4.63; P = 0.72). Adverse events (64% vs 63%) and serious adverse events (23% vs 22%) were balanced between SZC and placebo, respectively. Composite of cardiovascular (CV) death or worsening HF occurred in 11 (11%) participants in the SZC group (1 with CV death, 10 with HF events) and 3 (3%) participants in the placebo group (1 with CV death, 2 with HF events; log-rank nominal P = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: In participants with HFrEF and hyperkalemia, SZC led to large improvements in the percentage of participants with normokalemia while on optimal spironolactone dose, and reduced risk of hyperkalemia and down-titration/discontinuation of spironolactone. Although underpowered for clinical outcomes, more participants had HF events with SZC than placebo, which should be factored into the clinical decision making. (Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of SZC for the Management of High Potassium in Patients With Symptomatic HFrEF Receiving Spironolactone; NCT04676646).

• MeSH
• Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists * therapeutic use   administration & dosage   adverse effects   MeSH
• Double-Blind Method MeSH
• Hyperkalemia * drug therapy   MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Prospective Studies MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Silicates * therapeutic use   administration & dosage   adverse effects   MeSH
• Spironolactone * administration & dosage   adverse effects   therapeutic use   MeSH
• Heart Failure * drug therapy   MeSH
• Stroke Volume drug effects   physiology   MeSH
• Treatment Outcome MeSH
• Check Tag
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH
• Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a severe intestinal condition primarily affecting preterm neonates. It has a high mortality rate, particularly in infants with a birthweight of below 1,500 g or for those requiring surgical intervention. The European Reference Network for Inherited and Congenital Anomalies (ERNICA) has developed a clinical practice guideline to aid clinical decision-making pertaining to the surgical treatment and management of NEC in preterm neonates. This guideline was developed in accordance with the Guidelines 2.0 checklist and GRADE methodology. A multidisciplinary group of Europe's top experts collaborated with patient representatives to develop this guideline. After selecting critical points in care for which recommendations are required, a systematic review of the literature and critical appraisal of the evidence was performed. The Evidence to Decision framework was used as a guide to structure the consensus meetings and draft the recommendations. The panel developed seven recommendations and three good practice statements on the following topics: indications for surgery, peritoneal drainage, surgical technique, management of extensive NEC, enteral feeding, and neurodevelopmental outcomes in premature neonates with NEC. The certainty of evidence was graded as (very) low for most recommendations. However, the panel weighed up the benefits and harms in light of all relevant arguments and expert opinion. This guideline provides recommendations on caring for premature neonates with NEC. These recommendations can assist clinicians in their care decisions and can inform families on treatment options and relevant considerations. This guideline will be revised every 5 years to ensure it remains up to date.

• MeSH
• Enteral Nutrition MeSH
• Clinical Decision-Making MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Evidence-Based Medicine MeSH
• Enterocolitis, Necrotizing * surgery   diagnosis   MeSH
• Infant, Premature MeSH
• Infant, Newborn MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Infant, Newborn MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Practice Guideline MeSH
• Systematic Review MeSH
• Geographicals
• Europe MeSH

CONTEXT: Adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have recently emerged as guideline-recommended treatments of high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC). However, there is limited evidence regarding the optimal candidates and the differential efficacy of adjuvant ICI regimens. OBJECTIVE: To synthesize and compare the efficacy and safety of adjuvant ICIs for high-risk MIUC using updated data from phase III randomized controlled trials. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: In April 2024, three databases were searched for eligible randomized controlled trials that evaluated oncologic outcomes in patients with MIUC treated with adjuvant ICIs. Pairwise meta-analysis (MA) and network meta-analyses were performed to compare the hazard ratios of oncological outcomes, including disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. Subgroup analyses were conducted on the basis of predefined clinicopathological features. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Three randomized controlled trials that assessed the efficacy of adjuvant nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and atezolizumab were included in the MAs and network meta-analyses groups. Pairwise MAs showed that treatment with adjuvant ICIs significantly improved DFS [hazards ratio: 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66-0.90] as well as OS (hazards ratio: 0.87, 95% CI 0.76-1.00) in patients with MIUC compared with in the placebo/observation group. The DFS benefit was prominent in patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.041) and in those with bladder cancer (P = 0.013) but did not differ across programmed death-ligand 1 and lymph node status. Adjuvant ICI therapy was associated with increased risk of any (OR: 2.98, 95% CI 2.06-4.33) and severe adverse events (OR: 1.78, 95% CI 1.49-2.13). The treatment rankings revealed that pembrolizumab for DFS (84%) and nivolumab for OS (93%) had the highest likelihood of improving survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our analyses demonstrated the DFS and OS benefits of adjuvant ICIs for high-risk MIUC. Furthermore, patients with bladder cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy appeared to be the optimal candidates for adjuvant ICIs regarding prolonged DFS. Adjuvant ICIs are the standard of care for high-risk MIUC, and differential clinical behaviors and efficacy will enrich clinical decision-making.

• MeSH
• Chemotherapy, Adjuvant methods   MeSH
• Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors * therapeutic use   pharmacology   MeSH
• Neoplasm Invasiveness MeSH
• Carcinoma, Transitional Cell drug therapy   pathology   MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms drug therapy   pathology   MeSH
• Network Meta-Analysis as Topic MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Meta-Analysis MeSH
• Systematic Review MeSH

INTRODUCTION: The histopathological classification for antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody (ANCA)-associated glomerulonephritis (ANCA-GN) is a well-established tool to reflect the variety of patterns and severity of lesions that can occur in kidney biopsies. It was demonstrated previously that deep learning (DL) approaches can aid in identifying histopathological classes of kidney diseases; for example, of diabetic kidney disease. These models can potentially be used as decision support tools for kidney pathologists. Although they reach high prediction accuracies, their "black box" structure makes them nontransparent. Explainable (X) artificial intelligence (AI) techniques can be used to make the AI model decisions accessible for human experts. We have developed a DL-based model, which detects and classifies the glomerular lesions according to the Berden classification. METHODS: Kidney biopsy slides of 80 patients with ANCA-GN from 3 European centers, who underwent a diagnostic kidney biopsy between 1991 and 2011, were included. We also investigated the explainability of our model using Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) heatmaps. These maps were analyzed by pathologists to compare the decision-making criteria of humans and the DL model and assess the impact of different training settings. RESULTS: The DL model shows a prediction accuracy of 93% for classifying lesions. The heatmaps from our trained DL models showed that the most predictive areas in the image correlated well with the areas deemed to be important by the pathologist. CONCLUSION: We present the first DL-based computational pipeline for classifying ANCA-GN kidney biopsies as per the Berden classification. XAI techniques helped us to make the decision-making criteria of the DL accessible for renal pathologists, potentially improving clinical decision-making.

• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: While active surveillance (AS) is an alternative to surgical interventions in patients with small renal masses (SRMs), evidence regarding its oncological efficacy is still debated. We aimed to evaluate oncological outcomes for patients with SRMs who underwent AS in comparison to surgical interventions. METHODS: In April 2024, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were queried for comparative studies evaluating AS in patients with SRMs (PROSPERO: CRD42024530299). The primary outcomes were overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). A random-effects model was used for quantitative analysis. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: We identified eight eligible studies (three prospective, four retrospective, and one study based on Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results [SEER] data) involving 4947 patients. Pooling of data with the SEER data set revealed significantly higher OS rates for patients receiving surgical interventions (hazard ratio [HR] 0.73; p = 0.007), especially partial nephrectomy (PN; HR 0.62; p < 0.001). However, in a sensitivity analysis excluding the SEER data set there was no significant difference in OS between AS and surgical interventions overall (HR 0.84; p = 0.3), but the PN subgroup had longer OS than the AS group (HR 0.6; p = 0.002). Only the study based on the SEER data set showed a significant difference in CSS. The main limitations include selection bias in retrospective studies, and classification of interventions in the SEER database study. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Patients treated with AS had similar OS to those who underwent surgery or ablation, although caution is needed in interpreting the data owing to the potential for selection bias and variability in AS protocols. Our review reinforces the need for personalized shared decision-making to identify patients with SRMs who are most likely to benefit from AS. PATIENT SUMMARY: For well-selected patients with a small kidney mass suspicious for cancer, active surveillance seems to be a safe alternative to surgery, with similar overall survival. However, the evidence is still limited and more studies are needed to help in identifying the best candidates for active surveillance.

• MeSH
• Ablation Techniques methods   MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Kidney Neoplasms * surgery   mortality   pathology   MeSH
• Nephrectomy * methods   MeSH
• Watchful Waiting * MeSH
• Tumor Burden MeSH
• Treatment Outcome MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Review MeSH
• Comparative Study MeSH
• Systematic Review MeSH

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy with a high recurrence rate after surgical therapy with curative intent. Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) and mitotane therapy have been proposed as options following the adrenalectomy. However, the efficacy of adjuvant RT or mitotane therapy remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant therapy in patients who underwent adrenalectomy for localised ACC. The PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were queried on March 2024 for studies evaluating adjuvant therapies in patients treated with surgery for localized ACC (PROSPERO: CRD42024512849). The endpoints of interest were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were pooled in a random-effects model meta-analysis. One randomized controlled trial (n = 91) and eleven retrospective studies (n = 4,515) were included. Adjuvant mitotane therapy was associated with improved RFS (HR: 0.63, 95%CI: 0.44-0.92, p = 0.016), while adjuvant RT did not reach conventional levels of statistical significance (HR:0.79, 95%CI:0.58-1.06, p = 0.11). Conversely, Adjuvant RT was associated with improved OS (HR:0.69, 95%CI:0.58-0.83, p<0.001), whereas adjuvant mitotane did not (HR: 0.76, 95%CI: 0.57-1.02, p = 0.07). In the subgroup analyses, adjuvant mitotane was associated with better OS (HR:0.46, 95%CI: 0.30-0.69, p < 0.001) and RFS (HR:0.56, 95%CI: 0.32-0.98, p = 0.04) in patients with negative surgical margin. Both adjuvant RT and mitotane were found to be associated with improved oncologic outcomes in patients treated with adrenalectomy for localised ACC. While adjuvant RT significantly improved OS in general population, mitotane appears as an especially promising treatment option in patients with negative surgical margin. These data can support the shared decision-making process, better understanding of the risks, benefits, and effectiveness of these therapies is still needed to guide tailored management of each individual patient.

• MeSH
• Chemotherapy, Adjuvant MeSH
• Radiotherapy, Adjuvant methods   MeSH
• Adrenalectomy * methods   MeSH
• Adrenocortical Carcinoma * therapy   drug therapy   radiotherapy   MeSH
• Adrenal Cortex Neoplasms * therapy   drug therapy   surgery   radiotherapy   MeSH
• Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal * therapeutic use   MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Mitotane * therapeutic use   MeSH
• Treatment Outcome MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Meta-Analysis MeSH
• Review MeSH
• Systematic Review MeSH

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: While prostate cancer (PCa) incidence and mortality rates continue to rise, early detection of PCa remains highly controversial, and the research landscape is rapidly evolving. Existing systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) provide valuable insights, but often focus on single aspects of early detection, hindering a comprehensive understanding of the topic. We aim to fill this gap by providing a comprehensive SR of contemporary SRs covering different aspects of early detection of PCa in the European Union (EU) and the UK. METHODS: On June 1, 2023, we searched four databases (Medline ALL via Ovid, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) and Google Scholar. To avoid repetition of previous studies, only SRs (qualitative, quantitative, and/or MAs) were considered eligible. In the data, common themes were identified to present the evidence systematically. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: We identified 1358 citations, resulting in 26 SRs eligible for inclusion. Six themes were identified: (1) invitation: men at general risk should be invited at >50 yr of age, and testing should be discontinued at >70 yr or with <10 yr of life expectancy; (2) decision-making: most health authorities discourage population-based screening and instead recommend a shared decision-making (SDM) approach, but implementation of SDM in clinical practice varies widely; decision aids help men make more informed and value-consistent screening decisions and decrease men's intention to attempt screening, but these do not affect screening uptake; (3) acceptance: facilitators for men considering screening include social prompting by partners and clinician recommendations, while barriers include a lack of knowledge, low-risk perception, and masculinity attributes; (4) screening test and algorithm: prostate-specific antigen-based screening reduces PCa-specific mortality and metastatic disease in men aged 55-69 yr at randomisation if screened at least twice; (5) harms and benefits: these benefits come at the cost of unnecessary biopsies, overdiagnosis, and subsequent overtreatment; and (6) future of screening: risk-adapted screening including (prebiopsy) risk calculators, magnetic resonance imaging, and blood- and urine-based biomarkers could reduce these harms. To enable a comprehensive overview, we focused on SRs. These do not include the most recent prospective studies, which were therefore incorporated in the discussion. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: By identifying consistent and conflicting evidence, this review highlights the evidence-based foundations that can be built upon, as well as areas requiring further research and improvement to reduce the burden of PCa in the EU and UK. PATIENT SUMMARY: This review of 26 reviews covers various aspects of prostate cancer screening such as invitation, decision-making, screening tests, harms, and benefits. This review provides insights into existing evidence, highlighting the areas of consensus and discrepancies, to guide future research and improve prostate cancer screening strategies in Europe.

• MeSH
• Early Detection of Cancer * MeSH
• European Union * MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Prostatic Neoplasms * diagnosis   MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Review MeSH
• Geographicals
• United Kingdom MeSH

Moderní medicína disponuje silnými nástroji k záchraně a udržení života. Přesto je každý lidský život konečný, a ne vždy je udržování života za každou cenu přijatelné ve smyslu zajištění jeho přijatelné kvality. Obecně uznávaným pravidlem ve společnosti je, že by žádný zdravotník neměl rozhodovat o životě a smrti pacienta. Navzdory tomu jsou ale zdravotníci často ve svém rozhodování postaveni do situací, kdy jejich postoj o životě rozhoduje, byť je to v kategorii zachránit, či nechat zemřít, nebo v aplikaci léků na tlumení bolesti či neklidu vysoko převyšující dávkovací limity uvedené v SPC, nebo dokonce při vysazování život udržující orgánové podpory. Jde o závažná rozhodnutí, pro něž zdravotníci potřebují pravidla a návody, které obecně zpracovává etika a v praxi jsou determinovány právními předpisy a morálními principy konkrétní společnosti. Jedním z pomáhajících etických pravidel je úcta k životu, jejímž praktickým vyjádřením v naší společnosti jsou i pravidla pro nezahajování kardiopulmonální resuscitace, omezování zdravotní péče v situaci nepomáhající léčby, přijetí paliativní péče, postoj k eutanazii a respektování dříve vyslovených přání pacienta. Z pohledu úcty k životu zaujímá článek přístup k těmto medicínským postupům s cílem povzbudit vzdělání a diskusi k etickým tématům, která mají stejný význam pro úroveň kvality zdravotnictví jako odborná úroveň aplikace nových vědeckých poznatků. Orientace v etických principech zdravotnictví se týká všech občanů společnosti, tedy nejen zdravotníků. Řada stížností v situacích zdravotní péče vyplývá z nedostatků v aplikaci morálních principů, a to na straně zdravotníků, pacientů a často též pacientovi blízkých osob. Stejně tak různé patologické psychické stavy u zdravotníků ve škále od přecitlivělého úzkostného jednání až po bezcitnost a cynismus mají původ v nezvládnutí etických principů. Odpovědnost za život je vztahována ke konkrétní osobě a společnosti, v náboženském prostředí též k nadpřirozené autoritě. Individuální život je vnímán v celistvosti vlastní i v začlenění do konkrétní společenské skupiny. Eutanazie, dystanazie a marná léčba jsou hodnoceny jako negativní jevy v chápání úcty k životu.

Modern medicine has powerful tools to save and sustain life. Nevertheless, every human life is finite, and maintaining life at any cost is not always acceptable in the sense of ensuring its acceptable quality. It is a generally accepted rule in society that no health care professional should decide the life and death of a patient. Despite this, however, in their decision-making, medical professionals are often put in situations where their attitude decides about life, even if it is in the category of saving or letting die, or in the application of drugs to reduce pain or restlessness that greatly exceed the dosage limits specified in the Summary of Product Characteristics, or even when withdrawing life-sustaining organ support. These are serious decisions for which health professionals need rules and instructions, which are generally processed by ethics and in practice are determined by legal regulations and moral principles of a particular society. One of the helping ethical rules is respect for life, the practical expression of which in our society are also the rules for not starting cardiopulmonary resuscitation, limiting health care in a situation of non-helpful treatment, accepting palliative care, the attitude towards euthanasia and respecting the previously expressed wishes of the patient. From the point of view of respect for life, the article takes an approach to these medical procedures with the aim of encouraging education and discussion on ethical topics that are as important to the level of quality of health care as the professional level of the application of new scientific knowledge. Orientation in the ethical principles of health care concerns all citizens of society, i.e. not only health professionals. Anumber of complaints in health care situations result from shortcomings in the application of moral principles, on the part of health professionals, patients and often also patients ́ relatives. In the same way, various psychological pathological conditions in health professionals ranging from oversensitive, anxious actions to callousness and cynicism have their origin in failure to master ethical principles. Responsibility for life is related to a specific person and society, in a religious environment also to a supernatural authority. Individual life is perceived both in its own integrity and in its integration into a specific social group. Euthanasia, distanasia and futile treatment are evaluated as negative phenomena in the understanding of respect for life.