Národní program screeningu kolorektálního karcinomu (KRK) probíhá v České republice od roku 2000 a je příkladem mezioborové spolupráce. Podílí se na něm specialisté z oboru gastroenterologie, praktického lékařství, gynekologie a klinické biochemie. Program je založen na dvou základních metodách – screeningovém imunochemickém testu na okultní krvácení do stolice (iTOKS, FIT) a preventivní koloskopii (TOKS-pozitivní a screeningová koloskopie). O jeho efektivitě vypovídají vysoké počty zachycených kolorektálních prekancerózních a maligních lézí. V letech 2006–2023 bylo v rámci programu provedeno 531 362 preventivních koloskopií, diagnostikováno 202 575 pacientů s adenomy (38,1 %) a 14 473 s karcinomy (2,7 %). Kvalita programu je monitorována na základě indikátorů kvality, které jsou zaměřeny na organizaci (pokrytí cílové populace) i jednotlivé metody. Pokrytí screeningovými testy ve standardním dvouletém sledování se dlouhodobě pohybuje okolo 30 %, v roce 2023 činilo 30,0 % (s výjimkou let 2020 a 2021, kdy došlo k přechodnému poklesu pokrytí na 27 % z důvodu pandemie onemocnění covidem-19). Epidemiologické ukazatele ovlivňují i nescreeningové testy, pokrytí všemi relevantními metodami ve dvouletém intervalu činilo 37,5 % v roce 2023. Koloskopie je hodnocena šesti parametry (počet vyšetření, střevní očista, totální koloskopie, záchyt adenomů celkově, u žen a u mužů). Všechny tyto indikátory splňovalo v roce 2023 celkem 72 % center pro screeningovou koloskopii. Přístroje analyzující TOKS musejí nově procházet pravidelným externím hodnocením kvality (EHK). To by mělo vést také k optimalizaci pozitivity testů, která v roce 2023 dosahovala hodnoty 9,1 %. I díky programu screeningu KRK lze pozorovat příznivé epidemiologické trendy KRK, kdy v letech 2000–2022 došlo k poklesu incidence o 32,3 % a mortality o 47,8 %. Budoucnost programu spočívá v jeho dalším zefektivňování. Cílem je navýšení pokrytí cílové populace při udržení a dalším zvyšování kvality tak, aby byl program realizovatelný a průchodný.
The National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program has been conducted in the Czech Republic since 2000 and serves as an example of interdisciplinary collaboration. Specialists from gastroenterology, general practice, gynecology, and clinical biochemistry are involved in the program. It is based on two primary methods: the screening fecal immunochemical test for occult bleeding (iFOBT, FIT) and preventive colonoscopy (FOBT-positive colonoscopy and screening colonoscopy). The program‘s effectiveness is evidenced by the high number of detected colorectal precancerous and malignant lesions. Between 2006 and 2023, a total of 531,362 preventive colonoscopies were performed, diagnosing 202,575 patients with adenomas (38.1%) and 14,473 patients with cancers (2.7%). Program quality is monitored by indicators focused on both organization (target population coverage) and screening methods. Coverage with screening tests in a 2-year interval has consistently ranged around 30%, except between 2020 and 2021 during the COVID-19 pandemic (27%), reaching 30.0% in 2023. Non-screening tests also affect epidemiological indicators, with total coverage by all relevant methods in a 2-year interval in 2023 amounting to 37.5%. Colonoscopies are evaluated using six parameters (number of examinations, bowel preparation quality, total colonoscopies, and adenoma detection rate in total, in both women and men). In 2023, 72% of screening colonoscopy centers met all of these indicators. FOBT analyzers now must have the regular external quality assessment (EQA), which should help stabilize test positivity, standing at 9.1% in 2023. Thanks to the National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program, favorable epidemiological trends have been observed, with a 32.3% decrease in incidence and a 47.8% decrease in mortality between 2000 and 2022. The future of the program lies in its further optimization, with a goal of both increasing coverage of the target population by examination and quality improvement, ensuring the program’s feasibility and efficiency.
- MeSH
- incidence MeSH
- kolonoskopie MeSH
- kolorektální nádory * diagnóza mortalita prevence a kontrola MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- okultní krev MeSH
- plošný screening metody MeSH
- primární prevence MeSH
- řízení kvality MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
- MeSH
- analgosedace MeSH
- antibiotická profylaxe MeSH
- gastrointestinální endoskopie klasifikace metody normy MeSH
- gastrointestinální krvácení diagnóza prevence a kontrola terapie MeSH
- gastrointestinální nemoci diagnóza prevence a kontrola terapie MeSH
- hematologické látky aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- hemostáza endoskopická metody MeSH
- kolonoskopie * klasifikace metody normy škodlivé účinky MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- předoperační péče metody MeSH
- riziko MeSH
- roztoky analýza klasifikace terapeutické užití MeSH
- terciární prevence metody MeSH
- vysazování léků MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- směrnice pro lékařskou praxi MeSH
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Adequate bowel preparation is essential for successful and effective colonoscopy. Several types of cleansing agents are currently available including low-volume solutions. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of four different bowel cleansing agents. METHODS: A single-center, prospective, randomized, and single-blind study was performed. Consecutive patients referred for colonoscopy were enrolled and randomized into one of the following types of laxatives: polyethylenglycol 4L (PEG), oral sulfate solution (OSS), 2L polyethylenglycol + ascorbate (2L-PEG/Asc), or magnesium citrate + sodium picosulfate (MCSP). The primary outcome was quality of bowel cleansing evaluated according to the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Secondary outcomes were polyp detection rate (PDR) and tolerability. RESULTS: Final analysis was performed on 431 patients. The number of patients with adequate bowel preparation (BBPS total scores ≥6 and sub scores ≥2 in each segment) was not significantly different throughout all groups (95.4% PEG; 94.6% OSS; 96.3% 2L-PEG/Asc; 96.2% MCSP; p=0.955). Excellent bowel preparation (BBPS total scores ≥ 8) was associated with younger age (p=0.007). The groups did not have significantly different PDRs (49.5% PEG; 49.1% OSS; 38% 2L-PEG/Asc; 40.4% MCSP; p=0.201). The strongest predictors of pathology identification were age and male gender. The best-tolerated solution was MCSP (palatability: p<0.001; nausea: p=0.024).
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Adequate bowel preparation is essential for successful and effective colonoscopy. Several types of cleansing agents are currently available including low-volume solutions. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of four different bowel cleansing agents. METHODS: A single-center, prospective, randomized, and single-blind study was performed. Consecutive patients referred for colonoscopy were enrolled and randomized into one of the following types of laxatives: polyethylenglycol 4L (PEG), oral sulfate solution (OSS), 2L polyethylenglycol + ascorbate (2L-PEG/Asc), or magnesium citrate + sodium picosulfate (MCSP). The primary outcome was quality of bowel cleansing evaluated according to the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Secondary outcomes were polyp detection rate (PDR) and tolerability. RESULTS: Final analysis was performed on 431 patients. The number of patients with adequate bowel preparation (BBPS total scores ≥6 and sub scores ≥2 in each segment) was not significantly different throughout all groups (95.4% PEG; 94.6% OSS; 96.3% 2L-PEG/Asc; 96.2% MCSP; p=0.955). Excellent bowel preparation (BBPS total scores ≥ 8) was associated with younger age (p=0.007). The groups did not have significantly different PDRs (49.5% PEG; 49.1% OSS; 38% 2L-PEG/Asc; 40.4% MCSP; p=0.201). The strongest predictors of pathology identification were age and male gender. The best-tolerated solution was MCSP (palatability: p<0.001; nausea: p=0.024).
A substantial body of literature has provided evidence that type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and colorectal neoplasia share several common factors. Both diseases are among the leading causes of death worldwide and have an increasing incidence. In addition to usual risk factors such as sedentary lifestyle, obesity, and family history, common pathophysiological mechanisms involved in the development of these diseases have been identified. These include changes in glucose metabolism associated with adipose tissue dysfunction including insulin resistance resulting to hyperinsulinemia and chronic hyperglycemia. In addition to altered glucose metabolism, abdominal obesity has been associated with accented carcinogenesis with chronic subclinical inflammation. An increasing number of studies have recently described the role of the gut microbiota in metabolic diseases including T2DM and the development of colorectal cancer (CRC). Due to the interconnectedness of different pathophysiological processes, it is not entirely clear which factor is crucial in the development of carcinogenesis in patients with T2DM. The aim of this work is to review the current knowledge on the pathophysiological mechanisms of colorectal neoplasia development in individuals with T2DM. Here, we review the potential pathophysiological processes involved in the onset and progression of colorectal neoplasia in patients with T2DM. Uncovering common pathophysiological characteristics is essential for understanding the nature of these diseases and may lead to effective treatment and prevention.
- MeSH
- adipozita MeSH
- diabetes mellitus 2. typu epidemiologie mikrobiologie patofyziologie MeSH
- dysbióza MeSH
- energetický metabolismus MeSH
- hodnocení rizik MeSH
- hyperglykemie epidemiologie patofyziologie MeSH
- hyperinzulinismus epidemiologie patofyziologie MeSH
- incidence MeSH
- inzulinová rezistence MeSH
- kolorektální nádory epidemiologie mikrobiologie patofyziologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- obezita epidemiologie patofyziologie MeSH
- rizikové faktory MeSH
- střevní mikroflóra MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
