BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Bladder cancer (BCa) imposes a substantial economic burden on health care systems and patients. Understanding these financial implications is crucial for effective resource allocation and optimization of treatment cost effectiveness. Here, we aim to systematically review and analyze the financial burden of BCa from the health care and patient perspectives. METHODS: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA)-compliant systematic review was conducted, searching PubMed/Medline, Embase, and public sources for studies evaluating the financial impact of BCa, encompassing costs, cost effectiveness, and financial toxicity (FT). KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Non-muscle-invasive BCa (NMIBC) incurs significant costs for surveillance and treatment, with costs exceeding $200 000 after 5 yr for high-risk NMIBC patients progressing after bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) treatment (including inpatient, outpatient, and physician service expenses). Muscle-invasive BCa generates substantial costs from radical cystectomy (RC) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy, averaging $30 000-40 000 from surgical costs of RC, with additional expenses in case of complications. Trimodal therapy has higher costs (1-yr management cost >$200 000) than RC because of higher outpatient, radiology, and medication costs. Metastatic BCa incurs the highest financial burden, with systemic therapy costs ranging from $40 000 to over $100 000 per five-cycle course, increasing further with combination therapies (ie, enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab), treatment-related toxicity, and supportive care. FT is particularly prevalent among younger, less educated, and minority populations. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: BCa treatment, particularly in advanced stages, imposes a substantial economic burden. Innovations in care, while improving oncologic outcomes, necessitate detailed cost-effectiveness assessments. Addressing these economic challenges is essential for optimizing BCa management, targeting patients at a higher risk of FT, and improving patient quality of life.

• MeSH
• Cost-Benefit Analysis MeSH
• Cystectomy economics   adverse effects   MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Neoplasm Metastasis MeSH
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms * economics   therapy   pathology   MeSH
• Health Care Costs * MeSH
• Cost of Illness * MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Review MeSH
• Systematic Review MeSH

PURPOSE: To evaluate treatment outcomes and toxicity in patients with stage T1-3N0M0 oral cancer treated with surgery followed by high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Retrospective study of 50 patients with stage T1-T3N0 tongue and floor-of-mouth cancer who underwent tumour excision (+ elective neck dissection) followed by postoperative HDR-BT due to the presence of negative prognostic factors (close or positive resection margins, lymphovascular and/or perineural invasion, deep invasion). The plastic tube technique (dose: 18 x 3 Gy b.i.d.) was used. Survival outcomes, toxicity, and prognostic factors were evaluated. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 81 months (range, 4-121), actuarial 5-year local control (LC), nodal control (NC) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 79%, 69%, and 64%. After salvage treatment (surgery + external beam radiotherapy), LC, NC, and PFS increased to 87%, 77%, and 72.3%, respectively. Five-year overall survival and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates were 73% and 77%. Treatmentrelated toxicity included two cases of mandibular osteoradionecrosis and five cases of small soft tissue necrosis. T stage was significantly correlated with nodal control (p=0.02) and CSS (p=0.04). Tumour grade correlated with DFS (p=0.01). CONCLUSION: Postoperative HDR-BT 18 x 3 Gy b.i.d. seems to be an effective method in patients with T1-3N0M0 oral cancer with negative prognostic factors after tumour resection.

• MeSH
• Brachytherapy * methods   MeSH
• Radiotherapy Dosage * MeSH
• Adult MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Survival Rate MeSH
• Mouth Neoplasms * radiotherapy   pathology   surgery   MeSH
• Prognosis MeSH
• Retrospective Studies MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Neoplasm Staging * MeSH
• Treatment Outcome MeSH
• Check Tag
• Adult MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH

PURPOSE: The presence of MYC and BCL2 translocations (ie, double-hit lymphoma, DHL) in large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) is associated with reduced chemosensitivity, but less is known on its impact on radiotherapy (RT) efficacy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with LBCL who received their first course of RT for relapsed/refractory disease between 2008 and 2020 were eligible if there was adequate pathologic evaluation to be categorized as DHL versus non-DHL as per the World Health Organization (fifth edition). Separate analyses were conducted by treatment intent. Predictors for response (complete and partial) and local recurrence (LR) were evaluated using Cox regression analysis. LR analysis was restricted to curative-intent patients to ensure adequate follow-up. RESULTS: Three hundred and eighty-three patients (102 DHL, 281 non-DHL, and 44% curative) were treated at 447 sites. Median time from diagnosis to RT was 11.6 months, with 38.7% of patients having primary chemorefractory disease, 37.4% having received >2 lines of systemic therapy, and 24% status post-stem cell transplant. Median biological equivalent dose (alpha/beta: 10) was 28 Gy (range: 3.2-60.0) for palliative and 46.9 Gy (range: 6.4-84.0) for curative-intent patients. With a median follow-up of 41.1 and 41.5 months among curative and palliative patients, respectively, the response was high (81.1% curative, 60.1% palliative). On univariate analysis, DHL pathology was not associated with RT response in either curative or palliative patients. Among curative patients, 2-year LR rate was 38.8%. On multivariable analysis, DHL pathology was associated with a 2 times higher risk of LR (95% CI: 1.05-3.67, P = .03), with a crude LR rate of 42.9% (DHL) versus 28.9% (non-DHL). RT was well tolerated with low rates of grade 3 or higher acute toxicity (1.8% curative, 2.9% palliative). CONCLUSIONS: Relapsed/refractory LBCL remains radioresponsive with a 60%-80% response rate to RT. Although DHL pathology does not appear to influence RT response, its presence is associated with higher rates of LR, suggesting that it may be more radioresistant.

• MeSH
• Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse * radiotherapy   pathology   genetics   MeSH
• Adult MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Neoplasm Recurrence, Local * pathology   MeSH
• Young Adult MeSH
• Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2 genetics   MeSH
• Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc genetics   MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Translocation, Genetic MeSH
• Treatment Outcome MeSH
• Check Tag
• Adult MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Young Adult MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) poses a significant clinical challenge, particularly when failing bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy, necessitating alternative treatments. Despite radical cystectomy being the recommended treatment, many patients are unfit or unwilling to undergo this invasive procedure, highlighting the need for effective bladder-sparing therapies. This review aims to summarize and report the evidence on the efficacy and to estimate the costs of bladder-preserving strategies used in NMIBC recurrence after failure of intravesical BCG therapy. METHODS: We systematically searched online databases for prospective studies investigating intravesical therapy, systemic therapy, or combination of both in patients treated previously with BCG. Owing to significant heterogeneity across the studies, a meta-analysis was inappropriate. A sensitivity analysis was performed in an exploratory manner. We used a decision-analytic Markov model to compare novel U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved treatments with a 2-yr time horizon. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 57 studies published between 1998 and 2024, with 68 unique study arms and consisting of 2589 patients, were identified. The 3-mo overall response rate (ORR) across all studies, complete response rate (CRR) in concomitant carcinoma in situ (CIS) or CIS only disease, and recurrence-free rate (RFR) in papillary disease were estimated to be 52.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 45.4-59.2), 52.8% (95% CI: 42.9-62.6), and 26.4% (95% CI: 13.3-45.6), respectively. The 12-mo ORR, CRR, and RFR were estimated to be 78% (95% CI: 52.9-91.8), 27.8% (95% CI: 21.3-35.4), and 25.4% (95% CI: 18.2-34.2), respectively. The progression rate was estimated to be 13% (95% CI: 9-18.2). The mean proportion of patients treated with radical cystectomy was estimated to be 24.7 (range 0-85.7). The reported toxicity grades were overall mild, with a median of 3.4% (range 0-33.3%) participants experiencing a dose limiting toxicity. Compared with using radical cystectomy to treat patients failing BCG therapy, at a willingness-to-pay threshold of 100 000 USD, nadofaragene firadenovec was cost effective, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 10 014 USD per quality-adjusted life year (QALY), while nogapendekin alfa inbakicept was less cost effective than nadofaragene firadenovec (ICER of 44 602 USD per QALY). Pembrolizumab, which dominated, was both less costly and more effective than the other strategies. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Salvage bladder-sparing therapies show a response rate of around 50% at 3 mo in patients with NMIBC failing BCG. However, long-term data are heterogeneous. Nevertheless, recently developed agents show promising tumor control activity. In the rapidly evolving landscape of urothelial cancer, some of these treatment strategies might be cost effective and improve patients' quality of life. The findings of our review highlight the need for novel, more effective therapeutic strategies. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this study, we reviewed the evidence on the efficacy of bladder-preserving strategies used in patients with bladder cancer recurrence after failing bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy. We found that these strategies show a response rate of around 50% at 3 mo. However, long-term data are heterogeneous. Nevertheless, recently developed agents show promising tumor control activity. In the rapidly evolving landscape of urothelial cancer, some of these treatment strategies might be cost effective and improve patients' quality of life.

• MeSH
• Adjuvants, Immunologic * therapeutic use   economics   MeSH
• Cost-Benefit Analysis * MeSH
• Administration, Intravesical MeSH
• BCG Vaccine * therapeutic use   economics   MeSH
• Neoplasm Invasiveness MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Neoplasm Recurrence, Local MeSH
• Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Neoplasms MeSH
• Urinary Bladder Neoplasms * drug therapy   pathology   therapy   economics   MeSH
• Treatment Failure MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Review MeSH
• Systematic Review MeSH

BACKGROUND: Patients with gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma with tumour-positive lymph nodes (ypN+) or positive surgical margins (R1) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection are at high risk of recurrence. Adjuvant nivolumab is effective in oesophageal/oesophagogastric junction cancer and residual pathological disease following chemoradiation and surgery. Immune checkpoint inhibition has shown efficacy in advanced gastro-oesophageal cancer. We hypothesised that nivolumab/ipilimumab would be more effective than adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk (ypN+ and/or R1) patients with gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: VESTIGE was an academic international, multicentre, open-label, randomised phase II trial evaluating the efficacy of adjuvant nivolumab/ipilimumab versus chemotherapy in gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma at high risk of recurrence. Patients were randomised 1 : 1 to receive standard adjuvant chemotherapy (same regimen as neoadjuvant) or nivolumab 3 mg/kg intravenously (i.v.) every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg i.v. every 6 weeks for 1 year. Key inclusion criteria included ypN+ and/or R1 status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival in the intent-to-treat population. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, locoregional and distant failure rates, and safety according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. RESULTS: The independent Data Monitoring Committee reviewed data from 189 of the planned 240 patients in June 2022 and recommended stopping recruitment due to futility. At the time of final analysis, median follow-up was 25.3 months for 195 patients (98 nivolumab/ipilimumab and 97 chemotherapy). Median disease-free survival for the nivolumab/ipilimumab group was 11.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.4-16.8 months] versus 20.8 months (95% CI 15.0-29.9 months) for the chemotherapy group, hazard ratio 1.55 (95% CI 1.07-2.25, one-sided P = 0.99). The 12-month disease-free survival rates were 47.1% and 64.0%, respectively. There were no toxicity concerns or excess early discontinuations. CONCLUSION: Nivolumab/ipilimumab did not improve disease-free survival compared with chemotherapy in patients with ypN+ and/or R1 gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery.

• MeSH
• Adenocarcinoma * pathology   drug therapy   therapy   MeSH
• Chemotherapy, Adjuvant methods   MeSH
• Adult MeSH
• Gastrectomy MeSH
• Esophagogastric Junction * pathology   MeSH
• Immunotherapy methods   MeSH
• Ipilimumab administration & dosage   therapeutic use   MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Neoplasm Recurrence, Local * pathology   prevention & control   drug therapy   epidemiology   MeSH
• Esophageal Neoplasms * pathology   drug therapy   therapy   MeSH
• Stomach Neoplasms * pathology   drug therapy   therapy   surgery   MeSH
• Neoadjuvant Therapy * methods   adverse effects   MeSH
• Nivolumab administration & dosage   therapeutic use   MeSH
• Disease-Free Survival MeSH
• Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols * therapeutic use   MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Check Tag
• Adult MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Clinical Trial, Phase II MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH
• Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH

PURPOSE: While anal cancer is a very rare oncological diagnosis representing less than 2% of lower gastrointestinal tract cancers, the incidence has doubled in the past 20 years. Radical radiochemotherapy with sequential or simultaneous boost is now the standard treatment modality. Interstitial HDR brachytherapy is one of the boost application options. Implementation of new radiotherapy techniques has resulted in improved therapeutic outcomes; however, it is still associated with acute and especially late toxicity. Gastrointestinal disorders and sexual dysfunction are the most frequent factors affecting the long-term quality of cured patients' lives. METHODS: A total of 96 patients consecutively treated between 2000 and 2022 with external beam radio-/chemotherapy and an interstitial brachytherapy boost for histologically verified nonmetastatic anal squamous cell carcinoma were evaluated. The median follow-up time was 15.4 years (range 13.4-17.3 years). The primary objective of the study was to assess local control (LC) and quality of life (QoL). The Czech versions of internationally validated EORTC questionnaires were used to evaluate life quality-the basic EORTC QOL-C30 v.3 and the specific QOL-ANL 27 questionnaire. RESULTS: Local control was 85.5% at 5 years, 83.4% at 10 years, 83.4% at 15 years, and 83.4% at 20 years, and there was no dependence on clinical stage. The most common forms of acute toxicity were cutaneous and hematological but were gastrointestinal for late toxicities. In the evaluation of quality of life, 80.5% of patients alive at the time participated. In the EORTC quality of life questionnaire C30 v.3, patients rated the functional scale score as 86.2 points (standard deviation [SD] = 12.6) and the symptom score as 15.5 points (SD = 12.5). The global health score achieved 68.4 points (SD = 23.6). The most common symptoms were fatigue with 25.6 points (SD = 20.2) and diarrhea with 19.0 points (SD = 27.8). In the QOL-ANL 27 questionnaire, symptom scales assessing bowel symptoms were scored 27.5 points (SD = 19) in non-stoma patients and 11.9 points (SD = 17.2) in stoma patients. In the single-item symptom scales, the highest scores were rated for frequency of urination with 26.4 points (SD = 30.8), need to be close to a toilet with 22.4 points (SD = 27.3), and self-cleaning more often with 25.3 points (SD = 31.8). In the functional scales assessing sex life and interest, men and women reported scores of 45.2 (SD = 23) and 45.5 points (SD = 19), respectively. CONCLUSION: Boost with interstitial HDR brachytherapy is an established safe method of anal cancer treatment, with excellent results and limited late toxicity. Functioning scales were rated relatively highly in QoL questionnaires, and the overall global health score was comparable to published data. Gastrointestinal difficulties, fatigue, and sexual dysfunction dominated the symptom scales in our cohort.

• MeSH
• Brachytherapy * methods   MeSH
• Radiotherapy Dosage MeSH
• Adult MeSH
• Quality of Life * psychology   MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Anus Neoplasms * radiotherapy   psychology   pathology   MeSH
• Follow-Up Studies MeSH
• Surveys and Questionnaires MeSH
• Radiation Injuries * psychology   etiology   MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Carcinoma, Squamous Cell * radiotherapy   pathology   MeSH
• Treatment Outcome MeSH
• Check Tag
• Adult MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Aged, 80 and over MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH

Neuroaxiální léčba bolesti slouží jako doplněk analgetické terapie, když běžné analgetické postupy nejsou dostatečně účinné. Znamená to podání léků do epidurálního nebo intratekálního kompartmentu páteřního kanálu. Léky je možné aplikovat jednorázově, krátkodobě kontinuálně pomocí externího dávkovače nebo dlouhodobě prostřednictvím implantované pumpy. Standardně používanými léky jsou lokální anestetika, opioidy, případně v epidurálním prostoru též kortikoidy; tento výčet ale není konečný, zkoušely se i další látky. Neuroaxiální analgezie má řadu rizik, od systémové toxicity přes nežádoucí účinky léků až po neurotoxicitu.

Neuraxial pain treatment serves as an adjunct to analgesic therapy when conventional analgesic procedures are not sufficiently effective. It invol- ves the administration of drugs into the epidural or intrathecal compartment of the spinal canal. The medication can be administered as a single dose, continuously over a short period of time using an external dispenser, or over a long period of time using an implanted pump. The standard drugs used are local anesthetics, opioids, or, in the epidural space, corticosteroids, but this list is not exhaustive; other agents have also been tried. Neuraxial analgesia has some risks, ranging from systemic toxicity, adverse drug reactions and neurotoxicity.

BACKGROUND: Proton beam therapy using pencil beam scanning is an advanced radiotherapy technique that utilises proton beams to precisely target tumours. It is known for its enhanced ability in sparing healthy tissue and potentially reducing toxicity. Clinical experience with pencil beam scanning in the treatment of mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma remains limited. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study aimed to evaluate the toxicity and outcomes of a prospectively observed cohort. A total of 162 patients were irradiated between May 2013 and December 2020, with a median age of 32 years (range: 18.4-79.2) and followed up until April 2024. The median applied dose was 30 GyE (range: 20-40). Deep inspiration breath hold was used in 146 patients to enhance targeting precision. RESULTS: The disease-free survival, overall survival and local control rates were 95.1 %, 98.8 % and 98.8 %, respectively. The median follow-up was 59.1 months (range: 4-120.1). The most common acute toxicities observed were oesophageal and skin toxicity. Grade 1 oesophageal mucositis occurred in 76 patients (47 %), grade 2 in 16 patients (10 %). Dermatitis of grade 1 and 2 was observed in 65 (40 %) and 4 (3 %) patients respectively. Grade 1 pulmonary toxicity presented in 8 patients (4.9 %), and grade 2 in one patient (0.6 %). The most predominant late toxicity was grade 2 hypothyroidism in 37 patients (23 %). Three patients (1.8 %) underwent coronary interventions during follow-up, and one patient was diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma 3 months post-RT. No unexpected acute or late toxicities were observed. CONCLUSION: Proton beam therapy using pencil beam scanning is a safe and effective technique in terms of toxicity and local control, even when irradiating mediastinal targets.

• MeSH
• Radiotherapy Dosage MeSH
• Adult MeSH
• Hodgkin Disease * radiotherapy   mortality   MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Adolescent MeSH
• Young Adult MeSH
• Mediastinal Neoplasms * radiotherapy   mortality   MeSH
• Prospective Studies MeSH
• Proton Therapy * adverse effects   methods   MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Treatment Outcome MeSH
• Check Tag
• Adult MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Adolescent MeSH
• Young Adult MeSH
• Male MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH

OBJECTIVE: Maintenance olaparib demonstrated clinical activity for progression-free survival in patients without a germline BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutation (non-gBRCAm) who had platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer in the phase IIIb, open-label, single-arm, non-comparator, international OPINION trial (NCT03402841). We report final overall survival (OS; secondary endpoint), prespecified secondary endpoint updates and ad hoc OS analysis by homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and somatic BRCAm (sBRCAm) status. METHODS: Patients with non-gBRCAm platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer, ≥2 prior lines of platinum-based chemotherapy, and in response following their last platinum-based chemotherapy received 300 mg olaparib tablets twice daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: 279 patients were enrolled and treated. With a median follow-up in patients censored for OS of 33.1 months (data cut-off September 17, 2021), median OS was 32.7 months (95 % CI 29.5-35.3); the 24-month OS rate was 65.8 %. In ad hoc subgroup analyses, OS rates tended to be higher in patients with HRD-positive tumors; 24-month OS rates were 81.5 %, 74.2 %, 72.0 % and 55.8 % in the sBRCAm, HRD-positive including sBRCAm, HRD-positive excluding sBRCAm, and HRD-negative subgroups, respectively. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 82 patients (29.4 %), most commonly anemia (13.6 %). Overall, two cases of myelodysplastic syndrome were reported (no new cases since the primary analysis). CONCLUSION: These data provide additional evidence of olaparib as maintenance therapy in patients with non-gBRCAm platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer, with longer OS observed in those with HRD-positive tumors. The safety profile was consistent with the primary analysis and known safety profile of olaparib, with no new safety findings.

• MeSH
• Progression-Free Survival MeSH
• Adult MeSH
• Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial * drug therapy   genetics   mortality   MeSH
• Phthalazines * adverse effects   administration & dosage   therapeutic use   MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Neoplasm Recurrence, Local * drug therapy   genetics   MeSH
• Ovarian Neoplasms * drug therapy   genetics   mortality   MeSH
• Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors * adverse effects   administration & dosage   therapeutic use   MeSH
• Piperazines * adverse effects   administration & dosage   therapeutic use   MeSH
• BRCA1 Protein genetics   MeSH
• BRCA2 Protein genetics   MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Maintenance Chemotherapy MeSH
• Germ-Line Mutation MeSH
• Check Tag
• Adult MeSH
• Middle Aged MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Aged MeSH
• Female MeSH
• Publication type
• Journal Article MeSH
• Clinical Trial, Phase III MeSH
• Multicenter Study MeSH

Neoadjuvantní léčba nádorů tlustého střeva se na rozdíl od nádorů rekta používá zřídka. Jeho pozice v léčebném algoritmu není přesně definována. Tuto léčbu je třeba zvážit u lokálně významně pokročilých nádorů (cT4) s rozsáhlým postižením uzlin. Plán neoadjuvantní léčby by měl být stanoven v rámci multidisciplinárního týmu. Popisujeme hlavní klinické studie zaměřené na neoadjuvantní chemoterapii u karcinomu tlustého střeva. Zvláštní podskupinou jsou dMMR/MSI-high tumory, pacienti s takovými karcinomy jsou kandidáty na léčbu imunoterapií. Imunoterapie může navodit až kompletní remisi, ale může být také provázena dlouhodobou až trvalou toxicitou léčby. Neoadjuvantní imunoterapie nemetastatických nádorů tračníku je předmětem řady klinických studií. V současné době není žádná imunoterapie v EU registrována pro neoadjuvantní léčbu časných nádorů tračníku.

Neoadjuvant treatment for colon cancer, unlike rectal cancer, is rarely used. Its position in the treatment algorithm is not precisely defined. This treatment should be considered for locally significantly advanced tumors (cT4) with extensive nodal involvement. The neoadjuvant treatment plan should be determined in a multidisciplinary team setting. We describe the main clinical trials focused on neoadjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer. A special subgroup is dMMR/MSI-high tumors, patients with such cancers are candidates for immunotherapy treatment. Immunotherapy can induce complete remission, but can also be accompanied by long-term or permanent toxicity of the treatment. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy of non-metastatic colon cancer is the subject of a number of clinical trials. Currently, no immunotherapy is registered in the EU for the neoadjuvant treatment of early colon cancer.

• Keywords
• dMMR/MSI-H karcinom,
• MeSH
• Adenocarcinoma drug therapy   therapy   MeSH
• Early Diagnosis MeSH
• Immunotherapy MeSH
• Clinical Studies as Topic MeSH
• Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic MeSH
• Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic MeSH
• Drug Therapy, Combination methods   MeSH
• Humans MeSH
• Colonic Neoplasms * drug therapy   therapy   MeSH
• Neoadjuvant Therapy * methods   MeSH
• Antineoplastic Agents therapeutic use   MeSH
• Statistics as Topic MeSH
• Check Tag
• Humans MeSH