Clinical practice patterns
Dotaz
Zobrazit nápovědu
sv.
- MeSH
- lékařská praxe - způsoby provádění MeSH
- poskytování zdravotní péče MeSH
- Publikační typ
- periodika MeSH
- Konspekt
- Lékařské vědy. Lékařství
- NLK Obory
- všeobecné lékařství
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Members of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) come from different geographic locations and practice settings. A member survey regarding practice patterns provides valuable information for practitioners and researchers alike, and allows the IUGA to discover areas to focus on education and information dissemination. METHODS: A questionnaire was developed by the IUGA Research and Development committee and distributed electronically to IUGA surgeons. Answers were analyzed in reference to demographics, geographic distribution, and academic affiliation. RESULTS: Five hundred sixty-four members answered the questionnaire, representing a 28 % response rate, and closely reflecting the geographic distribution of IUGA membership. Preferred surgical treatment for uncomplicated SUI was the mid-urethral trans-obturator sling (49.7 %). Vaginal mesh was mainly used for repair of recurrent POP (20.4 %). Pessary use was offered "always" or "frequently" by 61.5 %, with no difference in academic affiliation, but significant differences based on region of practice. Compared to practitioners in non-academic centers, those with academic affiliation utilized Urodynamic studies (UDS) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) more frequently in the evaluation of POP. Regions of practice significantly influenced the majority of practice patterns, with the highest impact found in the use of robotic assistance. CONCLUSIONS: Many practice patterns in the evaluation and treatment of POP and SUI depend on academic affiliation and geographic location. Practice patterns are not always based on most recent evidence-based data.
- MeSH
- chirurgické síťky využití MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- gynekologie statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- internacionalita MeSH
- lékařská praxe - způsoby provádění statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- magnetická rezonanční tomografie využití MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- pesary využití MeSH
- prolaps pánevních orgánů chirurgie MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- stresová inkontinence moči chirurgie MeSH
- suburetrální pásky využití MeSH
- ultrasonografie využití MeSH
- urologie statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
xxviii, 789 stran : ilustrace, tabulky ; 18 cm
- Konspekt
- Veřejné zdraví a hygiena
- NLK Obory
- veřejné zdravotnictví
- infekční lékařství
- NLK Publikační typ
- kolektivní monografie
- MeSH
- etické komise MeSH
- lékařská praxe - způsoby provádění MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- rozhodování MeSH
- sociální odpovědnost MeSH
- výzkum MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- klinické zkoušky MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Slovenská republika MeSH
Journal of trauma, ISSN 0022-5282 Vol. 64, no. 3, suppl. March 2008
207-286 s. : il., tab. ; 28 cm
- MeSH
- kontrola infekce metody organizace a řízení MeSH
- lékařská praxe - způsoby provádění MeSH
- rány a poranění MeSH
- Publikační typ
- sborníky MeSH
- Konspekt
- Patologie. Klinická medicína
- NLK Obory
- traumatologie
- urgentní lékařství
Problematika tvorby ošetřovatelských klinických doporučených postupů je v současnosti dosti široká. Chybí centrální koncepce jejich tvorby, ať již co se týče jejich struktury či jasného vymezení oblastí ošetřovatelské péče určených pro standardizaci. Velkým problémem je i značná heterogennost ošetřovatelských postupů v klinické praxi, daná především absencí standardizace na národní úrovni v podobě klinických doporučených postupů. Cílem prezentovaného kvalitativního šetření byla analýza současného stavu standardizace u vybraných poskytovatelů zdravotní péče a názor na tvorbu klinických doporučených postupů na národní úrovni.
Problems of nursing guideline is currently quite wide. Missing central concept of their creation, whether in terms of their structure and a clear delineation of areas intended for nursing care standardization. The big problem is the considerable heterogeneity of nursing procedures in practice, especially given the lack of standardization at national level in the form of guidelines. The aim of the investigation was presented a qualitative analysis of the current state of standardization in selected hospitals and opinion on the creation of a guideline on the national level.
- MeSH
- kvalitativní výzkum MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- ošetřovatelské služby normy MeSH
- ošetřovatelství - vzorové postupy * normy MeSH
- pilotní projekty MeSH
- poskytování zdravotní péče normy MeSH
- řízení kvality MeSH
- směrnice jako téma MeSH
- směrnice pro lékařskou praxi jako téma MeSH
- zajištění kvality zdravotní péče MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- hodnotící studie MeSH
AIMS: This project aimed to improve physicians' adherence to evidence-based practices regarding the selection and administration of intra-articular knee injections for patients with osteoarthritis. The project also aimed to empower patients by increasing their awareness of these evidence-based practices. INTRODUCTION: In the management of knee osteoarthritis, intra-articular injections are commonly used when initial treatments prove inadequate. However, issues such as patients' demand for rapid relief and variability in physicians' familiarity with optimal practices often lead to suboptimal treatment decisions and potential adverse outcomes. METHODS: This project followed the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework, which is grounded in an audit, feedback, and re-audit process. Initially, physicians were surveyed on the topic under consideration, and hospital records were reviewed. Subsequently, targeted interventions were implemented, including briefings and the distribution of informative flyers. RESULTS: The baseline audit indicated low adherence with all audit criteria. Various parameters, such as adherence to best clinical practices, informed decision-making by patients, and the recommendation of alternative treatment modalities, were significantly lacking. Following the interventions, substantial improvements were observed, including higher rates of adherence to best clinical practices by physicians for multiple criteria, such as stepwise referral to conservative therapy options and the content of intra-articular injections. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to best clinical practices can be improved through educational briefings for physicians on the most current evidence-based treatment practices for injectable substances in knee osteoarthritis. The active engagement of patients, facilitated by informative flyers and physician assistance, contributed to better involvement in their treatment choices. However, the participation of health care institutions and providers as well as lifelong education practices may be necessary for more comprehensive and sustainable changes. SPANISH ABSTRACT: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A277.
- MeSH
- artróza kolenních kloubů * farmakoterapie MeSH
- dodržování směrnic * MeSH
- injekce intraartikulární MeSH
- lékařská praxe - způsoby provádění statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- lékařská praxe založená na důkazech MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- směrnice pro lékařskou praxi jako téma MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of advanced ovarian cancer is a subject of fast development. The aim of this survey was to collect data on current surgical treatment from selected European gynecological oncology centers. METHODS: A questionnaire has been sent to gynecological oncology centers from 18 countries across Europe, which are presented on the ESGO Web site. Data were collected on an anonymous basis. All questions were related to the cytoreductive surgery of advanced ovarian cancer. RESULTS: Response rate reached 63%, and data from 17 European countries were analyzed. The median number of new patients with ovarian cancer treated annually in a single centre was 95. Whereas 19% of centers perform infracolic omentectomy only, 81% carry on total omentectomy. Approximately half of the centers conduct appendectomy in all patients with advanced ovarian cancer, 1/3 only if the appendix is macroscopically involved. Lymphadenectomy is carried out in 20% of centers in all cases but in 31% only if no residual disease is achieved. Proportion of patients in whom colorectal resection is performed ranged from less than 5% to more than 40%. Colorectal resection, splenectomy and liver resection are conducted by gynecological oncologist in 27%, 46%, and 12%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There were substantial differences in the spectrum and complexity of procedures performed in patients with advanced ovarian cancer among large European gynecologic oncology centers. Tendency to more complex surgery was shown in centers with a higher number of cases. Selected bowel and upper abdominal procedures are already performed by gynecological oncologists in large proportion of centers, without existence of well-established postgraduate training program.
- MeSH
- gynekologické chirurgické výkony statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- gynekologie výchova statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- lékařská onkologie výchova statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- lékařská praxe - způsoby provádění statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory vaječníků chirurgie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH