elektronický časopis
- MeSH
- Ethics MeSH
- Animal Welfare MeSH
- Human-Animal Bond MeSH
- Animal Rights MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Animals MeSH
- Conspectus
- Psychologie
- NML Fields
- environmentální vědy
- veterinární lékařství
- NML Publication type
- elektronické časopisy
elektronický časopis
- MeSH
- Alphainfluenzavirus MeSH
- Betainfluenzavirus MeSH
- Influenza, Human MeSH
- Respiratory Tract Infections virology MeSH
- Viruses MeSH
- Conspectus
- Patologie. Klinická medicína
- NML Fields
- infekční lékařství
- NML Publication type
- elektronické časopisy
- MeSH
- Adrenergic beta-Antagonists administration & dosage metabolism therapeutic use MeSH
- Animal Experimentation MeSH
- Drug Evaluation MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Models, Theoretical MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Comparative Study MeSH
19, 245 s. : il.
Autor upozorňuje na 2 metodické problémy zooterapetického efektu „ostatních zvvířat".. Jde o vymezení pojmu zooterapie u nás a v anglosaských zemích;a o to, že většina studií o zooterapii rozděluje zvírata pouze na psy a ostatní druhy. Autor uvádí domácí zvířata a jejich vliv na zdravotní stav člověka. Celá práce je doplněna výstižnými tabulkami.
The author highlights 2 methodical problems of the zootherapeutical effect of „other animals". It is about defining the concept of zootherapy in our country and in Anglo-Saxon countries, about the fact that most studies of zootherapy divide animals only into dogs and other species. The author presents pets and their influence on the health condition of man. The whole work is completed with cogent charts.
- MeSH
- Child MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Animals, Domestic MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Disease genetics MeSH
- Human-Animal Bond MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Social Behavior MeSH
- Therapeutics methods psychology MeSH
- Health Status MeSH
- Check Tag
- Child MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Aged MeSH
Dermatofytózy jsou infekční kožní choroby vyvolané určitými druhy hub – dermatofyty. Dermatofyty rozdělujeme podle výběru primárního hostitele na geofilní, zoofilní a antropofilní. Zoofilní druhy napadají primárně zvířata, projevy jsou vysoce nakažlivé a může tak dojít k přenosu na člověka. Nejčastějšími zástupci jsou Microsporum canis, Trichophyton mentagrophytes var. mentagrophytes a Trichophyton verrucosum. Jsou popsány základní klinické projevy nejen u člověka, ale i u zvířat, se kterými člověk přichází nejčastěji do kontaktu. Po zjištění zoofilní dermatofytózy nestačí samotná léčba pacienta. Je nezbytná i celá řada dalších opatření: zajištění a léčba nemocného zvířete, dezinfekce prostředí a vyhledávání eventuálních dalších postižených. V závěru jsou uvedeny tři rozdílné kazuistiky zoofilních dermatofytóz.
Dermatophytoses are infectious skin diseases caused by some sorts of Fungi – dermatophytes. Based on their source dermatophytes are classified to geophilic, zoophilic and antrophophilic groups. Animals are primary afflicted by zoophilic Fungi, manifestations on their skin are highly infectious and Fungi can be transmitted to humans. Some members of zoophilic dermatophytes are: Microsporum canis, Trichophyton mentagrophytes var. mentagrophytes and Trichophyton verrucosum. Most common clinical findings in humans and also in some animals are described. If a zoophilic dermatophytosis is diagnosed at a patient, not only treatment of that person is necessary. Isolation and treatment of the afflicted animal, disinfection of its environment and locking for other infected persons and animals are essential. Finally, three various cases of zoophilic dermatophytoses are described.
- MeSH
- Dermatomycoses etiology drug therapy classification MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Animal Diseases transmission MeSH
- Disease Transmission, Infectious MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Case Reports MeSH
Práca popisuje výskyt antraxu (sneti slezinovej) u hovädzieho dobytka, koni, oviec, kôz a ošípaných v Československej republike (teraz Česká republika a Slovenská republika) v období rokov 1910-1965. Antrax v rokoch 1910-1934 sa v Českej republike (Čechy, Morava a Sliezsko) vyskytoval na 7 207 dvoroch; najčastejšie u hovädzieho dobytka (93,0 %), potom u koni (4,6 %), ošípaných (1,4 %), kôz (0,6 %) a oviec (0,4 %). Na Slovensku v rokoch 1921-1934 (Slovensko a Zakarpatská Ukrajina) bol výskyt ochorenia častejší. Evidovalo sa 18 613 antraxových dvorov. Prevažovalo ochorenie u hovädzieho dobytka (92,6 %), koni (4,1 %) a oviec (2,5 %). V rokoch 1946-1965 sa v Československej republike evidovalo 5129 antraxových dvorov. Výskyt na Slovensku bol častejší, evidovalo sa 4 548 dvorov (88,6 %)• Najväčší výskyt bol v letných mesiacoch, s vrcholom v júni až v septembri. Výskyt súvisel s pasením zvierat na infikovaných pasienkoch. Hlavnou príčinou častejšieho výskytu antraxu u potravinových zvierat na Slovensku a Zakarpatskej Ukrajine v porovnaní s českými zemami bola skutočnosť, že v minulosti sa tu uhynuté zvieratá nezakopávali do zeme dostatočne hlboko, ale často sa zahrabávali len pod povrch. Neskôr bolo nariadené uhynuté zvieratá spaľovať, ale aj toto opatrenie sa na mnohých miestach vykonávalo nedostatočne. Ďalšou príčinou boli neregulované rieky, ktoré takmer každoročne na jar zaplavovalí rozsiahle plochy lúk a orných pôd.
The article describes the occurrence of anthrax in cattle, horses, sheep, goats and pigs in Czechoslovakia (now in Czech BepubUc and Slovak Republic) from 1910 to 1965. Anthrax occurred in 7207 courtyards in Czech Republic (Bohemia, Moravia and Silesia) from 1910 to 1934 - the most frequently in cattle (93.0 %), horses (4.6 %), pigs (1.4 %), goats (0.6 %) and sheep (0.4 %). Occurrence of the disease was more frequent in Slovakia (Slovakia and Transcarpathian Ukraine) between 1921 and 1934. There was an evidence of 18613 courtyards with anthrax. The disease predominated in cattle (92.6 %), horses (4.1 %) and sheep (2.5 %). There were 5129 courtyards with anthrax in evidence in Czechoslovakia between 1946 and 1965. The occurrence was more frequent in Slovakia, there were 4548 courtyards in evidence (88.6 %). There was the highest occurrence in summer, with the peak from June to September. The occurrence was related to grazing animals at infected pastures. The main cause of more frequent occurrence of anthrax in food animals in Slovakia and TranscarpathianUkraine compared to Czech countries was the fact that dead animals were not hurried deep enough but were hurried under the surface. Later on, there was a directive to bum the dead animals, but this measure was not followed consistently at many places. Unregulated rivers which flooded vast pastures and land nearly every year were the other reason.
Cieľom práce bolo vyvolať experimentálnu infekciu antropofilným dermatofytom Trichophytonrubrum na zvierati a potvrdiť ju klinickým, mykologickým a histopatologickým vyšetrením.Na prípravu inokulátu sme použili kultúry T. rubrum izolované z pacientov chorých na dermato-mykózu. Inokulát sme kultivovali v podmienkach intenzívnej aerácie (trepanie). Jeho hustota bola2,0 . 10 6 /ml klíčenia schopných spór a hýfových fragmentov. Na chrbáte zvieraťa sme na plochuzbavenú srste a podráždenú skarifikáciou (plocha 4 cm 2 ) vtreli 2 ml inokulátu.Experimentálnu mykotickú infekciu sme vyvolali na jednom zo štyroch morčiat a na jednom z dvochkrálikov domácich. Prvé klinické prejavy mykotickej infekcie sme zistili 6. a 9. deň po inokulácii.Z ložiska sme vykultivovali T. rubrum. Z nepostihnutej srsti z blízkeho ako aj zo vzdialeného okoliasme izolovali početné kontaminanty, iné huby ako dermatofyty. V histopatologickom materiáli smezistili v odlučujúcich vrstvách stratum corneum PAS-pozitívne septované vlákna. Početné PAS-po-zitívne septované vlákna sa nachádzali aj vo vlasových folikuloch. V kóriu bola prítomná zmiešanázápalová infiltrácia s prevahou histiocytov a polymorfonukleárnych leukocytov. Nezistili sme mor-fologické zmeny pasážovaním dermatofyta T. rubrum cez zvieratá.Na vyvolanie experimentálnej infekcie dermatofytom Trichophyton rubrum sú vhodnými zvierata-mi morča aj králik domáci.
The objective of the work was to induce experimental infection with the anthropophil dermatophyteTrichophyton rubrum in animals and to confirm it by clinical, mycological and histopathologicalexamination.For preparation of the inoculum the authors used a T. rubrum culture isolated from patientssuffering from dermatomycosis. The inoculum was cultivated under conditions of intensive aeration(shaking). Its density was 2.0 . 10 6 /ml of germinative spores and hyphal fragments. On the animal’sback shoved and irritated by scarification (area 4 cm 2 ) 2 ml inoculum were rubbed in.Experimental mycotic infection was induced in one of four guinea pigs and one of two domesticrabbits. The first clinical manifestations of mycotic infection were found on the 6 th and 9 th day afterinoculation. From the focus T. rubrum was cultivated. From the unaffected hair in the close vicinityand at more remote sites numerous contaminants were isolated, other fungi as well as dermatophy-tes. In the histopathological material the authors found in the shed layers of the stratum corneumPAS positive septate fibres. Numerous PAS positive septate fibres were found also in the hairfollicles. In the corium a mixed inflammatory infiltration was present with a predominance ofhistiocytes and polymorphonuclear leukocytes. No morphological changes were found after pas-saging the dermatophyte T. rubrum via animals.Guinea pigs and the domestic rabbit are useful animals for inducing experimental infection withthe dermatophyte Trichophyton rubrum.
xiv, 97 s. ; 21 cm
(Publisher-supplied data) An Italian ethnobotanist explores the remarkable propensity of wild animals to seek out and use psychoactive substances. Throws out behaviorist theories that claim animals have no consciousness. Offers a completely new understanding of the role psychedelics play in the development of consciousness in all species. Reveals drug use to be a natural instinct. From caffeine-dependent goats to nectar addicted ants, the animal kingdom offers amazing examples of wild animals and insects seeking out and consuming the psychoactive substances in their environments. Author Giorgio Samorini explores this little-known phenomenon and suggests that, far from being confined to humans, the desire to experience altered states of consciousness is a natural drive shared by all living beings and that animals engage in these behaviors deliberately. Rejecting the Western cultural assumption that using drugs is a negative action or the result of an illness, Samorini opens our eyes to the possibility that beings who consume psychedelics--whether humans or animals--contribute to the evolution of their species by creating entirely new patterns of behavior that eventually will be adopted by other members of that species. The author's fascinating accounts of mushroom-loving reindeer, intoxicated birds, and drunken elephants ensure that readers will never view the animal world in quite the same way again.
- Conspectus
- Farmacie. Farmakologie
- NML Fields
- toxikologie
- NML Publication type
- studie
