BACKGROUND: Ulcerative colitis (UC) with concomitant primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) represents a distinct disease entity (PSC-UC). Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) is a standard tool for assessing disease activity in UC but its relevance in PSC-UC remains unclear. AIM: To assess the accuracy of MES in UC and PSC-UC patients, we performed histological scoring using Nancy histological index (NHI). METHODS: MES was assessed in 30 PSC-UC and 29 UC adult patients during endoscopy. NHI and inflammation were evaluated in biopsies from the cecum, rectum, and terminal ileum. In addition, perinuclear anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies, fecal calprotectin, body mass index, and other relevant clinical characteristics were collected. RESULTS: The median MES and NHI were similar for UC patients (MES grade 2 and NHI grade 2 in the rectum) but were different for PSC-UC patients (MES grade 0 and NHI grade 2 in the cecum). There was a correlation between MES and NHI for UC patients (Spearman's r = 0.40, P = 0.029) but not for PSC-UC patients. Histopathological examination revealed persistent microscopic inflammation in 88% of PSC-UC patients with MES grade 0 (46% of all PSC-UC patients). Moreover, MES overestimated the severity of active inflammation in an additional 11% of PSC-UC patients. CONCLUSION: MES insufficiently identifies microscopic inflammation in PSC-UC. This indicates that histological evaluation should become a routine procedure of the diagnostic and grading system in both PSC-UC and PSC.

• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH

INTRODUCTION: CT-P13 is the first biosimilar to infliximab that has been approved for the same indications as its originator infliximab. No data are available on the effect of infliximab biosimilar on mucosal healing. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of CT-P13 induction therapy on mucosal healing in patients with ulcerative colitis [UC]. PATIENTS AND METHODS: UC patients, who received CT-P13 therapy from its local introduction at three Hungarian and one Czech inflammatory bowel disease centres, were prospectively enrolled. Sigmoidoscopy was performed after the end of the induction therapy at week 14. Mucosal healing was defined as Mayo endoscopic subscore 0 or 1. Complete mucosal healing was defined as Mayo endoscopic subscore 0. Trough level of CT-P13 was measured at week 14. RESULTS: Sixty-three UC patients who underwent CT-P13 induction therapy were enrolled in the study. Indication for the therapy was acute, severe flare up and chronic, refractory activity in 24 and 39 patients, respectively. Cumulative clinical response and steroid-free remission at week 14 were achieved in 82.5% and 47.6% of the patients, respectively. Sigmoidoscopy revealed steroid-free mucosal healing in 47.6% of the patients, and complete mucosal healing was present in 27%. Mayo endoscopic subscore decreased significantly at week 14 compared to baseline. Trough levels of infliximab correlated with mucosal healing. CONCLUSION: This is, to our knowledge, the first study examining the efficacy of CT-P13 induction therapy on mucosal healing in UC. The results indicate that mucosal healing is achieved in two-thirds of UC patients by the end of the induction treatment with CT-P13.

• MeSH
• biosimilární léčivé přípravky terapeutické užití   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• gastrointestinální látky terapeutické užití   MeSH
• infliximab terapeutické užití   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• mladý dospělý MeSH
• monoklonální protilátky terapeutické užití   MeSH
• prospektivní studie MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• střevní sliznice patologie   MeSH
• ulcerózní kolitida farmakoterapie   patologie   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• mladý dospělý MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH

Úvod: Tofacitinib je léčivo ze skupiny inhibitorů Janusovy kinázy v perorální formě, které je určeno pro léčbu ulcerózní kolitidy (UC – ulcerative colitis). Účinnost přípravku byla prokázána v registračních studiích, avšak data o účinnosti a bezpečnosti z klinické praxe jsou dosud zřídkavá. Cílem této práce bylo posoudit klinickou odpověď na 8týdenní indukční léčbu tofacitinibem u pacientů s UC. Metodika: Do hodnocení byli zařazeni konsekutivní pacienti, u kterých byla zahájena léčba tofacitinibem v dávce 2 × 10 mg denně. Aktivita onemocnění byla posuzována indexem aktivity Mayo vč. endoskopického subskóre na počátku léčby a v týdnu 8, spolu s hodnocením zánětlivých parametrů v podobě C-reaktivního proteinu (CRP) a fekálního kalprotektinu (FC – fecal calprotectin). Jako odpovídající na léčbu byli v týdnu 8 hodnoceni pacienti s celkovým indexem Mayo 0–5 spolu s endoskopickým subskóre 0–1. Při každé návštěvě byly hodnoceny nežádoucí účinky léčby. Výsledky: Hodnocení proběhlo u 24 pacientů (41,7 % muži, 58,3 % ženy) o průměrném stáří 35,3 ± 11,8 let. Průměrná doba trvání choroby byla 8,3 ± 5,2 let. Průměrný pacient souboru byl v minulosti léčen dvěma biologiky, nicméně 25 % bylo zcela naivních k biologické léčbě. V týdnu 0 byla souběžná léčba kortikoidy přítomna u 41,7 % pacientů, jiná imunosupresvní nebo biologická léčba podávána nebyla. Po 8 týdnech odpovědělo na léčbu 52,9 % pacientů. Celkové Mayo skóre pokleslo u respondérů z hodnoty 5,9 ± 3,5 na 1,1 ± 1,3 (p = 0,01), zatímco u nonrespondérů došlo k nesignifikantní změně z 8,0 ± 2,5 na 8,9 ± 2,1 (p = 0,86). Zlepšení endoskopického skóre z 2,0 ± 1,0 na 0,6 ± 0,7 (p = 0,02) u respondérů kontrastuje se zcela nezměněnou hodnotou u pacientů bez odpovědi (2,9). Významný pokles hodnot CRP (6,7 ± 6,2 vs. 2,0 ± 2,2 mg/l; p = 0,04 a FC (1 195 ± 1 189 vs. 578 ± 654 μg/g; p = 0,05) byl zaznamenán rovněž pouze v kohortě s klinickou odpovědí. Všechny hodnocené parametry v týdnu 0 byly v obou kohortách srovnatelné, s výjimkou triacylglycerolů, jejichž vstupní hodnota byla u nonrespondérů vyšší. Léčba byla do 8 týdnů ukončena u 23,5 % pacientů, u všech z důvodu nedostatečné odpovědi. Byly zaznamenány dvě stížnosti na bolesti hlavy po zahájení léčby a po jednom výskytu cytomegalovirové kolitidy, klostridiové kolitidy a orální kandidózy. Závěr: Účinnost indukční fáze léčby tofacitinibem byla pozorována přibližně u poloviny pacientů s UC. S ohledem na omezený vzorek pacientů a délku terapie nutno získat dlouhodobá data o účinnosti a bezpečnosti léku.

Introduction: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). Its efficiency was proven in registration trials, however data from real clinical practice are still sparse. Our aim was to evaluate efficacy and safety of tofacitinib in UC patients within 8-week induction period. Methods: Data from consecutive UC patients who started tofacitinib 10 mg twice a day were evaluated. Disease activity was assessed by Mayo score including endoscopic Mayo at baseline and week 8 together with C-reactive protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin (FC). At week 8, patients with total Mayo ≤ 5 with endoscopic subscore ≤ 1 were considered responders. Adverse events were registered at each visit. Results: A total of 24 patients (41.7% males), mean age 35.3 ±11.8 years were included. The mean disease duration was 8.3 ± 5.2 years. In median, the patients were previously treated with two biologic agents, however 25% of the patients were naïve to any biologic therapy. Systemic corticosteroids were present in 41.7% of patients at baseline and no patient had concomitant biologic or immunosuppressive therapy. At week 8, 52.9% of patients responded to treatment. The mean total Mayo decreased in responders from 5.9 ± 3.5 to 1.1 ± 1.3 (p = 0.01), while non-responders it changed from 8.0 ± 2.5 to 8.9 ± 2.1 (p = 0.86). Endoscopic subscore decreased from 2.0 ± 1.0 to 0.6 ± 0.7 (p = 0.02) in responders, however remained stable in non-responders (2.9). CRP and FC dropped significantly in responders (6.7 ± 6.2 vs. 2.0 ± 2.2 mg/L, p = 0.04; 1,195 ± 1,189 vs. 578 ± 654 μg/g, p = 0.05), but not in non-responders. Non-responders had significantly higher baseline triglycerides compared to responders. Tofacitinib was stopped in 23.5% of patients until week 8 due to insufficient response. Two patients reported headaches after treatment initiation and single events of Cytomegalovirus colitis, Clostridium difficile colitis and oral candidiasis occurred. Conclusion: Tofacitinib was efficient in inducing clinical response with mucosal healing in about half of UC patients after 8 weeks of therapy. A need for long-term outcomes and for safety data with emphasis on infectious complications warrant further investigation.

• Klíčová slova
• tofacitinib citrát,
• MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• hodnocení léčiv MeSH
• Janus kinasa 3 antagonisté a inhibitory   farmakologie   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• klinická studie jako téma MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• ulcerózní kolitida * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The QUASAR Phase 2b Induction Study evaluated the efficacy and safety of guselkumab, an interleukin-23p19 subunit antagonist, in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) with prior inadequate response and/or intolerance to corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, and/or advanced therapy. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, induction study, patients were randomized (1:1:1) to receive intravenous guselkumab 200 or 400 mg or placebo at weeks 0/4/8. The primary endpoint was clinical response (compared with baseline, modified Mayo score decrease ≥30% and ≥2 points, rectal bleeding subscore ≥1-point decrease or subscore of 0/1) at week 12. Guselkumab and placebo week-12 clinical nonresponders received subcutaneous or intravenous guselkumab 200 mg, respectively, at weeks 12/16/20 (uncontrolled study period). RESULTS: The primary analysis population included patients with baseline modified Mayo scores ≥5 and ≤9 (intravenous guselkumab 200 mg, n = 101; 400 mg, n = 107; placebo, n = 105). Week-12 clinical response percentage was greater with guselkumab 200 mg (61.4%) and 400 mg (60.7%) vs placebo (27.6%; both P < .001). Greater proportions of guselkumab-treated vs placebo-treated patients achieved all major secondary endpoints (clinical remission, symptomatic remission, endoscopic improvement, histo-endoscopic mucosal improvement, and endoscopic normalization) at week 12. Among guselkumab week-12 clinical nonresponders, 54.3% and 50.0% of patients in the 200- and 400-mg groups, respectively, achieved clinical response at week 24. Safety was similar among guselkumab and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: Guselkumab intravenous induction was effective vs placebo in patients with moderately to severely active UC. Guselkumab was safe, and efficacy and safety were similar between guselkumab dose groups. CLINICALTRIALS: gov number: NCT04033445.

• MeSH
• dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
• humanizované monoklonální protilátky škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• imunosupresiva terapeutické užití   MeSH
• indukce remise MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• ulcerózní kolitida * diagnóza   farmakoterapie   komplikace   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze II MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH

BACKGROUND: PF-00547659 is a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds to human mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1 (MAdCAM-1) to selectively reduce lymphocyte homing to the intestinal tract. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of PF-00547659 in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. METHODS: This phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial recruited patients aged 18-65 years from 105 centres in 21 countries, with a history (≥3 months) of active ulcerative colitis extending more than 15 cm beyond the anal verge (with a total Mayo score ≥6 and a Mayo endoscopic subscore ≥2) who had failed or were intolerant to at least one conventional therapy. Patients were stratified by previous anti-TNFα treatment, and randomly assigned by a computer-generated randomisation schedule to receive a subcutaneous injection of 7·5 mg, 22·5 mg, 75 mg, or 225 mg PF-00547659 or placebo at baseline, then every 4 weeks. Patients, investigators, and sponsors were blinded to the treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving remission (total Mayo score ≤2 with no individual subscore >1 and rectal bleeding subscore ≤1) at week 12. The efficacy analysis included all patients who received at least one dose of the randomised treatment; the safety analysis was done according to treatment received. All p values were one-sided and multiplicity-adjusted. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01620255. FINDINGS: Between Nov 2, 2012, and Feb 4, 2016, we screened 587 patients; 357 were eligible and randomly assigned to receive placebo (n=73) or PF-00547659 at doses of 7·5 mg (n=71), 22·5 mg (n=72), 75 mg (n=71), or 225 mg (n=70). Remission rates at week 12 were significantly greater in three of four active-treatment groups than in the placebo group (2·7% [two of 73]): 7·5 mg (11·3% [eight of 71]), 22·5 mg (16·7% [12 of 72]), 75 mg (15·5% [11 of 71]), and 225 mg (5·7% [four of 70]). These rates corresponded to a stratum-adjusted (anti-TNFα-naive and anti-TNFα-experienced) risk difference versus placebo of 8·0% for 7·5 mg (90% CI 1·9 to 14, p=0·0425), 12·8% for 22·5 mg (5·6 to 19·9, p=0·0099), 11·8% for 75 mg (4·8 to 18·8, p=0·0119), and 2·6% for 225 mg (-1·2 to 6·4, p=0·1803). Four of 73 (5·5%) patients had a serious adverse event in the placebo group, ten of 71 (14·1%) in the 7·5 mg group, one of 70 (1·4%) in the 22·5 mg group, three of 73 (4·1%) in the 75 mg group, and three of 70 (4·3%) in the 225 mg group. No safety signal was observed for the study drug. INTERPRETATION: PF-00547659 was safe and well tolerated in this patient population, and better than placebo for induction of remission in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. The greatest clinical effects were observed with the 22·5 mg and 75 mg doses. FUNDING: Pfizer.

• MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
• gastrointestinální látky aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• humanizované monoklonální protilátky aplikace a dávkování   škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• indukce remise MeSH
• injekce subkutánní MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• mladý dospělý MeSH
• rozvrh dávkování léků MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• stupeň závažnosti nemoci MeSH
• TNF-alfa antagonisté a inhibitory   MeSH
• ulcerózní kolitida farmakoterapie   patologie   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• vztah mezi dávkou a účinkem léčiva MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• mladý dospělý MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze II MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patient-reported outcome measures [PROMs] assessing inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] activity are of interest for monitoring in clinical practice, telemedicine systems, or trials. Different PROMs for follow-up of disease activity are available; however, none was developed with endoscopy as gold standard. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a PROM to predict endoscopic disease activity, following the recommendations of the Food and Drug Administration. METHODS: During development, 178 IBD patients undergoing a colonoscopy were asked to fill out 13 clinical questions derived from the literature. During endoscopy, inflammation was assessed with the simplified endoscopic score for Crohn's disease [CD] and the Mayo endoscopic subscore for ulcerative colitis [UC]. Based on correlation with endoscopic inflammation, questions were reduced to a total of six for CD and five for UC. The newly developed Monitor IBD At Home questionnaire [MIAH] was validated in an independent cohort of 135 CD and 131 UC patients. Additionally, diagnostic accuracy of the MIAH combined with a calprotectin home test [CHT] was assessed. RESULTS: The MIAH-CD includes questions on rectal bleeding, mucus, stool frequency, urgency, fatigue, and patient-reported disease activity. The MIAH-UC contains items on rectal bleeding, stool frequency, urgency, abdominal pain, and patient-reported disease activity. Both questionnaires showed to be valid, reliable, and responsive to changes. The MIAH and CHT combined had a sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value [NPV], and positive predicitive value [PPV] of 96.7%, 66.7%, 94.7%, and 76.3% for CD and of 88.2%, 81.4%, 95.6%, and 60.0% for UC, respectively, compared with endoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: The MIAH is the first PROM developed to predict endoscopic inflammation in IBD patients. A combination of this questionnaire and a CHT shows excellent diagnostic accuracy to screen for patients who need further assessment of disease activity, and can be used in daily practice, telemedicine systems, and trials.

• MeSH
• Crohnova nemoc diagnóza   patologie   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• feces chemie   MeSH
• hodnocení výsledků péče pacientem * MeSH
• idiopatické střevní záněty diagnóza   patologie   MeSH
• kolitida patologie   MeSH
• kolonoskopie MeSH
• leukocytární L1-antigenní komplex analýza   MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• prospektivní studie MeSH
• průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
• reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
• střevní sliznice patologie   MeSH
• ulcerózní kolitida diagnóza   patologie   MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• pozorovací studie MeSH

Background: Current management of mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis (UC) involves monitoring clinical markers of disease activity, such as stool frequency (SF) and rectal bleeding (RB), and adjusting treatment accordingly. Our aim was to assess whether targeting treatment based on faecal calprotectin (FC) levels (treat-to-target; T2T) provides greater UC disease control versus a symptom-based approach. Methods: This was a pragmatic, randomised (1:1) controlled study of patients with mild-to-moderate UC (global Mayo score 2-6) treated with ≤2.4 g/day 5-aminosalicylic acid that compared the effectiveness of two management strategies with (interventional arm) and without (reference arm) FC home monitoring over 12 months of follow-up. Treatment was optimised in the interventional arm using FC values and clinical symptoms (PRO-2), while the reference arm used only PRO-2. Results: 193 patients completed the study. No significant difference was found for the primary endpoint (Mayo Endoscopic Subscore [MES] = 0 at 12 months). A numerical advantage for the interventional arm over the reference arm for the primary endpoint (37.0% vs. 33.4%, respectively) and for MES ≤ 1, RB = 0, and SF ≤ 1 at 12 months was found following imputation for missing data. The composite endpoint of MES = 0, RB = 0, and SF ≤ 1 at 12 months was achieved at a significantly higher rate in the interventional arm than the reference arm (effect size [ES]: 0.17, 95% CI 0.02-0.32; p < 0.05). A similar result was obtained for MES ≤ 1, RB = 0 and SF ≤ 1 (ES: 0.22; 95% CI 0.07-0.37; p < 0.05). Conclusions: T2T using FC monitoring was effective in patients with mild-to-moderate UC at 12 months. Further longer-term studies are required to confirm the results.

• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH

BACKGROUND: Etrolizumab is a gut-targeted anti-β7 integrin monoclonal antibody. In a previous phase 2 induction study, etrolizumab significantly improved clinical remission versus placebo in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of etrolizumab with infliximab in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. METHODS: We conducted a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, phase 3 study (GARDENIA) across 114 treatment centres worldwide. We included adults (age 18-80 years) with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (Mayo Clinic total score [MCS] of 6-12 with an endoscopic subscore of ≥2, a rectal bleeding subscore of ≥1, and a stool frequency subscore of ≥1) who were naive to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors. Patients were required to have had an established diagnosis of ulcerative colitis for at least 3 months, corroborated by both clinical and endoscopic evidence, and evidence of disease extending at least 20 cm from the anal verge. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive subcutaneous etrolizumab 105 mg once every 4 weeks or intravenous infliximab 5 mg/kg at 0, 2, and 6 weeks and every 8 weeks thereafter for 52 weeks. Randomisation was stratified by baseline concomitant treatment with corticosteroids, concomitant treatment with immunosuppressants, and baseline disease activity. All participants and study site personnel were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who had both clinical response at week 10 (MCS ≥3-point decrease and ≥30% reduction from baseline, plus ≥1-point decrease in rectal bleeding subscore or absolute rectal bleeding score of 0 or 1) and clinical remission at week 54 (MCS ≤2, with individual subscores ≤1); efficacy was analysed using a modified intention-to-treat population (all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study drug). GARDENIA was designed to show superiority of etrolizumab over infliximab for the primary endpoint. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02136069, and is now closed to recruitment. FINDINGS: Between Dec 24, 2014, and June 23, 2020, 730 patients were screened for eligibility and 397 were enrolled and randomly assigned to etrolizumab (n=199) or infliximab (n=198). 95 (48%) patients in the etrolizumab group and 103 (52%) in the infliximab group completed the study through week 54. At week 54, 37 (18·6%) of 199 patients in the etrolizumab group and 39 (19·7%) of 198 in the infliximab group met the primary endpoint (adjusted treatment difference -0·9% [95% CI -8·7 to 6·8]; p=0·81). The number of patients reporting one or more adverse events was similar between treatment groups (154 [77%] of 199 in the etrolizumab group and 151 [76%] of 198 in the infliximab group); the most common adverse event in both groups was ulcerative colitis (55 [28%] patients in the etrolizumab group and 43 [22%] in the infliximab group). More patients in the etrolizumab group reported serious adverse events (including serious infections) than did those in the infliximab group (32 [16%] vs 20 [10%]); the most common serious adverse event was ulcerative colitis (12 [6%] and 11 [6%]). There was one death during follow-up, in the infliximab group due to a pulmonary embolism, which was not considered to be related to study treatment. INTERPRETATION: To our knowledge, this trial is the first phase 3 maintenance study in moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis to use infliximab as an active comparator. Although the study did not show statistical superiority for the primary endpoint, etrolizumab performed similarly to infliximab from a clinical viewpoint. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche.

• MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
• gastrointestinální látky terapeutické užití   MeSH
• humanizované monoklonální protilátky terapeutické užití   MeSH
• infliximab terapeutické užití   MeSH
• injekce subkutánní MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• mladý dospělý MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• stupeň závažnosti nemoci MeSH
• ulcerózní kolitida farmakoterapie   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• mladý dospělý MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH