Sources
Dotaz
Zobrazit nápovědu
25, 590 s. : il., tab.
Methods in enzymology ; Vol. 268
[1st ed.] xxxiv, 555 s. : il.
[1st ed.], repr xii, 621 s.
369 s.
86 s.
WHO regional publications ; European series No. 19
71 s. : il.
- Konspekt
- Veřejné zdraví a hygiena
- NLK Obory
- veřejné zdravotnictví
- environmentální vědy
- environmentální vědy
- hygiena
- NLK Publikační typ
- publikace WHO
- MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- regresní analýza MeSH
- sebezhodnocení (psychologie) MeSH
- studenti klasifikace psychologie statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- temperament MeSH
- testování osobnosti statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- srovnávací studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: International comparisons of population birth data provide essential benchmarks for evaluating perinatal health policies. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe routine national data sources in Europe by their ability to provide core perinatal health indicators. METHODS: The Euro-Peristat Network collected routine national data on a recommended set of core indicators from 2015 to 2021 using a federated protocol based on a common data model with 16 data items. Data providers completed an online questionnaire to describe the sources used in each country. We classified countries by the number of data items they provided (all 16, 15-14, < 14). RESULTS: A total of 29 out of the 31 countries that provided data responded to the survey. Routine data sources included birth certificates (15 countries), electronic medical records (EMR) from delivery hospitalisations (16 countries), direct entry by health providers (9 countries), EMR from other care providers (7 countries) and Hospital Discharge Summaries (7 countries). Completeness of population coverage was at least 98%, with 17 countries reporting 100%. These databases most often included mothers giving birth in the national territory, regardless of nationality or place of residence (24 countries), whereas others register births to residents only. In 20 countries, routine sources were linked, including linkage between birth and death certificates (16 countries). Countries providing all 16 items (n = 8) were more likely to use EMRs from delivery hospitalisations (100%) compared to 50% and 11% in countries with 15-14 items (n = 12) and < 14 items (n = 9), respectively. Linkage was also more common in these countries (100%) versus 75% and 56%, respectively. Other data source characteristics did not differ by the ability to provide data on core perinatal indicators. CONCLUSIONS: There are wide differences between countries in the data sources used to construct perinatal health indicators in Europe. Countries using EMR linking to other sources had the best data availability.
- MeSH
- elektronické zdravotní záznamy statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- informační zdroje MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- novorozenec MeSH
- perinatální péče * statistika a číselné údaje normy MeSH
- rodné listy * MeSH
- rutinně sbírané zdravotní údaje * MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- novorozenec MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
