randomized control trial
Dotaz
Zobrazit nápovědu
Therapeutic plasma exchange (PLEX) is an adjunctive treatment for patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis and kidney involvement. Little is known about the effect of PLEX on early changes in kidney function. This post-hoc analysis of the PEXIVAS trial investigated the effects of PLEX on changes in kidney function within 12 months. PEXIVAS was a randomized controlled trial recruiting 691 patients with ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis, of whom 349 underwent PLEX and 342 received no-PLEX. The primary outcomes of this post hoc study of PEXIVAS were change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from baseline and recovery of kidney function (defined as eGFR increase of 15ml/min/1.73m2 or more). Baseline eGFR was 21.7 ± 20.3 and 20.6 ± 18.7 ml/min/1.73m2 in the PLEX and no-PLEX groups, respectively. Mean improvements in eGFR at weeks two, four, and eight after initiation of therapy were greater for the PLEX vs. the no-PLEX groups. The greatest significant difference in recovery of kidney function in the PLEX compared to the no-PLEX groups was at week four (relative risk (RR): 1.41; 95% confidence interval:1.09-1.82). Increased eGFR or recovery of kidney function at week four were significantly associated with lower risk for end-stage kidney disease at week 52 (RR: 0.96: 0.95-0.97, and RR: 0.29: 0.16-0.52; respectively). Neither changes in eGFR nor recovery of kidney function differed by reduced- compared to standard-dose glucocorticoid group. Overall, our study indicates that PLEX improves early kidney function in patients with ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis.
- MeSH
- ANCA-asociované vaskulitidy * patofyziologie terapie farmakoterapie komplikace imunologie diagnóza MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- glomerulonefritida * patofyziologie imunologie terapie krev MeSH
- glukokortikoidy * terapeutické užití aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- hodnoty glomerulární filtrace * MeSH
- ledviny * patofyziologie účinky léků MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- obnova funkce MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- výměna plazmy * MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: Patients with severe aortic stenosis present frequently (∼50%) with concomitant obstructive coronary artery disease. Current guidelines recommend combined surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) as the preferred treatment. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) represent a valid treatment alternative. We aimed to test the non-inferiority of FFR-guided PCI plus TAVI versus SAVR plus CABG in patients with severe aortic stenosis and complex coronary artery disease. METHODS: This international, multicentre, prospective, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial was conducted at 18 tertiary medical centres across Europe. Patients (aged ≥70 years) with severe aortic stenosis and complex coronary artery disease, deemed feasible for percutaneous or surgical treatment according to the on-site Heart Team, were randomly assigned (1:1) to FFR-guided PCI plus TAVI or SAVR plus CABG according to a computer-generated sequence with random permuted blocks sizes stratified by site. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, disabling stroke, clinically driven target-vessel revascularisation, valve reintervention, and life-threatening or disabling bleeding at 1 year post-treatment. The trial was powered for non-inferiority (with a margin of 15%) and if met, for superiority. The primary and safety analyses were done per an intention-to-treat principle. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03424941) and is closed. FINDINGS: Between May 31, 2018, and June 30, 2023, 172 patients were enrolled, of whom 91 were assigned to the FFR-guided PCI plus TAVI group and 81 to the SAVR plus CABG group. The mean age of patients was 76·5 years (SD 3·9). 118 (69%) of 172 patients were male and 54 (31%) patients were female. FFR-guided PCI plus TAVI resulted in favourable outcomes for the primary endpoint (four [4%] of 91 patients) versus SAVR plus CABG (17 [23%] of 77 patients; risk difference -18·5 [90% CI -27·8 to -9·7]), which was below the 15% prespecified non-inferiority margin (pnon-inferiority<0·001). FFR-guided PCI plus TAVI was superior to SAVR plus CABG (hazard ratio 0·17 [95% CI 0·06-0·51]; psuperiority<0·001), which was driven mainly by all-cause mortality (none [0%] of 91 patients vs seven (10%) of 77 patients; p=0·0025) and life-threatening bleeding (two [2%] vs nine [12%]; p=0·010). INTERPRETATION: The TCW trial is the first trial to compare percutaneous treatment versus surgical treatment in patients with severe aortic stenosis and complex coronary artery disease, showing favourable primary endpoint and mortality outcomes with percutaneous treatment. FUNDING: Isala Heart Centre and Medtronic.
- MeSH
- aortální stenóza * chirurgie komplikace MeSH
- chirurgická náhrada chlopně metody MeSH
- frakční průtoková rezerva myokardu * MeSH
- koronární angioplastika * metody MeSH
- koronární bypass * metody MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nemoci koronárních tepen * chirurgie komplikace terapie MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- transkatetrální implantace aortální chlopně * metody MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- hodnocení ekvivalence MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
CONTEXT: Adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have recently emerged as guideline-recommended treatments of high-risk muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC). However, there is limited evidence regarding the optimal candidates and the differential efficacy of adjuvant ICI regimens. OBJECTIVE: To synthesize and compare the efficacy and safety of adjuvant ICIs for high-risk MIUC using updated data from phase III randomized controlled trials. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: In April 2024, three databases were searched for eligible randomized controlled trials that evaluated oncologic outcomes in patients with MIUC treated with adjuvant ICIs. Pairwise meta-analysis (MA) and network meta-analyses were performed to compare the hazard ratios of oncological outcomes, including disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. Subgroup analyses were conducted on the basis of predefined clinicopathological features. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Three randomized controlled trials that assessed the efficacy of adjuvant nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and atezolizumab were included in the MAs and network meta-analyses groups. Pairwise MAs showed that treatment with adjuvant ICIs significantly improved DFS [hazards ratio: 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66-0.90] as well as OS (hazards ratio: 0.87, 95% CI 0.76-1.00) in patients with MIUC compared with in the placebo/observation group. The DFS benefit was prominent in patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.041) and in those with bladder cancer (P = 0.013) but did not differ across programmed death-ligand 1 and lymph node status. Adjuvant ICI therapy was associated with increased risk of any (OR: 2.98, 95% CI 2.06-4.33) and severe adverse events (OR: 1.78, 95% CI 1.49-2.13). The treatment rankings revealed that pembrolizumab for DFS (84%) and nivolumab for OS (93%) had the highest likelihood of improving survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our analyses demonstrated the DFS and OS benefits of adjuvant ICIs for high-risk MIUC. Furthermore, patients with bladder cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy appeared to be the optimal candidates for adjuvant ICIs regarding prolonged DFS. Adjuvant ICIs are the standard of care for high-risk MIUC, and differential clinical behaviors and efficacy will enrich clinical decision-making.
- MeSH
- adjuvantní chemoterapie metody MeSH
- inhibitory kontrolních bodů * terapeutické užití farmakologie MeSH
- invazivní růst nádoru MeSH
- karcinom z přechodných buněk farmakoterapie patologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory močového měchýře farmakoterapie patologie MeSH
- síťová metaanalýza MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- metaanalýza MeSH
- systematický přehled MeSH
BACKGROUND: Vaccination against 5 prominent meningococcal serogroups (A/B/C/W/Y) is necessary for broad disease protection. We report immunopersistence through 4 years after a 2-dose (6-month interval) pentavalent MenABCWY primary vaccine series and safety and immunogenicity of a booster administered 4 years after primary vaccination. METHODS: This randomized, active-controlled, observer-blinded study was conducted in the United States and Europe. In stage 1, healthy MenACWY vaccine-naive or -experienced 10- to 25-year-olds were randomized 1:2 to receive MenABCWY and placebo or MenB-fHbp and MenACWY-CRM. Eligible participants were randomly selected to participate in stage 2, which was an open-label immunopersistence and booster extension. Immunogenicity was assessed through serum bactericidal antibody using human complement (hSBA) assays with serogroups A/C/W/Y (MenA/C/W/Y) and 4 primary serogroup B (MenB) test strains. Immunogenicity endpoints included hSBA seroprotection rates through 48 months after primary vaccination and 1 month after the booster. Safety endpoints included booster reactogenicity events and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Of 1379 eligible participants, 353 entered stage 2; 242 completed the 48-month blood draw after primary vaccination and 240 completed the booster vaccination phase. MenA/C/W/Y seroprotection rates remained high for 4 years following a 2-dose MenABCWY primary series (MenACWY-naive, 62.0 %-100.0 %; MenACWY-experienced, 98.7 %-100.0 %) and trended higher than those after a single MenACWY-CRM dose (MenACWY-naive, 38.1 %-95.2 %; MenACWY-experienced, 89.7 %-100.0 %). Corresponding seroprotection rates against MenB remained stable and generally higher than baseline (MenABCWY, 18.2 %-36.6 %; MenB-fHbp, 16.2 %-31.9 % across strains). Following a booster, seroprotection rates against all 5 serogroups were ≥ 93.8 % across groups. Most booster dose reactogenicity events were mild or moderate in severity, and AEs were infrequent. CONCLUSIONS: Immune responses remained high for MenA/C/W/Y and above baseline for MenB through 4 years after the MenABCWY primary series, with robust responses for all 5 serogroups observed following a booster. The MenABCWY booster had an acceptable safety and tolerability profile consistent with the primary series. NCT03135834.
- MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- imunogenicita vakcíny MeSH
- komplement imunologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- meningokokové infekce * prevence a kontrola imunologie MeSH
- meningokokové vakcíny * imunologie škodlivé účinky aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- Neisseria meningitidis imunologie MeSH
- protilátky bakteriální * krev MeSH
- sekundární imunizace * metody MeSH
- séroskupina MeSH
- vakcíny konjugované imunologie aplikace a dávkování škodlivé účinky MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
- Spojené státy americké MeSH
INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Prospective, randomized, controlled trials of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) maintenance therapy in myasthenia gravis (MG) are lacking. In this trial, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of caprylate/chromatography-purified IVIG; (IGIV-C) in patients with generalized MG undergoing standard care. METHODS: Sixty-two patients enrolled in this phase 2, multicenter, international, randomized trial (1:1 IGIV-C [2 g/kg loading dose; 1 g/kg every 3 weeks through week 21] or placebo). Efficacy was assessed by changes in Quantitative MG (QMG) score at week 24 versus baseline (primary endpoint) and percentage of patients with clinical improvement in QMG, MG Composite (MGC), and MG-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) scores (secondary endpoints). Safety assessments reported all adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: The change in QMG at 24 weeks was -5.1 for IGIV-C and -3.1 for placebo (p = .187). Seventy percent of patients in the IGIV-C group had improvement in MG-ADL (≥2-point decrease) versus 40.6% in the placebo group (p = .025). Patients showing clinical improvement in QMG and MGC (≥3-point decrease) were 70.0% for IGIV-C versus 59.4% for placebo (p = .442) and 60.0% for IGIV-C versus 53.1% for placebo (p = .610). IGIV-C was well tolerated; serious AEs were similar between arms. Three of four MG exacerbations requiring hospitalizations occurred in the IGIV-C arm with one death. DISCUSSION: Several efficacy parameters showed numerical results greater than those seen in the placebo group. This was a small study and may have been underpowered to see significant differences. Additional studies may be warranted to fully determine the efficacy of IVIG maintenance therapy in MG.
- MeSH
- autoprotilátky krev MeSH
- činnosti denního života MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
- imunologické faktory terapeutické užití škodlivé účinky aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- intravenózní imunoglobuliny * terapeutické užití škodlivé účinky aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- myasthenia gravis * farmakoterapie MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- receptory cholinergní * imunologie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze II MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) secukinumab for the treatment of adults with active axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in INVIGORATE-1. METHODS: INVIGORATE-1 (NCT04156620) was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, phase 3 trial in patients with active axSpA (either radiographic or nonradiographic). Patients were randomized one to one to receive IV secukinumab (6 mg/kg at baseline followed by 3 mg/kg every four weeks) or IV placebo for 16 weeks. After week 16, patients randomized to placebo were switched to IV secukinumab (3 mg/kg every four weeks), and patients randomized to secukinumab continued treatment through week 52. The primary endpoint was the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS40) response at week 16. Safety was evaluated through week 60. RESULTS: Among patients initially randomized to IV secukinumab (n = 264) or placebo (n = 262), 86.0% and 88.9% completed the entire 60-week study period, respectively. A higher proportion of patients receiving secukinumab versus placebo met the primary endpoint (ASAS40 response) at week 16 (40.9% vs 22.9%; P < 0.0001). By week 24, patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 16 achieved ASAS40 response rates comparable to those in patients originally randomized to secukinumab. All secondary efficacy endpoints were met at week 16, and responses were sustained through week 52. No new or unexpected safety signals were observed with IV secukinumab. CONCLUSION: IV secukinumab was effective for the treatment of adults with active axSpA over 52 weeks. The safety profile was consistent with that in previous reports on subcutaneous secukinumab.
- MeSH
- antirevmatika aplikace a dávkování terapeutické užití škodlivé účinky MeSH
- axiální spondyloartritida * farmakoterapie MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
- humanizované monoklonální protilátky * aplikace a dávkování terapeutické užití škodlivé účinky MeSH
- intravenózní podání MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- monoklonální protilátky aplikace a dávkování terapeutické užití škodlivé účinky MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
INTRODUCTION: In a previously published randomised, placebo-controlled trial, 800 mg/day of pharmaceutical-grade chondroitin sulfate (CS) was shown to be superior to placebo in reducing pain and improving function over 6 months in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA). The aim of the current post hoc analyses was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of CS compared with placebo in a European perspective using individual patient data from this clinical trial. METHODS: Patients with knee OA randomised to CS or placebo were followed up at 1, 3 and 6 months. The algo-functional Lequesne index was used to derive the EuroQol Five-Dimension Five-Level (EQ-5D-5L) score based on a validated formula. The EQ-5D-5L scores at each time point were used to calculate the changes in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) with the area under the curve method. Costs were assessed using the average price of CS in the countries where the original study took place and where CS is currently marketed. The costs of CS in three countries were then used (i.e. the Czech Republic, Italy and Switzerland). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) threshold for CS to be considered cost-effective was set at 91,870 EUR per QALY (equivalent to the usually recommended threshold of US $100,000). The study used an intention-to-treat population, i.e. patients who received one dose of the study drug, and imputed missing values using the basal observation carried forward method. RESULTS: No significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed between the CS group (N = 199) and the placebo group (N = 205). The mean cost of CS for 6 months of treatment was 194.74 EUR. After 6 months of treatment, CS showed a mean ICER of 33,462 (95% CI 5130-61,794) EUR per QALY gained, indicating cost-effectiveness compared with placebo. The acceptability curve for cost-effectiveness shows that the CS treatment is likely to be cost-effective compared with placebo, with a 93% probability when the ceiling ratio is set at 91,870 EUR per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight the role of CS as a cost-effective therapeutic option in the management of OA. However, further studies taking into account the use of other healthcare resources are warranted for a more complete understanding.
- MeSH
- analýza nákladové efektivity MeSH
- analýza nákladů a výnosů * MeSH
- artróza kolenních kloubů * farmakoterapie ekonomika MeSH
- chondroitinsulfáty * terapeutické užití ekonomika MeSH
- kvalitativně upravené roky života * MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
- Itálie MeSH
- Švýcarsko MeSH
BACKGROUND: Androgen-receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) significantly improve survival in systemic therapy for advanced/metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) patients; however possible central nervous system (CNS) toxicity is an unaddressed concern. We aimed to assess and compare the incidence of CNS-related adverse events (AEs) secondary to the treatment of PCa patients with different ARSIs. MATERIALS: In August 2023, a comprehensive seach was conducted in three databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of PCa patients receiving ARSIs plus ADT. The primary endpoints included mental impairment, cognitive impairment, seizure, fatigue, and falls. RESULTS: Twenty-six RCTs, comprising 20,328 patients, were included in meta-analyses and network meta-analyses (NMAs). ARSIs increased the risk of mental impairment (RR: 1.72; 95% CI, 1.09-2.71), cognitive impairment (RR: 2.25; 95% CI, 1.78-2.86), seizure (RR: 2.20, 95% CI, 1.09-4.45), fatigue (RR: 1.31, 95% CI, 1.20-1.43), and falls (RR: 2.07, 95% CI, 1.60-2.67) compared to standard of care (SOC). Based on NMAs, Enzalutamide showed a significant increase in risk for all assessed CNS-related AEs, while Abiraterone demonstrated significant risk increases in cognitive impairment, fatigue, and falls. Conversely, Darolutamide did not exhibit significant increases in risk for any CNS-related AEs, except for fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of ARSIs to ADT increased all examined CNS-related AEs compared to SOC. Each ARSI is associated with a distinct profile of CNS-related AEs. Careful patient selection and monitoring for CNS sequelae is necessary to achieve the best quality of life in patients on ARSI + ADT for PCa.
- MeSH
- antagonisté androgenních receptorů * škodlivé účinky aplikace a dávkování terapeutické užití MeSH
- benzamidy MeSH
- fenylthiohydantoin škodlivé účinky aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory prostaty * farmakoterapie patologie MeSH
- nemoci centrálního nervového systému chemicky indukované MeSH
- nitrily MeSH
- pyrazoly MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma MeSH
- síťová metaanalýza * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- metaanalýza MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
- systematický přehled MeSH
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) secukinumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: INVIGORATE-2 (NCT04209205) was a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Patients with active PsA were randomized 1:1 to receive IV secukinumab (6 mg/kg at baseline followed by 3 mg/kg every four weeks [q4w]) or placebo. At week 16, patients randomized to placebo were switched to IV secukinumab (3 mg/kg q4w), and patients who received IV secukinumab continued treatment through week 52. The primary efficacy endpoint was achievement of 50% improvement in American College of Rheumatology response criteria (ACR50) at week 16. Efficacy and safety were evaluated through weeks 52 and 60, respectively. RESULTS: Among 191 patients randomized to IV secukinumab and 190 to placebo/IV secukinumab, 177 (92.7%) and 170 (89.5%) completed the entire study period, respectively. A significantly higher proportion of patients who received IV secukinumab versus placebo achieved ACR50 at week 16 (31.4% vs 6.3%; adjusted P < 0.0001). All secondary efficacy endpoints were met at week 16 (all adjusted P < 0.05 using the predefined hypothesis-testing hierarchy). Patients who switched from placebo to secukinumab at week 16 showed rapid improvements in ACR50 rates; by week 52, both treatment arms experienced similar improvements in efficacy outcomes. No new or unexpected safety signals were observed with receiving IV secukinumab. One death was reported in the placebo group before week 16. CONCLUSION: IV secukinumab led to rapid and sustained improvements in clinical measures of PsA, and the safety profile was consistent with that of secukinumab administered subcutaneously.
- MeSH
- antirevmatika terapeutické užití aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
- humanizované monoklonální protilátky * aplikace a dávkování terapeutické užití MeSH
- intravenózní podání MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- psoriatická artritida * farmakoterapie MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to demonstrate the clinical equivalence of biosimilar QL1205 and reference ranibizumab, Lucentis, in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). DESIGN: This was a multicenter, double-masked, randomized, controlled phase III trial. PARTICIPANTS: Treatment-naive patients with active nAMD were randomly assigned to receive QL1205 or reference ranibizumab. METHODS: Patients received intravitreal injection of QL1205 or reference ranibizumab at a dose of 0.5 mg in the study eye once every 4 weeks for 48 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) by ETDRS letters at week 8 compared with baseline level. Biosimilarity of QL1205 to reference ranibizumab was assessed with an equivalence range for the difference in BCVA letters between -3.49 and +3.49. RESULTS: Between June 27, 2019 and June 8, 2021, 616 patients were randomized to the QL1205 group (n = 308) and the reference ranibizumab group (n = 308). The mean improvement of BCVA was +6.3 ± 9.13 ETDRS letters in the QL1205 group and +7.3 ± 8.82 ETDRS letters in the reference ranibizumab group at week 8. Both the 90% confidence interval (CI, -2.23 to 0.13) and 95% CI (-2.46 to 0.36) of the difference between the 2 treatment groups (P = 0.1434) were within the predefined equivalence range. Safety profiles were manageable in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: QL1205 was biosimilar to reference ranibizumab regarding clinical efficacy, ocular and systemic safety, as well as immunogenicity and pharmacokinetics profiles in the treatment of patients with nAMD. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
- MeSH
- biosimilární léčivé přípravky * aplikace a dávkování škodlivé účinky MeSH
- dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
- inhibitory angiogeneze aplikace a dávkování škodlivé účinky MeSH
- injekce intravitreální MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- optická koherentní tomografie MeSH
- ranibizumab * aplikace a dávkování škodlivé účinky MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- vaskulární endoteliální růstový faktor A antagonisté a inhibitory MeSH
- vlhká makulární degenerace * farmakoterapie diagnóza MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- vztah mezi dávkou a účinkem léčiva MeSH
- zraková ostrost * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH